Forum Settings
       
1 2 3 4 5 Next »
Reply To Thread

In order to ruin the Asylum...Follow

#102 Aug 18 2005 at 9:21 AM Rating: Good
****
6,760 posts
El Duderino would have been better, but whatever strokes your pole.

/plays Cat Scratch Fever
____________________________
Some people are like slinkies, they aren't really good for anything, but they still bring a smile to your face when you push them down the stairs.
#103 Aug 18 2005 at 3:40 PM Rating: Good
****
4,396 posts
Quote:
This is an example of your other half of posts. I'd call it your "better half" but who are we trying to kid around here?


You for one. I have already duped you into simply answering me by saying that I have no talent and that I am not as good as the others here claim.

Your next mantra is that I am over the hill and no longer able to come up with a witty post or clever retort.

Tacosid
____________________________
I voted for the other guy.
#104 Aug 18 2005 at 4:30 PM Rating: Decent
Prodigal Son
******
20,643 posts
Pfft, you're such a has-been.

I, on the other hand, still aspire to will-be.
____________________________
publiusvarus wrote:
we all know liberals are well adjusted american citizens who only want what's best for society. While conservatives are evil money grubbing scum who only want to sh*t on the little man and rob the world of its resources.
#105 Aug 18 2005 at 5:15 PM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
NephthysWanderer the Charming wrote:
Well, after a long review session with my SO, we finally came up with a name. We were prepared to take the steps necessary to name him Tripod...
Win for me on technicality!
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#106 Aug 18 2005 at 5:20 PM Rating: Default
Quote:
Your next mantra is that I am over the hill and no longer able to come up with a witty post or clever retort.


It wouldnt be a lie
#107 Aug 18 2005 at 9:04 PM Rating: Good
****
4,396 posts
You see that right there is a lie of the ignorant. You see when everyone picks on Katie (a trend that all of you simpletons can thank me for)then while it is fashionable to pick on her, there is alas, some basis of fact for the criticism directed towards her.

Oddly enough she has proven herself in recent years to actually be able to outthink the average poster on this forum. But since the basis of fact is there, then it is only a lie of the masses. Unoriginal, but true.

But when you claim that I am verbally toothless and incapable of a witty retort then you are telling a lie of the ignorant. First, it is an obvious mistruth as I am a veritable fount of insult and degregation. Secondly, if you were to do a detailed search and list all of the people who have made this very claim, you would be embarrassed to have willingly added yourself to their number.

Tacosid
____________________________
I voted for the other guy.
#108 Aug 18 2005 at 9:13 PM Rating: Default
Quote:
You see that right there is a lie of the ignorant. You see when everyone picks on Katie (a trend that all of you simpletons can thank me for)then while it is fashionable to pick on her, there is alas, some basis of fact for the criticism directed towards her.


What?

Quote:
But when you claim that I am verbally toothless and incapable of a witty retort then you are telling a lie of the ignorant. First, it is an obvious mistruth as I am a veritable fount of insult and degregation


Prove it, son

Quote:
Secondly, if you were to do a detailed search and list all of the people who have made this very claim, you would be embarrassed to have willingly added yourself to their number.

Tacosid


Maybe so many people have made the claim because its true

Btw, you have to have been to be a has been, and you've never been
#109 Aug 18 2005 at 11:02 PM Rating: Good
****
4,396 posts
I am sorry you did not get the first part of my response. If you would like I can answer you in monosyllables for now on.

As for my state of ineptitude...sorry long word again. As for my state of being bad, when you look at the sources of the claim then you have your answer.

Thousands of morons swore that Galileo was a charlatan and a heretic. If only 5 people believe him during his time, then who was in the right?

Of course the situation here is entirely nonsensical in comparison to the above allusion. First, most of the people sporting at least half a brain acknowledge my superiority, even if they claim that said superiority was long in the past. Secondly there are many less than thousands of detractors, actually it is limited to a handful of simpletons attempting to look clever.

In the end, Galileo was right and so am I. Comparatively speaking I am the king of the demeaning.

Tacosid
____________________________
I voted for the other guy.
#110 Aug 18 2005 at 11:37 PM Rating: Decent
***
1,188 posts
You are....The el taco!
#111 Aug 18 2005 at 11:51 PM Rating: Decent
Tacosid wrote:
I am sorry you did not get the first part of my response. If you would like I can answer you in monosyllables for now on.

As for my state of ineptitude...sorry long word again. As for my state of being bad, when you look at the sources of the claim then you have your answer.

Thousands of morons swore that Galileo was a charlatan and a heretic. If only 5 people believe him during his time, then who was in the right?

Of course the situation here is entirely nonsensical in comparison to the above allusion. First, most of the people sporting at least half a brain acknowledge my superiority, even if they claim that said superiority was long in the past. Secondly there are many less than thousands of detractors, actually it is limited to a handful of simpletons attempting to look clever.

In the end, Galileo was right and so am I. Comparatively speaking I am the king of the demeaning.

Tacosid


I wonder how many people read that and thought, "Fu[b][/b]ck that guy is a step-above!"

Three paragraph ramblings about Galileo isn't interesting in the least and if you're so damn certain you have entertained people since the time you made the name "Tacosid", (Hopefully he will explain his name again!) please, enlighten us. Oh and buddy, you're about due for another guild post - those were always my favorites.
#112 Aug 19 2005 at 1:10 AM Rating: Default
Quote:
You see when everyone picks on Katie then while it is fashionable to pick on her, there is alas, some basis of fact for the criticism directed towards her.



That doesnt make any sense
#113 Aug 19 2005 at 6:25 AM Rating: Good
****
4,396 posts
Quote:
I wonder how many people read that and thought, ********** that guy is a step-above!"

Three paragraph ramblings about Galileo isn't interesting in the least and if you're so damn certain you have entertained people since the time you made the name "Tacosid", (Hopefully he will explain his name again!) please, enlighten us. Oh and buddy, you're about due for another guild post - those were always my favorites.


Ok. First the Galileo thing perhaps went over your head...which of course is completely understandable. And boy, you are the pot calling the kettle black about the "explaining your name" thing. How many times were we told that it was L.T. and not lieutenant? I mean, geez you went as far as to actually change your name to the much more original and clever Gooose.

About the guild posts...apparently you are missing the point of that too. Part of the role I play on this forum includes the "pissed off and unforgiving" type. Do I really care about an event in everquest that happened two years ago? Of course not. Its kinda taboo to have to spell it out for you, but since you are too thick to have gotten on your own there it is. I just act pissed because that is what everyone expects and it is sort of a rivalry that has been going on since before the last time you changed your underwear.

Quote:
You see when everyone picks on Katie then while it is fashionable to pick on her, there is alas, some basis of fact for the criticism directed towards her.


Ok. This is a little southernism coming through. I figured you would be bright enough to get the gist, but since you apparently are not then how about this?

You see ,everyone picks on Katie, and while it is fashionable to pick on her, there is alas, some basis of fact for the criticism directed towards her.

Changed two words to make it more regionally sound. Do you get it now? If not I will be happy to explain it for you.

Tacosid

____________________________
I voted for the other guy.
#114 Aug 19 2005 at 9:17 AM Rating: Decent
*****
10,755 posts
Who's trolling who?

I'm confused.
#115 Aug 19 2005 at 9:25 AM Rating: Excellent
Spankatorium Administratix
*****
1oooo posts
Jophiel wrote:
NephthysWanderer the Charming wrote:
Well, after a long review session with my SO, we finally came up with a name. We were prepared to take the steps necessary to name him Tripod...
Win for me on technicality!

I agree. Gratz Jophiel!
____________________________

#116 Aug 19 2005 at 2:15 PM Rating: Decent
NephthysWanderer the Charming wrote:
Who's trolling who?

I'm confused.


I'mm totally trolling him. I only say this because I haven't read any of his posts but he fires back with page long replys.
#117 Aug 20 2005 at 1:03 PM Rating: Decent
Quote:
First, it is an obvious mistruth as I am a veritable fount of insult and degregation


Quote:
I just act pissed because that is what everyone expects and it is sort of a rivalry that has been going on since before the last time you changed your underwear.


Quote:
you are the pot calling the kettle black


Quote:
since you are too thick


Ok, I can't compete. You win.
1 2 3 4 5 Next »
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 219 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (219)