There's actually 416 people with an average score over 5, just if it's over 5 the system displays it at 5.
Holy sh[/i]it. A lot of those are ratebots.
Ah, most are also old and have less than 10 posts. I guess it's the statistical fun of making one post and getting a couple 6s.
Edited, Fri Sep 23 16:19:59 2005 by Danalog
- Forums
- Cross Site
- The Asylum
- Katie the Scholar!
Katie the Scholar!Follow
Quote:
Holy ****. A lot of those are ratebots.
Can I borrow one? I won't use it for evil!
Nicroll 65 Assassin
Teltorid 52 Druid
Aude Sapere
Oh hell camp me all you want f**kers. I own this site and thus I own you. - Allakhazam
Teltorid 52 Druid
Aude Sapere
Oh hell camp me all you want f**kers. I own this site and thus I own you. - Allakhazam
Quote:
There's a table of ratings
Every time someone rates you, it puts in an entry
Every time you post, it puts in two entries at your current karma level
Your karma is the average of your entries in this table.
Every time someone rates you, it puts in an entry
Every time you post, it puts in two entries at your current karma level
Your karma is the average of your entries in this table.
Quote:
A lot of those are ratebots
Looks like you just found some work to do!
Danalog the Vengeful Programmer wrote:
There's actually 416 people with an average score over 5, just if it's over 5 the system displays it at 5.
Holy sh[/i]it. A lot of those are ratebots.
Holy sh[/i]it. A lot of those are ratebots.
Who is it that keeps saying the karma system isn't broken? Tsk Tsk!
Hacked would be more like it.
The double entries are your karma inertia, it's what keeps people more stable. It used to be only one entry per post but people and posts fluctuated too much.
Do what now?
Danalog the Vengeful Programmer wrote:
The double entries are your karma inertia, it's what keeps people more stable. It used to be only one entry per post but people and posts fluctuated too much.
I'll bet that caused too much krying.
publiusvarus wrote:
we all know liberals are well adjusted american citizens who only want what's best for society. While conservatives are evil money grubbing scum who only want to sh*t on the little man and rob the world of its resources.
After filtering it a bit, only 43 of those people have enough posts to rate. And all of the ones who have more than 100 posts on that list... are admins.
Do what now?
Well then could you tilt my inertia up a little bit? PLZKTHXLA~~
Nicroll 65 Assassin
Teltorid 52 Druid
Aude Sapere
Oh hell camp me all you want f**kers. I own this site and thus I own you. - Allakhazam
Teltorid 52 Druid
Aude Sapere
Oh hell camp me all you want f**kers. I own this site and thus I own you. - Allakhazam
I can tilt it down if you want
Do what now?
Quote:
I can tilt it down if you want
You are a tough negotiator, how the hell am I supposed to work with that?
Nicroll 65 Assassin
Teltorid 52 Druid
Aude Sapere
Oh hell camp me all you want f**kers. I own this site and thus I own you. - Allakhazam
Teltorid 52 Druid
Aude Sapere
Oh hell camp me all you want f**kers. I own this site and thus I own you. - Allakhazam
What made whoever made this system come up with it? It seems entirely too complex, though I can see how it works fairly well with each time someone hits the rate button. The server or whatever could easily average out the ratings that someone got post for post, like, if I were to post a comment, and someone rated it excellent, someone else rated it good, and another rated it poor, that one post would have the karma of whatever the average would be (including your total average posting karma) and then your total average would be based off've the average of each of your individual posts. It seems like either way you do it, it works out the same way, but yeah, I'm just thinking out loud. I used to love math before calculus.
To Flea: It seems that Katie can post about 5 times, and if EVERYONE who's able to rate DOES rate her an Excellent on all 5 of those posts, it would more than likely drastically raise her total average karma. Each time she's rated, that rating gets put on the table. Now, with what Dana has said, it'll probably be more like she needs 500-600 Excellent (5.00) ratings alltogether. So if she made 5 posts just to be rated (with nude pictures or whatever so people have INCENTIVE to rate her) and everyone able to rate does so and gives her an Excellent, she'd probably move up at least .5 points, maybe even the full 1.0 that she needs.
Edit: yeah...uh, my bad, I meant Flea, I remembered DSD was Green and Nadenu was Red...didn't know you were Red too and I was in a hurry (btw, it's Red and Green in WoW's uh...face...thing?).
Edited, Fri Sep 23 16:31:08 2005 by Roller
To Flea: It seems that Katie can post about 5 times, and if EVERYONE who's able to rate DOES rate her an Excellent on all 5 of those posts, it would more than likely drastically raise her total average karma. Each time she's rated, that rating gets put on the table. Now, with what Dana has said, it'll probably be more like she needs 500-600 Excellent (5.00) ratings alltogether. So if she made 5 posts just to be rated (with nude pictures or whatever so people have INCENTIVE to rate her) and everyone able to rate does so and gives her an Excellent, she'd probably move up at least .5 points, maybe even the full 1.0 that she needs.
Edit: yeah...uh, my bad, I meant Flea, I remembered DSD was Green and Nadenu was Red...didn't know you were Red too and I was in a hurry (btw, it's Red and Green in WoW's uh...face...thing?).
Edited, Fri Sep 23 16:31:08 2005 by Roller
Roller the Charming wrote:
To Nadenu: It seems that Katie can post about 5 times, and if EVERYONE who's able to rate DOES rate her an Excellent on all 5 of those posts, it would more than likely drastically raise her total average karma. Each time she's rated, that rating gets put on the table. Now, with what Dana has said, it'll probably be more like she needs 500-600 Excellent (5.00) ratings alltogether. So if she made 5 posts just to be rated (with nude pictures or whatever so people have INCENTIVE to rate her) and everyone able to rate does so and gives her an Excellent, she'd probably move up at least .5 points, maybe even the full 1.0 that she needs.
Who?
Katie currently has 20578 ratings on her.
Plus people keep rating her both down and up, making the upward trend slower.
Plus people keep rating her both down and up, making the upward trend slower.
Do what now?
One example for using raw ratings and not posts is:
Person X posts a really good guide to something and gets 100 6s (Excellent), ends up with a 5.0 post
Person Y posts "Yo Dawgz R U Down wit da whm/blm?" on the whm forum, gets a few rateups, enough to get a 5.0 post.
who deserves a bigger karma boost?
Person X posts a really good guide to something and gets 100 6s (Excellent), ends up with a 5.0 post
Person Y posts "Yo Dawgz R U Down wit da whm/blm?" on the whm forum, gets a few rateups, enough to get a 5.0 post.
who deserves a bigger karma boost?
Do what now?
Danalog the Vengeful Programmer wrote:
Plus people keep rating her both down and up
Funny, that's how people ride her too.
Danalog the Vengeful Programmer wrote:
One example for using raw ratings and not posts is:
Person X posts a really good guide to something and gets 100 6s (Excellent), ends up with a 5.0 post
Person Y posts "Yo Dawgz R U Down wit da whm/blm?" on the whm forum, gets a few rateups, enough to get a 5.0 post.
who deserves a bigger karma boost?
Person X posts a really good guide to something and gets 100 6s (Excellent), ends up with a 5.0 post
Person Y posts "Yo Dawgz R U Down wit da whm/blm?" on the whm forum, gets a few rateups, enough to get a 5.0 post.
who deserves a bigger karma boost?
Person Z who stays out of the FFXI forums?
Quote:
One example for using raw ratings and not posts is:
Person X posts a really good guide to something and gets 100 6s (Excellent), ends up with a 5.0 post
Person Y posts "Yo Dawgz R U Down wit da whm/blm?" on the whm forum, gets a few rateups, enough to get a 5.0 post.
who deserves a bigger karma boost?
Person X posts a really good guide to something and gets 100 6s (Excellent), ends up with a 5.0 post
Person Y posts "Yo Dawgz R U Down wit da whm/blm?" on the whm forum, gets a few rateups, enough to get a 5.0 post.
who deserves a bigger karma boost?
Um, Xythex!?
Nicroll 65 Assassin
Teltorid 52 Druid
Aude Sapere
Oh hell camp me all you want f**kers. I own this site and thus I own you. - Allakhazam
Teltorid 52 Druid
Aude Sapere
Oh hell camp me all you want f**kers. I own this site and thus I own you. - Allakhazam
Quote:
One example for using raw ratings and not posts is:
Person X posts a really good guide to something and gets 100 6s (Excellent), ends up with a 5.0 post
Person Y posts "Yo Dawgz R U Down wit da whm/blm?" on the whm forum, gets a few rateups, enough to get a 5.0 post.
who deserves a bigger karma boost?
Person X posts a really good guide to something and gets 100 6s (Excellent), ends up with a 5.0 post
Person Y posts "Yo Dawgz R U Down wit da whm/blm?" on the whm forum, gets a few rateups, enough to get a 5.0 post.
who deserves a bigger karma boost?
Roller the Charming wrote:
Much more clear, why didn't ya just say that in the first place?
Because after working with these databases for over 3 years now, what seems obvious to me might not be to other people =P
Do what now?
Dana is the man with the monkey! So he rocks.
Did someone say 
What?
What?
It's so much fun when a pale redhead gets mistaken for a cute Latina!
34 posts
rate ups for joo katie
Mistress Nadenue wrote:
It's so much fun when a pale redhead gets mistaken for a cute Latina!
/suspicious
Hey, I thought of you today.
Recent Visitors: 209
All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (209)
- Forums
- Cross Site
- The Asylum
- Katie the Scholar!
© 2024 Fanbyte LLC