Forum Settings
       
Reply To Thread

Stupid consumersFollow

#1 Jul 28 2005 at 4:14 PM Rating: Decent
Prodigal Son
******
20,643 posts
More pot-shots at Grand Theft Auto.

WBS880.com wrote:
NEW YORK (AP)
A woman upset that she bought the video game "Grand Theft Auto: San Andreas'' for her 14-year-old grandson without knowing it contained hidden, sexually explicit scenes sued the manufacturer Wednesday on behalf of consumers nationwide.

Florence Cohen, 85, of New York, said in the lawsuit filed in U.S. District Court in Manhattan that the game's manufacturer, Rockstar Games, and its parent company, New York-based Take Two Interactive Software Inc., engaged in false, misleading and deceptive practices.

She sought unspecified damages on behalf of herself and all consumers nationwide, saying the company should give up its profits from the game for what amounted to false advertising, consumer deception and unfair business practices.

Cohen said in the suit that she bought the game in late 2004 for her grandson when it was rated ``M'' for mature, for players 17 and older. According to the suit, she directed that it be taken away from her grandson, which was done.

Let's take a look at their false advertising and deception, shall we...
The box illustrations are full of guns, gangsters and scantily-clad wimmin. The ratings are on the front of the box. If it has a Mature rating, for people 17 and older, it is entirely her discretion to give it to a 14 year old. That right there is enough for a clear case of consumer stupidity.

What do you think? Should the video game boxes be plastered with government warnings like cigarettes? "Holy sh[/b]it, these things are bad for you? Fu[/b]ck, I thought they were good for you, thought they had vitamin C in em and stuff!" Or perhaps we should just line up and have the government hand us what they deem are proper, hermetically-sealed standard issue fare?
____________________________
publiusvarus wrote:
we all know liberals are well adjusted american citizens who only want what's best for society. While conservatives are evil money grubbing scum who only want to sh*t on the little man and rob the world of its resources.
#2 Jul 28 2005 at 5:03 PM Rating: Good
****
4,596 posts
I think the ESRB rating is plenty sufficient to avoid litigation, however, since Rockstar decieved the ESRB it will be up the court system to decide if it was intentional or not. Personally, as reprehensible as this lawsuit is I hope Rockstar loses to send a message to the industry that it needs to be very carefull to insure full discloser to the ESRB.
____________________________
Nicroll 65 Assassin
Teltorid 52 Druid
Aude Sapere

Oh hell camp me all you want f**kers. I own this site and thus I own you. - Allakhazam
#3 Jul 28 2005 at 5:27 PM Rating: Good
Considering the game requires a HACK to unlock that portion of the game that's considered X-rated, I say she has no real grounds to sue. The portion of the game wasn't meant to be accessed in the first place.
#4 Jul 28 2005 at 5:29 PM Rating: Decent
***
1,383 posts
I have to agree with the OP, and I think that frankly the government needs to leave video games alone. Everytime they say something about how bad they are they just prove how incompetent they are and how much they dont' know about them. I'm so sick of hearing this(especially from Jack Thompson) "The hot-coffee mod proves how incompetent the ESRB really is blah blah blah". How does that prove that they are incompetent, there was no way for them to know(unless they have changed their policies and proceders from the last time I checked) they don't even get a copy of the game, they get a video, a report, and paperwork. Someone needs to make all of these people shutup and go sit in a corner, I mean even our president said to stop blamming video games and be better parents.
#5 Jul 28 2005 at 5:34 PM Rating: Good
Encyclopedia
******
35,568 posts
Hmmm... Anyone else wonder if the mod was named "hot coffee" as a deliberate reference to the McDonald's suit?

Also, while the details I've seen were sketchy, I thought there was no actual nudity in the scenes? Just a lot of grinding in sexually explicit positions, but since there's no "nude" models in the game, they all still have clothes.

My impression is that the mod doesn't show or do anything worse then any R rated film (alot less really).
____________________________
King Nobby wrote:
More words please
#6 Jul 28 2005 at 5:41 PM Rating: Decent
***
3,101 posts
There seems to be a lot of lawsuit happy people out there in the world today. The grandmother is a moran. The game itself has had more bad hype then any other video game ever created as far as I can tell. A lot of the bad hype was before the thing came out too, since the previous GTA was rather "talked" about also. The suit should be tossed.
#7 Jul 28 2005 at 5:46 PM Rating: Decent
so she is an other MC D's coffee lady eh. just as long as the courts are not STUPID enough this time to award any of them money as this case should be tossed right out into the gutter were it belongs.
#8 Jul 28 2005 at 5:51 PM Rating: Excellent
It is just another person not willing to take responsibility for their action. The rating for the game was accurate, and plain as day. Just find a review and the rating description is.
Quote:
Blood and Gore, Strong Language, Use of Drugs, Intense Violence, Strong Sexual Content
The only one to blame is grandma for not reading the box before she bought it.
#9 Jul 28 2005 at 5:54 PM Rating: Decent
Any idiot that wouldnt consider the rating at the back of a game shouldnt be allowed to sue. At least the game is now rated A and noone sells it anymore, except like 1 store and Ebay. They should make the M bigger so people wont ignore it.
#10 Jul 28 2005 at 5:57 PM Rating: Good
Protect the idiots! Thats our policy. First one I can remember is when a woman sued McDonalds for serveing her hot coffee (without a warning label). It's funny how stupidity gets its way.
#11 Jul 28 2005 at 6:05 PM Rating: Excellent
I beleive the M is big enough now, I may not be 85 and cant see for crap, but it is easily seen by anyone who should be driving. If you have a couple of the original release of vice city, the rating was actually fine print smaller then the description text on the back of the box.

Shoot for SA they even put M on both the front and back. About the only thing more they could of done was black out the front and put the title in small print and put a big m there, but then again people not watching what they buy for the brats would still just buy it anyway.
#12 Jul 28 2005 at 8:06 PM Rating: Good
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 189 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (189)