Forum Settings
       
« Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6
Reply To Thread

Bogus business practices?Follow

#1 Nov 08 2004 at 3:44 PM Rating: Good
Encyclopedia
******
35,568 posts
Just curious what you all think about this. It's something that happened to me yesterday that's got me a bit peeved.

So I'm in the local Sears looking to buy a TV for my bedroom (cause the really old one that I bought out of the back of some guys car 15 years ago with the wood paneling on the sides stopped working). I settle on a 26" HDTV LCD screen that looks really nice (and wont take up a ton of space, which was the point). It's got a price tag of just a bit over $2k, and is actually a pretty good deal IMO. Surprisingly, I'd usually buy electronics at other locations, but I checked the Frys and Best Buy (and a couple other local places), and Sears actually did have the best deal in this range.

So I start the process of buying the thing, pull out my checkbook as I always do for larger purchases, and write a check. The guy takes my license and check and does his usual fiddling with the POS machine. I'm not concerned because I know that my checking account has plenty of money in it (heck. this purchase wouldn't make a dent in the bonus I got this 6 month review, let alone my normal account balance). I am utterly surprised when the machine tells the guy he can't take the check.


Hmm... This is curious. We decide to investigate. We call up the number for the service (that's printed with a ton of other garbage on the back of the check now). The upshot is that the check was not refused because of a lack of funds, or any odd history of check writing, or any history of bounced/bad checks. Some other part of their approval process rejected it, but the woman on the other end of the phone wont tell me what it is.

As a historical note, I have never once in my entire life bounced a check. I've been trying to rack my brain as to why this happened. The stupid service wont tell me, alledgedly for security purposes (which is annoying all by itself). After much thought on this though, I think I've come up with why.

About a year ago, I made a decision not to maintain a mailing address at my home address. Basically, I realized that out of the 10 pounds or so of junk that appeared each month, it was only the same 5 or 6 bills from businesses that I had business with that I cared about. With virtually all business available online, I decided that I'd cut out an extremely annoying part of my daily routine by simply cancelling my postal service (which is harder to do then you might think honestly).


About 3 months ago, with my washer and dryer on the fritz (they came with the place and really sucked), I bought a really nice set. From Sears. For about 1400 bucks. That's the key bit I think, and I believe that's where the problem lies.

My suspicion is that the check approval company uses the information to do direct marketing (or sell to other companies that do). Certainly, I have no knowledge of any contract with Sears much less myself where they promise not to do this (which in todays world means that they do). The fact that they got mail returned as undeliverable would be a "bad thing" to them. I suspect that flags something in their system that they use to refuse check approval.


Sears had the same approval process 3 months ago. My check cleared with no problem. Yesterday it didn't. What could possibly have changed? The only thing I can think of is that they tried to send me stuff in the mail, got a return and then flagged my account.

So here's the issue. Assuming this is true, on a scale of 1 to 10, how bogus is this as a business practice? After all, isn't the purpose of a check approval company to simply verify that the check being presented at the POS is a valid check, is owned by the person pictured in the ID, and likely has sufficient funds for the purchase? All of those conditions were confirmed, but they refused the check anyway (the woman told me that the check was not refused due to any history with the account, or any bad checks, or any suspicion that the account did not hold sufficient funds). Why exactly am I required to allow them to send me mail before they'll approve a check? Doesn't that amount to arm twisting to ensure they can mass market? Should a check approval company be able to do this? If it's ok to do this, then how exactly can one avoid dealing with piles of junk mail?



Yes. I know I'm a rebel. Most people will say: "Dude. Deal with the mail". Call it an experiment if you want. Honestly, it's worked out pretty well so far. The only issues I've had are government agencies like the DMV (have to schedule appointments to pick stuff up), and the state property tax people. But that's like 3 things I have to make special arrangements for a year. That's a hell of a lot less trouble then dealing sorting through a pile of junk mail every day. The last thing I actually expected to happen was to find that I couldn't write checks due to not having a mailing address.

Thoughts? Suggestions? I'm working up to getting them on the phone again and putting them through the wringer on this one (and to see if my suspicions is correct, although I can't think of anything else it could be). What do you think I should do?
____________________________
King Nobby wrote:
More words please
#2 Nov 08 2004 at 3:47 PM Rating: Decent
Imaginary Friend
*****
16,112 posts
Smiley: boozing
____________________________
With the receiver in my hand..
#3 Nov 08 2004 at 3:49 PM Rating: Good
****
4,596 posts
Quote:
Thoughts? Suggestions?


Debit Card
____________________________
Nicroll 65 Assassin
Teltorid 52 Druid
Aude Sapere

Oh hell camp me all you want f**kers. I own this site and thus I own you. - Allakhazam
#4 Nov 08 2004 at 3:56 PM Rating: Good
Drama Nerdvana
******
20,674 posts
When it comes to stuff like this its probably not the big brother marketing thing you think it is but basically the fact that the company has strict rules and guidelines that the drones must follow.

If you dont have the stationary address that they need to satisfy the beauracratic process they simply wont move along, no matter what you have in your account or how spotless your history is.

Edited, Mon Nov 8 16:04:08 2004 by bhodisattva
____________________________
Bode - 100 Holy Paladin - Lightbringer
#5 Nov 08 2004 at 4:01 PM Rating: Default
Well it seems to me that in the day and age we live in with terrorism the way it is (phony id's,bogus citizenship,etc) I suggest you just stop being petty and live with minimal inconveniences, like junk mail, telemarketing, etc. and pursue different avenues of anonnymity. There are legal ways to be removed from mailer lists and phone lists, it just takes a little investigation depending on where you live.
#6 Nov 08 2004 at 4:02 PM Rating: Good
Encyclopedia
******
35,568 posts
bhodisattva Defender of Justice wrote:


If you dont have the stationary address that they need to satisfy the beauracratic process they simply wont move along, no matter what you have in your account or how spotless your history is.


Ok. I could accept that. But I *do* have a stationary address. I live at that address. I have lived at that address for over 5 years. Heck. I *own* the home at that address (which is information available to the public).

The only distinction is that they can't send mail to that address. That's it. My question is *why* do they use that as a determinant?

I also understand that they are just drones following a system. I did not yell or scream at the folks at Sears (totally out of their control). I got a bit miffed at the woman with the approval company, but not overly so (I'll probably ***** out her manager when I do get around to calling them back). She's just following proceedure as well.

My issue is that their proceedures for validating checks should not include whether they can send mail to the person writing the check. Did it ever occur to them that I might not want them to do that? duh...
____________________________
King Nobby wrote:
More words please
#7 Nov 08 2004 at 4:04 PM Rating: Decent
What's a fu[u][/u]cking check?

On the bleeding edge of the Technological Divide, eh Gbaji?

I guess I'll have to borrow a time machine some time and travel down to "Sears" in "San Diego" and ask them what a check is myself.

#8 Nov 08 2004 at 4:09 PM Rating: Good
Drama Nerdvana
******
20,674 posts
Well they might like to have the mail address in the case the cheque bounces so they can contact you, or if there is ever a case of fraud or some such thing, even if they wanted to send you mail with statements for your checking account.

Now I know you have never had a bounced cheque or fraud but it can happen and companies do like to cover there asses.
____________________________
Bode - 100 Holy Paladin - Lightbringer
#9 Nov 08 2004 at 4:10 PM Rating: Good
****
6,760 posts
It wouldn't suprise me if what you describe as the possibility is exactly what happened. As someone else said, a check card would probably resolve any future problems in this area. In the meantime, Take some cash out in the bank and pay for your TV in cash.

BTW, pretty sure Best Buy will beat any price if they have the same model in stock. You may save a few bucks on it.
____________________________
Some people are like slinkies, they aren't really good for anything, but they still bring a smile to your face when you push them down the stairs.
#10 Nov 08 2004 at 4:10 PM Rating: Good
Encyclopedia
******
35,568 posts
Maggoo wrote:
There are legal ways to be removed from mailer lists and phone lists, it just takes a little investigation depending on where you live.


Yeah. There's another "legal" way to do it as well. It's called stop using your postal address for business. Works wonders. There is no law anywhere that requires that you accept mail at your home address. Certified mail can still be delivered. UPS can deliver. Fed Ex can deliver.


I did look into those methods. I spent quite a bit of time working with the post office about this issue. The problem is that that only addresses bulk mail. For some really bizarre reason the post office will not just block bulk mail if you ask them to (although they're the ones who put it in your box). You have to send letters to a half dozen different agencies that handle the bulk mailers and ask each one nicely to not send you any (I'm really not sure why the process is set up that way).


Um. That does nothing to prevent addressed junk mail though. So, if I write a check at some POS machine, and the check authorizer take that info to authorize the check, but also sells that to a marketing company, I'm going to get mail sent to me. Since it's addressed to me, the post office will deliver it no matter who you've asked to not send mailers to you. The only way to stop that sort of junk mailing is to not give them your address (which is what I normally do). In the case of a check though, you have no choice. It's on the check and tied into their database, so you're pretty much stuck.
____________________________
King Nobby wrote:
More words please
#11 Nov 08 2004 at 4:10 PM Rating: Decent
***
2,878 posts
While I have long since stopped using paper for paying for anything other than a hot dog, I have been victim of Identity Theft and has someone use my DL # to write forged checks. Not my name, not my SS, just the Drivers Licence #.

It took me 4 weeks of calls to the store that accepted the checks(Sam's Club) and 2 police reports(that the fu[b][/b]ckers wanted me to drive 500 miles to fill out, no thanks) to get it off my record.

Now use the damn check card.
#12 Nov 08 2004 at 4:16 PM Rating: Excellent
Ministry of Silly Cnuts
*****
19,524 posts
I sympathise gbaji

I was recently buying a wax-cylinder player and the apprentice-boy refused my groats!! The ******* insisted on a prometary note from my master and a signed affidavit from my apothecary's alchemist.

Since then, I've moved on and only deal in Magic Beans or small black children.

You're so yesterday gbaji.
____________________________
"I started out with nothin' and I still got most of it left" - Seasick Steve
#13 Nov 08 2004 at 4:16 PM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
Gbaji wrote:
I'm not concerned because I know that my checking account has plenty of money in it (heck. this purchase wouldn't make a dent in the bonus I got this 6 month review, let alone my normal account balance). I am utterly amazed at the awesome size of my e-peen
I think you should call up the powers that be and ask them for a reason before decrying the good people at Sears Roebuck & Co.
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#14 Nov 08 2004 at 4:21 PM Rating: Excellent
*****
16,160 posts
Get the Sears credit card, Gbaji, take an additional 10% off the price for using it and pay it off that same day.

Totem
#15 Nov 08 2004 at 4:29 PM Rating: Good
****
6,730 posts
Credit Cards. They arn't real money.


mmmm pretend money.
#16 Nov 08 2004 at 4:31 PM Rating: Decent
***
3,980 posts
Maybe its just me, but i highly doubt that they are refusing to sell you a 2k dollar television because they cant mail catalogs to you.

Catalogs are advetising. Advertising costs money. They were able to sell to you without advertising. Seems like a good thing to me.
#17 Nov 08 2004 at 4:32 PM Rating: Good
Drama Nerdvana
******
20,674 posts
Of course he will have to give out the mailing address inorder to get the sears card and those damn sears magazines.

Edited, Mon Nov 8 16:32:36 2004 by bhodisattva
____________________________
Bode - 100 Holy Paladin - Lightbringer
#18 Nov 08 2004 at 4:32 PM Rating: Excellent
*****
16,160 posts
I agree. And normally I wouldn't espouse their use, but since Gbaji has the cash to pay it off immediately, why not score an extra $200 off the purchase price and stick it to Sears on the way out the door?

Totem
#19 Nov 08 2004 at 4:33 PM Rating: Excellent
*****
16,160 posts
I agree. And normally I wouldn't espouse their use, but since Gbaji has the cash to pay it off immediately, why not score an extra $200 off the purchase price and stick it to Sears on the way out the door?

Totem
#20 Nov 08 2004 at 4:44 PM Rating: Good
Encyclopedia
******
35,568 posts
Prince pickleprince wrote:
What's a fu[u][/u]cking check?

On the bleeding edge of the Technological Divide, eh Gbaji?

I guess I'll have to borrow a time machine some time and travel down to "Sears" in "San Diego" and ask them what a check is myself.


As opposed to a credit card? What's the difference? It's just an extra step. Silly me. I prefer to pay for things I can afford right up front rather then borrowing money and then paying it back.

A check/debit card would work, but how much do you want to bet that they still use the same approval process? Why would a debit card be any different then a check? Same risks taken by the vendor (does the account have sufficient funds?).

And yeah. I could use cash easily enough. Um... Kinda hard to withdraw 2200 bucks through an atm on a Sunday afternoon though. You have to go in the bank for that.


That's what I use checks for. Buying things that are large enough purchases that I can't pay for them with cash easily. I'm just annoyed because it appears that the system they're using for check approval ties in information that has nothing to do with whether or not the check will clear, and everything to do with whether or not they can get market data out of the deal. Hence, the assertion that it's a bogus business practice.
____________________________
King Nobby wrote:
More words please
#21 Nov 08 2004 at 4:50 PM Rating: Excellent
Ministry of Silly Cnuts
*****
19,524 posts
Quote:
Um... Kinda hard to withdraw 2200 bucks through an atm on a Sunday afternoon though
Why?

And if your bank keeps your withdrawal limit that low, find a decent bank FFS.
____________________________
"I started out with nothin' and I still got most of it left" - Seasick Steve
#22 Nov 08 2004 at 4:52 PM Rating: Good
Encyclopedia
******
35,568 posts
Krogsbrew wrote:
Maybe its just me, but i highly doubt that they are refusing to sell you a 2k dollar television because they cant mail catalogs to you.

Catalogs are advetising. Advertising costs money. They were able to sell to you without advertising. Seems like a good thing to me.


You're missing the connection here. It wasn't Sears that refused the check. The guy there really wanted to make the sale, but had to follow proceedures (and I kinda felt sorry for him actually). It was a 3rd party agency that they use for check authorization. That company doesn't make a dime off the purchase I'm making. They get paid a set amount for providing a service to Sears (check authorization). Any extra money they can make on the side via marketing the information they gather while doing that is extra cash to them.

My point is that they didn't refuse the check because I was a risk to Sear's business, but because I was a risk to theirs. That's presumably not what Sears is paying them for. Sears lost a sale because the company they hired has some pretty squirrely conditions for check approval.


And yeah Joph. You are correct. I have not yet verified that this is the reason. It's just a very strong suspicion. I can't think of any other reason though, and it makes a lot of sense. I will be verifying it, I just left the check at home today, so I can't call them right now.
____________________________
King Nobby wrote:
More words please
#23 Nov 08 2004 at 4:52 PM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
Quote:
I'm just annoyed because it appears that the system they're using for check approval ties in information that has nothing to do with whether or not the check will clear, and everything to do with whether or not they can get market data out of the deal.
Yay capitalism!
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#24 Nov 08 2004 at 4:54 PM Rating: Good
Encyclopedia
******
35,568 posts
Nobby wrote:
Quote:
Um... Kinda hard to withdraw 2200 bucks through an atm on a Sunday afternoon though
Why?

And if your bank keeps your withdrawal limit that low, find a decent bank FFS.


Have you ever withdawn large amounts of cash from an ATM? It's not one bank. It's all ATMs. None of them will allow more then $300 dollars in cash withdrawn during a 24 hour period. Maybe things are different in the UK, but that's standard practice everywhere in the US.

Being that it was Sunday afternoon, and the bank was closed, the only way to get cash is an atm. You can't withdraw that much from an ATM. It has nothing to do with the bank.

Edited, Mon Nov 8 16:54:49 2004 by gbaji
____________________________
King Nobby wrote:
More words please
#25 Nov 08 2004 at 4:58 PM Rating: Decent
I'd actually agree with trying to get a credit card for the discount they offer.

On an unrelated note, has anyone else seen the new... er, Visa? promotion? If you spend money on your credit card you're entered into a contest. If you win, you're credited for whatever you bought in November and December (free, essentially).

Now that's a good way to totally ***** gullible people out the ***. "Look! It's like them lottery, but on the Home Shopping Channel! Lit's order up us'n some gifts, paw!"
#26 Nov 08 2004 at 5:26 PM Rating: Excellent
Will swallow your soul
******
29,360 posts
Back on topic: any business has the right to refuse your check for any reason whatever. A check is not legal tinder, in the sense that it's not issued by the U.S. Treasury.

If they turn down cash, you've got a case.

Edit: verb tenses > me.

Edited, Mon Nov 8 17:31:23 2004 by SamiraX
____________________________
In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.

« Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 297 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (297)