Forum Settings
       
Reply To Thread

Creepy Cool Actor Fight!Follow

#1 Dec 14 2004 at 3:03 PM Rating: Good
***
1,847 posts
Ok, suppose Gary Oldman, Cristopher Walken, and Mickey Rourke got into a fight (physical or of wits, use your imagination). Who would win? Who would run home to mama?
#2 Dec 14 2004 at 3:15 PM Rating: Good
Ministry of Silly Cnuts
*****
19,524 posts
Sharon Osborne
____________________________
"I started out with nothin' and I still got most of it left" - Seasick Steve
#3 Dec 14 2004 at 3:19 PM Rating: Good
****
6,730 posts
Please, Cristopher Walken for teh win.
#4 Dec 14 2004 at 3:21 PM Rating: Default
The Great GitSlayer wrote:
Please, Cristopher Walken for teh win.


ditto. That guy is crazy.
#5 Dec 14 2004 at 3:28 PM Rating: Decent
***
1,784 posts
Walken he has wits, physical grit aka DEERHUNTER, and is the Patron Saint of Cowbell.

http://www.geekspeakweekly.com/cowbell/


Guess What? I got a fever! And the only prescription is... more Cowbell!
#6 Dec 14 2004 at 3:37 PM Rating: Good
Walken for sure, although Gary Oldman is rather insane. Mickey Rourke in this Matchup? No match for either of them.

Now what I'd like to see is a screaming match between Al Pacino and Sam Kineson. Who do you think would win that one? (let's suspend disbelief here...we all know Sam is dead)
#7 Dec 14 2004 at 3:41 PM Rating: Good
***
1,847 posts
Ryneguy, pet mage of Jabober wrote:
Now what I'd like to see is a screaming match between Al Pacino and Sam Kineson. Who do you think would win that one? (let's suspend disbelief here...we all know Sam is dead)


I think it depends... Raging Bull Pacino would own, but Tony Montana would probobly be too drugged up to be effective.
#8 Dec 14 2004 at 3:45 PM Rating: Good
Ministry of Silly Cnuts
*****
19,524 posts
Christina Aguilera. It is isn't it?

What's my prize? Can I h4v3 teh m0n3y 1n5t34d?
____________________________
"I started out with nothin' and I still got most of it left" - Seasick Steve
#9 Dec 14 2004 at 3:46 PM Rating: Good
This is true. But what if Sam has a large, Italian garlic-ey dinner before the match? He might even the tides against even Raging Bull!
#10 Dec 14 2004 at 3:47 PM Rating: Good
Ministry of Silly Cnuts
*****
19,524 posts
Now if this was a 'worst british accent' competition, I reckon it's a close call between Mickey Rourke (Belfast priest) in "Thicker than Blood" and Keanu Reeves (English toff) in "Dracula".

I think Reeves probably gets the "**** Van ****" award on that one
____________________________
"I started out with nothin' and I still got most of it left" - Seasick Steve
#11 Dec 14 2004 at 3:52 PM Rating: Good
****
6,730 posts
"Whooa! Dracula dude!"
#12 Dec 14 2004 at 3:57 PM Rating: Decent
*
194 posts
Christopher Walken would win hands down. Not that Oldman wouldn't give it the old college try, mind you. Rourke wouldn't even show up.

As for the bad english accent competition, the champion would be Kevin Costner in Robin Hood: Prince of Thieves.
#13 Dec 14 2004 at 4:02 PM Rating: Good
Ministry of Silly Cnuts
*****
19,524 posts
Quote:
As for the bad english accent competition, the champion would be Kevin Costner in Robin Hood: Prince of Thieves
Doesn't count. He didn't even try.

Some of the most convincing Brit-speaking yanks:

Renee Zellweger (I never saw her before Bridget Jones and honestly thought she was a north Londoner)
George C Scott (Dr Watson in an otherwise disappointing Sherlock Holmes Film

And of course, Arnold Schwarzenegger (Everyone in Devon speaks like that. Uncanny)
____________________________
"I started out with nothin' and I still got most of it left" - Seasick Steve
#14 Dec 14 2004 at 4:04 PM Rating: Decent
***
2,453 posts
Quote:
Ok, suppose Gary Oldman, Cristopher Walken, and Mickey Rourke got into a fight (physical or of wits, use your imagination). Who would win? Who would run home to mama?



Physically Mickey Rourke could probably destory both of the others. Rourke actually fought professionally, albeit against some lackluster talent, but still even the worst professional fighters would clean up against Joe Average.

In a battle of wits Walken would clean up. While Rourke and Oldman can ACT scarey, Walken IS scarey.

#15 Dec 14 2004 at 4:09 PM Rating: Good
Quote:
While Rourke ... can ACT scarey,


Ha, Oldman can 'Act'. I don't know 'bout the above statement though...
#16 Dec 14 2004 at 4:16 PM Rating: Decent
Prodigal Son
******
20,643 posts
I would put my money on Walken to win the battle of wits, and Rourke for the physical matchup. Rourke often plays a heavy, or tough guy (though usually getting his as[b][/b]s kicked).
____________________________
publiusvarus wrote:
we all know liberals are well adjusted american citizens who only want what's best for society. While conservatives are evil money grubbing scum who only want to sh*t on the little man and rob the world of its resources.
#17 Dec 14 2004 at 4:21 PM Rating: Default
Walken is insane, but have you seen Oldman in 'Leon'? He's nuts.

Rourke is more a brawler type while Walken and Oldman are psychos in suits.
#18 Dec 14 2004 at 8:27 PM Rating: Decent
***
1,701 posts
Walken always makes me think creepy rather than scary, like I don't want him around my kids.

Gary Oldman was pretty intense in Leon. He gets my vote.

____________________________
If life gives you lemons, make lemonade. Then find someone that life has given vodka and have party.


This establishment does not serve women. You must bring your own.
#19 Dec 15 2004 at 9:50 AM Rating: Good
***
1,847 posts
I think it depends a lot. Walken would win if style and sheer creepiness would translate over to pure asskicking ability. Oldman seems to always play hardcore psychopaths (Zorg in 5th Element, the D.A. in The Professional). Plus he plays masterminds... so I'm thinking hand to hand he'd have less of a chance, but if he could have a few henchmen to be cannon fodder it would be a little more even.
Rourke actually has the mass and experience fighting to do some real damage. Head on, I think I'd go with Rourke for the win. Especially if he's playing the cook from Spun, or the detective from Angelheart... 100% pure tragic badass.
#20 Dec 15 2004 at 12:43 PM Rating: Decent
Prodigal Son
******
20,643 posts
Hell, Rourke was tragic badass in "Diner"!
____________________________
publiusvarus wrote:
we all know liberals are well adjusted american citizens who only want what's best for society. While conservatives are evil money grubbing scum who only want to sh*t on the little man and rob the world of its resources.
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 238 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (238)