BreedingFollow

Um... While I suppose it's theoretically possible for a child born of two people with AIDs to live long enough to get married and have a child as well, that's extremly improbable.

The absolute reality from the Catholic Church's perspective is that if people stopped having pre-martital and extra-marital sex, the AIDs epedemic simply would not exist. Thus, their "rules" are absolutely correct in this case, if only the rest of the world would follow them. It's kinda hard to argue against that (unless you're a hedonist like me).




The former isn't really needed though. AIDs is already terminal. No need to kill the people. God's doing that already, right?

And that "law" already exists as far as the Church is concerned. It's not their fault that most of the rest of the world chooses not to follow it.

like the one you started with?



I'm not saying you have to state all sides of the argument, i'm saying acknowldge that their gonna exist if you're going to focus an entire post on just one.

Am I a catholic? That holds no sway in the conversation, whatever my motives for posting that i disagree with you, i disagree with you, and that's what we're talking about. I'm stating the view of a catholic, if i'm a catholic or not.

Apart from all of this, you've done very well to completely sidestep my challenge, not answer me or SHUT THE FU[i][/i]CK UP.

Well Drac my last post wasn't an argument or even a perosnal attack disguised as an argument (as yours was). Mine was just a personal attack on you for being such an ******* in your post for no reason.

As for "sidestepping your challenge," your post really didn't seem like a challenge that would elicit some sort of argument from me. Maybe this statement confused me:

Telling someone not to respond to you really doesn't seem like an effective way to go about challenging someone... unless you were just challenging me to defy you by posting after you told me not to. In that case I did post again so that quasi-challenge was not "sidestepped."

Like I said, that last post was just a suggestion about making an argument (just like how you gave me advice with that list other points of view nonsense) and informing you that you're an *******...if you weren't already aware of it. If you can't read someone else's point of view without flipping out then maybe you best just avoid forums in general because that can't be good for your health. If you encompased your point of view with some kind of intelligent response that wasn't just a flame then maybe you would've gotten a counter-argument. But we both know that you didn't want an argument, you just wanted to bash me...nice job.

Just a small point. Don't know if it's been mentioned or not, or if it matters or not. AID's a bloodborne disease. Doesn't need sex for transmission.

I don't know, AIDs is spread in more way than sexual means, which is why I said exterminate everyone with AIDs..and probably HIV too. It may be terminal, but quite a amount of people have gotten AIDs by using needles, and stuff...

Sterile people can still have sex and still give each other diseases. They can also shoot up with dirty needles or get bad blood transfusions. So, while they're not reproducting anymore, they're still spreading.

Wow! So you're suggesting AID's is a man-made virus, secretly released on a poverty stricken society as a means or population control.




Edited, Sat Mar 5 10:10:03 2005 by Elinda

Everytime I contract AIDs I just rape a virgin, and.....POOF!

Clean weiner.