Forum Settings
       
1 2 Next »
Reply To Thread

What do you do when you get Busted?Follow

#27 Oct 28 2004 at 2:42 PM Rating: Good
Quote:
i think he got the cool knocked out of him.

Posting from experience, eh?

What's up, lurker?
#28REDACTED, Posted: Oct 28 2004 at 4:50 PM, Rating: Sub-Default, (Expand Post) Picksy,
#29 Oct 28 2004 at 6:04 PM Rating: Good
Encyclopedia
******
35,568 posts
bhodisattva Defender of Justice wrote:

He also states:
IAEA wrote:
We would like to inform you that the following materials which have been included in annex 3 (item 74) registered under IAEA custody were lost after 9 April 2003, through the theft and looting of the governmental installations due to lack of security.


Ignore the propaganda from the Kerry and Bush camps and the media. Here's the source.

Uncle Sam fu[i][/i]cked up big style. Will the CinC accept responsibility or not? Where does the buck stop?

[/quote]

Just a point Bhodi. That quote is not *from* the IAEA. That's a quote of them quoting the guy from the Iraqi Ministry on something or other (see the letter at the end of the PDF).

I'm curious how he concludes that the materials were removed after April 9th, when so far we've seen no evidence that anyone could find the materials at that site on or at any time after that date. That statement completely contradicts those of both the US military and the reporters embedded with the military who were present at the time and all state that in the April 9-10th time frame they were unable to find those materials at the site.


How does this guy know they were still there on April 9th to make that assessment? Was he there? Did he witness and count the materials? Did anyone? So while there was fighting going on all around the area, he had guys hanging out counting munitions to make sure they were all there?

Unlikely, don't you think?
____________________________
King Nobby wrote:
More words please
#30 Oct 28 2004 at 6:14 PM Rating: Decent
varrussword wrote:
Picksy,

Quote:
Have you never heard that phrase, Inbred Jed?


Isn't that cute picksy wants to suck smashes d*ck. Keep your heterosexually challenged rants limited to personal e-mails to smashed no one here's interested in your ***** tendencies.

Varus


I'm surprised you can spell "heterosexual" much less TRY to fool anyone that you are one, Mulletfag.
#31 Oct 28 2004 at 6:15 PM Rating: Decent
Quote:
That statement completely contradicts those of both the US military and the reporters embedded with the military who were present at the time and all state that in the April 9-10th time frame they were unable to find those materials at the site.


Hmm...I wonder why....
#32 Oct 28 2004 at 6:25 PM Rating: Good
Encyclopedia
******
35,568 posts
Prince pickleprince wrote:
Quote:
That statement completely contradicts those of both the US military and the reporters embedded with the military who were present at the time and all state that in the April 9-10th time frame they were unable to find those materials at the site.


Hmm...I wonder why....


Occams razor tells me that most likely the Iraqi guy is flubbing the date, and likely has a very political reason for writing that letter 3 weeks before the US elections.

But you can make up a super convoluted conspiracy theory involving collaboration between hundreds of US soldiers and embedded reporters from multiple networks if you want. I'm going to stick with the most obvious and apparent explanation...
____________________________
King Nobby wrote:
More words please
#33 Oct 28 2004 at 6:27 PM Rating: Decent
gbaji wrote:
Prince pickleprince wrote:
Quote:
That statement completely contradicts those of both the US military and the reporters embedded with the military who were present at the time and all state that in the April 9-10th time frame they were unable to find those materials at the site.


Hmm...I wonder why....


Occams razor tells me that most likely the Iraqi guy is flubbing the date, and likely has a very political reason for writing that letter 3 weeks before the US elections.

But you can make up a super convoluted conspiracy theory involving collaboration between hundreds of US soldiers and embedded reporters from multiple networks if you want. I'm going to stick with the most obvious and apparent explanation...


Umm...yeah it's totally tin-foiled to think that the military controls what is written and said about their operations.

1 2 Next »
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 298 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (298)