Forum Settings
       
Reply To Thread

Parents of schoolage kids, quick adviceFollow

#27 Oct 03 2005 at 11:08 AM Rating: Good
*****
18,463 posts
Molish wrote:
Quote:
The most shocking part of this post is that someone had sex with Elderon. Four times.


Not to point out the blaringly obvious, but I think she's jealous Eld.

You need to jump on that kool-aid right quick.

You know I almost replied to you as proof but then I realized you're not, Mikkle.
#28 Oct 03 2005 at 11:14 AM Rating: Good
The Glorious Atomicflea wrote:
The most shocking part of this post is that someone had sex with Elderon. Four times.


Like she had a choice in the matter. Smiley: sly
#29 Oct 03 2005 at 11:16 AM Rating: Default
**
874 posts
Quote:
Mikkle.


OWWW, thats below the belt there, missy............while your down there......


Little to the left.... oh yea, there it is
#30 Oct 03 2005 at 11:17 AM Rating: Good
*****
18,463 posts
Molish wrote:
Quote:
Mikkle.


OWWW, thats below the belt there, missy............while your down there......


Little to the left.... oh yea, there it is

Sorry, Qoaz.
#31 Oct 03 2005 at 11:20 AM Rating: Decent
**
874 posts
Quote:
Sorry, Qoaz.


Ok, that one fu[b][/b]cking blinded me.

Wrong... just wrong.
#32 Oct 03 2005 at 11:27 AM Rating: Good
I vote for barbarism.

Anyone who says that violence never solves anything doesn't know where to land a good punch.

Almost-Amusing and almost-related story:

When I was in kindergarten, we had the school Christmas program where each grade sang for the assembled parents, grandparents, teachers and anyone else dumb or committed enough to show up. My school had about 100 kids per grade, elementary being broken up into 4 roughly equal classes. So the music teacher had to teach all these songs to separate classes, then merge the classes together for the show. Horrendous stuff, of course.

We kindergartners had something simple like jingle bells that we were supposed to scream (our idea of singing) at the top of our lungs while we were cutely arranged on these aluminum risers set up just for the occasion. I, being one of the shorter kids, was on the next to the top riser. The kid behind me was in another class, and turned out to be a real pain. He kept poking me in the back and then pushing the back of my head. Never really hard, but quite enough to be annoying. After the 3rd time I told him to quit and the second time I tried to complain to my exasperated teacher only to be told to be quiet and stand there, I had enough. I told him if he poked me one more time, I was going to kill him. Big threat from a kindergartner, probably the most common one heard between the monkey bars and the slide, but it worked.

That is, until the program started. About 3 pokes in, I snapped. I turned around and shoved him off (it was only about 3 feet, but that was plenty for our size) the riser, then jumped down and punched him a few times until the teacher managed to get there.

My dad, for some strange reason, never attended another school event until graduation. He reminded me not to get in any fights at that, even then.

The kid: we wound up being buddies about 2 years later. He's a parole officer down in the area where I grew up and we still keep in touch but he doesn't poke me in the back.
#33 Oct 03 2005 at 12:31 PM Rating: Good
*****
18,463 posts
TStephens wrote:
I vote for barbarism.


Somehow, not surprised. I'm not saying it doesn't sometimes work, but teaching a child that it's a first recourse can turn out tricky.
#34 Oct 03 2005 at 1:56 PM Rating: Good
*****
14,454 posts
so meeting was rescheduled for Wed morning at 9:30 due to Bob knows what. At first I was miffed about it, however I think this gives my family an advantage. First off, my son will not be in school uintil then. Second, we will be having our meeting as school starts which means Im assuming our meeting will happen in or near the classroom to get a good look at the dynamics of the adult to child ratio and how it works. Thirdly, Mr. DSD usually works from home on Wed and he is going to be joining me at the meeting. I'm hoping having to face two upset parents as a front will make a bigger impact.
#35 Oct 03 2005 at 4:00 PM Rating: Excellent
***
1,863 posts
No advice for the specific situation, but some for dealing with organizational people when you're handling a complaint:

Don't be afraid to be angry.

You should stay rational - no yelling, no throwing things, any of that ilk - but you are allowed to be angry. In fact, I encourage it. One of the worst things people can do to themselves in a discussion situation is to understate the value of their own position -- call a meeting for something like this, then back down if the Principal suggests you're overreacting or improperly understanding.

The hell with that. You are an angry parent with a very valid complaint. If they try to weasel their way out of the situation, let them know it will be their ***. Make this plain - it often takes some work as academia types in particular have a faulty belief in their own invulnerability. Not "I may file a criminal charge" so much as "I will be filing a criminal charge this afternoon, and shall have my attorney contact you presently."

One other tip for aggression like that; be sure of your limits. Make up a decision-tree that you can carry in your head; if this then this, if that then that. Take the time to plan for conversational eventualities and always remember what actions you are prepared to accept. If you get carried away in the moment and make a threat that you can't carry out you've drastically weakened your position in the argument.

So, if you're considering a legal recourse, be ready to go through with it. If you feel that you should move your child to another institution should no help be forthcoming, start doing the related work (calling other schools, seeing what paperwork needs be done, etc). Prepare the road. It makes the position you argue from stronger, and it saves you time if you need to carry out one of your alternatives.

Heading in with the "wait and see" attitude puts you in an inert posture. You aren't ready to take independant action, so are at the mercy of whatever they opt to do (or not do). If you flip it around so that you're ready to leave you retain the initiative in conversation. So goes the theory.
#36 Oct 03 2005 at 4:42 PM Rating: Decent
Skelly Poker Since 2008
*****
16,781 posts
Wow progress. Three year olds are considered school-age now?
____________________________
Alma wrote:
I lost my post
#37 Oct 03 2005 at 5:07 PM Rating: Good
*****
14,454 posts
Elinda wrote:
Wow progress. Three year olds are considered school-age now?


It's not mandatory, but yes, they're considered school age now. Recently, preschool has become what kindergarten used to be. They learn their numbers, alphabet, the calender, weather, etc. They learn the most simplistic of mathematics and have science, learning how things work and why. They learn the rudimentary of writing skills and even have homework once in awhile. Plus at three, the beginnings of learning true socilization kick in, and at preschool they learn common manners around other kids their age; sharing, taking turns, comprimising, etc. It's crazy what they start learning formally at such a young age.
#38 Oct 03 2005 at 5:45 PM Rating: Good
Encyclopedia
******
35,568 posts
I'm thinking you're screwed here. If this was a private preschool, you'd have options, but since it's tied in to public education, there isn't much you can do about it. The best you can hope for is to get the adult minder for that child to actually do his job properly (which it appears is not being done now).

Welcome to your first experience with the disaster that is "special-needs" students in public school. By law (or federal funding requirements if you prefer), the public schools have to give these kids the exact same access to education that every other child gets. Due to the way budgets are done, this means that they are taught in the same class as every other kid. Even if it totally destroys the learning environment for the rest of the class. It's cheaper to stick an extra minder on the kid in a normal class setting then to duplicate the education in a separate environment. Also, they avoid comparisons of "separate but equal" treatment, and the inevitable backlash that would occur.

While it's possible that they could get better supervision to help with the situation, the only way to avoid it is to avoid public education. It doesn't get better either. My best friend is a High School teacher. Same deal. Special needs students eat up huge amounts of teacher time in our education system, and often cause disruptions as well. But we have to put them in the same classes as the rest of the students. Who thought that up? I don't know. But that's the way it's done...


I'm serious. Get out of public education. Join a local church parish and get your kid into a catholic school. You don't have to be super practicing. Just show up and fill out the forms to be a parish member, and you can get your kids into their school. It'll cost you more, but they have financial aid systems as well if needed. He'll get 10 times the education he'll ever get in a public school in this country, and the Catholic schools are actually pretty light on the religion (lots of non-catholics attend, so it's taught, but more like a "religion theory" approach).

If you don't like that, go with any other private school you can find and can afford. And hope to god that we eventually get school vouchers into law, so you can more easily afford it.
____________________________
King Nobby wrote:
More words please
#39 Oct 03 2005 at 6:31 PM Rating: Good
Gbaji, why do you hate America?
#40 Oct 03 2005 at 7:08 PM Rating: Good
*****
14,454 posts
gbaji thats totally untrue of the public school system in its entirety. Not all schools throw learning disbabled children into a regular class room. There are many public schools out there who have outfitted their special needs children with special needs classrooms. My mother has been a special ed teacher for over 30 years in the public school system. For the past ten years she has specialized in preschool. The children she teaches range from autism to blind, deaf, mute, and emotionally disturbed. In her classroom they have language boards for children who dont speak, like the child that is antagonizing my son. Ive spoken with her about the situation my son is in and she is bewildered why a special needs child has been thrown into the mix of regualr school children, especially without a language board to help him more easily communicate his needs without resorting to hitting. She has also surmised that this childs personal aid is imcompetant and is not doing her job. She should be replaced by someone who can handle watching one child for a max of 2 hours 3 days a week, and ensure the child does not attack other students.

Public schools can not turn down learning disabled childrens education if they do not have a place set up for special needs kids. But not all public schools are like that, and unfortunately it is because there is not enough funding being sent towards the schools to properly outfit each and every public school ut there for each and every type of child that needs to be educated.


However, if there is physical hitting going on, I have no qualms about making it crystal clear that if the child has tried the schooling out and can not handle it, he should be taken out until he goes to the schools that can handle him, even if that means he misses out on preschool and has to wait for primary school. And if that doesnt happen, then I guess I'll have to find my son a safer school to learn at

Edited, Mon Oct 3 20:24:47 2005 by deadsidedemon
#41 Oct 03 2005 at 7:17 PM Rating: Good
*****
18,463 posts
Lady deadsidedemon wrote:
However, if there is physical hitting going on, I have no qualms about making it crystal clear that if the child has tried the schooling out and can not handle it, he should be taken out until he goes to the schools that can handle him, even if that means he misses out on preschool and has to wait for primary school. And if that doesnt happen, then I guess I'll have to find my son a safer school to learn at.

Riiight. So you and this naughty teacher's aide are going to have a hair-pulling, shirt-ripping fight? Is that what you're saying?
#42 Oct 03 2005 at 7:28 PM Rating: Good
*****
14,454 posts
you'd like that, wouldn't you? Smiley: sly
#43 Oct 03 2005 at 7:36 PM Rating: Good
*****
18,463 posts
Lady deadsidedemon wrote:
you'd like that, wouldn't you? Smiley: sly

I'm not saying I would like it so much as I'm saying you should film it.
#44 Oct 03 2005 at 7:39 PM Rating: Good
Encyclopedia
******
35,568 posts
Lady deadsidedemon wrote:
gbaji thats totally untrue of the public school system in its entirety. Not all schools throw learning disbabled children into a regular class room. There are many public schools out there who have outfitted their special needs children with special needs classrooms. My mother has been a special ed teacher for over 30 years in the public school system. For the past ten years she has specialized in preschool. The children she teaches range from autism to blind, deaf, mute, and emotionally disturbed. In her classroom they have language boards for children who dont speak, like the child that is antagonizing my son.


While I'm sure there are "many" that don't do that, most do. The problem isn't just money. It's about perception of the "right" to education for every student, and an assumption that a separate classroom will mean inferior instruction. How strong that aspect is will vary from state to state. Here in cockooville California, land of political correctness gone horribly awry, it apparently is some kind of crime against nature to imply that a special needs kid can't manage in the same classroom as the rest of the kids, so they work really hard to make that square peg fit in the round hole.

It may also be that wherever your mom teaches has had a public school preschool program for a long time (10 years at least, right?), so they're allowed to grandfather in their existing program. Publically run preschools are relatively new in most places though, and my understanding of the federal funding processes for them is that they can't put special needs students in different classrooms for exactly that fear that they'll not get as good of an education.

Heh. I'll admit that I'm jaded on this issue because of where I live. I would *never* send a child through public school in California. It's really that bad. Even in the "good" areas, it's still pretty crappy. And from what I know (second hand from multiple teachers I know) most of the reasons for that are the result of federal restrictions on funding money that tie up their hands when it comes to how they structure the environment for the kids.

If things are better in your area, maybe you can get better results. My understanding is that putting those special needs kids into regular classrooms is the direction things are going in public schools though, so good luck.


Quote:
Ive spoken with her about the situation my son is in and she is bewildered why a special needs child has been thrown into the mix of regualr school children, especially without a language board to help him more easily communicate his needs without resorting to hitting. She has also surmised that this childs personal aid is imcompetant and is not doing her job. She should be replaced by someone who can handle watching one child for a max of 2 hours 3 days a week, and ensure the child does not attack other students.


I'm going for incompetant aid as well. But then, that may only cover the kid while he's in the classroom. Is your son getting hit while physically in the classroom? Or out playing? I guess I can't understand how he'd be getting hit so much inside the actual classroom. Is the teacher seating them next to eachother? That would seem silly if you've already complained about it...

Quote:
Public schools can not turn down learning disabled childrens education if they do not have a place set up for special needs kids. But not all public schools are like that, and unfortunately it is because there is not enough funding being sent towards the schools to properly outfit each and every public school ut there for each and every type of child that needs to be educated.


It's not just funding though. This could easily be an entire topic by itself. It's how the funds are used, and what kind of moronic rules some idiot dreamed up to make education "fair" that has far more to do with how good of an education environment is available. We spend more per-capita on education in this country then any of the other first world nations, yet we lag behind them. Honestly, most of the problems with our education system are so systematic and institutionalized that I'm not sure it *can* be fixed. And if it's not broken yet in your area, it probably will be in another 10 years...


Quote:
However, if there is physical hitting going on, I have no qualms about making it crystal clear that if the child has tried the schooling out and can not handle it, he should be taken out until he goes to the schools that can handle him, even if that means he misses out on preschool and has to wait for primary school. And if that doesnt happen, then I guess I'll have to find my son a safer school to learn at


Yeah. That's the dilemna though. While certainly this wont be the same everywhere, my experience has been that this kind of thing is not that unusual in the public school system as a whole. I'm just saying that this wont be the last time your son will have to deal with disruptive or problem students (for one reason or another, not trying to dis the deaf kid) and the power to deal with it wont be in your hands. Get used to it, because if your experience is typical, the next 12 years will bring more of the same.
____________________________
King Nobby wrote:
More words please
#45 Oct 03 2005 at 8:57 PM Rating: Good


I think that, more than likely, the reason parents try to fit their "square pegs into round holes" is that they want their children to have the same opportunities that other children have. Not that it excuses something such as this, but this is probably what parents are thinking. I also think that there are alot of students put into "special needs" classes that really shouldn't be there. How do you decide who does and does not go there? In your last sentence you stated the kid was deaf, if so, does he deserve to be taught with children with IQ problems?

Also, if everyone who is able to fix our public school problems simply took out their students and put them into private schools, it does not fix the public school problems. Public education is an important part of this country. This is why I don't like the idea of school vouchers. Why not put money into the public system instead of taking the students who will probably go somewhere in life out of the system? Eventually, if everyone did this, what would happen to public schools?

There is not an easy answer. I wrestle with it myself. I firmly believe in public education, but if I have the funds, would I send my child off to get a better education? Probably.

#46 Oct 03 2005 at 10:46 PM Rating: Good
****
5,311 posts
Whaddya know, Gbaji is an expert on primary school special needs students, and the methods of fulfilling their educational needs.

I'm constantly amazed.
#47 Oct 03 2005 at 11:00 PM Rating: Good
*****
14,454 posts
Yanari the Puissant wrote:
Whaddya know, Gbaji is an expert on primary school special needs students, and the methods of fulfilling their educational needs.

I'm constantly amazed.


arent we all?
Quote:

I also think that there are alot of students put into "special needs" classes that really shouldn't be there. How do you decide who does and does not go there? In your last sentence you stated the kid was deaf, if so, does he deserve to be taught with children with IQ problems?


Kids who have been diagnosed by their MDs are screened before they enter school. IQ does not have anything to do with special needs. A child who is blind or deaf can be just as smart as a "normal" child, but he or she will still have special needs in order to learn. Those children are not put into a special needs class because they are dumb, and it is ignorant to think that every special needs child is dumber than average. But it is plainly obvious that a child who is deaf or blind will need extra help in learning, or more one to one with teachers, as they are unable to "see" the chalkboard and know what is going on, or "hear" the teacher like other students do.
These kids are screened before they enter school and if the school has a decent special education they will determine what would best help the child learn and find a teacher who is specialized in helping them to fulfill their goals of education. Some children will have a special person, or "personal aid" to help them and them alone in order to help them learn.

please think clearly before you make such a blind statement and assumption about those with special needs. Not every one of them is lacking in IQ, smarts, or common sense. Some just have disabilities that they were born with that prohibits them from learning like a seeing, hearing child the same age. And those who are blind or deaf DO need more help than others, and should have the abilities available to them by a teacher who has been mastered in aiding them to learn better.

Edited, Tue Oct 4 00:09:28 2005 by deadsidedemon
#48 Oct 03 2005 at 11:51 PM Rating: Decent
***
2,328 posts
I was in almost all advanced classes in jr high and high school. There was one blind kid in some of my classes and one with MS or something where he couldn't move correctly but was still smart. The rest were in their own private room, until my senior year. A law was passed that they couldn't seperate like that, so my english, art and gym classes had several kids with down syndrome. I had to take english and art during summer school to graduate, because they slowed down the curiculum.

I'd go straight to the principle, give it one week, if its not fixed, go with the barbarism.
#49 Oct 04 2005 at 4:38 AM Rating: Default
I used to volunteer (until the program was cancelled) as a Child Advocate for children with special education needs. If this child has an assigned helper, they need to be sure they person is qualified to deal with the specific needs of the child. I have seen a number of cases where the helper couldn’t handle the child and basically just didn’t watch the child consistently. I have repeatedly seen where the schools tried to save money by not hiring a specialist.

That said I have also seen where hitting occurred once or twice and the behavior was corrected, but other kids continued to make accusations because they got a lot of attention when they did so. I have also seen children who did this because each time their mother would take the child out of class for a couple days. Essentially the child was having separation anxiety and just wanted to create a situation where they could be with mom again. I’m not saying this is the case with your child, just raising the possibility.

Given that this is Preschool and attendance isn’t mandated by law it shouldn’t be too difficult to get the principal to remove the child if they are disruptive and/or a danger to the other children in the classroom.

If your work schedule allows it, you (possible other parents as well) might see about volunteering in the classroom and get a firsthand look at the classroom dynamic. I have seen where parental participation in the classroom has had a beneficial influence of behavior in the class.
#50 Oct 04 2005 at 5:21 AM Rating: Good
I'm a firm believer in tough love: parents, give your children the ballistic weapons they deserve.

Problem with a bully at school? Teach your child the fundimentals of what three bullets can do.

Teacher giving your child too much homework? Give your child a fragmentation grenade and he's guaranteed to never have homework for the rest of that school year.

Nothing says you love your enemy more than a bullet to the spleen. Smiley: yippee


If that all seems a little out of line, there's always mace or pepper spray. Fu[b][/b]cking autistic kid who pokes and hits your child every day at school won't see it coming.
#51 Oct 04 2005 at 6:40 AM Rating: Good
***
2,324 posts
My kid gets hit at school that young? I am going to the school. I want someones' ***, and I want it now.

He comes home and informs me he was hit again, he will be instructed to hit back and not fuc[b][/b]king stop hitting until he is pulled off the tard in question.

If that doesn't end the hitting, he gets pulled out of the school for good. He is not there to fight.
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 195 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (195)