Forum Settings
       
Reply To Thread

VP Debate: Edwards v. CheneyFollow

#52 Oct 05 2004 at 8:50 PM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
"You asked a question about jobs and poverty?" Heh.
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#53 Oct 05 2004 at 8:50 PM Rating: Decent
I'll drop a grand right now saying Bush/Cheney win election.
#54 Oct 05 2004 at 8:51 PM Rating: Default
Quote:
lol, quit stealing my thunder pie man. Its hard typing on this laptop.


LOL sorry , as long as someone is able to call cheney on the stupid things he says.
#55 Oct 05 2004 at 8:52 PM Rating: Good
Elsahn wrote:
I'll drop a grand right now saying Bush/Cheney win election.


I'll take you on for $100. PM me, we will put he money in escrow seeing as how I don't trust you.
#56 Oct 05 2004 at 8:53 PM Rating: Decent
I dont think anyone can quote a jobs lost figure without quoting a jobs gained figure. Our Economy is very fluid. The only way to draw judgement on job performance figures is to see the difference between the two. Otherwise it's simply spin.. That goes for both sides.
#57 Oct 05 2004 at 8:54 PM Rating: Default
When the uh kery recrod on taxes uh.....
#58 Oct 05 2004 at 8:54 PM Rating: Good
Warlord Lefein wrote:
I dont think anyone can quote a jobs lost figure without quoting a jobs gained figure. Our Economy is very fluid. The only way to draw judgement on job performance figures is to see the difference between the two. Otherwise it's simply spin.. That goes for both sides.


Net jobs is most accurate. Our net jobs is in the negative. The jobs that were gained pay less than the ones that were lost. No spin there.
#59 Oct 05 2004 at 8:57 PM Rating: Decent
Uh oh whats that Kerry and edwards werent there for tax cut yesterday?

Stomped again. Cheneys shoe is gettin dirty with Edwards **** underneath it.
#60 Oct 05 2004 at 8:58 PM Rating: Decent
Lunatic
******
30,086 posts

I'll drop a grand right now saying Bush/Cheney win election.


I'll take that if you send the $100o to Allah in advaance and he holds both of our monies in trust untill the election and pays the winner.

Let me know.
____________________________
Disclaimer:

To make a long story short, I don't take any responsibility for anything I post here. It's not news, it's not truth, it's not serious. It's parody. It's satire. It's bitter. It's angsty. Your mother's a *****. You like to jack off dogs. That's right, you heard me. You like to grab that dog by the bone and rub it like a ski pole. Your dad? Gay. Your priest? Straight. **** off and let me post. It's not true, it's all in good fun. Now go away.

#61 Oct 05 2004 at 8:58 PM Rating: Default
I think freedom means freedom for all, I support the president(on amendmbent banning same sex marrage).

can you say mixed signals , or how bout flip flop.
#62 Oct 05 2004 at 8:59 PM Rating: Good
Elsahn wrote:
Uh oh whats that Kerry and edwards werent there for tax cut yesterday?

Stomped again. Cheneys shoe is gettin dirty with Edwards **** underneath it.


The 'weren't there' argument is getting old already. I really hope cheney doesn't do his parrot imitation like GWB.
#63 Oct 05 2004 at 8:59 PM Rating: Decent
Lubriderm the Tulip wrote:
Warlord Lefein wrote:
I dont think anyone can quote a jobs lost figure without quoting a jobs gained figure. Our Economy is very fluid. The only way to draw judgement on job performance figures is to see the difference between the two. Otherwise it's simply spin.. That goes for both sides.


Net jobs is most accurate. Our net jobs is in the negative. The jobs that were gained pay less than the ones that were lost. No spin there.


Indeed, thank you for being honest about that point though. On another note.. Government never has, and hopefully never will have any control over how much a job pays someone. I'm sorry that highschool dropouts arent getting paid 20 an hour to tack on bumpers to trucks anymore. This is the very heart of workforce re-education initiatives.
#64 Oct 05 2004 at 9:00 PM Rating: Decent
Both ways in massatuchets(sp?) lol The reporter lady just stomped Edwards. God this is grand.
#65 Oct 05 2004 at 9:00 PM Rating: Good
Official Shrubbery Waterer
*****
14,659 posts
Eek. Edwards got bamboozled on the gay marriage point. He's not exactly appealing to his voting base here.

Twiztid
____________________________
Jophiel wrote:
I managed to be both retarded and entertaining.

#66 Oct 05 2004 at 9:03 PM Rating: Decent
I think Edwards handled that question excellently. I respect him a lot for being able to clear the air on that. He sounds like he advocates unions. Not a bad answer to a crazy question.
#67 Oct 05 2004 at 9:03 PM Rating: Decent
Lunatic
******
30,086 posts
You do understand that Edwards could say "I hate fuc[b][/b]king ************* and they don't loose any gay votes, right?
____________________________
Disclaimer:

To make a long story short, I don't take any responsibility for anything I post here. It's not news, it's not truth, it's not serious. It's parody. It's satire. It's bitter. It's angsty. Your mother's a *****. You like to jack off dogs. That's right, you heard me. You like to grab that dog by the bone and rub it like a ski pole. Your dad? Gay. Your priest? Straight. **** off and let me post. It's not true, it's all in good fun. Now go away.

#68 Oct 05 2004 at 9:06 PM Rating: Decent
Lunatic
******
30,086 posts
Cheney: I'm not fammliar with his (Edwards legal) cases.

Golly I wonder if he'll attack him for being a trial lawyer at any future point in the campaign.
____________________________
Disclaimer:

To make a long story short, I don't take any responsibility for anything I post here. It's not news, it's not truth, it's not serious. It's parody. It's satire. It's bitter. It's angsty. Your mother's a *****. You like to jack off dogs. That's right, you heard me. You like to grab that dog by the bone and rub it like a ski pole. Your dad? Gay. Your priest? Straight. **** off and let me post. It's not true, it's all in good fun. Now go away.

#69 Oct 05 2004 at 9:10 PM Rating: Decent
Shame shame, loopholes on Edwards tisk tisk.

And in 97 Kerry did support it. I just googled it. w00t.

Stomped yet again.
#70 Oct 05 2004 at 9:10 PM Rating: Good
Official Shrubbery Waterer
*****
14,659 posts
Quote:
You do understand that Edwards could say "I hate ******* ************* and they don't loose any gay votes, right?
Oh, absolutely. But I do find it ironic that they Kerry campaign racks Bush for his proposed amendment to the Constitution (which I think is just stupid), then Edwards goes on to say, "Well, it really doesn't matter."

Twiztid
____________________________
Jophiel wrote:
I managed to be both retarded and entertaining.

#71 Oct 05 2004 at 9:10 PM Rating: Decent
600thousand dollars out of grandma's pills, whoohoo Edwards!
#72 Oct 05 2004 at 9:11 PM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
I'm giving it 55/45 Cheney right now. Edwards has some good points but Cheney is providing enough damning numbers to make Edwards look bad regardless. I don't know how valid they all are but few people are going to research them anyway.
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#73 Oct 05 2004 at 9:12 PM Rating: Default
Ya i say its about even right now. Nothing spactacular. Cheney is a good debater. Now only if GWB could be that good then the GOP would stand a chance in these debates.
#74 Oct 05 2004 at 9:16 PM Rating: Good
Lunatic
******
30,086 posts

Shame shame, loopholes on Edwards tisk tisk.

And in 97 Kerry did support it. I just googled it. w00t.

Stomped yet again.


How's that $1000 coming?
____________________________
Disclaimer:

To make a long story short, I don't take any responsibility for anything I post here. It's not news, it's not truth, it's not serious. It's parody. It's satire. It's bitter. It's angsty. Your mother's a *****. You like to jack off dogs. That's right, you heard me. You like to grab that dog by the bone and rub it like a ski pole. Your dad? Gay. Your priest? Straight. **** off and let me post. It's not true, it's all in good fun. Now go away.

#75 Oct 05 2004 at 9:16 PM Rating: Good
Official Shrubbery Waterer
*****
14,659 posts
Edwards wrote:
I would find terrorists where they are and stop them and kill them before they hurt us.
Hmm, this sounds a lot like what the Republicans have been saying.

Twiztid
____________________________
Jophiel wrote:
I managed to be both retarded and entertaining.

#76 Oct 05 2004 at 9:17 PM Rating: Default
do you think hes gonna come out and say were gonna let the terrorists go?
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 202 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (202)