dirges the Irrelevant wrote:
They are not FACTS, you are supposing what the judge would do. Ambrya told a story, then Tarv did the same, changing the gender does do squat. Neither are fact. You can say the judge would of hung a women in the guys case till you are blue in the face, but it still didnt happen.
One more time, for those of you in the tall hats.
The "facts" are the circumstances surrounding the event. What happened. Knife in, knife out. Husband and wife. Pact for an open marriage. Intent to run off with lover. Got it?
Not fact=abusive relationship, anything to do with judges. I never even touched on the judge. As we've said before and often, reading comprehension is your friend, although maybe it's time you try to make out with it. I don't think you're close enough.
Quote:
I cant understand how you can argue that one story is more accurate then another when neither are based on the facts.
I pointed out to Tarv that Ambrya was dealing with the facts (she was, even if the genders were switched), while Tarv was making up a fake abuse scenario where the woman gets off with some artful tears.
I saved this gem for last:
The Times article you didn't bother to read wrote:
Willsher was sentenced yesterday to six years imprisonment after a judge at Plymouth Crown Court accepted his plea of guilty to manslaughter on the ground of diminished responsibility.
Pretty pointless to argue against the accuracy of something that already happened, isn't it?
Or maybe you wouldn't know.