- Forums
- Cross Site
- The Asylum
- Wrong War Wrong time Wrong Place
Wrong War Wrong time Wrong PlaceFollow
Oman...
Azerbaijan
Oh look! Thats 3 for me!
No ones answered the question, big surprise.
I did, in the second post. Big surprise, you ignored it.
Disclaimer:
To make a long story short, I don't take any responsibility for anything I post here. It's not news, it's not truth, it's not serious. It's parody. It's satire. It's bitter. It's angsty. Your mother's a *****. You like to jack off dogs. That's right, you heard me. You like to grab that dog by the bone and rub it like a ski pole. Your dad? Gay. Your priest? Straight. **** off and let me post. It's not true, it's all in good fun. Now go away.
To make a long story short, I don't take any responsibility for anything I post here. It's not news, it's not truth, it's not serious. It's parody. It's satire. It's bitter. It's angsty. Your mother's a *****. You like to jack off dogs. That's right, you heard me. You like to grab that dog by the bone and rub it like a ski pole. Your dad? Gay. Your priest? Straight. **** off and let me post. It's not true, it's all in good fun. Now go away.
Oman and Kuqait are both allies with monetary intrests in the Bush family. Azerbijan would have been more difficult than Iraq because of Terain.
Keep trying though. Venezuala has a lot of oil. Maybe they would have been a better target.
Keep trying though. Venezuala has a lot of oil. Maybe they would have been a better target.
Disclaimer:
To make a long story short, I don't take any responsibility for anything I post here. It's not news, it's not truth, it's not serious. It's parody. It's satire. It's bitter. It's angsty. Your mother's a *****. You like to jack off dogs. That's right, you heard me. You like to grab that dog by the bone and rub it like a ski pole. Your dad? Gay. Your priest? Straight. **** off and let me post. It's not true, it's all in good fun. Now go away.
To make a long story short, I don't take any responsibility for anything I post here. It's not news, it's not truth, it's not serious. It's parody. It's satire. It's bitter. It's angsty. Your mother's a *****. You like to jack off dogs. That's right, you heard me. You like to grab that dog by the bone and rub it like a ski pole. Your dad? Gay. Your priest? Straight. **** off and let me post. It's not true, it's all in good fun. Now go away.
Terrain compared to what? The damn tunnels and mountains we were fighting in during afghanistan? or maybe worse than the cities we've been fighting in during Iraq? Also, I dont believe the money issue would change for the Bush family once we took them over. I mean it would be Bush and his cronies taking over the oil buisness there right?
Quote:
The damn tunnels and mountains we were fighting in during afghanistan
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
Also, I dont believe the money issue would change for the Bush family once we took them over. I mean it would be Bush and his cronies taking over the oil buisness there right?
Somehow I think people might be hesitant to invest in your private buisness after you invade their country.
Disclaimer:
To make a long story short, I don't take any responsibility for anything I post here. It's not news, it's not truth, it's not serious. It's parody. It's satire. It's bitter. It's angsty. Your mother's a *****. You like to jack off dogs. That's right, you heard me. You like to grab that dog by the bone and rub it like a ski pole. Your dad? Gay. Your priest? Straight. **** off and let me post. It's not true, it's all in good fun. Now go away.
To make a long story short, I don't take any responsibility for anything I post here. It's not news, it's not truth, it's not serious. It's parody. It's satire. It's bitter. It's angsty. Your mother's a *****. You like to jack off dogs. That's right, you heard me. You like to grab that dog by the bone and rub it like a ski pole. Your dad? Gay. Your priest? Straight. **** off and let me post. It's not true, it's all in good fun. Now go away.
Joph.. it helps if you pay attention. We have moved on from that and was arguing that the terrain in Az isnt as much of a factor as Smashi says it is.
Im sorry.. we were talking about INVADING these places Smash.. not visiting.
Smashed,
Is this your answer? So you would have the U.S. bribe countries with oil to aid us in the protection of our liberty?
Varus
Quote:
By offering them a peice of the oil and the reconstruction contracts.
Is this your answer? So you would have the U.S. bribe countries with oil to aid us in the protection of our liberty?
Varus
Queen Cherrabwyn wrote:
Joph.. it helps if you pay attention. We have moved on from that and was arguing that the terrain in Az isnt as much of a factor as Smashi says it is.
It isn't? It looks to me like Az is rugged and mountainous (like Afgh.) as opposed to flat and sandy, like Iraq. Which do you think would be more troublesome? I mean, sure we can bomb Az. flat (like Afgh.) but then we need to spend the next five years raking through the resulting mountains of gravel (like Afgh.)
publiusvarus wrote:
we all know liberals are well adjusted american citizens who only want what's best for society. While conservatives are evil money grubbing scum who only want to sh*t on the little man and rob the world of its resources.
varrussword wrote:
Smashed,
Is this your answer? So you would have the U.S. bribe countries with oil to aid us in the protection of our liberty?
Quote:
By offering them a peice of the oil and the reconstruction contracts.
Is this your answer? So you would have the U.S. bribe countries with oil to aid us in the protection of our liberty?
After Dubya told the rest of the civilized world to fu[b][/b]ck off, we'll do it ourselves? Or do you still think we can finish it ourselves - without instituting another draft?
How would you handle the situation? The Brits are about to lynch Blair; then whatcha gonna do?
publiusvarus wrote:
we all know liberals are well adjusted american citizens who only want what's best for society. While conservatives are evil money grubbing scum who only want to sh*t on the little man and rob the world of its resources.
Quote:
Let me also tell you that you support the mindset that American boys and girls have to die to keep feul in your SUV! **********
I drive an SUV. Does that make me a Di[u][/u]ckhead?
Edited, Tue Oct 19 15:19:18 2004 by xythex
Nicroll 65 Assassin
Teltorid 52 Druid
Aude Sapere
Oh hell camp me all you want f**kers. I own this site and thus I own you. - Allakhazam
Teltorid 52 Druid
Aude Sapere
Oh hell camp me all you want f**kers. I own this site and thus I own you. - Allakhazam
varrussword wrote:
Smashed,
Is this your answer? So you would have the U.S. bribe countries with oil to aid us in the protection of our liberty?
Varus
Quote:
By offering them a peice of the oil and the reconstruction contracts.
Is this your answer? So you would have the U.S. bribe countries with oil to aid us in the protection of our liberty?
Varus
No, it's called putting something on the table so that the strain on US forces can be alleviated... Even just a little. Oh, and putting a larger international face on their struggle for Democracy instead of an American one.
Lord xythex wrote:
I drive an SUV. Does that make me a Di[li][/li]ckhead?
Lol, worst swear filter bypass...ever! ;)
Edited, Tue Oct 19 15:20:12 2004 by trickybeck
Queen Cherrabwyn wrote:
HEY LEF! You ****** Dumbass! If this were about oil dont you think we'd invade somewhere that they wouldnt fight back? I can think of a few not too far from where we are we could have done that too and is worth way more than IRAQ. Go research oil over there and then take a great big look at the map. You are a dumbass if you believe what the media has fed you.
Iraq is one of the few countries that has its own arrable land. It also has a relatively cosmpolitan popluace (at least compared ot its neighbors) It's directly in the center of the middle east and shares borders with both Syria and Iran. Come on, it was THE most logical target for regime change and destabilization of Middle East politics (which is a good thing) it also has an assload of oil.. Now, if our intentions are purely for the good of the people then why do we turn people AWAY?? That is the reality I am putting forward. Im not saying the war itself was over just oil.. Im saying that it at least looks like a major factor in the whole thing. Oil should not be even a reason to invade a country. That would be like China invading us for our Cheetos.
Edited, Tue Oct 19 15:23:26 2004 by Lefein
and yes, it makes you a ********* Consumption has driven the price of gasoline astronomically. You should be free to have an SUV and thats great and all but do you think you could drive a hybrid to and from work and save the SUV for family occasions?
Quote:
Joph.. it helps if you pay attention. We have moved on from that and was arguing that the terrain in Az isnt as much of a factor as Smashi says it is.
(1) You say that there are better targets for a war for oil than Iraq
(2) Smash asks you to name some
(3) You say, among others, Azerbaijan
(4) Smash says the terrain in Azerbaijan isn't as hospitible to an invasion as Iraq's
(5) You start babbling about the terrain in Afghanistan as if that were somehow relevant
(6) I point out it's not relevant
(7) You try to pretend I'm not paying attention
(8) I prove you wrong yet again
(9) Humiliated, you resort to calling me a dog fu[b][/b]cker or pedeophile or some other well worn phrase
Whoops.. looks like I got a bit ahead of myself there.
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
Its okay Joph, I stated some of the tactical reasons why Iraq was a logical choice. Azerbaijan wouldnt have anywhere near the geopolitical effect that Iraq does. Plus Iraq is a great candidiate for democracy since they can grow their own food and dont have a one dimensional economic structure. I like how people cant see beyond simple cause and effect... As if there has to be a single reason to do anything.
I thought it was about terrain....not location.
Flat, sandy, slightly marshy vs. mountainous wilderness.
Flat, sandy, slightly marshy vs. mountainous wilderness.
publiusvarus wrote:
we all know liberals are well adjusted american citizens who only want what's best for society. While conservatives are evil money grubbing scum who only want to sh*t on the little man and rob the world of its resources.
You assume the war was simply over oil, or that we would have just waged war with any random country that had oil. I think you guys underestimate Bush greatly. I'm not saying he's a great guy, but you guys are lasering in on just one aspect of things to satisfy your ideology.
Warlord Lefein wrote:
we would have just waged war with any random country that had oil
Psst, now they want our oil and our flu vaccines!!
Jihad!!!
What's bred in the bone will not out of the flesh.
I'm not saying the war WAS all about oil. I'm saying if we DID just want oil, Iraq's terrain is easier to fight a war in than Azerbaijan's is. Which isn't even to say that we COULDN'T fight in Azerbaijan, but you won't find a commander who'd want to wage an invasion into mountains instead of a nice tank battle in the desert.
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
Katie's really the only one trying to push the oil agenda. She is a Texan, after all.
publiusvarus wrote:
we all know liberals are well adjusted american citizens who only want what's best for society. While conservatives are evil money grubbing scum who only want to sh*t on the little man and rob the world of its resources.
Recent Visitors: 292
All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (292)
- Forums
- Cross Site
- The Asylum
- Wrong War Wrong time Wrong Place
© 2024 Fanbyte LLC