I'm a bit confused about all this leg humping going on by the left over Colin Powell. I mean, wtf...I could have told you he was going to be leaving two years ago if Bush was re-elected. Hell all the news organizations that are now humping his leg coulda told you it two years ago, and it wasn't because of this "yes man" crap.
Wasn't anyone watching when Powell took us to the U.N.? Why don't any of these "news" agencies remember the fact that Powell was the one that convinced the Bush administration to go to the U.N., and assured them we would receive support from both France and Germany. I remember it because to me, it was one of the biggest tactical errors that occured...and was a huge blow to Powell's credibility. Up until that point, he was the golden boy...after that point, he kinda faded into the background and with good reason.
This isn't to say Powell is a bad person, or that he isn't a smart man. All I'm saying was that when that all went down at the U.N., I knew the guy was screwed...hell you probably all posted it here at the time as well, but have just forgotten about it.
So for those talking about Bush looking for a "yes man" (or woman, as it were), I'd submit to you that Bush trusted Powell's judgement on one of the most important policy decisions in the past fifty years over his own, and it turned out that Powell was wrong. That to me is reason enough for the guy to lose his job, and it to me is the main reason.
On a side note, I felt real bad about how all that went down, I've always liked Colin Powell. We're all imperfect individuals, and it's unfortunate that when his time to make a mistake came, it came on such a grand scale...que sera, sera.