Setting oneself up to failFollow

Or, the course of true love never did run smooth.

Not much to say about this, except to note that her boyfriend's last name was Beaver. (If her husband had gone after him, would that make him a Beaver cleaver?)

Bah if you need more than 3 goes at it then you're in need of proper training.

Nah she would have just said he was hitting her and it would have been justifiable homicide because of self defence and bye bye mrs murderer you can go home now.

Equality is so tilted in the favour of the female these days it's not even funny, just ask any divorcee.

Fender is right ~_~ There were other options other than letting his wife sleep around- hell, he still could have pleased her in bed in many many ways- a man’s means of pleasuring a woman is not regulated on just the **** ~_~

If I let my wife sleep around instead of finding ulterior methods to please her, or fix my own problems so I could please her, and she went to another man that I was letting her ***** … I would stab myself 120 times.

Seriously though, there are a lot of mental issues that this man needed to deal with. Who willing lets their wife sleep around on them? The wife on the other hand has some issues herself. What sort of a wife asks to sleep with other men in order to keep a marriage moving? This is of course following the assumption that she initiated this instead of the husband.

I personally find both individuals to be rather sick and twisted.

Are you defending polygamy in the name of equality?

Well, at least he finally managed to poke her, even if he did use the wrong utensil.

...the hell?

Who said anything about polygamy?

The only thing I am "defending" is the position that 6 years for a crime like this is asinine and that the judge seemed to go out of his way to make excuses for an inexcusable crime.

Edited, Wed Jul 6 22:15:28 2005 by Ambrya

They are not FACTS, you are supposing what the judge would do. Ambrya told a story, then Tarv did the same, changing the gender does do squat. Neither are fact. You can say the judge would of hung a women in the guys case till you are blue in the face, but it still didnt happen. I cant understand how you can argue that one story is more accurate then another when neither are based on the facts.

So which one of those facts said that the judge would give the wife a harsher sentence. Here are the facts with the roles reversed. Husband and wife with pact for an open marriage. The husband decides to run off with the young girl, and the wife stabs him over 100 times. The judge then gives the wife a sentance for 6 years because they were sympathetic to her. Every thing Ambrya added to the story about the wife getting a harsher punishment is not fact.

Maybe you should follow your own advise and read what Ambrya wrote, and compare it to your list of facts, you will see she did not deal with facts in the comment.

I was pointing out the bit about the wife getting a harsher punishment was not fact. It is make believe, just like Tarv's defense for the wife. Two tales that make their own version based on the reverse of genders in a court case.

I never argued the sentence was fair, I said judges are getting too sympathetic instead or remaining neutral. But if you work on your reading comprehension you may learn to understand what I said.

Edited, Wed Jul 6 23:22:48 2005 by dirges

To attempt to do so would be a monumental mistake, seeing that here I tapped at my shiny black keyboard and you still missed my giant ********* of a point. Keep tapping your head on that wall, though. Eventually it'll dent and I'll concede.

Night-night.