Forum Settings
       
« Previous 1 2
Reply To Thread

John Kerry <3 puppiesFollow

#1 Oct 14 2004 at 8:52 PM Rating: Good
Mistress of Gardening
Avatar
*****
14,661 posts
http://abcnews.go.com/Nightline/Vote2004/story?id=166434&page=1

I'm just linking it for now because I'm still reading it.
____________________________
Yum-Yum Bento Box | Pikko Pots | Adventures in Bentomaking

Twitter


[ffxivsig]277809[/ffxivsig]
#2 Oct 14 2004 at 9:05 PM Rating: Good
****
6,730 posts
Interesting read.

Waiting for Tot3m to chime in and attempt to twist the facts with a joke and gabaji to do so with a lot of wind.
#3 Oct 14 2004 at 9:06 PM Rating: Good
Tracer Bullet
*****
12,636 posts

Aaahh, he's got a bad case of the puppycrotch. A little GoldBond Medicated Powder oughtta clear that right up.



#4 Oct 14 2004 at 9:09 PM Rating: Good
Mistress of Gardening
Avatar
*****
14,661 posts
Yeah, was pretty interesting. I wish I could catch on my little radio in this office. Then I could hear what Savage has to say about it. Or said about it anyway. His show just started 10 minutes ago in Hawaii. Any listen to him that could fill me in?

Edited, Thu Oct 14 22:10:57 2004 by pikko
____________________________
Yum-Yum Bento Box | Pikko Pots | Adventures in Bentomaking

Twitter


[ffxivsig]277809[/ffxivsig]
#5 Oct 15 2004 at 9:52 AM Rating: Decent
*
199 posts
Here's the video of the Nightline Report. :D

http://news.globalfreepress.com/movs/wonk/ABC/NightlineSwiftBoatVetLiars.wmv

#6REDACTED, Posted: Oct 15 2004 at 10:00 AM, Rating: Sub-Default, (Expand Post) Dan Blather and ABC a paradigm of virtue in the media world...
#7 Oct 15 2004 at 10:02 AM Rating: Decent
Lunatic
******
30,086 posts

Dan Blather and ABC a paradigm of virtue in the media world...


Did rather get caught with a big drug problem, or sexually harassing his producer?

Just curious.

Ahahahahah.

Man, O'riley's finished. It's so great that Bush gave him an exclusive interview.

Muhahahhahah!! Rather's ethics are now untouchable!

Too funny.

Edited, Fri Oct 15 11:04:21 2004 by Smasharoo
____________________________
Disclaimer:

To make a long story short, I don't take any responsibility for anything I post here. It's not news, it's not truth, it's not serious. It's parody. It's satire. It's bitter. It's angsty. Your mother's a *****. You like to jack off dogs. That's right, you heard me. You like to grab that dog by the bone and rub it like a ski pole. Your dad? Gay. Your priest? Straight. **** off and let me post. It's not true, it's all in good fun. Now go away.

#8REDACTED, Posted: Oct 15 2004 at 10:04 AM, Rating: Sub-Default, (Expand Post) Well they may have their problems but refresh my memory as to which major news media outlet fabricated a story in order to slander a sitting president?
#9 Oct 15 2004 at 10:06 AM Rating: Decent
Lunatic
******
30,086 posts

Well they may have their problems but refresh my memory as to which major news media outlet fabricated a story in order to slander a sitting president?


Do you mean Fox's coverage of Clinton?

That was so long ago, though.
____________________________
Disclaimer:

To make a long story short, I don't take any responsibility for anything I post here. It's not news, it's not truth, it's not serious. It's parody. It's satire. It's bitter. It's angsty. Your mother's a *****. You like to jack off dogs. That's right, you heard me. You like to grab that dog by the bone and rub it like a ski pole. Your dad? Gay. Your priest? Straight. **** off and let me post. It's not true, it's all in good fun. Now go away.

#10REDACTED, Posted: Oct 15 2004 at 10:20 AM, Rating: Sub-Default, (Expand Post) Nice memory, a bit fuzzy on the details though. Allow me refresh your memory Clinton actually did bang Monica then lie under testimony. Fox reported this, you know news. CBS fabricated a source to create a story to bash a president. I know the differences are subtle but if you take your time and keep hydrated I'm sure you'll see the difference eventually.
#11 Oct 15 2004 at 10:24 AM Rating: Good
Lunatic
******
30,086 posts

CBS fabricated a source to create a story to bash a president.


Really, they fabricated a source?

Do you have proof of this? That's a serious allegation.

Ooops, talking out of your *** again, eh?


Hahahahaha.
____________________________
Disclaimer:

To make a long story short, I don't take any responsibility for anything I post here. It's not news, it's not truth, it's not serious. It's parody. It's satire. It's bitter. It's angsty. Your mother's a *****. You like to jack off dogs. That's right, you heard me. You like to grab that dog by the bone and rub it like a ski pole. Your dad? Gay. Your priest? Straight. **** off and let me post. It's not true, it's all in good fun. Now go away.

#13 Oct 15 2004 at 10:37 AM Rating: Decent
OK, ENOUGH!!!!

Ok, so the administration and it's right wing media outlets and have discredited ALL media with the aims of having NO accountability for their actions.

I mean, can you PROVE anything?

Anything we say about Bush is the "liberal media" regardless if it actually is liberal or media.

So, now we have a new forum law...long overdue.

If you intimate that a fairly respectable news source that is actually governed and held accoutable BY SEVERAL different government agencies is just an example of "LIBERAL Media", you automatically lose the argument.

EOFS.
#15 Oct 15 2004 at 10:40 AM Rating: Good
Lunatic
******
30,086 posts

can you provide proof that they didnt fabricate the source smash ?


Can you prove that I'm not ******* you in the *** right now?
____________________________
Disclaimer:

To make a long story short, I don't take any responsibility for anything I post here. It's not news, it's not truth, it's not serious. It's parody. It's satire. It's bitter. It's angsty. Your mother's a *****. You like to jack off dogs. That's right, you heard me. You like to grab that dog by the bone and rub it like a ski pole. Your dad? Gay. Your priest? Straight. **** off and let me post. It's not true, it's all in good fun. Now go away.

#16 Oct 15 2004 at 10:41 AM Rating: Decent
proofkuniva wrote:
Quote:
I mean, can you PROVE anything


peep teh name son


Your name is a product of the liberal media...sorry, I can't believe it.
#17 Oct 15 2004 at 10:51 AM Rating: Decent
***
3,571 posts
proofkuniva wrote:
can you provide proof that they didnt fabricate the source smash ?


Not the way it works jackass. You make an allegation you prove it. You don't disprove something that isn't an allegation.
#19 Oct 15 2004 at 11:01 AM Rating: Decent
"Tard" is term that was invented by the liberal media.

Sorry, I don't believe in "tard".
#20 Oct 15 2004 at 11:15 AM Rating: Good
proofkuniva wrote:
can you provide proof that they didnt fabricate the source smash ?

Well can you prove that the CBS document wasn't planted by Karl Rove in the first place?
#22 Oct 15 2004 at 11:18 AM Rating: Good
proofkuniva wrote:
i was actually just wandering what he was talking about you tard


Wandering

Wondering

"Tard"
#23 Oct 15 2004 at 11:20 AM Rating: Decent
Spelling is a tool of the "liberal media".

#24 Oct 15 2004 at 11:23 AM Rating: Decent
Prodigal Son
******
20,643 posts
Prince pickleprince wrote:
Spleeing is a tewl of tha "lybral meediah".


Smiley: wink
____________________________
publiusvarus wrote:
we all know liberals are well adjusted american citizens who only want what's best for society. While conservatives are evil money grubbing scum who only want to sh*t on the little man and rob the world of its resources.
#25REDACTED, Posted: Oct 15 2004 at 12:46 PM, Rating: Sub-Default, (Expand Post) Pickled,
#26 Oct 15 2004 at 12:51 PM Rating: Decent
Quote:
Ok you believe in your ABC's, CBS's and NBC's I'll stick with drudge, rush, boortz, hannity.



Hahahahahah.
« Previous 1 2
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 312 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (312)