Forum Settings
       
« Previous 1 2 3 4 5
Reply To Thread

How to Solve North KoreaFollow

#1 Sep 29 2004 at 7:08 PM Rating: Decent
*note this is a bit of fiction*

President Lefein announced today that after over fifty years of control that Japan would be able to have a military. [cue soundbite]

"With the problems of North Korea having a robust missile program and nuclear capability I simply cannot justify allowing a country to remain defenseless in the region."
[end soundbite]

#2 Sep 29 2004 at 7:33 PM Rating: Good
Japan is not defenseless. Unless you pull out the US military that is in the region to protect them.
#3 Sep 29 2004 at 7:47 PM Rating: Decent
Hahaha, yeah but could you imagine the N Koreans and the Chinese crapping on themselves seeing two or three Nimitz Class carriers with "meatballs" for flags? Maybe seeing a few JSF's on the flight deck? Bwahahaahaha, those Koreans would regret the day they even begun thinking about nukes.
#4 Sep 29 2004 at 7:49 PM Rating: Decent
Lunatic
******
30,086 posts

Japan is not defenseless


S Korea on the other hand, pretty much fuc[b][/b]ked because Bush didn't do anything at all about N Korea's nuclear program except declare the country "evil". Which pretty much sped up the nuclear program.
____________________________
Disclaimer:

To make a long story short, I don't take any responsibility for anything I post here. It's not news, it's not truth, it's not serious. It's parody. It's satire. It's bitter. It's angsty. Your mother's a *****. You like to jack off dogs. That's right, you heard me. You like to grab that dog by the bone and rub it like a ski pole. Your dad? Gay. Your priest? Straight. **** off and let me post. It's not true, it's all in good fun. Now go away.

#5 Sep 29 2004 at 7:50 PM Rating: Decent
Hey Smash did you read my list of ten things i'd do differently? ^^
#6 Sep 29 2004 at 7:52 PM Rating: Decent
***
1,499 posts
Quote:
"meatballs" for flags


Now, that is just uncalled for. How dare you insult my heritage! That "meatball" is the sun!

Sir, I challenge you to a duel!
#7 Sep 29 2004 at 8:11 PM Rating: Good
Quote:
S Korea on the other hand, pretty much ****** because Clinton didn't do anything at all about N Korea's nuclear program except build them the reactor.


FTFY
#8 Sep 29 2004 at 8:13 PM Rating: Decent
Lunatic
******
30,086 posts
Yeah, I know Stok. Anything that happens while Bush is in office that's negative is Clinton's fault and anything that happens that's posative is Bush's credit.

We're all clear on how the brainwashed mind works, no need to demonstrate it so frequently.
____________________________
Disclaimer:

To make a long story short, I don't take any responsibility for anything I post here. It's not news, it's not truth, it's not serious. It's parody. It's satire. It's bitter. It's angsty. Your mother's a *****. You like to jack off dogs. That's right, you heard me. You like to grab that dog by the bone and rub it like a ski pole. Your dad? Gay. Your priest? Straight. **** off and let me post. It's not true, it's all in good fun. Now go away.

#9 Sep 29 2004 at 8:24 PM Rating: Good
Did I strike a nerve Smash. Clinton builds the reactor through his be nice to the whacko policies and now it is Bush's fault that the whacko has the capability to have nukes.

Care to reason this one out, so I understand what Bush was supposed to do after Clinton let the bastards have the reactor in the first place.

It wasn't the US that escalated the tensions between NK and the World. It was the NK's by trying to build the nukes. But you go ahead and live in your fantasy land where everything bad in this world is GWB's fault. I understand your frustration in having the truth shown to you everytime you try to rationalize what is going on in the world.
#10 Sep 29 2004 at 8:30 PM Rating: Decent
Lunatic
******
30,086 posts

Did I strike a nerve Smash.


By posting the same tired excuse for the 100th time?

Not hardly.

We get it allready. 9-11, Clinton's fault. N Korea, Clinton's fault. Economy, Clinton's fault.

Bad = Clintons' fault

Good = Bush's fault.

North Korea started working on a heavy water reactor in the fuc[b][/b]king 70's. Show me what you're babbling about regarding CLinton please.
____________________________
Disclaimer:

To make a long story short, I don't take any responsibility for anything I post here. It's not news, it's not truth, it's not serious. It's parody. It's satire. It's bitter. It's angsty. Your mother's a *****. You like to jack off dogs. That's right, you heard me. You like to grab that dog by the bone and rub it like a ski pole. Your dad? Gay. Your priest? Straight. **** off and let me post. It's not true, it's all in good fun. Now go away.

#11 Sep 29 2004 at 8:34 PM Rating: Decent
*****
16,160 posts
President Lefein would have no control over whether or not the Japanese will have a military. That is strictly a matter of internal Japanese politics and at present the Nip populace is content not to have a standing army.

Totem
#12 Sep 29 2004 at 8:37 PM Rating: Good
Go look it up your self Smash. I'm not turning this into a 5 page post of quotes that prove my arguement and have you end up blowing a gasket and cussing and calling people names.

I'm doing this for your health Smash. If you want to see the facts I refer you to another of those 5 page posts about said topic.

We care about you Smash because we are compassionate conservatives.
#13 Sep 29 2004 at 8:37 PM Rating: Good
Lunatic
******
30,086 posts

That is strictly a matter of internal Japanese politics and at present the Nip populace is content not to have a standing army.


Somebody should probably let the 180,000 men in the standing army know that.
____________________________
Disclaimer:

To make a long story short, I don't take any responsibility for anything I post here. It's not news, it's not truth, it's not serious. It's parody. It's satire. It's bitter. It's angsty. Your mother's a *****. You like to jack off dogs. That's right, you heard me. You like to grab that dog by the bone and rub it like a ski pole. Your dad? Gay. Your priest? Straight. **** off and let me post. It's not true, it's all in good fun. Now go away.

#14 Sep 29 2004 at 8:38 PM Rating: Good
Lunatic
******
30,086 posts

Go look it up your self Smash. I'm not turning this into a 5 page post of quotes that prove my arguement and have you end up blowing a gasket and cussing and calling people names.

I'm doing this for your health Smash. If you want to see the facts I refer you to another of those 5 page posts about said topic.

We care about you Smash because we are compassionate conservatives.


Per ussual. Random accusations with no grounding in fact.

Not unexpected, but dissapointing all the same.
____________________________
Disclaimer:

To make a long story short, I don't take any responsibility for anything I post here. It's not news, it's not truth, it's not serious. It's parody. It's satire. It's bitter. It's angsty. Your mother's a *****. You like to jack off dogs. That's right, you heard me. You like to grab that dog by the bone and rub it like a ski pole. Your dad? Gay. Your priest? Straight. **** off and let me post. It's not true, it's all in good fun. Now go away.

#15 Sep 29 2004 at 8:44 PM Rating: Good
No Smash. I'm just not falling for your bull ****. Seriously.

I will summarize for you though. In 1994 Clinton sent Carter to North Korea to settle tensions down. Carter agreed to help NKorea to build a Nuclear Reactor with the agreement that they would not build nukes. NK defied the argreement in 1998 and started the process of developing nukes. Go to the UN web site and do a search on North Korea Nuclear Weapons. I linked to a document that specificly addresses what I just summarized.

For any other information regarding this, go ahead and check it out yourself. I don't have the time to discuss the same arguements with you.
#16 Sep 29 2004 at 8:54 PM Rating: Good
*****
16,160 posts
That is not a standing army per se, but a national guard. Of course if you wish to split hairs and say that that constitutes an army, so be it, I'll concede the point to avoid a meaningless argument. However, even their name is the Japanese Self Defense Force, not a name that they randomly picked out of a hat...

Is there any other topic that you'd like the village idiot to beat you over the head with, sweetheart?

Totem
#17 Sep 29 2004 at 8:54 PM Rating: Good
Lunatic
******
30,086 posts

I will summarize for you though. In 1994 Clinton sent Carter to North Korea to settle tensions down. Carter agreed to help NKorea to build a Nuclear Reactor with the agreement that they would not build nukes. NK defied the argreement in 1998 and started the process of developing nukes. Go to the UN web site and do a search on North Korea Nuclear Weapons. I linked to a document that specificly addresses what I just summarized.

For any other information regarding this, go ahead and check it out yourself. I don't have the time to discuss the same arguements with you.


So this, in your mind, assuming it's all true, and let's do that for the moment. Somehow makes it Clinton's fault that Bush who clearly knew about the weapons program did nothing at all to stop it?

I just want to be clear. If I'm driving a car and pass out and you're in the passenger seat and can either take the wheel and steer us away from a brick wall or let us hit the brick wall, it's my fault if you choose to do nothing?

Just wondering.
____________________________
Disclaimer:

To make a long story short, I don't take any responsibility for anything I post here. It's not news, it's not truth, it's not serious. It's parody. It's satire. It's bitter. It's angsty. Your mother's a *****. You like to jack off dogs. That's right, you heard me. You like to grab that dog by the bone and rub it like a ski pole. Your dad? Gay. Your priest? Straight. **** off and let me post. It's not true, it's all in good fun. Now go away.

#18 Sep 29 2004 at 8:59 PM Rating: Good
1998 Smash. Bush was not in office. Clinton should have stopped it. Now Bush is doing what you liberals said he should have kept doing in Iraq and using diplomacy, except he isn't playing pansy like Carter did. So because the NK aren't backing down yet, it's Bush's responsbility to have taken out the nukes. I don't think so. Bush is playing the diplomacy card the way a Super power needs to play it, from a position of strength and power not one of underpaid world babysitter.
#19 Sep 29 2004 at 9:12 PM Rating: Good
*****
16,160 posts
"I just want to be clear. If I'm driving a car and pass out and you're in the passenger seat..." --Smashaquidd1ck

Then you'd be pulling a Ted Kennedy.

~Whack!~
/he takes another shot to the jaw by the village idiot

Totem

Edited, Wed Sep 29 22:12:56 2004 by Totem
#20 Sep 29 2004 at 9:16 PM Rating: Good
Totem said it best ^
I have nothing to add.
#21 Sep 29 2004 at 9:26 PM Rating: Decent
***
1,499 posts
I don't think Bush helped things with N. Korea by calling them a member of the "axis of evil."

His statement of such was to "put them on notice," which I felt was tantamount to a bully saying "you better listen to us, or else!" Now, how helpful can that be? Not very.
#22 Sep 29 2004 at 9:46 PM Rating: Default
I just say nuke em.
#23 Sep 29 2004 at 9:46 PM Rating: Good
Geez. Wake up and smell the coffee. If world politics has come down to a country taking offense to being called a member of the axis of evil then we are in a lot worse shape than you know.

Half of you people probably don't even know which half of the korean peninsula is the northern half. We have been at war with this country since the 1950's all that was signed was an Armistice, a cessation of all hostilities. That was it. NK has been arguing and nit picking over the size of flags since Pan Mu Jam. Do you really think that NK has become a bad country only since Bush took office? Gee you must be the same type ofperosn that think Reagan calling the Soviet Union the Evil Empire was a huge political blunder.

My goodness folks, learn about the world before you post about it. :)
#24 Sep 29 2004 at 9:47 PM Rating: Default
Quote:
Per ussual. Random accusations with no grounding in fact.

Not unexpected, but dissapointing all the same.


You know Smash, come to think of it, you never really seem to bring up any new facts your self. It always seems you are hush hushing the others ones people bring up.

Just sayin'
#25 Sep 29 2004 at 9:47 PM Rating: Default
Quote:
9-11, Clinton's fault. N Korea, Clinton's fault.

Clinton did play a role in bringing these things about, however, I will not be so arrogant as to say N Korea = Clinton's fault.

Quote:
Economy, Clinton's fault.


This could be just my uneducated self but, anyone that says this a complete *** that needs to be smacked and then have duct tape put over their mouth.
#26 Sep 29 2004 at 11:21 PM Rating: Decent
***
1,499 posts
Quote:
Do you really think that NK has become a bad country only since Bush took office?


No, if you read the post, you would see that I stated that Bush didn't help things with North Korea by labelling them. It's a diplomatic blunder. Is it possible the the US and N. Korea could have come to a civil compromise before he made that statement? Who knows.

Did it make it more difficult to come to a compromise? Definitely. I mean, can you really expect any country to just give in because another country tries to bully them?
« Previous 1 2 3 4 5
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 283 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (283)