Forum Settings
       
Reply To Thread

a question to those alive during the vietnam draftFollow

#27 Jan 27 2005 at 1:43 AM Rating: Good
***
1,847 posts
Angry Hippo wrote:

http://www.erowid.org for all your drug related info.


Awesome site, btw. I use it constantly as a resource when I write papers for classes.. the citations come in incredibly useful.

As for using clean-pee site as a reference, the material they had elsewhere wasn't important.. the chart of durations for drug metabolites to be detected on the other hand, was. And if you were intelligent enough to read the caption, it said "Information cited from NIDA."

NIDA = The National institute of drug abuse, part of NIH, the national institute of health.

So, yes, I used a clean **** page as a reference. Namely so that people who didn't know better could have a nice clean chart to look at instead of digging around NIDA's website for hours (because it's set up like a labrynth... potentially because it's one of the only little-propaganda-ized government sites out there).

But, I think a lot of you don't understand how urinalysis works. When you use a drug, it is metabolized by your body through a series of chemical reactions. When you pee afterwards, there aren't going to be bits and pieces of LSD, or marijuana pouring out with it. What will come out are the metabolites.. that is, the byproducts of the chemical reactions your body has. These are what are measured by urine tests. However for most drugs they leave the body fairly rapidly... which is why urine tests aren't too hard to beat. Even a full spectrum thingamajig. It doesn't matter how sophisticated the test is... if the metabolites are gone, then they're gone. Plain and simple.

As for flashbacks being purely psychological, that is possible. However there are cases of it not having any clear base other than prior exposure to a hallucinogen. Erowid lists the prerequisites, and the rarity however in their LSD section.

Sorry also about posting about the spinal tap thing.. I should've checked my sources first. My bad for not confirming an urband legend, lol.
#28 Jan 27 2005 at 2:29 AM Rating: Decent
***
1,463 posts
There will be no draft. It's a third-rail issue. Do you know what that means? What is the third rail? It's the one that carries the juice on the subway tracks. Touch it and you die. Get it? Touch it and you die - if a politician touches this issue (except to say he's against it), he dies.

The only way for the draft to return would be if a major war developed and if our national security were *really* threatened. Not this current situation.

Sleep well, my little peaceniks.

(I remember as a kid realizing I was going to be drafted. Vietnam had been raging forever and seemed like it would never end. It was scary as crap for me, because I'd been watching the news and knew the Vietnam War wasn't going well. I remembered realizing there was no way I could shame myself and my family and evade it, run away, dodge, whatever. As it turned out the war ended while I was still a kid... but I'll never forget that feeling - that it was inevitable that I would go)

(edit - as one of the above posters said, you are statistically far more likely to end up being drafted and sent off to a major foreign war under a democrat - WW1, Wilson; WW2, FDR; Korea, Truman; Vietnam, Johnson - all Dems. Forgot who was Pres for the Spanish American War, but I think it was a Republican. But was that a "major" war? And were draftees sent to it? I don't really think so. As much as you may hate Bush, it's something to think about)

Edited, Thu Jan 27 02:33:28 2005 by EvilGnomes
#29 Jan 27 2005 at 2:44 AM Rating: Decent
****
7,486 posts
your body eliminates every trace of LSD in the body within 4 days (probably fewer than 2). if there the chemical is nowhere to be found how could it possibly be responsible for flashbacks? that being the case the *must* be psychological.


i realize it is unlikely there will be a draft. my question was purely out of curiosity because i asked my parents (both of which were alive during vietnam (born in 1949), my dad, fortunately, had a very high draft number and was never called in) and they said they never heard of anyone saying they were gay to get out of going to vietnam.
#30 Jan 27 2005 at 4:54 AM Rating: Decent
***
1,463 posts
Oh, okay. I was a little kid back then - most people think I'm crazy or lying about realizing that about the war. But even as a kid I watched the news w/ my mom... I wasn't dumb. And it was scary. It was a botched war on the part of our President. Lyndon Johnson totally screwed it up - the very idea of going in to fight a defensive war... I'll stop. Either fight a war right or don't fight it. If you're worried about the Chinese stopping you from fighting it "right", well... yer gonna lose. That's the hard lesson from that war, or a hyper-simplified version of it. God help those who had their lives ruined by it. I admire anyone who had the guts, drafted or volunteer, to go to it.

LSD may leave traces in your body. I know other drugs do. And for quite a long time, too. Guess where?
#32 Jan 27 2005 at 9:01 AM Rating: Decent
****
7,486 posts
"LSD may leave traces in your body. I know other drugs do. And for quite a long time, too. Guess where?"

bulls[b][/b]hit. prove it. despite having someone say something that contradicts your statement completely (a statement, which, by the way, you arent even sure of) you still find it neccessary to post it?

if someone is saying 2 + 2 = 4 and is damn sure of it would it make any sense to say "2 + 2 may = 5, but im not certain."?

after 4 days (and almost always much less) you will never be able to tell someone has dropped acid. ever. even if they have taken it 100 times you wont be able to tell. there is no way, at all.

as i said, it is generally accepted in the scientific community that flashbacks are purely psychological and there is very little (and perhaps no) evidence to the contrary.
#33 Jan 27 2005 at 9:29 AM Rating: Good
***
1,847 posts
Angry Hippo wrote:
your body eliminates every trace of LSD in the body within 4 days (probably fewer than 2). if there the chemical is nowhere to be found how could it possibly be responsible for flashbacks? that being the case the *must* be psychological.


Not entirely.. most hallucinogens temporarily modify brain chemistry beyond their effectiveness. That's why many users feel slightly different after using one.. you feel almost like a new person.

That one is speaking from experience, and the encyclopedia of psychoactives.
#34 Jan 27 2005 at 12:42 PM Rating: Default
EvilGnomes wrote:
The only way for the draft to return would be if a major war developed and if our national security were *really* threatened. Not this current situation.
Yea, I wouldn't worry about it too much. It would take a war with Iran to....oh wait....crap. Yea there will probably be a draft in the next 1-2 years.
#35 Jan 27 2005 at 12:48 PM Rating: Default
Redyne wrote:
Sounds like the only real loophole would be an illness, or a disability.
This can work. It will make it the first time you are thankful for your hunchback or your depression. Start seeing a psychiatrist now! Then all you have to do is get a note, kind of like how you needed one to skip school as a kid.
#36 Jan 27 2005 at 9:27 PM Rating: Default
I was just going to mention that during the "ceremony" there is no "stepping forward." At least, not in the past decade when I started doing it, and have repeated several times since. Now, it's pretty much "raise your right hand, and repeat after me." Once that's complete you are in the military. You can sign a contract, but until the "oath-giver" (a commisioned officer) signs off on your contract, it's just trash-can filler. After the oath, it is legally binding.

However, another thing caught my eye. Hippo mentioned if the US was ever under a "credible" attack, he would join. I guess several thousand people dying on 9-11 wasn't the result of a credible attack? And yes, while many may disagree with the war in Iraq, we still have troops on the Afghan-Pakistani border looking for bin Laden. So, either, you're ready to go sign up and look for him, or were the attacks of 9-11 not credible enough for you?

#38 Jan 27 2005 at 9:35 PM Rating: Default
Ok.....

Could we get a little more insight to the obviously superior workings of your mind? I mean, I understand that "No it wasn't" should be the definitive answer on the subject, but how about some facts, or heck even some opinions?
#39 Jan 27 2005 at 9:40 PM Rating: Excellent
Mistress of Gardening
Avatar
*****
14,661 posts
Sorry to shove some humor in, but I remember in high school my boyfriend dragged me to In The Army Now cause he for some odd reason he thought Pauly Shore was hilarious. There was this one scene when the two friends told the recruiter they were gay, therefore they should get kicked out. I think the guy told them to prove it by kissing each other and they couldn't do it. Smiley: lol
____________________________
Yum-Yum Bento Box | Pikko Pots | Adventures in Bentomaking

Twitter


[ffxivsig]277809[/ffxivsig]
#41 Jan 27 2005 at 9:48 PM Rating: Good
jumpr wrote:
However, another thing caught my eye. Hippo mentioned if the US was ever under a "credible" attack, he would join. I guess several thousand people dying on 9-11 wasn't the result of a credible attack? And yes, while many may disagree with the war in Iraq, we still have troops on the Afghan-Pakistani border looking for bin Laden. So, either, you're ready to go sign up and look for him, or were the attacks of 9-11 not credible enough for you?


I agree 9/11 was a credible attack. But the enemy who orchestrated it is as you say, in Afghanistan. It's al qaeda and bin Laden. It was never Hussein or Iraq. I can sure understand Angry Hippo's reluctance to join, as we have 150,000 troops in Iraq for no protective reason. And AFAIK you sure can't decide where you're going to serve--the military decides that for you.

Besides, the BA may attack some other country soon. Iran, Syria, maybe even Micronesia or Canada or something. As I'm sure there are plenty who signed up for a good cause who regret being placed in Iraq, it's a good reason not to sign up today, for the risk of a ridiuculous war tomorrow.

As for the draft, if we attack Iran with an intent to occupy it we'll have either have a draft or we'll pull every soldier and national guardsman in the world into the Middle East. And we may attack Iran with the intent to occupy--never should the intelligence of the Bush Administration be overestimated.
#42 Jan 27 2005 at 9:54 PM Rating: Decent
Just because people have died elsewhere? That takes it out of the credible attack category? Geez. Open your bedroom door when you're using glue and painting those models, buddy.

In my opinion, what makes it a credible attack is that an a political group outside our own borders did something that created the death of citizens within our borders. I think that's pretty cut and dry, however, if you don't think think that meets the definition of attack, then I'd sure like to see your definition. As far as it being credible, I know a few people from New York who weren't that far away when it happened, and they seem pretty sure that it did in fact happen. They're pretty sure that the twin towers aren't there anymore either.

I'm beginning to think you're just trying to yank my chain. Either that, or your childhood home had lead-based paint, and you sure like paint chips.
#44 Jan 27 2005 at 10:05 PM Rating: Decent
****
4,512 posts
proofsock wrote:
Quote:
Ok.....

Could we get a little more insight to the obviously superior workings of your mind? I mean, I understand that "No it wasn't" should be the definitive answer on the subject, but how about some facts, or heck even some opinions?


People die all the time, 9-11 wasnt special just because it happened in america


Well sh[b][/b]it. I guess it's perfectly ok for us to fire nuclear missles at any country. People die all the time!
#45 Jan 27 2005 at 10:09 PM Rating: Decent
Sorry for the double posting, but people keep posting before I'm done with one post.

I wouldn't blame AH for not joining because he doesn't believe in the war in Iraq. I'm just saying that he said he would join if he thought there were a credible attack against the US. There already was, therefore, what he said was in all reality, him puffing up his chest and saying something without thinking. If he really meant it, he'd be asking people what military job would give him the best opportunity to destroy the people who commited such an act, not whether or not saying he's a pole-smoker would get him out of a draft.

I don't think the military is right for some people, even during a war. Many of them would be nothing more than a hindrance to the rest of the military. Currently, the US military is plagued with enough dead-weight who have mistaken it for the camoflauge welfare system.

AH obviously doesn't have an ounce of a warrior ethos in him, and I don't think Ares himself could instill it in him. I think it's ludicrous that he would sit there and posture about what he would do if this and that happened, when IT has already happened, yet, he's still posturing. My whole point with my original post mentioning him joining was that his conditions for joining had already been met, but I don't hear him bragging about his new spiffy uniform. In other words, put up or shut up being directed at him. I could honestly care less whether he joined the military, and I honestly believe the military is better without him, however, he shouldn't posture about doing something he never would do unless forced to do.
#47 Jan 27 2005 at 10:17 PM Rating: Decent
I'm not promoting/condemning the war in Iraq. You can call it a war for oil all you want, however, I'm waiting to see what happens with the "food for oil" investigation to get completed before I decide who did what for oil. It seems that the most adamant opponents of the war (country-wise) might in fact have dirt (or oil) on their hands.

But, once again, the whole point of my original post was missed.


Edited, Thu Jan 27 22:27:36 2005 by jumpr
#48 Jan 27 2005 at 10:19 PM Rating: Decent
****
4,512 posts
What post? Where?

For the idiots: disregard this. It was a misunderstanding.

Edited, Thu Jan 27 23:42:32 2005 by CBD
#49 Jan 27 2005 at 10:22 PM Rating: Decent
Imaginary Friend
*****
16,112 posts
Just say you're Bi-polar. They won't give you a gun.
____________________________
With the receiver in my hand..
#50 Jan 27 2005 at 10:29 PM Rating: Decent
My bad, CBD. I was trying to do too many things at once, and I misread what you'd posted. You can kick me in the jimmy later.
#51 Jan 28 2005 at 1:10 AM Rating: Good
****
7,486 posts
okay, i ment that if it ment preserving the continued existance of the USA, i'd do it. the kind of thing where it would be expected to join up because your way of life basically depended on it. the sort of case where no one would even object to a draft.
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 306 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (306)