Forum Settings
       
« Previous 1 2 3
Reply To Thread

Booty-CallageFollow

#1 Feb 21 2005 at 3:02 PM Rating: Excellent
*****
18,463 posts
Following in our recent trend, I have a question about a standard practice that I don't have a lot of experience with. Apparently some single gals I know have told me that they have a special someone, either an ex or a friend but sometimes even a barely-known acquaintance, that they use for the purposes of no-strings-attached sex.

I personally can't countenance the stranger bit, but the rest seems like it would eventually spin out of control as well. Anybody have any interesting stories to share? Are you able to carry on this kind of thing long-term? I tend to advise them, since I think that emotions will overrule practicality on one side or another, and eventually make a mess of things.
#2 Feb 21 2005 at 3:04 PM Rating: Excellent
Gurue
*****
16,299 posts
When I was single, the idea of a sex buddy always sounded good on paper. But in practice, I'd find out I didn't like the guy well enough to even have meaningless sex with him, or I liked him too much to be casual about it.

So I settled for bad relationships and broken hearts instead Smiley: grin

not counting my hubby, though
#3 Feb 21 2005 at 3:04 PM Rating: Excellent
Tracer Bullet
*****
12,636 posts

There was a long thread about a similar topic a few months ago, in which the OP stated that she was pretty sure that everybody has had Friends With Benefits at some point. An assertion that baffled me, anyway.



#4 Feb 21 2005 at 3:07 PM Rating: Excellent
*****
18,463 posts
I'm with Nadenu. I've given decent guys shots and turned down some asses, but I can't really think that anyone would just make themselves available that way, especially with the threat of illnesses and no real commitment to monogamy.
#5 Feb 21 2005 at 3:09 PM Rating: Excellent
Tracer Bullet
*****
12,636 posts

I'd give it a shot (what guy wouldn't), but I'm positive I'd become desperately clingy and emotionally attached within a few weeks.



#6 Feb 21 2005 at 3:11 PM Rating: Excellent
*****
18,463 posts
trickybeck the Sly wrote:

I'd give it a shot (what guy wouldn't)

What guy indeed. Has any woman (or gay man, for that matter) that solicited this ever been turned down, I wonder?
#7 Feb 21 2005 at 3:12 PM Rating: Good
****
8,747 posts
Its my assertion that while people can become quite fond of one another without sex, that its ultimately sex that leads to love.

That being said, there is no such thing as casual sex. While you may THINK there is, its a trigger for the heart to get more involved than it should.

I only ever had one booty call/friend with benefits and it was incredibly short lived. Due mostly to the fact I fancied myself in love with his roommate...

edited due to an annoying tendancy to repeat myself.

Edited, Mon Feb 21 15:13:08 2005 by sheebasaurusrex
#8 Feb 21 2005 at 3:17 PM Rating: Good
Official Shrubbery Waterer
*****
14,659 posts
I haven't personally tried this, but a good friend of mine broke up with his girlfriend of almost a year and decided to stay "friends with benefits". I advised him against it; all that leads to is even more pain and suffering in the end.

Turns out I was right. One of my ex's wanted to try it, and drawing on my friend's experiences, I said no (not before some goodbye sex though).

Twiztid
____________________________
Jophiel wrote:
I managed to be both retarded and entertaining.

#9 Feb 21 2005 at 3:20 PM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
Tried it once with an ex. I could write a series of books about how that was a bad idea.
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#11 Feb 21 2005 at 3:22 PM Rating: Excellent
Drama Nerdvana
******
20,674 posts
Very bad idea.
____________________________
Bode - 100 Holy Paladin - Lightbringer
#12 Feb 21 2005 at 3:22 PM Rating: Decent
****
7,861 posts
While I say I'm all for it, deep down I know it's a bad idea, and would never actually be able to practice it.
____________________________
People don't like to be meddled with. We tell them what to do, what to think, don't run, don't walk. We're in their homes and in their heads and we haven't the right. We're meddlesome. ~River Tam

Sedao
#13 Feb 21 2005 at 3:27 PM Rating: Decent
I've had great success with my "chew-toys" A basic understanding of each othrs needs and goals is a must. This is why I recommend having friends with benefits with a close friend of a close friend. That way if it goes to **** you will have an arbiter in the situation. Although, now that I have a "true love" I haven't gone to the old chewtoy. But we're still friends and nothing awkward has reared its head.
#14 Feb 21 2005 at 3:37 PM Rating: Excellent
*****
18,463 posts
Warlord Lefein wrote:
But we're still friends and nothing awkward has reared its head.

Fascinating. Some people may just have the right wiring for it, I suppose.

Only sex I ever had with an ex was shortly post-breakup, and awkward as all get-out. When you're contemplating the viability of jumping out of the window in the course of the act, you know it's just wrong. Smiley: disappointed
#15 Feb 21 2005 at 4:05 PM Rating: Decent
Yeah this was a girl I dated in highschool and I was her rebound. I knew and and she knew it at the time which I guess made it that much better. Ever since then whenever me and her seemed single we just did it like that. Seeing as how we had a mutual friend *I* being the guy in the situation and morei nclined to boneheadedness had an actual reason to treat her with respect and she had that confort zone. As far as im concerned I've never really treated any girl I slept with badly, but I know girls tend to be a bit insecure about that aspect of the whole "casual sex" thing... Which was avoided in this case.
#17 Feb 21 2005 at 4:44 PM Rating: Decent
Whenever Ive had sex with my "chewtoy" it has been absolutely amazing because we've been friends for so long. Of course the same is even more true with my current girlfriend because we've been friends for almost five years now and have been close since day 1. I think we're foolish to have sex or put romantic interest in people we dont really know. We simply superimpose all the things we want out of a relationship on someone we dont know so all they can do is ***** things up from there. But with a friend you know what they are about and they know what you are about. Its a much much more intimate experience whether romance is involved or not.

This is the main reason why I advocate the whole "friends with benefits" thing.
#18 Feb 21 2005 at 4:56 PM Rating: Good
I've tried this twice with no real success. Once, I got in too deep. The other time she did.

About the only good thing I can say is that it was a lot easier to break off in both cases cause I already knew it wasn't what I wanted.

Jerkin off ain't a bad thing. I only have to buy dinner for one, my hand never has a headache, no arguments, no rag, ahh hell, bbl.
#19 Feb 21 2005 at 5:08 PM Rating: Excellent
*****
18,463 posts
TStephens wrote:
Jerkin off ain't a bad thing. I only have to buy dinner for one, my hand never has a headache, no arguments, no rag, ahh hell, bbl.

You sweet-talker. Smiley: laugh
#20 Feb 21 2005 at 5:08 PM Rating: Decent
Prodigal Son
******
20,643 posts
Woe is me, i kept thinking thi thread was called "Booty-Collage", as in a picture comprised of images of booty.
____________________________
publiusvarus wrote:
we all know liberals are well adjusted american citizens who only want what's best for society. While conservatives are evil money grubbing scum who only want to sh*t on the little man and rob the world of its resources.
#21 Feb 21 2005 at 5:10 PM Rating: Decent
And on a side note, she told me I rocked her like a Slipknot vs. Metallica concert.
#22 Feb 21 2005 at 5:12 PM Rating: Excellent
*****
18,463 posts
Debalic wrote:
Woe is me, i kept thinking thi thread was called "Booty-Collage", as in a picture comprised of images of booty.
Get proactive.
#23 Feb 21 2005 at 5:12 PM Rating: Excellent
*****
18,463 posts
Warlord Lefein wrote:
And on a side note, she told me I rocked her like a Slipknot vs. Metallica concert.
Noisily, in a way that would affect her future hearing?
#24 Feb 21 2005 at 5:13 PM Rating: Decent
Princess Atomicflea wrote:
Debalic wrote:
Woe is me, i kept thinking thi thread was called "Booty-Collage", as in a picture comprised of images of booty.
Get proactive.


Roflcopter
#25 Feb 21 2005 at 5:14 PM Rating: Good
****
5,311 posts
It can be done, but you both have to be on the same wavelength of expectations. If either one of the people has a crush on the other, it's not going to work.

If you have a casual friend (a friendly acquaintance is better than an actual friend) whose company you enjoy, find attractive, but have no real interest in having as your "one and only" then you may have a recipe for success. The biggest restriction is that I don't know that people can have the same playmate for any length of time without at least one of the parties getting emotionally attached.

All things being equal, ************ is easier and leads to less complications.
#26 Feb 21 2005 at 5:16 PM Rating: Excellent
Tracer Bullet
*****
12,636 posts

Booty Collage!

A

B

C

D

E

F

G



Edited, Mon Feb 21 17:19:57 2005 by trickybeck
« Previous 1 2 3
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 232 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (232)