Forum Settings
       
« Previous 1 2 3
Reply To Thread

Cut or Uncut?Follow

#1 Feb 14 2005 at 4:35 PM Rating: Default
I've had sex with circumcised and uncircumcised men and in my humble opinion, I believe sex with an uncircumcised man is much better.

My first boyfriend was circumcised and the sex was great, but there was more friction and dry spells than with the uncircumcised men I've been with. I have more orgasms with the uncircumcised men and it just plain feels better in my expirience.

I've heard uncircumcised men feel up to 30% more than circumcised men, so it's not just me who's feeling more pleasure^^

I guess I was just wondering if any of the ladies out there agree with me, or what they think about uncircumcised vs. circumcised.
#2 Feb 14 2005 at 4:47 PM Rating: Good
Drama Nerdvana
******
20,674 posts
Whats your take on female genital mutilation though?

Cultural practice that is a right of womenhood that defines a people

OR

fighting the good fight againt the myth of the female ******?
____________________________
Bode - 100 Holy Paladin - Lightbringer
#3 Feb 14 2005 at 4:53 PM Rating: Good
Most women like their men mouth-cut.
#4 Feb 14 2005 at 4:56 PM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
Just for the hell of it: Previous thread about circumcison.
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#5 Feb 14 2005 at 5:35 PM Rating: Good
*****
18,463 posts
^Bookmarked it.


Eh, I can't think it makes that much of a difference. What matters to me at the end of the day is that whoever it is isn't sloppy, and somewhat experienced. I'm not gonna begrudge a guy some ******** if it makes it better for him.
#6 Feb 14 2005 at 5:37 PM Rating: Decent
I have never seen an uncircumsized ***** so I do not know.
#7 Feb 14 2005 at 5:41 PM Rating: Good
Tracer Bullet
*****
12,636 posts
The Glorious Mlynn wrote:
I have never seen an uncircumsized ***** so I do not know.

You're on the internet, take some initiative.


#8 Feb 14 2005 at 5:45 PM Rating: Decent
Quote:
The Glorious Mlynn wrote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I have never seen an uncircumsized ***** so I do not know.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


You're on the internet, take some initiative.



No, it isn't a matter of "initiative". If I wanted to see one, Id'e look it up. I really don't care either way. If I am ever with a guy who is uncircumsized, I can look at it then.


#9 Feb 14 2005 at 5:46 PM Rating: Good
Gurue
*****
16,299 posts
Female mutilation absolutely makes me sick. I feel sorry for those women, even the women who advocate it, because they don't know any better.

And as for the sex with a woman who's had that done to her.. what man truly wants a woman for whom sex is very painful? Do men really want a woman who's just going to lay there, possibly crying until it's over, or do you want a woman who's as into it as your are, possibly more into it?

Circumsized men still enjoy sex.
#10 Feb 14 2005 at 5:51 PM Rating: Good
Tracer Bullet
*****
12,636 posts
Quote:
And as for the sex with a woman who's had that done to her.. what man truly wants a woman for whom sex is very painful? Do men really want a woman who's just going to lay there, possibly crying until it's over

Lots of men get off on power. Hence 75% of **** revolves around causing pain or embarassment to the women.


#11 Feb 14 2005 at 5:56 PM Rating: Default


I recall several orgasms in my bedroom last night so I think my circumcised co[b][/b]ck is doing the trick.
#12 Feb 14 2005 at 5:56 PM Rating: Excellent
Will swallow your soul
******
29,360 posts
The Glorious Mlynn wrote:
I have never seen an uncircumsized ***** so I do not know.


They look kinda cute, like they're wearing turtlenecks.
____________________________
In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.

#13 Feb 14 2005 at 5:57 PM Rating: Good
Gurue
*****
16,299 posts
@ tricky

That's true, but there are still a lot of men out there who really do want to please a woman and have her wriggling around, moaning, screaming, yadda, yadda, yadda.

I have always thought that the men in the countries who accept mutilated women have some serious issues. I'd sure like to get a hold of one of them and show him my knife.

Edited, Mon Feb 14 17:59:51 2005 by Nadenu
#14 Feb 14 2005 at 5:59 PM Rating: Decent
To quote the Army: "Be all that you can be."

If I was more sensitive I'd come sooner. I wouldnt want my SO to be subjugated to any less than the best, most long lasting sex I could give her.. And busting a nut feels damn good, so I dont think Im missing much.

Yours Truly,
A member of Team Kosher
#15 Feb 14 2005 at 6:05 PM Rating: Decent
Quote:
Lots of men get off on power. Hence 75% of **** revolves around causing pain or embarassment to the women.


*clap*
Well put! Unfortunatly this is so true. Women (atleast women who arent stupid...) should be loved and embrassed, not sexualized and dehumanized. You'd think people would be moving forward in this subject, you know, treating women like humans, but to me it seems like women are the only one's who's civil rights are going backwards. I hope one day this will change.

Back to this subject...

I'm not saying circumcised men cant be good in bed, I'm just saying in my expirience, I've enjoyed sex better with an uncircumcised man and vise-versa.
#16 Feb 14 2005 at 6:06 PM Rating: Decent
Aliisza wrote:
Quote:
Lots of men get off on power. Hence 75% of **** revolves around causing pain or embarassment to the women.


*clap*
Well put! Unfortunatly this is so true. Women (atleast women who arent stupid...) should be loved and embrassed, not sexualized and dehumanized. You'd think people would be moving forward in this subject, you know, treating women like humans, but to me it seems like women are the only one's who's civil rights are going backwards. I hope one day this will change.

Back to this subject...

I'm not saying circumcised men cant be good in bed, I'm just saying in my expirience, I've enjoyed sex better with an uncircumcised man and vise-versa.


But your opinion doesnt count, cuz you're a woman. Now, go cook me something!
#17 Feb 14 2005 at 6:10 PM Rating: Default
Oh and...

Quote:
If I was more sensitive I'd come sooner. I wouldnt want my SO to be subjugated to any less than the best, most long lasting sex I could give her.. And busting a nut feels damn good, so I dont think Im missing much.


My husband, who is uncircumcised, lasts hours if he wants to. I think all men, cut and uncut, have the ability to last a long time. Just takes some willpower. And if you're going to last for a long time, why not have 30% pleasure before the ******? Just a thought.

But your opinion doesnt count, cuz you're a woman. Now, go cook me something!


Quote:
But your opinion doesnt count, cuz you're a woman. Now, go cook me something!


LOL, yes dear...

Edited, Mon Feb 14 18:13:20 2005 by Aliisza
#18 Feb 14 2005 at 6:10 PM Rating: Good
*****
18,463 posts
Mistress Nadenu wrote:
Female mutilation absolutely makes me sick. I feel sorry for those women, even the women who advocate it, because they don't know any better.

And as for the sex with a woman who's had that done to her.. what man truly wants a woman for whom sex is very painful? Do men really want a woman who's just going to lay there, possibly crying until it's over, or do you want a woman who's as into it as your are, possibly more into it?

Circumsized men still enjoy sex.


Women who advocate female genital mutilation do so for pretty much the same reason men advocate circumcision. They are socialized to think it's cleaner and more aesthetically pleasing, and they had it done, so what's the big deal???

And men in these cultures would rather intercourse be painful for their women, as it is thought that it keeps them faithful.
#19 Feb 14 2005 at 6:17 PM Rating: Decent
There are two types of female circumcision. One of which is the highly touted but rarer fibulation (sp) which I agree is quite disturbing. Then again, women in america take health risks on making their boobs bigger and whatnot. We as a society really can't judge in that respect. Unless you are universalist in your approach and can hold your own culture as culpable as you can judge any other culture.

The other form of circumcision requires the trimming of the clitoral hood. I know of one lady who claimed it made no difference in the enjoyment of sex.

That being said, I kinda like it when a girl has a "meatier" *****. It makes it far easier to part the "lips" and perform oral as well as fingering. In my personal experience, girls who have more pronounced extremities tend to stay moist longer and enjoy sex more. To me its far more important that the woman gets hers than I get mine. If a girl cant come its not even considered perplexing. A guy who cant get off is a medical condition.
#20 Feb 14 2005 at 6:23 PM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
Quote:
And if you're going to last for a long time, why not have 30% pleasure before the ******?
You're going to need an unbiased medical cite before that's even an argument. Sexual experience and pleasue varies greatly from encounter to encounter -- I fail to see how you're going to quantify it from person to person.
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#21 Feb 14 2005 at 6:30 PM Rating: Good
Gurue
*****
16,299 posts
Princess Atomicflea wrote:
And men in these cultures would rather intercourse be painful for their women, as it is thought that it keeps them faithful.


I know, and that's what gets me. The men are free to cheat and run wild, but if the woman strays... HARLOT!

Yes, I realize this double standard is in place in more than just Middle Eastern and African nations, but here we don't try to pretend that if the woman can't enjoy sex, the marriage is safe.

I've not read up on this much, because it physically makes me ill, but from what I have heard, they take a girl who's about 9 or so and with no drugs of any kind, saw off her labia and ********. And it's usually female members of her family that are holding her down through this process.

Like I said, I've not read as much on this as maybe I should, so I could be totally wrong about the above description.
#22 Feb 14 2005 at 6:34 PM Rating: Decent
It is very rare for the actual ******** (entire thing) to be cut off. The more prevalent circumcision is for the hood to be trimmed.

The "sowing up" is actually far more grusome. They will take a girl who is only a few months old and sow her vaginal opening closed. Since the child is still developing there are instances where the young tissue actually grows TOGETHER and the husband would literally rip her open upon first intercourse.

Thats the sick shi[/u]t that no doubt will make a few of you wretch (I was quite discomforted when I learned of this)

Also, sometimes the opening left isnt large enough to properly deal with the flow of a period. Some cases of the vaginal opening being blocked up and causing infection have been documented.

Edited, Mon Feb 14 18:35:21 2005 by Lefein

Edited, Mon Feb 14 19:14:25 2005 by Lefein
#23 Feb 14 2005 at 6:36 PM Rating: Good
Gurue
*****
16,299 posts
And the way the women are totally brainwashed into believing this is right, and if they don't do it, they will bring disgrace to their families.

Smiley: mad
#25 Feb 14 2005 at 6:40 PM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
That'd be "fundamentalist Jewish". It's clear in Acts that circumcision is not a requirement for being a Christian. These days male circumcision in the US is done mainly for tradition and somewhat for medical purposes. The extent of the medical benefits are debated but most physicians take the opinion that, while it probably won't save your life to have it done, neither will it detract from your life.
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#26 Feb 14 2005 at 6:41 PM Rating: Decent
Mistress Nadenu wrote:
And the way the women are totally brainwashed into believing this is right, and if they don't do it, they will bring disgrace to their families.
Smiley: mad


No different than women in our country paying large sums of money to impose an unnatural image of beauty upon not only men, but also young women as well. They risk all kinds of infection and anaesthetic complications to enlarge their boobs/***/etc and don't even think about the twelve year old girl they pass on the street whom they have affected with their unrealistic image of feminine beauty.

Again, we may not agree with it, but we should probably deal with our own societal woes before worrying about others. To a Tanzanian woman, the idea of breast implants is completely reprehensible.

And the money could feed her family for a year or send a child to college.

Edited, Mon Feb 14 18:44:23 2005 by Lefein
« Previous 1 2 3
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 188 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (188)