Forum Settings
       
Reply To Thread

Bush and the OSS and the *****.Follow

#1 Oct 08 2004 at 10:33 AM Rating: Decent
Imaginary Friend
*****
16,112 posts
Message has high abuse count and will not be displayed.
____________________________
With the receiver in my hand..
#2 Oct 08 2004 at 10:36 AM Rating: Good
And they would have gotten away with it if it wasn't for that meddling Kelvyquayo the Hand!! Garrr!
#3 Oct 08 2004 at 10:38 AM Rating: Decent
Imaginary Friend
*****
16,112 posts
I'm actually waiting to see a glowing red dot.....
____________________________
With the receiver in my hand..
#4 Oct 08 2004 at 10:41 AM Rating: Good
Quote:
I'm actually waiting to see a glowing red dot.....


I bet Al'Katie has some of those.

Smiley: yikes
#5 Oct 08 2004 at 10:43 AM Rating: Decent
Prodigal Son
******
20,643 posts
This is the only passage that meant anything to me:

Quote:
1897:Union Pacific Railroad (UPR) bankrupted.

1898:Union Pacific Railroad sold to Edward Henry Harriman & partner, Judge Robert Scott Lovett. The deal was managed by Kuhn Loeb brokerage of which Felix Warburg was a partner.



"I am in the employ of Mr. E. H. Harriman of the Union Pacific Railroad..."
"Woodcock? Is that you?"
____________________________
publiusvarus wrote:
we all know liberals are well adjusted american citizens who only want what's best for society. While conservatives are evil money grubbing scum who only want to sh*t on the little man and rob the world of its resources.
#6 Oct 08 2004 at 10:58 AM Rating: Decent
Hmm, it's seldom you get to see the dot...unless you're talking to the person who's wearing it.
#7 Oct 08 2004 at 11:00 AM Rating: Decent
I'm not going to post any Links....


Cause it is most likely lefty crap to begin with. Show some CREDIBLE sources first, then people might actually take you seriously. Till then your just making the democrat party look dumber by the day.

- Elsahn
#8 Oct 08 2004 at 11:01 AM Rating: Decent
I love conspiracy theories.
#9 Oct 08 2004 at 11:06 AM Rating: Decent
Elsahn wrote:
I'm not going to post any Links....


Cause it is most likely lefty crap to begin with. Show some CREDIBLE sources first, then people might actually take you seriously. Till then your just making the democrat party look dumber by the day.

- Elsahn


Elsahn, say what you like about what the above FACTS mean....there is TONS of evidence pointing to the fact that the Bush Family had **** ties.

You can't argue that....just what it exactly means....well, that's open for discussion.

#10 Oct 08 2004 at 11:06 AM Rating: Decent
Imaginary Friend
*****
16,112 posts
Elsahn wrote:
I'm not going to post any Links....


Cause it is most likely lefty crap to begin with. Show some CREDIBLE sources first, then people might actually take you seriously. Till then your just making the democrat party look dumber by the day.

- Elsahn



Blah blah blah blah

Who said I was a Democrat anyway.

Why don't you look up some of this, it's listed as facts. Anyone of the things listed in that timeline can easily be looked up.

i really could care less. I don't feel the need to prove anything to anyone. I stated that if you can debunk this go ahead.

I see the Whole world as corrupt. IF this stuff is true, it wouln't shock me in the least bit.

Do your own homework. I'm not going to be your link *****.
____________________________
With the receiver in my hand..
#11 Oct 08 2004 at 11:11 AM Rating: Good
I'm one of the most liberal people on this board. But I think your post is just mostly left wing propaganda.

Quote:
1990: This timeline contains lots of unrelated things.

1992: Some of the facts mentioned don't have much to do with the point it's trying to make, but are only there to make the Bush family look bad.

1999: You should really provide links in the future if you have them. What would it hurt?

2000: Skull and Bones brought up early on to scare people. Fails to mention that John Kerry is also a S&B alum.
#12 Oct 08 2004 at 11:19 AM Rating: Good
Elsahn wrote:
I'm not going to post any Links....


Cause it is most likely lefty crap to begin with. Show some CREDIBLE sources first, then people might actually take you seriously. Till then your just making the democrat party look dumber by the day.

- Elsahn


Smiley: lol Thats rich, considering the source.
#13 Oct 08 2004 at 11:19 AM Rating: Good
Double Post

Edited, Fri Oct 8 12:35:38 2004 by Lubriderm
#14 Oct 08 2004 at 11:23 AM Rating: Decent
Imaginary Friend
*****
16,112 posts
for ***** sake:

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/1301306.stm

http://www.rense.com/general42/bshnazi.htm

http://www.guardian.co.uk/usa/story/0,12271,1312540,00.html

http://www.nhgazette.com/cgi-bin/NHGstore.cgi?user_action=detail&catalogno=NN_Bush_Nazi_Link

http://emperors-clothes.com/articles/randy/swas5.htm

http://newsweek.redakcja.pl/archiwum/artykul.asp?Watek=7159&WatekStr=1&Artykul=4903



How these links prove ANYThing more to you I don't know.

How do you know you're even sitting where you are and you jsut don't have a chip in your head making you think you are doing waht you are doing?


____________________________
With the receiver in my hand..
#15 Oct 08 2004 at 11:25 AM Rating: Decent
How do you know you're even sitting where you are and you jsut don't have a chip in your head making you think you are doing waht you are doing?

Yeah, but I KNOW what chocolate tastes like.
Reply To Thread
Message has high abuse count and will not be displayed.">

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 211 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (211)