Forum Settings
       
« Previous 1 2 3 4
Reply To Thread

Saddam a terroristFollow

#1 Oct 07 2004 at 12:14 PM Rating: Decent
I know many of you believe we shouldn't have invaded Iraq. The question you have have to ask yourself is was Saddam a terrorist?

Varus
#2 Oct 07 2004 at 12:16 PM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
The question I had to ask myself was... "Do I feel lucky?"

Well, do I? Punk?
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#3 Oct 07 2004 at 12:20 PM Rating: Decent
That's right ignore the question because you can't answer it honestly and be against the occupation of Iraq. How compassionate of you all.

Varus
#4 Oct 07 2004 at 12:20 PM Rating: Decent
Prodigal Son
******
20,643 posts
Terrorist? No.

Abusive tyrant/dictator? Sure.

While I do believe that action against Saddam was indeed necessary, it could have waited till after we were done in Afghanistan, ie. caught Osama. Maybe if we'd given Saddam another year or so, there would have been evidence of a newly-developed WMD program, instead of the handfuls of sand we came up with.
____________________________
publiusvarus wrote:
we all know liberals are well adjusted american citizens who only want what's best for society. While conservatives are evil money grubbing scum who only want to sh*t on the little man and rob the world of its resources.
#5 Oct 07 2004 at 12:29 PM Rating: Decent
Debo,

What makes you so certain Bin Laden is still alive? Bin Laden is taking a dirt nirt and democrats are using his noticable absence as a sign of Bushes policy failing.

Debo what would you have done if you were president and every country in the EU was saying Saddam had wmd's and Britain said he had wmd's and Saddam was leading the inspectors around like blind sheep?

Varus
#6 Oct 07 2004 at 12:32 PM Rating: Good
YAY! Canaduhian
*****
10,293 posts
varrussword wrote:
What makes you so certain Bin Laden is still alive? Bin Laden is taking a dirt nirt and democrats are using his noticable absence as a sign of Bushes policy failing.


Prove it. And what the hell is a dirt nirt, while we're at it? Smiley: lol

____________________________
What's bred in the bone will not out of the flesh.
#7 Oct 07 2004 at 12:36 PM Rating: Decent
Varuss, you're losing it, man.

Seriously...this morning I've been witness to the worst drivel to ever come out of your mouth.

I sincerely hope you are a sock puppet and the guy attached to the hand up your *** is getting bored.

Otherwise, seek help immediately.
#8 Oct 07 2004 at 12:37 PM Rating: Default
Tare,

You are such a turn on. But alas Jophed has enligthened me as to my evil hedonistic ways so we can't make passionate love under the full moon in the okra patch =(. But keep your head up I'm sure there's someone out there for you, just don't let your hubby find out =).

As for Bin Laden prove he's alive.

Varus
#9 Oct 07 2004 at 12:40 PM Rating: Good
YAY! Canaduhian
*****
10,293 posts
varrussword wrote:
As for Bin Laden prove he's alive.


I'm not the one making bold statements here. You are the accuser, therefore you have the burden of proof.

You do know how a regular, everyday debate works, right?

Oh, yeah, I forgot. You don't even know how to read. My bad.

____________________________
What's bred in the bone will not out of the flesh.
#10 Oct 07 2004 at 12:48 PM Rating: Good
Official Shrubbery Waterer
*****
14,659 posts
Saddam sez: "You forgot Poland!"

<-- Thanks, Nobby!

Twiztid
____________________________
Jophiel wrote:
I managed to be both retarded and entertaining.

#11 Oct 07 2004 at 12:49 PM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
I'm ignoring it because you've responded to every argument this morning with "I'm not giving cites! I'm through with you!"

Why would you possibly expect anyone to take you seriously?
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#12 Oct 07 2004 at 12:50 PM Rating: Decent
Prodigal Son
******
20,643 posts
varrussword wrote:
Debo,

What makes you so certain Bin Laden is still alive? Bin Laden is taking a dirt nirt and democrats are using his noticable absence as a sign of Bushes policy failing.

Absolute rubbish. bin Laden is the biggest threat to the US; we need some sort of proof that he's dealt with one way or another. He's still releasing statements through his top lieutenants via Al Jazeera. Bush at first stated that bin Laden is the Number One priority, but was then distracted by Iraq and said it's not necessary to capture him. Just because he hasn't shown his face recently doesn't mean he's not a threat anymore. The only "noticeable abscence" is abscence of any kind of resolution to the bin Laden issue. Unless he's already been captured and Bush is waiting another two weeks to trot him out in chains. That prospect doesn't make me feel any better.

Quote:
Debo what would you have done if you were president and every country in the EU was saying Saddam had wmd's and Britain said he had wmd's and Saddam was leading the inspectors around like blind sheep?

Every country in the EU was not saying that Saddam had WMDs. Where did you hear that? Oh, that's right, you don't have any cites or sources for your babble. Intelligence had claimed that they didn't exist but were manipulated or ignored. Blair was misleading his people as much as Bush was.
____________________________
publiusvarus wrote:
we all know liberals are well adjusted american citizens who only want what's best for society. While conservatives are evil money grubbing scum who only want to sh*t on the little man and rob the world of its resources.
#13 Oct 07 2004 at 12:52 PM Rating: Decent
Tare,

So when they bombed the hell out of that little hill Laden was known to have been is it possible that his body could have been destroyed beyond recognition. It's rather naive to assume he survived. The only reason you assume he's alive is because no one can find him, or has seen him, that aren't radical terrorists.



Varus
#14 Oct 07 2004 at 12:53 PM Rating: Default
Debo,

Quote:
Every country in the EU was not saying that Saddam had WMDs


cite please?

Varus
#15 Oct 07 2004 at 12:54 PM Rating: Default
Debo,

LOL nice way to ignore the question...what would you have done?

And on a side note I challenge you to show me one country that has benefited from a UN resolution.

Varus
#16 Oct 07 2004 at 12:54 PM Rating: Decent
OK, let's say Bin Laden IS dead.

The implications are not good for Bush at all. Especially if the administration has known about it for some time.

#17 Oct 07 2004 at 12:55 PM Rating: Good
YAY! Canaduhian
*****
10,293 posts
varrussword wrote:
It's rather naive to assume he survived. The only reason you assume he's alive is because no one can find him, or has seen him, that aren't radical terrorists.


No, it's rather ridiculous to assume that he's dead, jackass.

This man is probably responsible for the most devastating terrorist attack on U.S. soil and you assume that he's dead?

You assume?

Well, you better hope that your assumption doesn't come back and bite you and another 2700 Americans in the ***.
____________________________
What's bred in the bone will not out of the flesh.
#18 Oct 07 2004 at 12:55 PM Rating: Decent
****
7,486 posts
i'd say we were terrorizing saddam more than he was terrorizing us.

what do terrorists say? meet our demands or we'll blow your **** up. thats exactly what the USA did.

what do non-terrorists say? please dont blow my **** up. thats saddam did.


not defending him, really, but if you want to talk about terrorism, there wasnt alot done by him.
#19 Oct 07 2004 at 12:59 PM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
Quote:
The only reason you assume he's alive is because no one can find him, or has seen him, that aren't radical terrorists.
That and the tapes of him talking about contemporary events.

Quote:
and you assume that he's dead?
Sure. It's like assuming someone has massive stockpiles of WMDs and the capacity to create lots more on a moment's notice Smiley: lol
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#20 Oct 07 2004 at 1:04 PM Rating: Default
Bin Laden wasn't responsible for 911 radical Islam was, there is a distinction. Do you know what the word martyr means? Bin Laden is of more value to our struggle against islamic terrorists alive than dead.

You dummycrats must really be getting worried about the election because the vicisiousness of your attacks are intensifying daily.

Varus
#21 Oct 07 2004 at 1:05 PM Rating: Decent
Prodigal Son
******
20,643 posts
Varus,

You want me to make a theoretical decision on a hypothetical scenario? You're the one making wild claims that the entire EU was convinced thaqt Iraq had WMD. You need to prove your claims.
____________________________
publiusvarus wrote:
we all know liberals are well adjusted american citizens who only want what's best for society. While conservatives are evil money grubbing scum who only want to sh*t on the little man and rob the world of its resources.
#22 Oct 07 2004 at 1:07 PM Rating: Decent
Prodigal Son
******
20,643 posts
Now Varus claims there's no connection between Al Quaeda and 9/11.

Why are we still talking to him? Smiley: confused
____________________________
publiusvarus wrote:
we all know liberals are well adjusted american citizens who only want what's best for society. While conservatives are evil money grubbing scum who only want to sh*t on the little man and rob the world of its resources.
#23 Oct 07 2004 at 1:13 PM Rating: Decent
Yep, it's done...

/on Cold Shoulder...
#24 Oct 07 2004 at 1:13 PM Rating: Default
Debo,

Ok put down the pipe, it's official you've smoked yourself stupid.

What does this mean to you? Bin Laden wasn't responsible for 911 radical Islam was, there is a distinction.

Bin Laden was the tool, I know it's a difficult concept for you to grasp.

Varus

#25 Oct 07 2004 at 1:14 PM Rating: Good
YAY! Canaduhian
*****
10,293 posts
Jophiel wrote:
Quote:
and you assume that he's dead?
Sure. It's like assuming someone has massive stockpiles of WMDs and the capacity to create lots more on a moment's notice Smiley: lol


Good point, Earwig. Smiley: laugh

____________________________
What's bred in the bone will not out of the flesh.
#26 Oct 07 2004 at 1:15 PM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
Quote:
You dummycrats must really be getting worried about the election because the vicisiousness of your attacks are intensifying daily
Bush is a dummycrat!

Smiley: lol

By the way, Drudge links to the latest polls showing Kerry ahead of Bush. Wonder how Bush'll do in that debate tomorrow.
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
« Previous 1 2 3 4
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 204 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (204)