Forum Settings
       
Reply To Thread

Classroom of the future?Follow

#1 Jul 11 2005 at 2:22 PM Rating: Good
*****
18,463 posts
AP wrote:
Arizona School Will Not Use Textbooks

TUCSON, Ariz. - A high school in Vail will become the state's first all-wireless, all-laptop public school this fall. The 350 students at the school will not have traditional textbooks. Instead, they will use electronic and online articles as part of more traditional teacher lesson plans.

Vail Unified School District's decision to go with an all-electronic school is rare, experts say. Often, cost, insecurity, ignorance and institutional constraints prevent schools from making the leap away from paper.

"The efforts are very sporadic," said Mark Schneiderman, director of education policy for the Software and Information Industry Association. "A minority of communities are doing a good or very good job, but a large number are just not there on a number of levels."

Calvin Baker, superintendent of Vail Unified School District, said the move to electronic materials gets teachers away from the habit of simply marching through a textbook each year.

He noted that the AIMS test now makes the state standards the curriculum, not textbooks. Arizona students will soon need to pass Arizona's Instrument to Measure Standards to graduate from high school.

But the move to laptops is not cheap. The laptops cost $850 each, and the district will hand them to 350 students for the entire year. The fast-growing district hopes to have 750 students at the high school eventually.

A set of textbooks runs about $500 to $600, Baker said.

It's not clear how the change to laptops will work, he conceded.

"I'm sure there are going to be some adjustments. But we visited other schools using laptops. And at the schools with laptops, students were just more engaged than at non-laptop schools," he said.


I'm not sure how I feel about this. Maybe I'm just old-fashioned, but I liked reading an actual book vs. a series of printed-out articles. What will this do for the attention span? Will it affect children's eyesight?
#2 Jul 11 2005 at 2:24 PM Rating: Decent
Prodigal Son
******
20,643 posts
Yeah, everything you need to know you can learn from the intarweb and cable TV.
____________________________
publiusvarus wrote:
we all know liberals are well adjusted american citizens who only want what's best for society. While conservatives are evil money grubbing scum who only want to sh*t on the little man and rob the world of its resources.
#3 Jul 11 2005 at 2:36 PM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
I don't have much faith in it but I guess it's worth trying as an experiment if only to prove it's better to stick with books (or else to prove I'm wrong).

On one hand, it's obviously easier to "update" the information on a laptop than it is to buy a new set of textbooks. But books have the advantage of being more durable, less prone to theft and, while the cost of a set might be $600 per student, a student doesn't lose his or her entire set of textbooks. At worse they lose one and pay $40 to replace it instead of charging mom and dad $800. There's also more potential for abuse with laptops, possible questions of personal privacy, etc.

Besides which, most textbooks don't really go obsolete. English, mathmatics, biology, etc are all pretty much the same from a textbook standard as they were five or ten years ago. Advances in, say, biology can be cheaply covered via supplement or else just the teacher doing his or her job and teaching about the Human Genome Project or whatnot. Aside from history/social study textbooks, the printed page doesn't go obsolete as quickly as some would believe.

Again, I say "try it". But I don't think the printed page will stop being the standard any time soon.
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#4 Jul 11 2005 at 2:39 PM Rating: Default
I wonder how people felt about switching to books after using scrolls for so many years.
#5 Jul 11 2005 at 2:41 PM Rating: Decent
****
5,372 posts
When I were a kid, it were stone tablets and a chisel. Kids today don't know they are born!
#6 Jul 11 2005 at 2:54 PM Rating: Decent
Will swallow your soul
******
29,360 posts
Patrician wrote:
When I were a kid, it were stone tablets and a chisel. Kids today don't know they are born!


They don't?

When I was a kid it was all memorized! You learned how to recite your ancestry for 90 generations AND YOU LIKED IT!
____________________________
In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.

#7 Jul 11 2005 at 3:05 PM Rating: Good
****
6,730 posts
When I was a kid you grunted and hooted and if you didn't like it they threw poo at you.
#8 Jul 11 2005 at 3:16 PM Rating: Decent
****
4,632 posts
The students will have figured out how to baypass all web filters within a month. In my school, if you're found using a proxy, you lose your computer privileges. What happens when you're found goofing off during class-time?
#9 Jul 11 2005 at 3:20 PM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
Duchess SamiraX wrote:
When I was a kid it was all memorized! You learned how to recite your ancestry for 90 generations AND YOU LIKED IT!
Yeah. Like there were 90 generations to memorize when you were a kid. Smiley: rolleyes
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#10 Jul 11 2005 at 3:24 PM Rating: Good
Tracer Bullet
*****
12,636 posts
Jophiel wrote:
Duchess SamiraX wrote:
When I was a kid it was all memorized! You learned how to recite your ancestry for 90 generations AND YOU LIKED IT!
Yeah. Like there were 90 generations to memorize when you were a kid. Smiley: rolleyes

Well the first couple dozen were all protozoa and ameoba, but her grandfather was lovingly known as Ol' Chimpface.


#11 Jul 11 2005 at 3:33 PM Rating: Decent
Will swallow your soul
******
29,360 posts
Generations were shorter then. You young ones are spoiled to pieces with your 70-year lifespans. HMPH! Why, we got 16 good years if we were lucky!
____________________________
In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.

#12 Jul 11 2005 at 3:35 PM Rating: Decent
****
5,372 posts
Quote:
Why, we got 16 good years if we were lucky!


Sure felt like a long time, with nothing but a cardboard box to live in.
#13 Jul 11 2005 at 3:38 PM Rating: Decent
Will swallow your soul
******
29,360 posts
CARDBOARD? Why, you were living in the lap of luxury if you had CARDBOARD! We survived on moss and dirt, and we were glad to have it!
____________________________
In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.

#14 Jul 11 2005 at 3:40 PM Rating: Good
Drama Nerdvana
******
20,674 posts
Course the first couple arent hard to remember

SamiraIX
SamiraVIII
SamiraVII

etc.
____________________________
Bode - 100 Holy Paladin - Lightbringer
#15 Jul 11 2005 at 3:42 PM Rating: Decent
***
2,961 posts
Smiley: laugh Samira is Old Smiley: lol
#16 Jul 11 2005 at 4:04 PM Rating: Good
Ministry of Silly Cnuts
*****
19,524 posts
LUXURY!
____________________________
"I started out with nothin' and I still got most of it left" - Seasick Steve
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 269 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (269)