Forum Settings
       
« Previous 1 2 3
Reply To Thread

Free Breast Exams!!Follow

#1 Oct 13 2004 at 4:10 AM Rating: Excellent
Mistress of Gardening
Avatar
*****
14,661 posts
http://www.10news.com/news/3799783/detail.html

Now us women don't need to go through the trouble of finding an OB/GYN. Just buy a plane ticket and ask if they found anything "suspicious".
____________________________
Yum-Yum Bento Box | Pikko Pots | Adventures in Bentomaking

Twitter


[ffxivsig]277809[/ffxivsig]
#2 Oct 13 2004 at 4:23 AM Rating: Decent
Lunatic
******
30,086 posts

"I was shaking, I was sobbing. I couldn't believe that this was happening to me. It was surreal. It was like out of a movie, with these guys yelling at me, telling me that, yes, she has to feel my breasts or I'm not getting on my airplane," Kingsford said.


Calm the hell down.

Anywhere but the Puritan US this would be such a minor deal.

It's not like someone said "I have to rape you with a shovel now, mam."

____________________________
Disclaimer:

To make a long story short, I don't take any responsibility for anything I post here. It's not news, it's not truth, it's not serious. It's parody. It's satire. It's bitter. It's angsty. Your mother's a *****. You like to jack off dogs. That's right, you heard me. You like to grab that dog by the bone and rub it like a ski pole. Your dad? Gay. Your priest? Straight. **** off and let me post. It's not true, it's all in good fun. Now go away.

#3 Oct 13 2004 at 4:30 AM Rating: Good
***
3,571 posts
Full-body searches are nothing new.

Hell, it wasn't even like the searcher was going to be groping her or fondling her breasts or anything. Patting on and around the breasts is hardly the same as being sexually assaulted.


Edit: Was to wasn't.

Edited, Wed Oct 13 05:31:25 2004 by Chtulhu
#4 Oct 13 2004 at 5:35 AM Rating: Good
Gurue
*****
16,299 posts
Quote:
"And then they said, 'That's it. We're not going to complete the search and you're not boarding your plane,'" Kingsford said. "They escorted us out and said they didn't care how we got home, it wasn't their problem."

She and her fiance ended up renting a car for the 15-hour drive home.


If I was her fiance, I'd have punched her in the boobs for making me miss my flight, then have to drive 15 hours.
#5 Oct 13 2004 at 5:38 AM Rating: Decent
How did someone so dumb manage to buy plane tickets in the first place?
#6 Oct 13 2004 at 5:59 AM Rating: Decent
I can see how she would be upset having it done in public, but they took her somewhere private so it could be continued. Chances are, she would never see those people again anyways.

Quote:
I have to rape you with a shovel now, mam.


Ow...
#7 Oct 13 2004 at 6:04 AM Rating: Decent
****
5,372 posts
What a stupid pathetic baby that woman is.
#8 Oct 13 2004 at 6:05 AM Rating: Decent
pretty stupid for her not to see it from their point of view, someone wants to get on a plane but for some reason does not want to be searched, i know what i'd think...

Quote:
"I just realized, I am close to 200 posts and haven't pissed anyone off yet..."


you pissed me off at least twice
#9 Oct 13 2004 at 6:07 AM Rating: Decent
Quote:
you pissed me off at least twice


Doh...

/delete
#10 Oct 13 2004 at 6:27 AM Rating: Good
Hell my question is was he good looking?
Officer, yahoo............
#11 Oct 13 2004 at 7:25 AM Rating: Good
****
4,596 posts
fu[i][/i]cking wahhhh. Cry me a river. If you don't like the security procedure don't ride the plane. It's pretty simple really.

What if you had an aversion to being looked at? Do you feel you can ask all of the security screeners to avert their eyes as you pass by? Or if you feel that metal detectors steal your soul? Do you get the right to tell them your not going through it? Or if you feel that clutching a huge pack of C4 is the only way you feel safe flying?

You are entering a situation that is egregiously easy to put others at risk. Therefore you are required to submit to enhanced security measures for the greater good of all of the passengers.

It was kind of them to bring her to a private area and use a female screener. I think we've clouded the "rights" issue in this country. You should have the right to do whatever you want on your own property as long as it does not infringe on the rights of others. Everything else is a compromise.
____________________________
Nicroll 65 Assassin
Teltorid 52 Druid
Aude Sapere

Oh hell camp me all you want f**kers. I own this site and thus I own you. - Allakhazam
#12 Oct 13 2004 at 7:29 AM Rating: Good
*****
18,463 posts
Quote:
The agency announced extra security measures last month in the wake of the mid-air bombing of two Russian jetliners. Authorities believe two women smuggled explosives onto the aircraft, possibly in "torso packs" underneath their clothing.

Bob Kapp, customer service manager for the TSA in Denver, said that to conduct a thorough pat-down search of women, "it does require going beneath, between and above the breasts."

As far as feels go, that's not even a decent one.
#13 Oct 13 2004 at 8:27 AM Rating: Decent
Am I the only one that can udnerstand how this is crossing the line.

I know if someone said they had to grab my **** for national security I would be Hell Pissed off.
#14 Oct 13 2004 at 8:29 AM Rating: Good
***
3,458 posts
PieMan wrote:
Am I the only one that can udnerstand how this is crossing the line.

I know if someone said they had to grab my **** for national security I would be Hell Pissed off.
Not me. Free hand job.
#15 Oct 13 2004 at 8:42 AM Rating: Decent
Am I the only one that can udnerstand how this is crossing the line.

I know if someone said they had to grab my @#%^ for national security I would be Hell Pissed off.



No, you're the only one who can't understand how it's not crossing the line.

You know, my company sponsored health insurance clearly states that I MUST have a physyical every 2 years in order to remain eligible for the coverage. I can't be disqualified for anything uncovered by the physical, even drug abuse. But I still have to have it if I want coverage. That means sometime in the next 18 months, I've probably got the joy of having another man's finger up my ass to look forward to. I didn't get that during my last physical and counted myself extremely lucky. Ball-fondling was as far as the physician went...but then it was a first date sorta thing.

I don't HAVE to get the physical. And they don't HAVE to cover me. That lady didn't HAVE to submit to the search. And they didn't HAVE to let her get on the plane.

Get it?
#16 Oct 13 2004 at 9:57 AM Rating: Decent
Prodigal Son
******
20,643 posts
Wow. Where do I sign up?

I'll give free breast exams. Have to use my tongue, though, to detect any nitroglycerin leaking from the dynamite.
____________________________
publiusvarus wrote:
we all know liberals are well adjusted american citizens who only want what's best for society. While conservatives are evil money grubbing scum who only want to sh*t on the little man and rob the world of its resources.
#17 Oct 13 2004 at 10:03 AM Rating: Good
****
6,760 posts
I want to feel her breasts too.
____________________________
Some people are like slinkies, they aren't really good for anything, but they still bring a smile to your face when you push them down the stairs.
#18 Oct 13 2004 at 10:05 AM Rating: Good
****
4,596 posts
Quote:
I'll give free breast exams. Have to use my tongue, though,


Can't disqualify you because you don't have use of your hands. That would be unamerican.
____________________________
Nicroll 65 Assassin
Teltorid 52 Druid
Aude Sapere

Oh hell camp me all you want f**kers. I own this site and thus I own you. - Allakhazam
#19 Oct 13 2004 at 10:33 AM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
I vote for the "big baby" side as well. It's not like the guard was asking to feel her up while sticking her tongue down the woman's throat. Does the woman throw a fit when the OB/GYN asks to poke at her bits?

Of course, it's documented that men have fewer hang-ups about these things and would probably whip their ******* out at the security gate if asked. By anyone. Any time we're asked anything about our ***** or surrounding area, we assume it's leading to sex.
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#20 Oct 13 2004 at 10:37 AM Rating: Decent
Lunatic
******
30,086 posts

Am I the only one that can udnerstand how this is crossing the line.

I know if someone said they had to grab my @#%^ for national security I would be Hell Pissed off.


Time to get over that small **** complex.
____________________________
Disclaimer:

To make a long story short, I don't take any responsibility for anything I post here. It's not news, it's not truth, it's not serious. It's parody. It's satire. It's bitter. It's angsty. Your mother's a *****. You like to jack off dogs. That's right, you heard me. You like to grab that dog by the bone and rub it like a ski pole. Your dad? Gay. Your priest? Straight. **** off and let me post. It's not true, it's all in good fun. Now go away.

#21 Oct 13 2004 at 10:43 AM Rating: Decent
Jophiel wrote:
I vote for the "big baby" side as well. It's not like the guard was asking to feel her up while sticking her tongue down the woman's throat. Does the woman throw a fit when the OB/GYN asks to poke at her bits?

Of course, it's documented that men have fewer hang-ups about these things and would probably whip their ******* out at the security gate if asked. By anyone. Any time we're asked anything about our ***** or surrounding area, we assume it's leading to sex.


An unneccessary search instituted at the whim of security could be abused. I don't like getting searched period.

Let me ask this:

"What if an obviously flaming homosexual man had to 'check' your under your ******* and between your cheeks?"

An intersting side note...many DOCTORS are giving free breast exams this month in observance of "Breast Cancer Awareness" Month...FYI, ladies.
#22 Oct 13 2004 at 10:47 AM Rating: Decent
**
540 posts
There is nothing wrong with an "external" breast check, the interanal one's really ******* suck though.

Oh, make sure that the screener is using both hands, and in my experience, they never do these things in bathroom stalls.
#23 Oct 13 2004 at 11:00 AM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
Quote:
"What if an obviously flaming homosexual man had to 'check' your under your ******* and between your cheeks?"
If the security guard in question was asking to diddle the woman with her fingers, you'd have an apt comparison. If said man needed to pat around my *******, much like the woman was going to be patted around her breasts, I wouldn't start crying and take a 15 hour drive home.
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#24 Oct 13 2004 at 11:07 AM Rating: Decent
Jophiel wrote:
Quote:
"What if an obviously flaming homosexual man had to 'check' your under your ******* and between your cheeks?"
If the security guard in question was asking to diddle the woman with her fingers, you'd have an apt comparison. If said man needed to pat around my *******, much like the woman was going to be patted around her breasts, I wouldn't start crying and take a 15 hour drive home.


Riiigghhhtt...

#25 Oct 13 2004 at 11:10 AM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
You've never been to the doctor? You've never had the ole cup 'n cough?

I assume from your answer that you would rather scream and cry and drive for fifteen hours than have a security guard pat you on the blue jeans around your sac?
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#26 Oct 13 2004 at 11:20 AM Rating: Decent
That isn't the point.

The point is.....


IT'S A SLIPPERY SLOPE!!!!
« Previous 1 2 3
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 291 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (291)