Quote:
I propose the following: That counteracting anyone's argument against the quality/sense/construction of your posts with an attack on their spelling, grammar or typos is an automatic loss of the argument.
That's the motion. Ayes or Nays. Edits accepted.
I find attack a persons lack of spelling and grammar to be an excellent way of cutting them down and winning an argument.
The whole point of a flame or arguement is not to win the battle through the use of intelligent, constructive point making and putting forth the truth of the mater, so the majority agrees with you.
The way to win is to make the other person look/seem dumber than you.
I'm happy to skim over and ignore minor spelling mistakes and grammar mistakes, we all make them, but when some deadsh
it comes here (or any forum) and posts, using very lazy english, leet speak or writes a novel sized post, without a single paragraph, so it's one large chuck of writing, then I'm going to most likely attack them over it.
I personally think that making a decent attempt at spelling and grammar in your post (whatever the forum), shows a little bit of respect for yourself and for the people you hope will read what you have to say.
I normally look at a badly written post and think: "It's just not worth my time to read."
If you have something you think is worth posting, then take the extra few minutes and make it worth my time to read.
I say "Nay"
edit: because I always spell it "Grammer"...
Edited, Sat Feb 5 02:27:52 2005 by lagduff