Forum Settings
       
« Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Reply To Thread

To those who believe in the "American Dream"Follow

#1 Dec 20 2004 at 8:02 PM Rating: Good
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/6738449/

Quote:
In only four of the nation’s 3,066 counties can someone working full-time and earning federal minimum wage afford to pay rent and utilities on a one-bedroom apartment, an advocacy group on low-income housing reported Monday.

A two-bedroom rental is even more of a burden — the typical worker must earn at least $15.37 an hour to pay rent and utilities, the National Low Income Housing Coalition said in its annual “Out of Reach” report. That’s nearly three times the federal minimum wage of $5.15 an hour.

“You get pushed into a situation where some necessities don’t get paid for” because more salary must be devoted to housing, said Sheila Crowley, the coalition’s executive director. “For people on low-wage fixed incomes, that’s a chronic way of life.”


:(
#2 Dec 20 2004 at 8:07 PM Rating: Good
***
1,847 posts
I saw something similar to this before, however it was pointing at the fact that government subsidized housing still would require a person to earn around 12$ an hour to keep a roof over their head. Pretty pathetic, huh?
#3 Dec 20 2004 at 8:11 PM Rating: Decent
Imaginary Friend
*****
16,112 posts
It's prolly their way of pushing people to get better jobs.

Smiley: lol






but yeah.. it's ****** up... no wonder we have dealers and hookers and theives and homeless...

but that's a can of worms right there.....


****, I STILL have a roomate.(for a reason)





Come to think of it.. It DOES keep the lovely Welfare System alive doesn't it?

Edited, Mon Dec 20 20:12:12 2004 by Kelvyquayo
____________________________
With the receiver in my hand..
#4 Dec 20 2004 at 8:13 PM Rating: Decent
Encyclopedia
******
35,568 posts
OMGZ! So highschool students working the fryolater can't afford to live on their own? Say it aint so Pickle.

How about you find me the percentage of people who actually *need* to support themselves who are working at the federal minimum wage rate. There's also this thing called *cough* roomates. See... You get 2-4 student types all working at near minimum wage to go in together on a larger room place, and the total cost per person drops dramatically.

So a totally anti-social person with no friends and no family, who's unable to get better then a minimum wage job is going to have a hard time supporting themselves. Um... Duh! At what point did we have an expectation that a minimum wage is supposed to allow someone to be 100% financially independant? They call it "minimum" for a reason. It's the minimum we can pay a high school student with no work ethic or skills. If you're still making that much money into your 20s, and maybe after popping out a kid or two, then that's you creating your own problems.

At what point do we consider it "enough"? When someone can afford to support themselves and 12 kids on minimum wage? I'm sorry, but that's not what minimum wage exists for. Only idiot Liberals think it's supposed to be a wage that an adult member of the work force should be able to raise a family on.


The "American Dream" is about improving your station in life as the result of your own hard work and good choices. I'm willing to go out on a limb and say that anyone who would be negatively effected by minimum wage rates is not going to live the American Dream anyway. If you work hard and make good choices, you wont be making minimum wage while needing to support yourself and your family completely on your own. The American Dream is about making more then the minimum. It's about advancing. If we fix the "problem" you are pointing to, then we'll break that dream for far more people then we help.
____________________________
King Nobby wrote:
More words please
#5 Dec 20 2004 at 8:14 PM Rating: Good
***
1,847 posts
They need to make it that federal minimum wage is updated on a yearly basis. At least multiply it each year by the consumer price index to account for inflation. When prices go up, but minimum wage never changes, you're going to have more crime because people are turned to other means to get what they need.

And gbaji...
Quote:
So a totally anti-social person with no friends and no family, who's unable to get better then a minimum wage job is going to have a hard time supporting themselves. Um... Duh! At what point did we have an expectation that a minimum wage is supposed to allow someone to be 100% financially independant? They call it "minimum" for a reason. It's the minimum we can pay a high school student with no work ethic or skills. If you're still making that much money into your 20s, and maybe after popping out a kid or two, then that's you creating your own problems.


It's called minimum wage because it's supposed to be the minimum amount, at full time employment, that a person needs to maintain the standards of living. Read up on economics.

Edited, Mon Dec 20 20:16:53 2004 by scubamage
#6 Dec 20 2004 at 8:15 PM Rating: Decent
gbaji wrote:
OMGZ! So highschool students working the fryolater can't afford to live on their own? Say it aint so Pickle.

How about you find me the percentage of people who actually *need* to support themselves who are working at the federal minimum wage rate. There's also this thing called *cough* roomates. See... You get 2-4 student types all working at near minimum wage to go in together on a larger room place, and the total cost per person drops dramatically.

So a totally anti-social person with no friends and no family, who's unable to get better then a minimum wage job is going to have a hard time supporting themselves. Um... Duh! At what point did we have an expectation that a minimum wage is supposed to allow someone to be 100% financially independant? They call it "minimum" for a reason. It's the minimum we can pay a high school student with no work ethic or skills. If you're still making that much money into your 20s, and maybe after popping out a kid or two, then that's you creating your own problems.

At what point do we consider it "enough"? When someone can afford to support themselves and 12 kids on minimum wage? I'm sorry, but that's not what minimum wage exists for. Only idiot Liberals think it's supposed to be a wage that an adult member of the work force should be able to raise a family on.


The "American Dream" is about improving your station in life as the result of your own hard work and good choices. I'm willing to go out on a limb and say that anyone who would be negatively effected by minimum wage rates is not going to live the American Dream anyway. If you work hard and make good choices, you wont be making minimum wage while needing to support yourself and your family completely on your own. The American Dream is about making more then the minimum. It's about advancing. If we fix the "problem" you are pointing to, then we'll break that dream for far more people then we help.


You're a spoiled-brat-fu[/u]ck from the Land of Fruits and Nuts, Gbaji.

No one gives a fu[u]
ck about what you think.

Edited, Mon Dec 20 20:16:01 2004 by pickleprince
#7 Dec 20 2004 at 8:17 PM Rating: Decent
I think this just says that more stupid people need to stop breeding. Seriously, when I moved out on my own I was making 9 an hour and managed to pay rent just fine. Of course, i had other, more questionable sources of income as well, but that's the American frikken dream too. You take care of yourself and stop sucking on society's teet to get ahead.
#8 Dec 20 2004 at 8:18 PM Rating: Default
Not to brag, but we got some of the highest salaries. Of course, our taxes are so f[b][/b]ucking high you won't actually notice you got paid.
#9 Dec 20 2004 at 8:22 PM Rating: Good
Imaginary Friend
*****
16,112 posts
Tell all that to the poor blacks in the Inner City....


you got to start somewhere..... but when you can't afford a place to live you're gonna go where the sun shines brightest.....

..then it's just another crack baggie on a Baltimore streeet curb..
____________________________
With the receiver in my hand..
#10 Dec 20 2004 at 8:32 PM Rating: Decent
*****
19,369 posts
Qoaz wrote:
Not to brag, but we got some of the highest salaries. Of course, our taxes are so ******* high you won't actually notice you got paid.
Your a hooker right Qoaz? Yah those "taxes" are killing your profits, damn pimps... errr IRS agents.
#11 Dec 20 2004 at 8:33 PM Rating: Good
**
290 posts
I must agree with Gbaji in that not every wage absolutely *needs* to be a "living wage," as economists put it. A high school kid working a part time job to get gas money isn't going to need to maintain an apartment complete with utilities. A senior citizen working for extra retirement money probably already has a substantial cushion worked up from a higher-paying, full-time, more specialized position. And so on, and so forth.

In fact, most people fail to see the negative side of the government imposing a minimum wage (or, at the very least, a higher minimum wage.) Some possible working positions cannot be maintained on the salary that the minimum wage sets; many possible companies would essentially be taking a loss to hire people. There are also pople out there who would be willing to work at positions for under the minimum wage, though these people may be a small minority of the eligible workforce. In other words, there is a demand for such labor, and a workforce willing to fill it, but jobs that pay below minimum wage are not created because the government won't allow it.

In such a conception, the answer to economic problems such as unemployment and inflation would come, at least in part, from dropping the minimum wage. The newly-created, low-paying jobs would employ the labor least in demand (presumably unskilled high school kids), vacating higher-paying positions for unemployed adults. The resulting influx of cheaply-made goods would lower the level of the so-called "living wage," creating more jobs that can sustain a person in terms of basic needs, and even more that can offer someone a modicum of luxury. The deadweight loss that occurs when the gov't imposes a price floor like the minimum wage would disappear, slowing the inflation of the dollar.

Of course, that's simply in theory, and I'm just offering an opinion contrary to the norm to spur dscussion. Doubtless I'll get rated down by at least a few die-hard liberal/socialists for that, but oh well.

EDIT: Yep, someone rated me down. So much for liberal open-mindedness.

Edited, Tue Dec 21 09:41:40 2004 by RognarsDwarvenGrog
#12 Dec 20 2004 at 8:36 PM Rating: Excellent
*****
18,463 posts
Most latinos seem to do all right on minimum wage. I think that the secret is to live with all of your extended relatives.
#13 Dec 20 2004 at 8:36 PM Rating: Excellent
Encyclopedia
******
35,568 posts
scubamage the Stupendous wrote:

It's called minimum wage because it's supposed to be the minimum amount, at full time employment, that a person needs to maintain the standards of living. Read up on economics.


Yes and no. What minimum wage intends to do, and what it actually does are often very different. You also have to remember that back when it was first adopted, the vast majority of workers for whom it applied either lived at home, or in some sort of dorm/appartments common at the time. People stayed at home until they earned enough to move out. Those that moved out early did not expect to support themselves. They often ended up in hostels and YMCA type facilities until they got a more sufficient wage. You simply can't compare that to todays expectation that every adult should be able to afford a multi-room appartment with hot and cold running water, it's own bathroom, kitchen, electricity, and all the other modern conveniences. Minimum wage was *never* intended to support people in such relative luxury.

Check out this site for somem interesting information. This paragraph in particular is relevant:

Quote:
In spite of evidence indicating that minimum wage laws reduce the number of jobs and distort compensation packages, some people still argue that their benefits outweigh their costs because they increase the incomes of the poor. This argument implicitly assumes that minimum wage workers are the sole earner in a family. This assumption is false. In 1988, for example, the vast majority of minimum wage workers were members of households containing other wage earners. Moreover, only 8 percent of all minimum wage workers were men or women who maintained families, and not all of those families were poor. The simple fact is that most minimum wage workers are young and work part-time. In 1988, 60 percent of minimum wage workers were sixteen to twenty-four years old, and about 70 percent worked part-time.



See... As I pointed out above. What Pickles post is missing is the numbers of people who are actually in a position where the minimum wage is hurting them. It's also missing the "cost" of raising minimum wage. It's not as simple as increasing the wage so that it's enough for anyone to raise their family on. There's a lot more to the issue.
____________________________
King Nobby wrote:
More words please
#14 Dec 20 2004 at 9:00 PM Rating: Excellent
Prodigal Son
******
20,643 posts
Princess Atomicflea wrote:
Most latinos seem to do all right on minimum wage. I think that the secret is to live with all of your extended relatives.

Right on. Mexicans can easily fit 18-20 people into a 2-room. And a 2-door too, for that matter.
____________________________
publiusvarus wrote:
we all know liberals are well adjusted american citizens who only want what's best for society. While conservatives are evil money grubbing scum who only want to sh*t on the little man and rob the world of its resources.
#15 Dec 20 2004 at 9:28 PM Rating: Decent
How hard are you willing to work to make your dreams come true?
#16 Dec 20 2004 at 9:41 PM Rating: Good
Encyclopedia
******
35,568 posts
Warlord Lefein wrote:
How hard are you willing to work to make your dreams come true?


What?! Work hard? I demand the American Dream simply for showing up and filling out an application at the local fast food joint. What is this "work hard" you are talking about? I don't get it...
____________________________
King Nobby wrote:
More words please
#17 Dec 20 2004 at 10:14 PM Rating: Decent
I think people forgot that America is the Land of opportunity. it amazes me how people can walk about an apple orchard and complain about climbing a tree to get an apple. As if waiting for one to fall is the way to be. I got news for ya, more often than not, the only apples that fall from the tree are rotten. Get your damn apple!
#18 Dec 20 2004 at 10:21 PM Rating: Good
Encyclopedia
******
35,568 posts
Lefein. Sometime in the last few decades, "opportunity" got re-invented as "entitlement". We've increased our minimum expectations and now ***** that our minimum wage doesn't pay for it. How ludicrous is that?

Minimum wage today will certainly pay for you to live single and on your own in a one room dorm style appartment with no running water, no electricity, little or no heat, and shared facilities. Just as it did in 1930. What's changed is our expecations, not the wage. In fact, minimum wage pays *more* in adjusted dollars today then it did when it was first introduced.

People just expect to get more for less today. Go figure...
____________________________
King Nobby wrote:
More words please
#19 Dec 21 2004 at 12:10 AM Rating: Decent
*
170 posts
Quote:
How about you find me the percentage of people who actually *need* to support themselves who are working at the federal minimum wage rate.


ummm....i know a mother who has to support 5 count five children, how does she do it (she even makes more than minimum wage) i dont know. but she does get her water,electric,phone turned off every other month, for some people minimum wage isnt really minimum wage
#20 Dec 21 2004 at 12:39 AM Rating: Decent
Quote:
ummm....i know a mother who has to support 5 count five children, how does she do it (she even makes more than minimum wage) i dont know. but she does get her water,electric,phone turned off every other month, for some people minimum wage isnt really minimum wage


maybe she should have thought about that before having 5 count 5 kids...

I would have to agree with Gbaji on this also. If you are working for minimum wage at an adult age with children then you did something wrong. Hey I got an Idea join the military. Better than minimum wage, free housing, water, electric, and you get a food alotment.
#21 Dec 21 2004 at 12:49 AM Rating: Good
Tracer Bullet
*****
12,636 posts
Warlord Lefein wrote:
I think people forgot that America is the Land of opportunity. it amazes me how people can walk about an apple orchard and complain about climbing a tree to get an apple. As if waiting for one to fall is the way to be. I got news for ya, more often than not, the only apples that fall from the tree are rotten. Get your damn apple!

Plattitudes don't keep you warm at night.

#22 Dec 21 2004 at 1:41 AM Rating: Excellent
Encyclopedia
******
35,568 posts
InvisibleWar wrote:
Quote:
How about you find me the percentage of people who actually *need* to support themselves who are working at the federal minimum wage rate.


ummm....i know a mother who has to support 5 count five children, how does she do it (she even makes more than minimum wage) i dont know. but she does get her water,electric,phone turned off every other month, for some people minimum wage isnt really minimum wage


Ok. So explain to me how raising the minimum wage would help her at all? And if we did raise it sufficiently to allow her to raise those 5 kids without fear of having her power and water turned off, what about the woman down the block with 7 kids? And the one a few streets over with 9?

If there is one thing that is constant in the world it is that need is infinite. Unfortunately, everything else is in limited supply. We have to draw a line somewhere, and no matter where that line is there'll always be someone on the wrong side of it. No possible way to avoid it.

How about we discourage people with no means of support from having 5 kids? Seems like that's far more likely to happen if we *don't* reward them by increasing their pay to match. It's not like her productivity increases if we just increase her pay by legal mandate...
____________________________
King Nobby wrote:
More words please
#23 Dec 21 2004 at 3:31 AM Rating: Good
Tracer Bullet
*****
12,636 posts

Gbaji.

People are poor, they shouldn't be, it sucks.

That's it, now shut the fu[b][/b]ck up.


#24 Dec 21 2004 at 4:59 AM Rating: Good
Drama Nerdvana
******
20,674 posts
According to Stats Canada I am living below the poverty level, I've been living there for 3 years.

Of course I'm living on my own and in my third year of university with no loans or debt and minimal parental mooching. However I goto school full time, work 5 days a week, and still manage to spend to much time on Allakhazams and have a girlfriend.

I work at a job I despise that pays well and is good for scheduling around school and have managed to earn 2$/hr raise over a period of 15 months at the job.

You would not believe how much that extra 2$/hr helps, I'm a high roller now. Around this time last year I was barely able to afford even cheap presents for family and between Xmas, bills, tuition and books I just barely made it through January. This year however I am able to spend oodles on family, tuition, books, rent and bills and actually eat. Im actually have a couple hundred extra dollars in extra income that is automatically put into next years tuition so Im already ahead.

Hard work is a lot of getting yourself out of the hole but having the opportunity there to actually get started is needed, Im not for the govt tripling minimum wage but raising it wouldnt be a bad thing.
____________________________
Bode - 100 Holy Paladin - Lightbringer
#25 Dec 21 2004 at 8:49 AM Rating: Good
**
835 posts
Trickybeck wrote:

Quote:
Plattitudes don't keep you warm at night.


AND

Quote:
Gbaji.

People are poor, they shouldn't be, it sucks.

That's it, now shut the **** up.


So everybody is entitled to have all the conveniences no matter how lazy they happen to be?

We, who work and strive, need to be taxed until we only have a minimum wage lifestyle to bring everyone else up to the same? Yea, lets all go for mediocrity in all facets of our lives. Welcome to socialism.

People can be stupid and lazy, they shouldn't be, it sucks. Not my fault.
#26 Dec 21 2004 at 8:59 AM Rating: Good
****
4,596 posts
Quote:
Seriously, when I moved out on my own I was making 9 an hour and managed to pay rent just fine. Of course, i had other, more questionable sources of income as well, but that's the American frikken dream too. You take care of yourself and stop sucking on society's teet to get ahead.


Since you fail to declare your more questionable forms of income I can only conclude that they were illegal. The American dream is to have to violate the law in order to maintain a reasonable wage?

Quote:
How about we discourage people with no means of support from having 5 kids? Seems like that's far more likely to happen if we *don't* reward them by increasing their pay to match.


Yes because only people born into wealth should have children. If we just sterilized all of those pesky poorfolk we wouldn't have to wait in line at the restaurant so long right? How dare they think that they have the same right to exist in our world? We come from rich blood! We have a right to this planet!

Maybe we could breed just enough poor people to run the coal mines. They could live underground so we wouldn't have to look at them all the time. We could call them darkies! That way we wouldn't have to worry about how we are gonna get enough power to run out latte machines and we wouldn't have so much competition for our "limited resources"
____________________________
Nicroll 65 Assassin
Teltorid 52 Druid
Aude Sapere

Oh hell camp me all you want f**kers. I own this site and thus I own you. - Allakhazam
« Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 296 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (296)