Forum Settings
       
« Previous 1 2 3
Reply To Thread

Random BS ComplaintFollow

#1 Nov 03 2004 at 3:39 PM Rating: Decent
The karma system blows.

Everyone above 3.00 rate posts down just to demonstrate how they're the bigger league.

Wow. I envy your Sage, Guru and Custom titles so much it hurts.

Who invented this karma system anyway and for what reason?

Those with Sub-Default rating are all pretty hardcore posters here, contributing with some nice stuff. Some people just have a grudge against them and because they did various sexual favours to the devs (and because they find their only joy here as they can show of their manhood like the brutes they are), they are able to quickly put a user down to a Sub-Default rating expelling them from the boards (normal filter settings).

Since the majority of the users here are kids (yes Smash, you heard me) I find it rather below my standard to actually try and fight it. But hey, what can I say. You elected an asshat for President so I think I'm entitled to make a ****** thread, eh?

Btw, due to the new family filter laws you're no longer allowed to write obese words or abbreviations like GFY or FTFY (it's not an obese abbreviation, but c'mon, who came up with that ****?)
#2 Nov 03 2004 at 3:42 PM Rating: Good
***
2,453 posts
Quote:
Btw, due to the new family filter laws you're no longer allowed to write obese words or abbreviations like GFY or FTFY (it's not an obese abbreviation, but c'mon, who came up with that sh*t?)




Obese means fat. The word you're looking for is obscene.



Asshat.

#3 Nov 03 2004 at 3:44 PM Rating: Excellent
****
6,730 posts
Quote:
Those with Sub-Default rating are all pretty hardcore posters here, contributing with some nice stuff.


If they were contributing to anything other then the general decline in I.Q on this forum we wouldn't be rating them down, that includes you by the way.
#4 Nov 03 2004 at 3:46 PM Rating: Excellent
Quote:
Everyone above 3.00 rate posts down just to demonstrate how they're the bigger league.

this is patently false. In your case its because you absolutely suck as a poster and should probably think about a labotomy.

And it obvious, not obese.
#5 Nov 03 2004 at 3:47 PM Rating: Good
Tracer Bullet
*****
12,636 posts

Posters who are sub-default:

Varus, JayCGN, proofkuniva, proof's puppet siznatch


Go ahead, defend them.

I use default filter nowadays. Every once in a while I switch to Never filter, roll my eyes, and quickly switch back.


#6 Nov 03 2004 at 3:51 PM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
Quote:
Wow. I envy your Sage, Guru and Custom titles so much it hurts
Enough to make a thread crying about it, anyway.
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#7 Nov 03 2004 at 3:54 PM Rating: Good
What about the sporatic post counts? You don't envy those? Smiley: frown

#8 Nov 03 2004 at 3:56 PM Rating: Good
***
1,930 posts
I do Skeet.
#9 Nov 03 2004 at 3:58 PM Rating: Excellent
Prodigal Son
******
20,643 posts
Qaoz wrote:
Those with Sub-Default rating are all pretty hardcore posters here, contributing with some nice stuff. Some people just have a grudge against them and because they did various sexual favours to the devs (and because they find their only joy here as they can show of their manhood like the brutes they are), they are able to quickly put a user down to a Sub-Default rating expelling them from the boards (normal filter settings).

FYI below 3.00 does not make sub-default. I believe it's 1.50 that's sub-default, which takes some doing to accomplish. I'm at 2.87 which doesn't allow me to rate, but does not get filtered.

Anyways, I believe that most of the active posters here are in their 20s or more, so if you want to demean us, you'd have to call us "childish" or "child-like" instead of "kids". I mean, it says something when a good deal of us have or are having our own kids.
____________________________
publiusvarus wrote:
we all know liberals are well adjusted american citizens who only want what's best for society. While conservatives are evil money grubbing scum who only want to sh*t on the little man and rob the world of its resources.
#10 Nov 03 2004 at 3:58 PM Rating: Excellent
Gurue
*****
16,299 posts
Quote:
Since the majority of the users here are kids


I wouldn't say majority.
#11 Nov 03 2004 at 4:01 PM Rating: Good
Deb, I'd help get you over 3.0 but I recall a thread a long time ago where you asked me to do that so you could rate my 'dumb ***' down.

Lol, I going to try to find that thread.
#12 Nov 03 2004 at 4:06 PM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
Rate-ups for everyone in the thread who isn't crying about Karma!

Edited, Wed Nov 3 16:06:30 2004 by Jophiel
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#13 Nov 03 2004 at 4:07 PM Rating: Decent
Quote:

Obese means fat. The word you're looking for is obscene.



Asshat.


No, no... Not fat

PHAT!

You walk the walk, but you sure as hell don't talk the talk!
#14 Nov 03 2004 at 4:15 PM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
You know what you should do?

Go to the Feedback forum and make a thread explaining how and why the karma system is broken and sucks. Once Danalog, Illia, etc read your carefully crafted complaint, I have no doubt that they will immediately abolish the system and restore you to your rightful place.
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#15 Nov 03 2004 at 4:24 PM Rating: Excellent
Prodigal Son
******
20,643 posts
Queen Skeeter wrote:
Deb, I'd help get you over 3.0 but I recall a thread a long time ago where you asked me to do that so you could rate my 'dumb ***' down.

Lol, I going to try to find that thread.

Skeet, I believe that was the thread early on in the new forum's life when you wanted to retain all the regulars' post counts and such from the old boards. I think I was being a whiny little ***** over the sockpuppet drama at the time.
____________________________
publiusvarus wrote:
we all know liberals are well adjusted american citizens who only want what's best for society. While conservatives are evil money grubbing scum who only want to sh*t on the little man and rob the world of its resources.
#16 Nov 03 2004 at 4:33 PM Rating: Decent
Quote:
Skeet, I believe that was the thread early on in the new forum's life when you wanted to retain all the regulars' post counts and such from the old boards. I think I was being a whiny little ***** over the sockpuppet drama at the time.


Yeah, that's the one! I was thinking it was my "Yay 1000 posts" thread but it wasn't it.

Ah... Good times..

Lol.
#17 Nov 03 2004 at 4:34 PM Rating: Decent
Hehe...

You really love me, don't you?

All of you.

Hell, I've attracted most of you kids even though this thread screams "WHINER!" from a mile away.

I'm telling you, you can't live without us! We are the only reason why you're still here. To flame us down like the bugs we are. You enjoy it, don't you? Admit it.. You really do!

So I got the word obscene wrong.. My bad, I know that obese means fat and that obscene was the word, but my mind went blank for a minute or two. That never happens to you or what?

So I whine about the karma system. Sure, it's easy for you to stand up and cuss at me because you're all friggin Scholars and Sages (and schizofrenic in Skeet's case). What has happened to this board? You can no longer post on the Out Of Topic board without getting rated to hell and back again (or sometimes you're just left alone down there).

You all post about election and that ****. I don't care at all about the friggin election and you got like 40 posts about the **** out there. If you reply on any of the posts you're gonna get flamed by the random flamers, elite flamers or the ones who doesn't agree with your oppinion. Need I say that the karma system isn't a "rate his performance or relevancy"-poll. It's a way of removing spammers and trolls or whatever you call them automatically without having to put 20 admins on a fulltime job.

I can't even take a **** on these boards without written approval from at least 4 of you bastards and even then some *** will rate me down on a thread I posted 3 weeks ago. It sickens me that you can't say what's on your mind without having to worry about the evil leet board scanners who apparently have loads of sparetime at work. Everytime a person is rated above 3.00 he or she becomes an admin-like user with the ability to kick other users down the stairs so ******* hard you won't believe it.

It's easy for the elite unit of posters in here because they have enough "fans" to rate them up and prolly a connection or two with the administration. They can hover around with their 4.59 rating and 12k posts, spam, cuss and humiliate other posters and those posters can't do jack about it (because they're below 3.00 in rating).

What kinda sick rule is that? Sure, you need to remove certain posters who provide nothing usefull to these boards, but I'm not talking usefull to be something you determines. It's useless writing "suck my c*ck you c*nt" 20 times in a thread, but it's not useless to say your opinion as long as it's not filled with swearing and stuff. I find as much usefullness in a thread about the English grammar as I do in a thread about the recent election. They both entlighten me in different ways.

Get this into your mind:

Do NOT rate posts down just because you don't agree with the poster.
Do NOT rate posts down just because you don't find the post relevant.
Do NOT rate posts down just because others have done so.
Do NOT rate posts down just because you don't like the person.

DO rate posts down if the person is being rude.
DO rate posts down if the person contributes with nothing but spam and such.

The rate system is meant to sort out the useless from the usefull posters.

You'll prolly pull a lot of GFY out after I'm done with this, but please don't. It's not usefull for me to know you want me to go **** myself. Keep your perverted thoughts to yourself or you'll have to rate yourself down. Please don't correct my typos. I know there are some, including a misspelled 'oppinion' up there. I know I can't write perfect English and I don't intend to, but I'm doing my best. I don't flame analphabetic people so please think twice before rating posts.

I didn't intend for this to be a whining post about how unfair it is that you get to be Sages and Gurus. I just think the rate system is being used the wrong way. You might just turn my own words against me, it seems to be the standard response to any post in here. You're gonna write something like this:

Qaoz wrote:

Sure, you need to remove certain posters who provide nothing usefull to these boards


"You're not contributing with anything usefull, GFY."

or

Qaoz wrote:

Sure, you need to remove certain posters who provide nothing usefull to these boards, like me


"FTFY"

I don't find that amusing at all. In fact I find it very childish of you to do such a thing. It's kindergarten responses. "Nu-uuh, you're the biggest tard".

So, do what you want with my rating, but try and pretend like you actually understood what I just wrote. If you don't realize that something is really wrong with the rating system here, then you're truly screwed.
#18 Nov 03 2004 at 4:37 PM Rating: Excellent
Gurue
*****
16,299 posts
I've never said anything about my karma. But mine never moves anyway.

yeah, just set myself up to be rated down big time, like I care...
#19 Nov 03 2004 at 4:37 PM Rating: Good
****
4,285 posts
^^ Who hasn't scrolled past that post?



EDIT: Damn you Nadenu...getting in my way...

Edited, Wed Nov 3 16:40:11 2004 by DewVictim
#20 Nov 03 2004 at 4:37 PM Rating: Good
Quote:
Need I say that the karma system isn't a "rate his performance or relevancy"-poll. It's a way of removing spammers and trolls or whatever you call them automatically without having to put 20 admins on a fulltime job.

I can't even take a sh*t on these boards without written approval from at least 4 of you bastards and even then some *** will rate me down on a thread I posted 3 weeks ago. It sickens me that you can't say what's on your mind without having to worry about the evil leet board scanners who apparently have loads of sparetime at work. Everytime a person is rated above 3.00 he or she becomes an admin-like user with the ability to kick other users down the stairs so @#%^ing hard you won't believe it.

It's easy for the elite unit of posters in here because they have enough "fans" to rate them up and prolly a connection or two with the administration. They can hover around with their 4.59 rating and 12k posts, spam, cuss and humiliate other posters and those posters can't do jack about it (because they're below 3.00 in rating).

What kinda sick rule is that? Sure, you need to remove certain posters who provide nothing usefull to these boards, but I'm not talking usefull to be something you determines. It's useless writing "suck my c*ck you c*nt" 20 times in a thread, but it's not useless to say your opinion as long as it's not filled with swearing and stuff. I find as much usefullness in a thread about the English grammar as I do in a thread about the recent election. They both entlighten me in different ways.


I only see one poster in this thread that is sub-default? The system seems to be working!
#21 Nov 03 2004 at 4:40 PM Rating: Excellent
STFU n00b!11!one. GFY!

Oh yeah, eat **** and die, podter child for retroactive abortion!
#22 Nov 03 2004 at 4:42 PM Rating: Decent
Wtf was I thinking?

I thought that since you afterall got children and stuff you would actually take this seriously, but I guess you're not mature enough.

What I wouldn't do for some serious people on these boards.
#23 Nov 03 2004 at 4:45 PM Rating: Decent
**
791 posts
You know what I haven't had in a while? Big League Chew.
#24 Nov 03 2004 at 4:48 PM Rating: Good
Quote:
What I wouldn't do for some serious people on these boards.

You're a tool. I have read posts you've made for months now and you haven't improved. One impassioned plea to help you stay above the default filter does not make you worth a sh'it as a poster. You want to be accepted? Make another 650 posts without sucking. Or abandon Qaoz and come back fresh as something else.

Other than that, f'uck off.
#25 Nov 03 2004 at 4:48 PM Rating: Decent
You need to log off, play with your children and remember how to treat people.

You're obviously not capable of listening (Baron, you rated me down even though you didn't read my post? How sweet of you).

Maybe it's a good thing you got so much sparetime at work. Giving you any responsibility whatsoever would probably lead to a disaster.

When you're conversing with your boss, do you also reply like this:

GFY, asshat!!1!one

U R teh s0x0rs! Dumbface!

And then you try clicking the rate scroll bar to get him below 1.50 so that the filter will remove him for you?
#26 Nov 03 2004 at 4:49 PM Rating: Decent
***
3,458 posts
Qaoz wrote:
I can't even take a **** on these boards without written approval from at least 4 of you bastards and even then some *** will rate me down on a thread I posted 3 weeks ago.
You are more than welcome to take a sh[/b]it. The problem is you have this gorilla like tendancy to smear your fecal matter all over the forum in the form of your posts. So by all means take a sh[b]it, just dont share it.
« Previous 1 2 3
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 188 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (188)