Forum Settings
       
Reply To Thread

The myth of Voter disenfranchisementFollow

#52 Oct 28 2004 at 1:54 PM Rating: Good
Quote:
Especially now that his sock puppet, Varrus, failed.

FTFY
#53 Oct 28 2004 at 1:55 PM Rating: Decent
Interesting how fast you ran from the Republican party line when it was shown how you're an idiot (read: Last thread you started).

But please, crosspost more Druge stuff. We've never seen any of this before, because no one else on this board has ever posted it, especially not when it was new rather than 3 weeks old.

Quote:
Do you realize there's not a single shred of evidence that one black voter who wanted to vote anywhere in this country was not allowed to, legally registered to vote, was not allowed to? Not one shred of evidence to support this claim, and yet the Democrats and Kerry keep making it.


Your grammar looks like a 92 year old hooker- ugly and nothing you'd want to wake up to. For that matter, try to do a bloody google search. And before you ***** at the source, that's an AP article that they posted on their site.

Quote:


Under the settlement, both sides will work to restore voters who were wrongly removed from voters lists in the 2000 election. Many law-abiding voters across the state said their names were dropped because they were mistakenly pegged as ex-cons, who generally aren't allowed to vote in Florida.
#54 Oct 28 2004 at 1:55 PM Rating: Decent
Jophed,

Quote:
Totem knows that voter disenfrachisment is true, hence his desire to hijack the thread away from it.



Mary Frances Berry wrote a transmittal report that you guys are quoting as a source for proof that voter disenfranchisement it occuring. All this while the democrates are putting out a memo to claim disenfranchisement for minorities even if there's nothing apparent that it's occuring. Again Mary Frances Berry is who you whacko's are citing, lol and you say sh*t about drudge. Left coast dummycrats at their best.

Varus
#55 Oct 28 2004 at 1:57 PM Rating: Default
I'm just wondering... What is this phantom menace keeping people from voting anyways?

/hunts the weed monster that made people forget what day it was or where the polls were.
#56 Oct 28 2004 at 1:58 PM Rating: Decent
varrussword wrote:
Smashed,

Quote:
I'm a little fuzzy why you're so fascinated by that.


The word hypocrite comes to mind. Are we to believe someone who avoids taxes himself but would kill tax cuts in a heartbeat is looking out for anyones best interest but their own?

Varus


Hypocrisy?

As opposed to:

Bush's cocaine use.

Bush's avoiding the war

(ad inifnitum)
#57 Oct 28 2004 at 1:58 PM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
"you guys"?

All I've cited so far was some Florida government site and my ole favorite, the Straight Dope.
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#58 Oct 28 2004 at 2:00 PM Rating: Good
*****
16,160 posts
There is no such thing as voter disenfranchisement. I should know, I am black and the president of N.E.G.R.O.S. It is a myth propogated by my Caddy Escalade-challenged brethren, who feel gipped by the system because they are still driving older model Lincoln Continentals.

It's black jealousy thing. You white folk wouldn't understand.

Totem
#59 Oct 28 2004 at 2:00 PM Rating: Decent
Warlord Lefein wrote:
I'm just wondering... What is this phantom menace keeping people from voting anyways?

/hunts the weed monster that made people forget what day it was or where the polls were.


Lefein, read a little of the posts before You post next time.

Thanks,

Your mom.
#60 Oct 28 2004 at 2:02 PM Rating: Decent
varrussword wrote:
Jophed,

Quote:
Totem knows that voter disenfrachisment is true, hence his desire to hijack the thread away from it.



Mary Frances Berry wrote a transmittal report that you guys are quoting as a source for proof that voter disenfranchisement it occuring. All this while the democrates are putting out a memo to claim disenfranchisement for minorities even if there's nothing apparent that it's occuring. Again Mary Frances Berry is who you whacko's are citing, lol and you say sh*t about drudge. Left coast dummycrats at their best.

Varus


What about my link, Water-head baby?
#61 Oct 28 2004 at 2:10 PM Rating: Decent
Picksy,

Quote:
Bush's cocaine use.

Bush's avoiding the war


How about Kerry murdering fleeing children in vietnam and deserting his swiftboat squad at the first sign of danger. Nominating himself for all his purple hearts. Refusing to sign the form that allows for the release of his medical records which prove how much of a coward he is. Meeting with the chai-cons in france to discuss the communist manifesto which cost thousands of u.s. soldiers lifes. Oh and how about his testimony to the senate regarding war crimes he hadn't witnessed or can verify in anyway. And lets not forget Kerry's ever popular " I voted for it right before I voted against it" statement.

Varus


Varus
#62 Oct 28 2004 at 2:15 PM Rating: Decent
To the Republican ***** boys, you're wrong.


Just look at Oregon, and those other useless states in the west. Have you not heard about the shady registration tactics?

Tactics that only the RNC is doing? Wake up and smell the bubbling cup of STFU.
#63 Oct 28 2004 at 2:19 PM Rating: Decent
My LINK...ENGLISH, DO YOU SPEAK IT, MOTHERFUC[/u]KER?????

varrussword wrote:


How about Kerry murdering fleeing children in vietnam and deserting his swiftboat squad at the first sign of danger.Nominating himself for all his purple hearts.


Not true.

http://www.factcheck.org/article231.html


Varussword wrote:
Meeting with the chai-cons in france to discuss the communist manifesto which cost thousands of u.s. soldiers lifes. Oh and how about his testimony to the senate regarding war crimes he hadn't witnessed or can verify in anyway.


Not true.

http://www.factcheck.org/article244.html

Varussword wrote:
And lets not forget Kerry's ever popular " I voted for it right before I voted against it" statement.


Not true.

http://www.factcheck.org/article269.html


Got anything else, you sad, sad sack of sh[u]
it??

Edited, Thu Oct 28 15:20:20 2004 by pickleprince
#64 Oct 28 2004 at 2:19 PM Rating: Good
*****
16,160 posts
Whatdya talkin' about, Goody-goody-two-shoes? I've already admitted to wild orgies with Wiccans, razor wire, and german shepherds. What more do I have to 'fess up to? My secret nights of shame in D1ck Cheney's hideaway dressed as a Demmie donkey and braying, "Give it to me up my ~eeeeh-ohhhhhn!~ a$$, you virile oilman, you!"

/sobs

Damn you! I just lost whtever self respect I had because of you, you *******!

Totem
#65 Oct 28 2004 at 2:21 PM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
Everyone knows FactCheck is a tool of the liberal media. That's why Cheney used it as a reference in the debates.
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#66 Oct 28 2004 at 2:21 PM Rating: Good
Quote:
Tactics that only the RNC is doing? Wake up and smell the bubbling cup of STFU.

Yeah, 'cuz no democrats are employing shady tactics.

Welcome to the party, dipsh'it. Now sit back, get accustomed to your surroundings and grow a little while grown folks talk.
#67 Oct 28 2004 at 2:29 PM Rating: Default
The Commission commends the legislation, including the elimination of punch cards, paper ballots, mechanical lever machines, and central-count voting systems as well as the addition of provisional balloting, but notes the legislation was deficient in several areas of concern and would only be effective if the implementation matches the legislature’s intent to eliminate the problems.

So basically, according to this report minorities are too stupid to vote the same way as everybody else and not only is this notion not considered racist but in fact it is a finding by a government agency. My, we've come a long way since "Give me liberty or give me death."

Edited, Thu Oct 28 15:33:27 2004 by Lefein
#68 Oct 28 2004 at 2:32 PM Rating: Decent
Warlord Lefein wrote:
The Commission commends the legislation, including the elimination of punch cards, paper ballots, mechanical lever machines, and central-count voting systems as well as the addition of provisional balloting, but notes the legislation was deficient in several areas of concern and would only be effective if the implementation matches the legislature’s intent to eliminate the problems.

So basically, according to this report minorities are too stupid to vote the same way as everybody else and not only is this not racist but it is state sponsored disenfranchisement. My, we've come a long way since "Give me liberty or give me death."


^^Overreaction...
#69 Oct 28 2004 at 2:40 PM Rating: Default
No, I'm not hearing anything about the disenfranchisement of all communities it was "primarily minority communties"

I saw NOTHING in the report that said the machiens were broken or that people were selecting faulty ballots that would be harder to punch than other ballots to send to minority districts. Basically when you break that report down it came out to.

"Darn those monkeys can't punch a hole, pull a lever, etc like the rest of the state.... So it's disenfranchisement."

That gets a great big finger from Lefein.

Edited, Thu Oct 28 15:41:16 2004 by Lefein

Edited, Thu Oct 28 15:48:58 2004 by Lefein
#70 Oct 28 2004 at 2:49 PM Rating: Decent
Warlord Lefein wrote:
No, I'm not hearing anything about the disenfranchisement of all communities it was "primarily minority communties"

I saw NOTHING in the report that said the machiens were broken or that people were selecting faulty ballots that would be harder to punch than other ballots to send to minority districts. Basically when you break that report down it came out to.

"Darn those monkeys can't punch a hole, pull a lever, etc like the rest of the state.... So it's disenfranchisement."

That gets a great big finger from Lefein.

Edited, Thu Oct 28 15:41:16 2004 by Lefein

Edited, Thu Oct 28 15:48:58 2004 by Lefein



READ MY GODDAMNED LINK!!!!!

Sheez.
#71 Oct 28 2004 at 2:57 PM Rating: Default
I did, and the government in no official capacity can truly interfere with the actions of individual citizens short of putting a police officer at every corner 24/7 during election years.... Oh wait! Let's call it disenfranchisement if they dont!
#72 Oct 28 2004 at 3:01 PM Rating: Decent
Prodigal Son
******
20,643 posts
Antidisenfranchisement?
____________________________
publiusvarus wrote:
we all know liberals are well adjusted american citizens who only want what's best for society. While conservatives are evil money grubbing scum who only want to sh*t on the little man and rob the world of its resources.
#73 Oct 28 2004 at 3:02 PM Rating: Decent
Warlord Lefein wrote:
I did, and the government in no official capacity can truly interfere with the actions of individual citizens short of putting a police officer at every corner 24/7 during election years.... Oh wait! Let's call it disenfranchisement if they dont!


One of the people in the article admitted the Parties RECRUIT people to do this.

Come on, Lefein..you just aren't being rational today.

#74 Oct 28 2004 at 3:09 PM Rating: Default
Look, I'll admit the parties suck more *** than a septic treatment plant. You're right that this is a bad thing and a symptom of the modern political atmosphere. America is so damn divided my block looks like a protest without people holding the signs. I just can't call this disenfranchisement. Noones stopping people from voting they're just being dirty about how they go about it. I am so sick of the BS bickering of people over this election that I am putting this:
http://maddox.xmission.com/c.cgi?u=regressive

In my window this weekend and Im removing the regressive party text and putting a giant

BOTH SUCK! in it's place. If anyone has a right to say they are disenfranchised it's ME! Because I can't vote for my candidate of choice in my state because my state is a puppet di[/u]ck sucker of the two party system.

Edited, Thu Oct 28 16:13:41 2004 by Lefein
#75 Oct 28 2004 at 3:12 PM Rating: Decent
Last I saw, only the RNC were throwing away opposite party registrations.

I guess being older and having guzzled more *** makes you more intelligent. Still wrong.
#76 Oct 28 2004 at 3:16 PM Rating: Default
Oh yes, we all know Democrats are way above registering dead people in elections or the NAACP would NEVER do anything underhanded to get registered Democrats either Shoes...

Oh and then we woke up.
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 301 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (301)