Forum Settings
       
Reply To Thread

Tis the season I guess.Follow

#27 Nov 30 2004 at 3:43 PM Rating: Good
Ministry of Silly Cnuts
*****
19,524 posts
Quote:
Nobby if you wanted to get Lefein going you should mention those sexy Unitarians


I have every respect for people's faith, no matter how whacky it may seem to me.

I have equal respect for truth and facts.

When people confuse the two, I tend to revert to leaving without a goodbye or handing them enough theological rope for them to get their "30 silver pieces"-worth.
____________________________
"I started out with nothin' and I still got most of it left" - Seasick Steve
#28 Nov 30 2004 at 3:49 PM Rating: Good
Ministry of Silly Cnuts
*****
19,524 posts
Biggity0 wrote:
The Bible is all about belief and faith.
Correct. Not facts or evidence to support an argument. As valid as Area 51 is to a tin-foil hatter. How many versions have you read? How many U-Turns in the text, connatation or message do you need to see before you realise that what now exists is a Frankenstein's Monster of politically convenient reinterpretations, mistranslations and blatant modern fiction?

Biggity0 wrote:
If this is not what you are intending to say Nobby, then help us out and explain?
How many times Einstein? If you believe in God, Jesus as deity in flesh, Mohammad as the last and final prophet, the Virgin Mary in a Cheeseburger or Hong Kong Phooey, fine. Have a nice time. Burn a candle or two, build a temple, send money to a synagogue and wear pretty dreadlocks, spin that prayer-bell.

Just f[i][/i]uck off from arguments OK?
____________________________
"I started out with nothin' and I still got most of it left" - Seasick Steve
#29 Nov 30 2004 at 4:12 PM Rating: Good
Can you guys explain the Easter Bunny to me now? I understand Santa, and I have an insight into his operation (workshop, elves north pole,etc etc), but where does the Easter bunny come from? IE where does he get all he chocolate eggs from, and where does he kick back during his time off?
#30 Nov 30 2004 at 4:18 PM Rating: Decent
#31 Nov 30 2004 at 4:29 PM Rating: Decent
Technically most people who call themselves Christian aren't Christian. Going to a building full of singing people is hardly a prerequisite to sanctity. Then again, I suppose I'd be killed for being a heretic in another day, another land, and another time. Also, to Redyne, terrorists and their organization promote violent means to an end. MLK died nobly, while the likes of Bin Laden will die as criminals. When we confuse the two, we spiral into madness.
#32 Nov 30 2004 at 4:30 PM Rating: Decent
*****
14,454 posts
/hijack on

Actually if we want to get technical, Christmas originally had nothing to do with Jesus. The original holiday is the Winter Solstice http://www.circlesanctuary.org/pholidays/SolsticeArticle.html

Today, many people in Western-based cultures refer to this holiday as "Christmas." Yet a look into its origins of Christmas reveals its Pagan roots. Emperor Aurelian established December 25 as the birthday of the "Invincible Sun" in the third century as part of the Roman Winter Solstice celebrations. Shortly thereafter, in 273, the Christian church selected this day to represent the birthday of Jesus, and by 336, this Roman solar feast day was Christianized. January 6, celebrated as Epiphany in Christendom and linked with the visit of the Magi, was originally an Egyptian date for the Winter Solstice.


So, if it makes you feel better, just know that Jesus was actually born around the springtime but we celebrate his birth as a cover up for Pagan holidays.

Happy Solstice everyone!
#33 Nov 30 2004 at 4:37 PM Rating: Decent
http://www.candlegrove.com/sacaea.html

Sorry... Had to straighten that up a bit. It's kinda a combination of a lot of things that fell around the same time of year... They kinda threw in Christs birthday for the hell of it I suppose.

Edited, Tue Nov 30 16:38:58 2004 by Lefein
#34 Nov 30 2004 at 5:17 PM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
First off, it's always a little exasperating to see people who can't view a conversation about the Bible without throwing in their "OMG Jesus isn't real!!!" Who the hell cares? That's not the question, the question is what was so exceptional about the death of Jesus and how are the two halves of the Book reconciled in relation to God's actions towards man. If I ask a question about sacrifices made in the The Lord of Rings, will you feel the need to start derailing the topic to how hobbits aren't real?

Anyway...
Quote:
Jophiel, as I am at work and donot have a copy of the bible at my disposal for perusal, what was the nature of the sin for the 2 in question. Was there prior warning of the outcome of lieng to the apostle? When you stated Disciple I was thinking Saint type disciple, not a common follower Disciple.
In Acts 3 (I believe, no Bible in front of me), two new disciples (i.e. Christians) sold their property as was the custom to give the money to the Church. Ananias decided to hold some money back and his wife knew about it. He went to Peter and said "Here's all my money" to which Peter asked why he felt the need to lie to the church, at which point Ananias dropped dead. Then Peter went to Sapphira and asked her "was this the money you got for your property?" and Sapphira said "Yeah, that's all of it" and Peter again asked why she was lying about it and she died as well. Note that giving up all you owned wasn't mandated by Jesus so it wasn't a question of why they were "stealing from the Church" as much as why they were lying to Peter about their supposed charity.
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#35 Nov 30 2004 at 5:40 PM Rating: Decent
**
475 posts
Exactly,

Nobby butting in with the whole beliefs are irrelevant cheese whiz is is complete ignorance. This discussion IS about beliefs and sayin beliefs have no relevance in a discussion about beliefs is moronic.

so go ********** off" from this arguement nobby. As you so boldly put it to biggity...


as for jophiel... Hmmm, not familiar with that section, i'll need to read it to see what it says in complete context to properly respond...
#36 Nov 30 2004 at 5:43 PM Rating: Good
Ministry of Silly Cnuts
*****
19,524 posts
Maddstarr

If I 'believe' that flying a passenger jet into a packed office block, will you still respect me in the morning?

Now GFY you supercilious piece of sh[i][/i]it.

Jophiel quotes scripture in context. It seems he has faith.

He has my respect.

You, my little pre-teen fluffer, have my undying contempt.
____________________________
"I started out with nothin' and I still got most of it left" - Seasick Steve
#37 Nov 30 2004 at 5:45 PM Rating: Decent
Nobby obviously knows nothing of this matter, therefore his ignorant responses will be ignored from here on out. As that seems the best way to deal with his type.

you ask for clarification, and you get insulted. Very mature.
#38 Nov 30 2004 at 5:47 PM Rating: Decent
**
475 posts
I really don't give a flying **** what I have of yours nobby... you are not contributing to this belief discussion, therefore Biggity has the right idea... and I'll follow suit.

Good bye ********
#39 Nov 30 2004 at 5:51 PM Rating: Good
Ministry of Silly Cnuts
*****
19,524 posts
Biggity0 wrote:
ignorant responses
OK. You started this.

I was a practising and devout Christian for over 40 years.

I have studied the Bible and its antecedant texts in 7 languages in over 45 iterations. In depth.

I have participated in theological debate in the Vatican and the Anglican General Synod with a pontiff and numerous cardinals, priests, Rabbis and Imami.

I no longer have faith. (Pray for me. Light a Candle. Slaughter a lamb or a homosexual. Whatever floats your boat)

If for one fu[/i]cking second you think that you have the first clue about theology or 'intellectual debate', I suspect you'll feel like Shirley Temple in the ring with a 24 year old Mike Tyson.

May the seventh pit of hell (or whatever you've decided to avoid) greet you on your awakening, you stinking little Skunk's Cu[i]
nt.
____________________________
"I started out with nothin' and I still got most of it left" - Seasick Steve
#41 Nov 30 2004 at 6:05 PM Rating: Good
*****
10,755 posts
Anyone else hear Digweed's mix this last weekend? Nice and dark, just how I love it. Not a big fan on Anthony Pappa, but he did a nice job too.


Joph...you impressed me. Pretty sure you don't care, but nice job if you truly got that from your memory.
#42 Nov 30 2004 at 6:10 PM Rating: Good
Quote:
First off, it's always a little exasperating to see people who can't view a conversation about the Bible without throwing in their "OMG Jesus isn't real!!!" Who the hell cares? That's not the question, the question is what was so exceptional about the death of Jesus and how are the two halves of the Book reconciled in relation to God's actions towards man. If I ask a question about sacrifices made in the The Lord of Rings, will you feel the need to start derailing the topic to how hobbits aren't real?


I thought this was directed at me. Who knew?

For me, I don't like to see any fictitious book taken too seriously. But feel there is less harm in having a in depth full frontal discussion about Frodo's bad case of Athlete's foot, than examples of God's Wrath in the New and Old Testament.

People who study the justifiable reasons for violence in the bible, should really remember that it is just a story.
#43 Nov 30 2004 at 6:42 PM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
Friar Reinman wrote:
I thought this was directed at me. Who knew?
Heh, not a direct comment to you. Just a general rolling of the eyes that people feel the constant need to interject their claims of how fake the Bible is as if they fear people might somehow all become evangelical Christians by reading a message board thread. It's a safe bet that no one's beliefs are going to be severely changed by anything typed here and the constant piping up about how God isn't real just turns the thread from a potentially semi-interesting look at the literature and philosophy itself into the same stereotypical "God is real! Haha No he's not you idiot!" thread we've seen a bajillion times before.

Back to Ananais 'n Sapphira, I had the chapter wrong:

Now a man named Ananias, together with his wife Sapphira, also sold a piece of property. With his wife's full knowledge he kept back part of the money for himself, but brought the rest and put it at the apostles' feet.
Then Peter said, "Ananias, how is it that Satan has so filled your heart that you have lied to the Holy Spirit and have kept for yourself some of the money you received for the land? Didn't it belong to you before it was sold? And after it was sold, wasn't the money at your disposal? What made you think of doing such a thing? You have not lied to men but to God."
When Ananias heard this, he fell down and died. And great fear seized all who heard what had happened. Then the young men came forward, wrapped up his body, and carried him out and buried him.
About three hours later his wife came in, not knowing what had happened. Peter asked her, "Tell me, is this the price you and Ananias got for the land?"
"Yes," she said, "that is the price."
Peter said to her, "How could you agree to test the Spirit of the Lord? Look! The feet of the men who buried your husband are at the door, and they will carry you out also."
At that moment she fell down at his feet and died. Then the young men came in and, finding her dead, carried her out and buried her beside her husband. Great fear seized the whole church and all who heard about these events.
-- Acts 5:1-11
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#44 Nov 30 2004 at 6:52 PM Rating: Good
*****
10,755 posts
Quote:
Joph...you impressed me. Pretty sure you don't care, but nice job if you truly got that from your memory.


Acts ch5 not ch3? I take it all back. Smiley: wink2
#45 Nov 30 2004 at 6:55 PM Rating: Decent
Nobby, your avatar is crazy. lol *poor lil' redyne....it was hers first right?*


Anyways, back to the thread.

You can believe in Evolution or you can believe in Creation. Hawat, noone really cares what you believe in. So ranting about Jesus if you really don't care in the first place is stupid.
If you don't believe, don't ask. Don't care what others believe either. Stop the questions and find a hobby. Leave Jesus alone. Smiley: mad
#46 Nov 30 2004 at 6:58 PM Rating: Decent
Nobby wrote:

Someone's just read Borges (or Moorcock, or Kierkegaard, or Boethius)


Kierkegaard! Kierkegaard!

We all love Søren Kierkegaard!

"Life can only be understood backwards; but it must be lived forwards"

All right.. Not everyone loves the Master of Philosophy.

Edited, Tue Nov 30 19:05:37 2004 by Qaoz
#47 Nov 30 2004 at 7:05 PM Rating: Decent
**
475 posts
nobby, I dont give a hair on an ameobas ******* whether you trained under the pope AND the dhali lama! The fact that you cannot see the common sense flaw in your arguement is all the evidence i need to make you look patheticaly stupid!

Nobby, the fact you have to throw credentials into an arguement against someone who your whimsical mind sees as an intellectual inferior, speaks volumes about you...

its quite funny actually! LOL you tool you!

do yourself a favor nob... shut up while the title you have and the number of posts forged with it still gives you some sense of dignity and credibility...
#48 Nov 30 2004 at 7:08 PM Rating: Decent
And it's off.. Who will win?!
#49 Nov 30 2004 at 7:10 PM Rating: Decent
**
475 posts
Jophiel,

That passage says that they lied to the spirit... makes me wonder if there is missing information us mortals do not know? Denying the spirit after you have recieved a witness of it, is unforgiveable and is one of the only 2 unforgiveable sins. Could it be they died denying the witness they recieved? Anyways, I must go, I will return tomorrow to share in this joy once again!
#50 Nov 30 2004 at 7:12 PM Rating: Decent
A mother dies while giving birth to a baby. This baby caused her death making it a sinner, right?

Now, the baby dies within the hour or maybe even while in her stomache.. Will it go to heaven or will it go to hell?

Edited, Tue Nov 30 19:12:48 2004 by Qaoz
#51 Nov 30 2004 at 7:14 PM Rating: Good
Ministry of Silly Cnuts
*****
19,524 posts
maddstarr wrote:
common sense
=Indoctrination of the feeble minded.

You're out of your depth Ignatius.

There's a division called 'reason v. argument'.

Dare I quote Smash and recommend Aquinas?

Naa, f[i][/i]uck it.

Whoosh!

Quick! Look up!

Naww. Too late. You missed it again!
____________________________
"I started out with nothin' and I still got most of it left" - Seasick Steve
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 224 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (224)