Forum Settings
       
Reply To Thread

Eq noobs?Follow

#27 Oct 01 2005 at 6:54 AM Rating: Good
***
2,324 posts
The One and Only Katie wrote:
She's mine, bi[b][/b]tch! Get your own hottie mama! I aint skeered of no truck driving, weight lifting, hot rod building, biker! Step off, 'fore I has ta cutcha!



You're just fortunate that I can no longer flex, without passing gas.
#28 Oct 01 2005 at 6:57 AM Rating: Excellent
lmao! Ok.. I'm cracking up over here.. I think I should go to sleep now. Thanks for the laugh.
#29REDACTED, Posted: Oct 01 2005 at 6:59 AM, Rating: Sub-Default, (Expand Post) The equivalent of a DSD "Is that the best you can come up with?" for lack of better material.
#30 Oct 01 2005 at 8:42 AM Rating: Excellent
***
3,829 posts
Mikkel wrote:
Since you are apparently an idiot Ambyra, I will point out the point of my insult was that someone with a lesser girth will not fit into the gaping wide hole that is Katie, and that someone with one of considerable size might be able to on days when she isn't completely flapping in the wind.


That may be what you meant to say, but what you actually said is that someone of very small girth (2 inches girth = a thumb) would be too small, and someone of average or only slightly larger than average girth would be just right (6-7 inches = two inch diameter, i.e. just over average.)

So your insult...wasn't insulting, as there is actually no real implication that Katie is any "looser" than average, which is what you were trying to get at (but, so sad for you, failing miserably.)

Sorry, YOU lose.




Edited, Sat Oct 1 09:57:08 2005 by Ambrya
#31REDACTED, Posted: Oct 01 2005 at 8:52 AM, Rating: Sub-Default, (Expand Post) So, what you are saying is that someone with a 7inch thick ***** would only be average? Yeah okay.
#32 Oct 01 2005 at 9:10 AM Rating: Good
***
3,829 posts
Message has high abuse count and will not be displayed.
#33 Oct 01 2005 at 9:18 AM Rating: Good
Gurue
*****
16,299 posts
Ambrya r teh coolest.
#34REDACTED, Posted: Oct 01 2005 at 9:22 AM, Rating: Sub-Default, (Expand Post) Better yet! Let's not do the maths, because honestly, it's not a scientifically proven theory that Katie could use her flaps to push a sail boat.
#35 Oct 01 2005 at 9:22 AM Rating: Good
***
3,829 posts
Nadenu wrote:
Ambrya r teh coolest.


Smiley: blush

I just know a di[u][/u]ck when I see one.

Edited, Sun Oct 2 19:13:57 2005 by Ambrya
#36 Oct 01 2005 at 9:25 AM Rating: Good
***
3,829 posts
Mikkel wrote:
It doesn't take a genius to notice that i was inferring Katie's ****** is deep enough to house a small civilisation.


Actually, you were IMPLYING. It's up to the reader to INFER.

I highly recommend you steer clear of words with two or more syllables. But then..."girth" was only one syllable.

Best to spare yourself the embarassment and just don't attempt to use language at all.

#37 Oct 01 2005 at 9:25 AM Rating: Excellent
Gurue
*****
16,299 posts
Ambrya wrote:
Nadenu wrote:
Ambrya r teh coolest.


/blush

I just know a di[u][/u]ck when I see one.


Smiley: lol

But just what is this di[/b]ck's girth?

or is that diameter...

puns 4tw!
#38 Oct 01 2005 at 9:28 AM Rating: Excellent
*****
18,463 posts
Ambrya, really. It's like kicking a cripple.
#39 Oct 01 2005 at 9:29 AM Rating: Good
***
3,829 posts
Nadenu wrote:
But just what is this di[u][/u]ck's girth?

or is that diameter...


Since it's been pretty well established that in idiots such as Mikkel, ***** size is inversely proportional to the frequency with which they run their yaps, I'm gonna go with "microscopic."



Edited, Sat Oct 1 10:35:36 2005 by Ambrya
#40 Oct 01 2005 at 9:31 AM Rating: Good
***
3,829 posts
Atomicflea wrote:
Ambrya, really. It's like kicking a cripple.


I know, I know...sometime's I'm just mean that way.

#41REDACTED, Posted: Oct 01 2005 at 9:34 AM, Rating: Sub-Default, (Expand Post) Yeah, because someone who cant even hold a relationship without them stealing their money and valuables is clearly in a very dignified position.
#42 Oct 01 2005 at 9:36 AM Rating: Excellent
*****
18,463 posts
Mikkle wrote:
Quote:
Ambrya, really. It's like kicking a cripple.



Yeah, because someone who cant even hold a relationship without them stealing their money and valuables is clearly in a very dignified position.

See what I mean? He/she/it can't even come up with an original insult! Mikkle, snookums. Why don't you try something about my hair? Insult my fashion sense? Those ought to hurt.
#43REDACTED, Posted: Oct 01 2005 at 9:38 AM, Rating: Sub-Default, (Expand Post) v. in·ferred, in·fer·ring, in·fers
#44REDACTED, Posted: Oct 01 2005 at 9:39 AM, Rating: Sub-Default, (Expand Post) How about shut up you stupid latina ****?
#45 Oct 01 2005 at 9:41 AM Rating: Excellent
*****
18,463 posts
Mikkle wrote:
How about shut up you stupid latina ****?

Or what are you?

Some half-breed.

Let's see.... Um, nope. I'd say nice try but I wouldn't mean it.
That particular slant has been hit to death as well, by much more creative posters. I'll refer you to Bhodi and Nephthyswanderer. Maybe they wouldn't mind PMing you, giving you some tips?

Edited, Sat Oct 1 10:57:30 2005 by Atomicflea
#46 Oct 01 2005 at 9:42 AM Rating: Excellent
***
3,829 posts
Mikkel wrote:
v. in·ferred, in·fer·ring, in·fers
v. tr.

1. To conclude from evidence or premises




r.v. im·plied, im·ply·ing, im·plies

1. To involve by logical necessity; entail: Life implies growth and death


I think you will find the word infer was acceptable.


Try again.


"Infer" is an act the listener does, drawing a conclusion from something that someone else has said.

"Imply" is something a speaker does, imbuing their statement with a more subtle or hidden meaning.

Since you were speaking/writing about Katie, you were IMPLYING. INFERRENCE is what the listener/reader does.

So, again, your use of the word "infer" is out of place, and you are simply too illiterate to know it. Move along.

#47REDACTED, Posted: Oct 01 2005 at 9:46 AM, Rating: Sub-Default, (Expand Post) You didn't read the definition did you?
#48 Oct 01 2005 at 9:52 AM Rating: Excellent
***
3,829 posts
Mikkel wrote:
You didn't read the definition did you?


Actually, I did, but it wasn't necessary, because, unlike certain ignorami who persist in making themselves look foolish by posting when they really ought to cut their losses and shut the hell up, I actually KNOW what words mean without having to look them up.

See what I did there? I IMPLIED that you were the ignoramus in question.

From that statement, you may INFER that I am speaking of you.

All your definition did was demonstrate that you don't even know how to apply a dictionary definition in its appropriate context.

(hint: I just IMPLIED that you are an idiot. INFER what you may.)


And now I'm going to IMPLY that you are no longer amusing me, by announcing that I am bored and going to bed.



Edited, Sat Oct 1 11:00:23 2005 by Ambrya
#49REDACTED, Posted: Oct 01 2005 at 9:56 AM, Rating: Sub-Default, (Expand Post) Wow with that intelligence I'm sure your advanced diploma in house-wife duties has landed you a succesful career in the field of baking pies.
#50 Oct 01 2005 at 11:05 AM Rating: Good
I must say this turn into a very amusing thred. Rate up for Ambrya!
#51REDACTED, Posted: Oct 01 2005 at 11:07 AM, Rating: Sub-Default, (Expand Post) Try again.
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 198 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (198)