Quote:
Christians love to legislate their biblical morality on the masses. Christians love to dictate their beliefs into the public consciousness whenever they get a chance.
Personally, if one would take the time to view Christianity, one would see that every doctrine in it is beficial, so long as you are not looking at a crackpot version. (Which by the way, tend to be the ones everyone points to when saying, Christianity is wrong.)
It teaches one not to kill, not to steal, to love God, and to treat everyone as you would would wish to be treated. (The last two are the most important commandments.)
Biblical morality, it has been agreed by many, simply provides a better basis for living life.
Quote:
Christians tend to believe despite facts and science. Christians tend to be fanatical in their beliefs calling it the truth with no scientifically verifiable data. Very little of christian dogma stands up to any sort of scientific methodology, but they tend to pretend like it does.
How is this true? Nothing within the Bible has ever been proven historicaly inaccurate, and much of the time the Bible is supported by coraborating evidence. Examples include the fact that we have, based on fact, more evidence that Jesus existed than Napoleon. Second is the Hittite culture, which was screamed as the fact to why the Bible could not be true, because no such race had been found. However, it was uncovered, and is exactly as the Bible told.
However, I feel the point you are trying to make is Creation vs. Evolution. (I say this because there is no other way for man to be Created if you dismiss higher powers) Again, no scientific evidence disproves Creation, while much does defy Evolution. Things as, vertical fossels, susbended between two layers of sedement that, by evolution, should have been created millions of years apart. Another is natural tendancy of the universe to decay into simple particles such as hydrogen. Evolution states that things become more complex, which defies our known nature of the universe. (Also please don't go into the adaptation vs. evolution argument. People and animals adapt to new situations to survive, in one generation, but this cannot be equated with evolution.)
Lastly though, this seems to be an attack on Christian Scientists. Do you realize that a good part of the Scientific comunity has embraced if not Christianity, Creationist ways of thinking? It is an attempt to discredit us by painting us all as fanatics of low intellegence, who believe blindly. Faith has a part, but I personally attend a class weekly about how to defend my faith.
Quote:
Creationism is as believable as the bible says it is and that is all. Yet, christians would love to put creationism on school curriculums and teach it as science.
CreationISM would be for an -ISM is generally means to put above all others, in this case, puting Creation above the Bible's true message. Creation however, is generaly supported by nature. There is a level of complexity in nature which defies evolution. The probability that so many tiny interlocking pieces would come into being is astronomical, and thats only for somthing small, like a bee's wing. When you look at the macroscopic, such as the system of pollination, the chances of it coming into being radomly are probably far less. Do you agree?
It takes far more faith to believe in evolution anymore, rather than Christianity.
On another note, Why is it that all other religions want to discredit Christianity so badly? They have no problems with each other, at least when Christianity is around, even when their doctrines conflict. (And here I am not talking about within countries, rather on a global scale.) (And yes, Athiests and Agnostics are just as much religions as others, they simply have the faith that there is no God, they put their faith in Science. They also attempt to discredit Christianity just as much.)
Thank you to everyone who reads this post with an open mind, if you agree or not.
~God Bless,
Hanspeter
P.S. (This goes to everyone who is willing to argue their point of veiw. Not to be unkind, but could you please study Christianity or Intellegent Design before arguing agianst them?
I could respond to many of this posters statements because I have a working knowledge of other ways, and the fallicies within them. Many of the arguments I have seen point to the fact that they have never really looked at the other side of the issue. This would seem to me to indicate you are guilty of what I am accused, blindly following what others have said, without seeing all sides and formlation your own opinion.)
"But blessed are your eyes because they see, and your ears because they hear. For I tell you the truth, many prophets and rightous men longed to see what you see and did not see it, and to hear but did not hear it." (Matthew 13:16-17)
"You are the light of the world. A city on a hill cannot be hidden. Neither do people light a lamp and put it under a bowl. Instead they put it on its stand, and it gives light to everyone in the house. In the same way, let your light shine before men, that they may see your good deeds and praise your Father in heaven." (Matthew 5:14-16)
Edited, Mon Jul 18 12:22:04 2005 by Hanspeter