Iraq WMD report finnished.......................Follow

good post. a week ago. however, no rate-down for actually talking about something that really happened this time!!! congrats!

That isn't news anymore. The whole WoMD theory stinked from the beginning, and my country believed it.
After 3 months without any proof it seemed I was right, and when a few months later the CIA said the messed with the photo's I knew it for sure.

Allmost two years later -> the country is still a full piece of ****, in the central regions it's allmost total anarchy. Troops of non UK/US countries are leaving since they now understand they came there for someone else's pleasure. (No not the Iraqi peoples' but someone elses) But hey, atleast the 'western' countries have enough oil for a while! ;)



Stop whining, your country choose him themselves. Live with it, plan a revolution, emigrate to Holland (you'll love it :D) but for god's sake, stop whining.

Well at least move out of you own *** and into the world of 'Nobody gives two fu[i][/i]cks what you think' land.

After reading all of shadow's posts, I must ask, how old are you? It's not meant to be mean-spirited or anything, but it just seems to me that:
1. You can't spell
2. You can't capitalize
3. You dont' strike me as a person who has voted before, i don't know why...maybe i'm wrong.

You are wrong

Im pretty sure Shadow has mentioned having a daughter so that would make him at least old enough to vote.

You are right about his lack of grammar though, but good or bad its not his grammar I have a problem with. Its his "crazy manifesto guy" ramblings that that annoys.

He is either a wacko or a sock used in the same way that Varus is used to discredit the right by making them look crazy. The fact that he has never posted on an issue outside of a political thread kinda leads me to believe that he is a sock mainly just trying to stir sh[b][/b]it up.

Edited, Tue Jan 18 16:27:28 2005 by bhodisattva

I agree with Bhoddi. Shadow is nothing but a troll. Ignore it.

Ok that was funny

Did Saddam not gas some half a million Kurdish citizens?

Did he not unleash gas on the Iranians during the 8 year war?

Did we -the U.S.- not provide him, along with the Russians, with the technological know-how to produce said weapons?

The left in this country seems to have puppets like you who spew this nonsense about Iraq. They did have WMDs at some point and every single intelligence service across the globe said that he did in fact have accessibility to WMDs at the time of the invasion. Just because he destroyed them or was lied to by his own experts does not give Saddam a pass. He had 12 years with which to turn over evidence of his lack of weapons. Either he believed there was a reason to ignore the demands because he thought he still had the weapons, or he thought Bush would pull a French maneuver known as a "Blink". He was wrong.

Something you might want to stick in your pipe and toke on: If Iraq does indeed become a free state with its own governing body, those countries in the Middle East that are anti-change will be given pause. Iran is under stress from the young students of its nation who desire freedom and reform. The Saudi sovereigns are terrified that their people will get some cojones and rise up to overrun their sadistic and tyrranical theocratic rule. Egypt, Syria, Yemen and on and on may get the idea to rearrange the political make-up of their own societies, and in 50 years the entire face of the Middle East could change in our favor.

Of course, it could be the beginning of Armageddon. But there will be water if God wills it, or so they say.

Shadowmrelm meet Darkrein

let the troll competition being!!

Heh, it was part of today's Tribune online story on the confirmation hearings. I just didn't think it deserved its own thread.

Ok bhod.

But of those 120-150k how many were Saddam's loyalist forces who put countless numbers of their own people into the ground at his request. And how many did we save in the process.

O and please don't lose my respect by using the old "yer a troll" ********* I admit I don't have 1000s of posts, but that's because I like my posts to actually mean something. I've been around for a long while even if you don't know who the fuck I am.

And you're right because its only 250-320k and not half a million that makes it okaly-dokaly. Christ man, they say kill one person it's a murder, kill 100,000 and its a statistic. Have a heart?

So we don't need proof or evidence to go to war? You're stating that we based the war on speculation, expectation and fear-mongering.
I would just like to make a small fix to one of your statements:


Quick, we better invade Iran before they actually do anything to threaten us!

It would seem that we took Saddam out to protect the Israeli people, not the Iraqis. The terrorists he supported were mostly working on behalf of the Palestinian movement, not al'Quaeda. The Taliban was the party responsible for harboring al'Quaeda and the ones directly responsible for killing Americans - yet Osama bin Laden is still not in custody (that we know about).