Forum Settings
       
« Previous 1 2 3 4 5
Reply To Thread

It's time to discuss tats on chick's a$$esFollow

#1 Oct 12 2005 at 11:03 PM Rating: Good
*****
16,160 posts
Ok, most of you prolly know I am not down with tattoos. We have had a thread about this in the past and I was roundly excoriated for having such a narrow world view that I could not see the artsy-fartsy and liberating aspect of getting inked. All that aside, what is it about chicks between the ages of 16 and 30 who have gone and gotten a tramp stamp drawn on their back five inches above the chocolate starfish? Ok, ok, I understand the lemming mentality-- not that I engage or condone it --and how 98% of all human beings really would jump off the Golden Gate bridge if their friends did it, but really, what makes these dumb ******* think getting a spooge target above their shi[/i]tter a good idea? Especially when it's not anywhere close to being freaky or rebellious these days?

This is what I think when I see a girl with ink on her lower back:

weakness
poor decision making
recklessness
low self esteem
instability
hepatitis


This describe any of you yet? Nod your head and make "yes" noises, dumba$$es, you know I am talking about you. The way I figger it, at this rate we'll be seeing nuns with these things on them soon enough. Which brings me to my next point. Why all the flowers or butterflys on these white trash chicks? I mean if you're gonna have a pic for your dude to stare at as he's laying the wood to yoru puss, why not make it something he'd like to admire, say, like [i]Dogs Playing Poker
? Guys like Smasharoo would dig on that. It'd get his gambling juices flowing, so as soon as he bust his nut he'd be back online blowing all that cash his wife makes on her job. I ean if you're really a freaky as you girls like to pretend you are, get a checker board tatted on your back so the AIDS infected scumbags you attract have something to do while they're using you as a pegboard.

I'm telling you, the dude that figures out how to remove them cheaply and effectively will have more money than Bill Gates some day.

Totem
#2 Oct 12 2005 at 11:08 PM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
"The time has come," the Walrus said, "To talk of many things: Of shoes and ships and sealing-wax. Of cabbages and tats on chicks' asses."

I largely agree, being anti-tattoo myself. The whole lower back tattoo thing does nothing for me.
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#3 Oct 12 2005 at 11:12 PM Rating: Excellent
*****
16,160 posts
Oh, so I have this next door neighbor who has a semi-hottie daughter who tells me she was going to get a lower back tattoo this past summer. I said, "What are you going to get done?" She says, "I don't know, probably a small rose or my initials in Chinese." I said, "Cool. Go get me a permanent marker and I'll put it on and you can wear it around for a while and you can see if you like it." She says, "No way! What if you eff it up?" So I tell her, "Well, it won't be as permanent as the boneheaded risk you are about to take."

She got the tattoo anyway, and it looks incredibly stupid. Come to think about it, so does she now.

Totem
#4 Oct 12 2005 at 11:14 PM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
Quote:
She says, "No way! What if you eff it up?"
Which was a polite way of saying "I'd rather you didn't place your old man hands so close to my ***, thankyouverymuch."
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#5 Oct 12 2005 at 11:17 PM Rating: Good
Drama Nerdvana
******
20,674 posts
Forget about tatooed lower backs. I hate tongue piercings.

Here is a tip for the sexually newb. A tongue piercing is NOT a sign of a willing and experienced ******** fairy. I'll tell you what it is, its a sign of a girl that is so orally challenged that she felt the need to some how jazz up her mouth with a piece of metal/plastic. Not only does it have no effect on feeling it actually lessens the nimbleness and deftness of her tongue.

Edited, Thu Oct 13 00:33:32 2005 by bodhisattva
____________________________
Bode - 100 Holy Paladin - Lightbringer
#6 Oct 12 2005 at 11:19 PM Rating: Excellent
*****
16,160 posts
Ozzy recently said, "To not get a tattoo is to rebel." It's one thing if ol' Totem, Mr. Middle Class say tats are unoriginal, but when anti-establishment rock's icon says they're lame, it time for white America to lay off the ink.

Just wait until these **** stamps get stretch marks in ten years. That butterfly is gonna look like the one that hit your windshield 50 miles ago. U-g-l-y, baby.

Totem
#7 Oct 12 2005 at 11:21 PM Rating: Excellent
*****
16,160 posts
Yeah, that's prolly true, Jo, but since she was so eager to tell me about the stupid thing I figured I was at liberty to offer my artistic services, sans a dirty old man's groping.

Totem
#8 Oct 12 2005 at 11:26 PM Rating: Excellent
*****
16,160 posts
Ok, since I'm rollin' here, let me tell you what I really think. Being the sexist that I am, I was mostly speaking about women with tattoos. Tattoos on a man, particularly an ugly man, are like primer on an old rusty car. Who really gives a shi[i][/i]t? Now, on an attractive women, a tattoo is like a big a$$ fading bumper sticker on a shiny Ferrari or a Porsche. It just looks freaking stupid, and looks worse as time goes by. A bad idea all around made all the moreso by how common it is.

Totem
#9 Oct 12 2005 at 11:28 PM Rating: Excellent
*****
16,160 posts
One caveat: I think if a chick had a back tat of a WWII battleship, with 16" guns blazing, that would be kind of a turn on.

Totem
#10 Oct 12 2005 at 11:32 PM Rating: Good
Funny you mention that Totem, when was the last time you saw a **** where the chick didn't have a tattoo? Mark of the debil they's is.
#11 Oct 12 2005 at 11:35 PM Rating: Default
What about one of those kinky flavored tattoos placed in a ever so strategic spot??

Edited, Thu Oct 13 01:02:29 2005 by Katie
#12 Oct 12 2005 at 11:36 PM Rating: Good
*****
14,454 posts
Elderon the Wise wrote:
Funny you mention that Totem, when was the last time you saw a **** where the chick didn't have a tattoo? Mark of the debil they's is.


or one who's not afraid of a little pain Smiley: sly
#13 Oct 12 2005 at 11:40 PM Rating: Excellent
*****
16,160 posts
RACK me for finding this gem...

Even SNL agrees with me

Totem
#14 Oct 12 2005 at 11:41 PM Rating: Good
Lady deadsidedemon wrote:
Elderon the Wise wrote:
Funny you mention that Totem, when was the last time you saw a **** where the chick didn't have a tattoo? Mark of the debil they's is.


or one who's not afraid of a little pain Smiley: sly


RAWR! Smiley: inlove

Wait, I still don't like tattoos. But I like teh womyns under them.Smiley: glare
#15 Oct 12 2005 at 11:44 PM Rating: Good
Totem wrote:
RACK me for finding this gem...

Even SNL agrees with me

Totem


+1 Totem Smiley: lol Good find.
#16 Oct 12 2005 at 11:45 PM Rating: Decent
I don't share totem's views on tattoo's myself, probably because I have numerous ones myself. That aside, I think getting a tattoo because it's "cool" or "sexy" is insipid, however not every tat has to have meaning either. Few of mine have any "meaning" but rather just stories behind them. Tat's have been around for a longer amount of time than written history, so I have no idea where this "rebel" thing comes from out of it. For me, I always wanted to get many tat's as a kid(my father and mother not having any, and my grandfather only having a few military related tat's), and I started getting tattoo's at 15 years old(from a professional, mother approved).

Even today with tat's as popular as they are, still require a certain level of eccentric behavior. Contrary to popular belief, I don't have any STD's(including hepititis), and I am not on welfare, so those points are moot.

As far as women with tattoo's go... For me it really isn't criteria. Some women pull it off well, and others don't, kinda like the color red.

I would just definately say, for employment purposes, stay away from tat's on the neck, face, and hands. Anything a business suit, or dress shirt won't cover. Though I do know a couple that got wedding bands tattooed on, for whatever reason. On that note, don't get wife/girlfriend/husband/boyfriends names inked, as well they aren't permenant, children's names are okay.

As far as people judging me for having tattoo's? If they like it, cool, if they don't, well fu[b][/b]ck em'. To me it just seems to be really shallow to judge someone for somthing so petty. I do not see where someone has the audacity to think someone is scum of the earth because of a tattoo when in fact, everyone has a little piece of proverbial **** on their face.
#17 Oct 12 2005 at 11:46 PM Rating: Good
Rimesume the Shady wrote:
I don't share totem's views on tattoo's myself, probably because I have numerous ones myself. That aside, I think getting a tattoo because it's "cool" or "sexy" is insipid, however not every tat has to have meaning either. Few of mine have any "meaning" but rather just stories behind them. Tat's have been around for a longer amount of time than written history, so I have no idea where this "rebel" thing comes from out of it. For me, I always wanted to get many tat's as a kid(my father and mother not having any, and my grandfather only having a few military related tat's), and I started getting tattoo's at 15 years old(from a professional, mother approved).

Even today with tat's as popular as they are, still require a certain level of eccentric behavior. Contrary to popular belief, I don't have any STD's(including hepititis), and I am not on welfare, so those points are moot.

As far as women with tattoo's go... For me it really isn't criteria. Some women pull it off well, and others don't, kinda like the color red.

I would just definately say, for employment purposes, stay away from tat's on the neck, face, and hands. Anything a business suit, or dress shirt won't cover. Though I do know a couple that got wedding bands tattooed on, for whatever reason. On that note, don't get wife/girlfriend/husband/boyfriends names inked, as well they aren't permenant, children's names are okay.

As far as people judging me for having tattoo's? If they like it, cool, if they don't, well fu[b][/b]ck em'. To me it just seems to be really shallow to judge someone for somthing so petty. I do not see where someone has the audacity to think someone is scum of the earth because of a tattoo when in fact, everyone has a little piece of proverbial **** on their face.


Dirty hippy.
#18 Oct 13 2005 at 12:02 AM Rating: Good
*****
16,160 posts
/shrugs

Monkey see, monkey do, Rimesume. Eccentricity is not a necessary ingredient in the recipe. However, desire to be part of the cool crowd generally* ** is.

Totem

* note that you may indeed be one of the exceedingly rare few that get tats because they express some inner... thing... that demonstrates you're a unique snowflake, but for the vast majority of people, especially chicks with **** stamps, it is a cheap way to fit in. Wanna really show how freaky you are? Go Mike Tyson on us and prove you don't give a shi[/i]t by inking your face. [i]That's sticking your thumb in the collective eye of mainstream America. But please stop pretending you are cutting edge by throwing down some green and getting one of those cookie cutter designs.

** the above diatribe prolly doesn't apply to you Rime, since it appears you are a dude and this is a chick-specific rant.
#19 Oct 13 2005 at 12:03 AM Rating: Good
****
6,760 posts
Quote:
I mean if you're gonna have a pic for your dude to stare at as he's laying the wood to yoru puss, why not make it something he'd like to admire, say, like Dogs Playing Poker?


Smiley: lol


I will say some chicks use extraordinarilly bad judgement when deciding where to get one. On your lower abdomen is probably a bad idea. Either you're going to have kids one day, which will stretch the hell out of it and turn a butterfly into a pterodactal. Or you're going to get fat in middle age and stretch that daisy into some sort of dustmop.
____________________________
Some people are like slinkies, they aren't really good for anything, but they still bring a smile to your face when you push them down the stairs.
#20 Oct 13 2005 at 12:37 AM Rating: Good
It's not just for teens any more, T-bone. I have a very dear friend who is in her mid just hit the big 5-O. Before anyone goes to speculatin, yeah, when I was 18 I was putting the wood to Mrs. Robinson. Anyway, she got divorced, did the mid-life crisis thing, and has come out of it a homeopathic healing, herb selling, herb selling, candle-lighting, leg hair-growing bleeding heart war protesting liberal. She's making up for the fun she thinks she missed out on watching her sister wear ill-fitting clothes and drive away in the back of the Dodge cargo van.

Whatever. She's a grown woman and is more than capable of making her own decisions. One of the things she's decided to do is go out and get herself 5 tatoos now. They are all in places she could show a married man, but they are of these ridiculous little pithy hippy-esque images, all moon-glowed and flowered up with their trite platitudinal messages and "meanings". She's not a bad looking woman for being 20 years older than I am. If she kept herself up, still drove the convertable bimmer and shaved her legs occasionally she would still rate highly on the senior citizen boneability scale.

Instead, she has decided to regress and become one more unique and special person in a crowd of similarly unique and special people, all marching to a different drummer playing the same tune, over and over and over again.

EDIT: speeling > me

Edited, Thu Oct 13 01:51:18 2005 by MoebiusLord
#21 Oct 13 2005 at 12:47 AM Rating: Decent


Totem, so you're telling me this doesn't do anything for you?

Come on brotha!

#22 Oct 13 2005 at 3:16 AM Rating: Decent
*
219 posts
I have two sleeves (coverable by a buisness short-sleeve shirt), and they both have incredible meaning to me. I love my tats and am reminded every day of the reasons I got them.

People give tats a bad name, I'll admit that weird design thing on the lower back screams 'I'm a *****' but many people get them done for many valid reasons.

My girlfriend is also has a sleeve and she's working on her masters in Marine Biology, while working at an aquarium. Don't caterogize women with tats as dumb broads who make bad choices.

Besides, you're all video game nerds. Most girls with tats wouldn't talk to you as a joke. Har Har Har.

In closing, I find well thought out, well placed, meaningful tats incredibly sexy.
#23 Oct 13 2005 at 5:20 AM Rating: Good
Gurue
*****
16,299 posts
I have no tattoos and I will never get one. And the only thing pierced are my ears, and just one hole per lobe. I had considered a small Snoopy tat at one point because that would be a safe one, then I thought, why? I own tons of Snoopy stuff anyway, I don't need him with me all the time.

But I'd get a tat before I got my tongue pierced. Blech.
#24 Oct 13 2005 at 5:21 AM Rating: Good
I guess they're handy if you want to be more easily identifiable. You know, you can get your SSN in a few places so if you catch a remington roomsweeper in the face they don't have to resort to DNA testing to match a name to the corpse.

Other than that, my view of tattoos is largely negative. If you need one to remember a special moment, then I pity you. If you need one to indicate how special you are, I despise you. If you have to have ink to prove you're cool, I really don't want to be around your posturing ***. I you believe that a tat will grant you some sort of special power, ability, or immunity, I keep my distance because I don't like people with no tangential connection to reality.

I do try to temper my view with the same respect I grant to foreign cultures but it's hard to put the ink people into that category because most of them are obvious dumbasses in so many other ways. I'm gonna keep working at it, though. One day I will be a kinder, gentler Tom who empathizes with the dumb things people try to justify daily. Til then, amigos.
#25 Oct 13 2005 at 5:56 AM Rating: Good
**
608 posts
Hey, quit your hatin'. The good ole "tramp stamp" helps me find my prey.


Quote:
guess they're handy if you want to be more easily identifiable. You know, you can get your SSN in a few places so if you catch a remington roomsweeper in the face they don't have to resort to DNA testing to match a name to the corpse.


Its kind of funny that you mention that because I actually have a bar code on the back of my head.


Quote:
Other than that, my view of tattoos is largely negative. If you need one to remember a special moment, then I pity you. If you need one to indicate how special you are, I despise you. If you have to have ink to prove you're cool, I really don't want to be around your posturing ***. I you believe that a tat will grant you some sort of special power, ability, or immunity, I keep my distance because I don't like people with no tangential connection to reality.


Yeesh, I understand ink not being some people's thing but it just seems silly to be all over the top about it. Pity? Despise? I hope you were exaggerating because it seems like that would be a whole lot of wasted energy on your part.


Quote:
I do try to temper my view with the same respect I grant to foreign cultures but it's hard to put the ink people into that category because most of them are obvious dumbasses in so many other ways. I'm gonna keep working at it, though. One day I will be a kinder, gentler Tom who empathizes with the dumb things people try to justify daily. Til then, amigos.


Maybe I am just a minority as far as this whole thing goes. My ink is for nobody but myself. Every piece I have, save one, has deep spiritual meaning for me. I have 7 tattoos so far and if you saw me on the street you wouldn't know I have one.

I guess I do see a lot of people who are using ink as a kind of "fashion" which I do see as pretty stupid. The thing is most of them have the same sh[/b]it tattooed on them. There are the red and black 5 pointed stars, the sparrows, or the leggings lines on the backs of the legs. I could think of a lot more but, aside from the "panthers, butterflys, and unicorns" folks these people bug the **** out of me. Probably because I just can't see getting a tattoo without it having any meaning. I mean sure, it looks cool... but you could have just silkscreened a fu[b]cking T-shirt too right?

#26 Oct 13 2005 at 6:19 AM Rating: Decent
It just acts as a Bullseye.
« Previous 1 2 3 4 5
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 197 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (197)