to the Theists..Follow

boy u asylum people are a bunch of ratin down muther f... nvm. ok, i use to be 50/50 on the whole religion issue. figured hell, we had to come from somewhere. then i watched the discovery channel one day, turned athiest the next. scientists seen no know signs of a global flood so either ur god is a liar, or his deciples arent very good at writing **** down correctly. ive seen more evidence of aliens than god. everyone knows the bible was made just so we feel we have a purpose in life whether u admit it or not. and the miracle ****? please stop. theres lucky and unlucky. guy has cancer, doctors say he was 5 months to live. a year later the cancer disappears.... that *********** was lucky. baby being born a miracle? no, its nature. show me a snap shot of this so called god or the seas being departed and ill withdraw my comment but please people, for christs sake.... wheres he at? he hasnt did any tricks in a while, is the MF dead? that is all.

i was talking to the 18 and older audience of this forum but thats ok, ill intake some of ur idiocy. atm, i dont really have a picture of luck, but go look in the mirror if u wanna see unlucky. that is all

To glece:

Please explain to me how the universe we live in could've been created without SOME sort of divine presence. Science states that matter can neither be created nor destroyed, and the same goes to energy. If energy and matter, which we are surrounded by, cannot be created, then how did all of this get here? Science says the big bang did it, but how did this big bang happen? What created the energy that caused the big bang, or the matter that blossomed from it?

Science contradicts itself. If you are denying the possibility that someone or something bigger than you created all that we call life, then you are an ignorant ***.

Good day.

Way to get the Law of Conservation of Mass-Energy wrong.

That aside, being able or unable to fully explain the origins of the universe as a whole has nothing at all to do with the theories of evolution. Hell, Darwinian evolution doesn't even attempt to explain the genesis of Earthly life, only how that life had adapted and changed over the millennia.

Not sure if I phrased it poorly, but how did I get it wrong?

If the universe is indeed infinate then everything that anyone has ever imagined or possibly could ever imagine must exist somewhere at some point in time.

true or false?

----

seifer you wrote : Science contradicts itself. If you are denying the possibility that someone or something bigger than you created all that we call life, then you are an ignorant ***.

Religion also contradicts itself. And religions contradict each other.
If you are denying the possiblity that something or someone biger than you DID NOT create all that we call life are you also an ignorant ***?

Quite right, but if someone was to come to the conclusion that in an infinate universe all possiblities exist, then even without experiencing these possibilities they can still reach the conclusion that, for instance, sentient life exists in other places than just earth.

Statistically, it is more than likely than sentient life exists on other planets. Considering it is estimated there are 125 billion galaxies in the world, the chance that one of them would have the conditions necessary to sustain life, which are not as fixed as we thought, it quite high.

Statistically, it is more than likely than sentient life exists on other planets. Considering it is estimated there are 125 billion galaxies in the world, the chance that one of them would have the conditions necessary to sustain life, which are not as fixed as we thought, it quite high.


No one has any idea at all about the likelyhood.

Why is it just soooo fucking hard to admit that?

When we can replicate organogenisis and create an amobea from a bowl of chemicals then we'll be able to gauge the likelyhood.

Because some peple do have an idea. They know some of the conditions necessary to sustain life. And considering that life adapts to environments much more easily than we first thought, it is easier to debate about the likelihood of life on other planets than it is to debate the existence of God, for exemple. At least in the first case we have some basis for discussion.

Whereas for God, its just a matter of faith.

Ya, that seems like the one. It's been a bit since I saw the article on it, but that seems to be it.

Because some peple do have an idea. They know some of the conditions necessary to sustain life.

What's the likelyhood life will come into being on planets with those conditions?

Oh yeah, no ******* clue.

Stop hurting yourself.

I hope a few more people will quote Contact. I really liked that movie.

Nexa