In those old sepia family prints from the 1880s, ever wondered why the wife is always standing dutifully behind the seated husband?
That's because he was too shagged-out to stand, and she was too sore to sit down.
Seriously. Check em out.
It's true.
- Forums
- Cross Site
- The Asylum
- Victorian Family Portraits
Victorian Family PortraitsFollow
"I started out with nothin' and I still got most of it left" - Seasick Steve
Dumbass. People back then didn't have sex. That's why they look the way they do.
Its true! I hear they had to go "outside" and do exercise.
I think you can just say "excersize" instead of "do excersize".
Excersize is like...a verb in the way you used it, and you don't need "verb verb".
Um...did missionaries only do that one position?
Excersize is like...a verb in the way you used it, and you don't need "verb verb".
Um...did missionaries only do that one position?
I think the real missionary position is the one where you're on your back getting slammed while you're chanting prayers and giving food to starving African children.
Potty:
It is true, and I would also like to add that in those old Victorian silver nitrate photographs they were sore from erotic spankings. I mean just think of all the riding crops, just lying around the house, waiting to be used on someone's unsuspecting buttocks. That and they wore a lot of frilly, binding under-garments back then that caused painful chaffing.
Edited, Sat Sep 24 19:46:52 2005 by RedjedBlue
Quote:
In those old sepia family prints from the 1880s, ever wondered why the wife is always standing dutifully behind the seated husband?
That's because he was too shagged-out to stand, and she was too sore to sit down.
Seriously. Check em out.
It's true.
That's because he was too shagged-out to stand, and she was too sore to sit down.
Seriously. Check em out.
It's true.
It is true, and I would also like to add that in those old Victorian silver nitrate photographs they were sore from erotic spankings. I mean just think of all the riding crops, just lying around the house, waiting to be used on someone's unsuspecting buttocks. That and they wore a lot of frilly, binding under-garments back then that caused painful chaffing.
Edited, Sat Sep 24 19:46:52 2005 by RedjedBlue
Redjed knows. He's wearing some right now!
So, would one suppose that people all throughout history people were as big of ****-star wannabes as they are now?
I've wondered this.. because in this day and age.. we see sex all around us in one form or another since birth....
Do you think that people that long ago had the sexual appetites that we have today?
Keep in mind that ROmans like Martial and Juvenal we a bit absessed with the common Roman practice of oral sex...
so I'd say YES.
I've wondered this.. because in this day and age.. we see sex all around us in one form or another since birth....
Do you think that people that long ago had the sexual appetites that we have today?
Keep in mind that ROmans like Martial and Juvenal we a bit absessed with the common Roman practice of oral sex...
so I'd say YES.
PottyMouth wrote:
In those old sepia family prints from the 1880s, ever wondered why the wife is always standing dutifully behind the seated husband?
That's because he was too shagged-out to stand, and she was too sore to sit down.
Seriously. Check em out.
It's true.
That's because he was too shagged-out to stand, and she was too sore to sit down.
Seriously. Check em out.
It's true.
Drac, using your dad's account to post while he's not home, is wrong. I hope he kicks your ***.
That, and everyone had 14 brothers and sisters seem to indicate there was a lot of "hide the sausage" being played.
Recent Visitors: 185
All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (185)
- Forums
- Cross Site
- The Asylum
- Victorian Family Portraits
© 2024 Fanbyte LLC