Way to be original Bhod..
I'll try to add something new to the playbook.. The ignorant Texan thing is..
*channeling my inner Dan Rather*
more worn out than a pair of moccasins after a raindance.
- Forums
- Cross Site
- The Asylum
- More pearls from Rick Santorum
More pearls from Rick SantorumFollow
Lefein wrote:
However, noone is legislating who can or cannot sleep with each other
Umm...Rick Santorum is trying to do exactly that. Do you want some links?
Here.
SANTORUM: And if you make the case that if you can do whatever you want to do, as long as it's in the privacy of your own home, this "right to privacy," then why be surprised that people are doing things that are deviant within their own home? If you say, there is no deviant as long as it's private, as long as it's consensual, then don't be surprised what you get.
...
AP: I mean, should we outlaw homosexuality?
SANTORUM: I have no problem with homosexuality. I have a problem with homosexual acts. As I would with acts of other, what I would consider to be, acts outside of traditional heterosexual relationships
...
AP: OK, without being too gory or graphic, so if somebody is homosexual, you would argue that they should not have sex?
SANTORUM: We have laws in states, like the one at the Supreme Court right now, that has sodomy laws and they were there for a purpose. Because, again, I would argue, they undermine the basic tenets of our society and the family.
Would you like your crow fried or poached?
Lefein wrote:
Perhaps when people have spent large sums of money to live in an upscale neighborhood away from the usual problems of the hustle and bustle of downtown life only to have a gay married couple move in next door. People take their family life and what they exposed to very personally.
However, noone is legislating who can or cannot sleep with each other.
However, noone is legislating who can or cannot sleep with each other.
First off, unless you're somehow implying that homosexuality is driven by economics, I fail to see how moving to "an upscale neighborhood" is going to ensure you don't live by any scary gay people. I know most people trying to move "up" in where they live are trying to escape factors like crime, gangs, violence, decaying properties, unemployment, etc. I didn't know homosexuality was one of those factors.
Secondly, not legalizing gay marriage will do nothing to stop a couple of gay men from moving in next door and having loud buttsex within earshot of your virgin WASP daughters (thus turning them into lesbians, no dount). It just means they'll be having loud buttsex in sin and it'll be harder for them to visit one another in the hospital. Your only option here would be to make buttsex illegal which you just said no one is legislating.
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
GAHH stop it Joph, I just busted out laughing and the guys in my shop are looking at me all crazy.
-Nagafen
-Nagafen
"Loud buttsex" is my new favorite phrase.
In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.
joph wrote:
Secondly, not legalizing gay marriage will do nothing to stop a couple of gay men from moving in next door and having loud buttsex within earshot of your virgin WASP daughters (thus turning them into lesbians, no dount).
I really started to laugh when I read the part about his "WASP" daughters turning dyk.
Quote:
I think I'll go tell my boss that I like tying my girlfriend up while she's wearing leather outfits, and whipping her.
He needs to accept my "lifestyle"
He needs to accept my "lifestyle"
Where is it written that anyone HAS to accept anyones LIFESTYLE?
If you like peter puffing by all means have at it. The rest of us don't HAVE to like or say its ok.
Hey I say its ok if you are gay twink just stay out of my house and I won't have to SHOOT you :)
SHOOT get it?
Quote:
Hey I say its ok if you are gay twink just stay out of my house and I won't have to SHOOT you :)
SHOOT get it?
SHOOT get it?
Yes, I get it. You have homosexual fantasies about spurting on another man. Good for you.
In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.
So...with all these pearls from Mr. Santorum, would we get a necklace?
publiusvarus wrote:
we all know liberals are well adjusted american citizens who only want what's best for society. While conservatives are evil money grubbing scum who only want to sh*t on the little man and rob the world of its resources.
Debalic wrote:
So...with all these pearls from Mr. Santorum, would we get a necklace?
"I started out with nothin' and I still got most of it left" - Seasick Steve
Don't be too hard on Lef for his views. I have a great deal of respect for him and, while we don't necessarily see eye to eye on the issue, he's very gracious in his debating. And really, I DO see his point. If I truly believed that homosexuality was wrong, I wouldn't want to expose my kids to that either. I DON'T feel it's wrong, but I understand the mindset. I feel that drug use is wrong, and I'd feel like a bad parent if I raised my kids next to a crack house. How is this any different? People are allowed to decide for themselves if homosexuality truly IS a moral issue. I'm not going to judge someone for that.
Recent Visitors: 172
All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (172)
- Forums
- Cross Site
- The Asylum
- More pearls from Rick Santorum
© 2024 Fanbyte LLC