Forum Settings
       
Reply To Thread

Furious about WarFollow

#27 Oct 01 2005 at 4:37 PM Rating: Excellent
Elderon! /kicks Elderon in the nuts. Shad up.
#28 Oct 01 2005 at 4:41 PM Rating: Decent

You have to admit it was funny though...

#29 Oct 01 2005 at 4:44 PM Rating: Excellent
shhh.. dont let him think he's funny, we'll never hear the end of it.
#30 Oct 01 2005 at 4:44 PM Rating: Good
The One and Only Katie wrote:
Elderon! /kicks Elderon in the nuts. Shad up.


Smiley: grin
#31 Oct 01 2005 at 4:45 PM Rating: Good
The One and Only Katie wrote:
shhh.. dont let him think he's funny, we'll never hear the end of it.


Now, you're in trouble. Smiley: lol
#32 Oct 01 2005 at 4:46 PM Rating: Excellent
Me? In trouble? Arent I always?
#33 Oct 01 2005 at 4:49 PM Rating: Good
The One and Only Katie wrote:
Me? In trouble? Arent I always?


I always say, you can always be in more trouble. It usually holds true when dealing with me.
#34 Oct 01 2005 at 4:50 PM Rating: Excellent
True dat! My saying is, " I dont find trouble, trouble finds me. "
#35 Oct 01 2005 at 5:01 PM Rating: Decent
Katie, if you are 3.0, why are you not a scholar?

Edit: Oooh, I think you must be 3.1....oh well...

Edited, Sat Oct 1 18:08:10 2005 by Katarine
#36 Oct 01 2005 at 5:03 PM Rating: Good
Katarine wrote:
Katie, if you are 3.0, why are you not a scholar?

Edit: Oooh, I think you must be 3.1....oh well...



She is defaulting at 2.99. Her other score (attached to her name) is calculated differenly, meaning it will show 3.01 when she is really 3.00. Mine works the same way.
#37 Oct 01 2005 at 5:08 PM Rating: Decent
*****
12,501 posts
That's good, my finger is starting to get tired...Back on track though.


Basically it was already said, nothing can really be done about it, you can yell till ur blue in the face, but he will still get deployed. Just make sure u spend enough time and make memorys so he has something nice to remember and come back to =).
#38 Oct 01 2005 at 5:10 PM Rating: Good
Quote:
That's good, my finger is starting to get tired...


Then you are not doing it right. Try using your tongue at the top, and make little circle like "come here" motions with your finger on the frontal wall about 1.5 inches in. This should rectify your tired finger issue.
#39 Oct 01 2005 at 5:14 PM Rating: Decent
*****
12,501 posts
Ah i see, i was clearly doing it wrong then. I will try that the next time i have that "Problem"
#40 Oct 01 2005 at 5:17 PM Rating: Excellent
I'm still waiting for the official nuke.
#41 Oct 01 2005 at 5:19 PM Rating: Good
Gurue
*****
16,299 posts
The One and Only Katie wrote:
I'm still waiting for the official nuke.


There better not be, or I'll be pissed.

And there, it's official! Welcome to Scholar!!
#42 Oct 01 2005 at 5:21 PM Rating: Good
Mistress Nadenu wrote:
And there, it's official! Welcome to Scholar!!


This calls for a LOLBIFRONS. Smiley: boozing

Congo Rats *****! Smiley: flowers
#43 Oct 01 2005 at 5:26 PM Rating: Excellent
/dances the jig
#44 Oct 01 2005 at 7:45 PM Rating: Default
Encyclopedia
******
35,568 posts
paulsol wrote:
Gbaji said "Well. I know this isn't going to comfort you at all, but let's put things in perspective".


Over 1900 dead from the USA. thousands more from USA injured.

The whole war, illegal from the start and completely based on lies and fabrications.

How about that for a perspective?


Not even going to start on the rest of your post since it's just drivel.

I'll tell you what. One out of every 7 men in the US died during the civil war. 50,000 men died in about 3 hours in one battle alone. We could go on to casuality rates in WW1 and WW2 if you'd like.

2000 out of 300 million isn't so bad when you put it in perspective, is it?



God I get tired of people who keep parroting the same garbage.
____________________________
King Nobby wrote:
More words please
#45 Oct 01 2005 at 7:55 PM Rating: Decent


What does how many people died in past wars have to do with a war we are in now that was completely based on fabricated evidence?

I could go into detail as to what might have caused the wars you mentioned, but no one needs a history lesson. No one deserves to die for an unworthy cause. How are people in the military supposed to trust their superiors if they can't be trusted to not send them into harms way for stupid reasons?

#46 Oct 01 2005 at 8:08 PM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
I can only guess that Gbaji walks up to people miserable with the flu, flush with 105F fevers and vomiting into garbage cans and tells them "Hey, I know it won't make you feel better but a hundred years ago lots of people died from influenza! It's a modern miracle that you probably won't! And be glad you don't have bubonic plague -- did you know it wiped out a third of Europe? Keep it all in perspective!"
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#47 Oct 01 2005 at 8:11 PM Rating: Excellent
*****
14,454 posts
he's a regular heart warmer, he is
#48 Oct 01 2005 at 9:49 PM Rating: Decent
Imaginary Friend
*****
16,112 posts
Gbaji wrote:
For most of the history of mankind, if your husband had signed up for military service, he'd be gone for years at a time. Not 6-9 months and then back. It's frankly amazing that during wartime, we're cycling soldiers back as frequently as we do. I'm not aware of any military in history that has done that.


OH for God's sake man listen to yourself!

You are telling people to view modern-times from the standards of 100+ years ago, and to find solace in that?
You honestly cannot expect me to believe that JUST because we're not living in caves and dying of old age at 25, that the world doesn't need to still improve.

You cannot compare.
I guess if you get into a car accident you shouldn't be unhappy, but be GLAD because we don't have to shoe horses anymore..

'Surprised that we're cycling soldiers back'? C'mon.

Tell me.. do you think that the Viet Nam war was ok?

Seriously.. it's not the 1940s anymore... We are no longer oblivious to proper tactics of modern warfare. WW2 was supposed to be the War to End All Wars.. because after that we KNEW then waht was capable of happening and the massive and horrendous ammount of casualities that could be sustained...

If we had better planned, better prepared, had more foresight, had more troops, and had more support... then perhaps we could have dealt with this Iraq situation a bit better. But didn't Bush want to go in there Soo Badd.. so his cronies could milk it for everything it's worth for these shameful 4 years?
They did not prepare because they did not care. Their eyes were so focused on some fabricated destination that they never even bothered to see the path right in front of their feet in front of their feet.

Now we are struggling. We are sending in the National Guard for Christs sake!? How much longer will it last?
It will last as long as our President wants it do.

I don't suggest we leave now. Nope Nope, we are lock in that place now aren't we. I actually think Bush is smarter than most people give him credit for. He is living out that good ole' American Dream to The Fullest. Really somone for the kids to look up to. Go for waht you want no matter tha cost.. no matter how long it takes, no matter how many lives have to be shattered to get there. That's power for you there. Yes siree.


hey, at least you weren't born in Iraq right? I guess for that reason alone we should all be prostrating ourselves everyday in the direction of the holy city of Washington D.C., aye Gbaji?



____________________________
With the receiver in my hand..
#49 Oct 01 2005 at 11:35 PM Rating: Default
Quote:
Not even going to start on the rest of your post since it's just drivel.

I'll tell you what. One out of every 7 men in the US died during the civil war. 50,000 men died in about 3 hours in one battle alone. We could go on to casuality rates in WW1 and WW2 if you'd like.

2000 out of 300 million isn't so bad when you put it in perspective, is it? ~gbaji


now, gbaji, you failed to mention that the Civil War, WWI and II were all necessary. 2000 out of 300 million is 2000 too many for pointlessness.

Better yet, can somebody tell me why we're in Iraq in the first place? i asked my Bush supporting mother why and she just yelled at me that she was watching her soap opera's
#50 Oct 02 2005 at 5:18 AM Rating: Good
Ministry of Silly Cnuts
*****
19,524 posts
gbaji

an cnut

nuff said
#51 Oct 02 2005 at 6:02 AM Rating: Default
PottyMouth wrote:
gbaji

an cnut

nuff said


Would it kill you to have a post with substance?

You should just give your account to dracoid
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 172 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (172)