Forum Settings
       
1 2 Next »
Reply To Thread

Taxes, Anger, Questions?Follow

#27 Jan 20 2005 at 9:15 PM Rating: Decent
If your as young as you say you might want to look into contributing to an IRA. Not only will this help you by establishing a retirement account to draw on later but it decreases you Adjusted Gross Income. If your adjusted gross income is under a certain amount you can receive a portion of the money contributed back as a credit. (I.E. I put 3000.00 into an IRA. As a married man making 50,000 Adjusted Gross I get 10% back as a credit. When my tax liability is calculated $300.00 will be figured in against that amount.)

Check out if you qualify here:

http://www.irs.gov/newsroom/article/0,,id=107686,00.html

If your continuing your education then you definately want to look into Lifetime learning credits which will give you 20% of the first 10,000 of tuition paid. For your first two years of schooling though the Hope credits are a better deal. These give you a 100% tax credit on your first $1000 in expenses and an addition %50 percent on the next $1000 so you can claim a maximum of $1500. What freshman or sophmore in college doesn't rack up two grand in tuition?

Check out this link for these credits:

http://www.irs.gov/taxtopics/tc605.html

The car recommendation wasn't actually a half bad peice of advice but the trick is that charitable contributions are filed on a shcedule A. As a single young male I am betting you do not have the needed deductions to make filing a schedule A worthwhile. (Medical, Mortgage interest, state tax, real estate, charitable contributions, non-reimbursed employee expenses and tax preparation fees are the most common items on a Schedule A)

Check out this refrence on how to claim a non-cash contribution of over $500.00

http://www.irs.gov/faqs/faq-kw37.html

Best of luck to you.
#28 Jan 21 2005 at 12:40 AM Rating: Decent
Single white male, no dependents...according to the 1040 form, I can claim a whopping personal deduction of $3100 dollars. Subtract that from the 34k I made 2004 *********** of OT) and my fed tax liability is $4400...which is $800 bucks more than I paid in.

Gosh, I luv the tax cuts Georgie gave all us regular, workin' folks.

Anybody wanna loan (possibly in perpetuity) me $800 bucks? ;-)
#29 Jan 21 2005 at 6:31 AM Rating: Decent
You should be able to claim more than that. You should have your personal exemption plus the standard deduction if you don't itemize try it again.
#30 Jan 21 2005 at 10:28 AM Rating: Decent
***
1,700 posts
Quote:
Let me share with you a very nice little way to help on taxes at the end of the year. They recently changed it here in Arizona so this is the last year im capable of doing it.

You go buy an old car, doesnt even have to run. You then donate that car to any kind of service such as a church, shelter, etc...

At the end of the year you can then claim that for the total retail value that it is worth.

Example:

I go to the junkyard and buy a 1981 toyota corolla for $500. At the end of the year I can then claim it for $1200 because thats the retail on it.

I have for the last three years done this and usually gotten back a good chunk. Check in your local state and see if this is a way you can go.


While this was sound advice (maybe not ethical), this will no longer work, I work for a CPA firm and get RIA Newsletters with tons of information on this topic weekly, I can post a few if you wish.

But anyways, do not do this, please, you are asking to be audited, and then they'll deny your "donation", make you pay the difference and prob charge you a fine and interest. It is considered a loop hole in the tax system and they are removing it completely, not only in Arizona. While you are correct and state it is the last year you can do it, your prob lucky they didnt single you out for previous instances.

By removing it completely I mean the ability to donate a car and then claim its retail value.

Edited, Fri Jan 21 10:30:04 2005 by Kronig

Edited, Fri Jan 21 10:30:25 2005 by Kronig
#31 Jan 21 2005 at 5:57 PM Rating: Good
Encyclopedia
******
35,568 posts
Patrician wrote:
Sourced from the liberal media.

http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/budget/fy2005/tables.html


Um... Pat? You said that defense was approximately 50% of the total US budget, right?

You're looking only at "discretionary" funds. That's only one part of the budget.

The best overview table on that link is S-12. Here's some quick numbers to give you an idea of just how wrong you are:

Quote:
2003 2004 2005 Outlays: Discretionary: Defense (DOD) 388 433 429 Nondefense 438 475 485 Total, Discretionary 826 908 914 Mandatory: Social Security 470 492 510 Medicare 246 266 290 Medicaid and SCHIP 165 183 188 Other 298 314 320 Total, Mandatory 1,179 1,254 1,308



What this tells us is that of the discretionary budget (914B), approximately 50% was allocated to defense. However, a quick glance at the Mandatory budget area should show you just how little of the pictures you're seeing.

And that's not to mention that while the total Discretionary budget went up from 908B in 2004 to 914B in 2005, the actual amount spent on Defense (which you are implying is where all the tax money is going) actually decreased from 433B to 429B.

Meanwhile Social Security and Medicare (why does it get two separate lines in here), both increased.

A greater share of his taxes are going to health care and education and other "stuff" this year then last year Pat, no matter how much it might be more fun to assume otherwise...
____________________________
King Nobby wrote:
More words please
#32 Jan 21 2005 at 10:03 PM Rating: Good
Quote:
Hell, I didn't even file my taxes last year?
Keep this hushed up, the statute of limitation for tax evasion does not start until you file. So this can come down on you 20 years from now, likely no, but like murder dont brag about it, remember Capone. But then again if the IRS went after everyone that did tax evasion 90% of the country would be in trouble.

On another side note, funny thing with evasion, even if you fight it in court, it is one of those things you have to prove you are innocent. If you can not prove you are innocent you are automatically guilty.

Quote:
WTF?? You were a student and didn't file taxes? You did know about the education credits... right? Thousands of dollars for free just for being in college full-time?
Actually school credits are onl;y great for the first two years, and that is $1500 max. 100% of the first $1000 and 50% of the second $1000, and nothing after that, and this is for hope. After the first 2 years you are stuck with the lifetime-learning credit is 20% up to $10,000. Now this does have a higher credit allowance, but with the 20% of what is put in does not help a student much, it is ment for mommies and daddies that pay for bubba to go to school. If you only make 5-6k like this poster did the education credits can be more hassel then what they could save. Then again it also depends on what type of work they did and if they had paid taxes on that work, if they did pay taxes then they should of filed since they only owed around $300 and most likely paid more then that through payroll deductions.

Then scholarships complicte this even more since it lowers the amount paid, and is only tax free for what is used for tuition and learning supplies, while you are suppose to pay taxes on any spent on room and board.

Overall looking at the vague numbers, it looks like you are in about 25-30k a year job, this is assuming you claim no dependents on your w-4 and are just talking about federal taxes, I hate states that do income taxes as well. Though your tax base increased dramatically, you should still get a bunch of what you put in back.

Most single people without children dont get much for deductions, and most deductions are ment for people with houses and children any way. This is standard for us single people, just get used to it, or ruin your life and get married early.

If you are concerned about having to pay at the end of the year, keep your w-4 with no deductions, this means they take more out through the year, but in the end it takes a complete ***** up to have to pay.

Quote:
the fire department, police department, military, the roads you drive on, the bridges you cross, the schools that brought you to college, the laws that protect you..................

who do you think SHOULD pay for that?
Do you even know anything about taxes, since this is the stupidest thing I have heard someone say about taxes. The discussion is about income taxes. Federal income taxes only pay for military on your lists. Fire departments and police are funded by local taxes. Roads and bridges are paid for by federal, local, or state taxes depending on their classification.

If you read their complaint they never said anything about sales tax, property tax, gas tax, or sin taxes, which are how most state/local taxes are applied.
#33 Jan 22 2005 at 4:12 AM Rating: Decent
Arrivan, thank you, I did do that incorrectly....now I only owe $150 bucks instead of $800....which is, at least, manageable.

I guess my refund days are over.

In contrast, my top boss bought a Beamer with how much he saved on his taxes. Odd, that, eh?

Bah. I forget my manners. Thank you again, Arrivan.
#34 Jan 22 2005 at 9:05 AM Rating: Decent
****
5,372 posts
Gbaji, as far as I am aware, Social Security and Medicare are not funded by income tax. Which is what the OP is talking about.
#35 Jan 22 2005 at 9:40 AM Rating: Default
To the OP:

Use the 1040EZ form. You can fill it out yourself in roughly 20-30 minutes, it's easy, and includes all the standard deductions. With only 1900$ payed in, itemizing will be useless to you. Depending on whether or not your parents claimed you, you should get most of that back, depending on what your total income was.

As for high taxes for a good job, welcome to my world. In fact, welcome to the real world. The only thing on the planet more hated than taxes are dumocrats. If you don't like it, go on welfare and be just another loser punk whining about how if you ran things everything would be better.
#36 Jan 22 2005 at 9:44 AM Rating: Default
Quote:
The US defence budget for 2005 is approximately 50% of the total budget (compared with about 13% that could be described as wealth redistribution).


Bad numbers from the uninformed. The Defense budget only equals about 1/6th of the total U.S. budget, roughly the same as Welfare.
#37 Jan 22 2005 at 11:26 PM Rating: Default
What a wonderful world, my dad actually pays for in income taxes than for our morgage(15 years 400k). You know the right wing is totally stupid, huh.


#38 Jan 22 2005 at 11:46 PM Rating: Default
Quote:
What a wonderful world, my dad actually pays for in income taxes than for our morgage(15 years 400k). You know the right wing is totally stupid, huh.


Huh? That first sentence made no sense.
#39 Jan 24 2005 at 3:57 AM Rating: Decent
****
5,372 posts
Quote:
Bad numbers from the uninformed. The Defense budget only equals about 1/6th of the total U.S. budget, roughly the same as Welfare.


This thread is about income tax. Income tax does not pay for the majority of the mandatory budget. Try to keep up!
#40 Jan 24 2005 at 5:10 PM Rating: Good
Encyclopedia
******
35,568 posts
Patrician wrote:
Quote:
Bad numbers from the uninformed. The Defense budget only equals about 1/6th of the total U.S. budget, roughly the same as Welfare.


This thread is about income tax. Income tax does not pay for the majority of the mandatory budget. Try to keep up!


It all goes into the same bucket though. If you're going to go that route, then you need to calculate how much of Corporate taxes, capital gains taxes, tarrifs, commerce taxes, luxury taxes, "sin" taxes, and a zillion other various forms of Federal Revenue go towards what budget lines.

Ultimately, all that really matters is that the government has an amount of revenue (which it gets from a variety of sources), one of which is income tax. It also has an amount it spends (budget), which consists of a number of line items, one of which is defense. Arguing about which money goes where is silly. I can guarantee you that if there's a shortfall in one area, it'll be taken out of another. You're playing semantics here IMO. Just because generic "income tax" and Social Security tax, and Medicare taxes are separate line items on your tax statement doesn't change the fact that from your perspective they are all a tax on your income.


Also. IIRC, you didn't say that 50% of this income taxes went to defense. You said that 50% of the federal budget went to defense. That's the incorrect statement I was correcting. If you want to argue that we should list the different taxes separately, that's great. I think it's pointless though. From a workers perspective, does it really matter if the taxes are taken out on line 8 or line 12? It's still money taken out of each paycheck, and it's still progressive (the more he earns, the more he pays). I'm reasonably sure that when the OP listed how much the government was taking out of his paycheck, he was not excluding social security and medicare payments. Your response implied that 50% of the money taken out of his paycheck went to defense, and that is absolutely not true no matter how you manipulate the numbers.
____________________________
King Nobby wrote:
More words please
1 2 Next »
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 195 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (195)