Suck lessFollow

New orders from the front:

Anyone who posts needs to suck less, you are driving away the decent posters with your crappy one line spam.

1. Henceforth anyone with less than 500 posts must post more than a 50 word count submission. With so few posts we assume you are a 14 year old who found mommy’s computer on again and while looking for *** **** found us instead. Therefore until such time as you can prove your worth we will assume you truly suck and expect you to amuse us with your pathetic understanding of basic spelling and grammar and astound us with your poor grasp of rudimentary debating skills and most importantly of all entertain us with your badly worded insults. This can only be done adequately with a larger post anything less smacks of a pathetic attempt at garnering respect through post count totals.

2. In addition, those of you recent additions with greater than 500 posts in their count must also submit with the 50 word count protocol, if you are not sure if you should be included in this provision but suspect you should be, do us all a favor and include yourself anyway, but pat yourself on the back for waking the fuck up and realizing some of us can’t stomach your shit.

3. Speaking of post count spamming: stop it, it’s old, you aren’t going to get to 10,000 anytime soon and if you did we would only shake our heads and wonder what prison or psychiatric ward allows you 24/7 access to a computer. Those of us with such huge post counts did it over years. Still think we will like you when you hit some magical number of posts? Well we won’t. Give it up, no one knows you, no one likes you, and no one will remember you 5 minutes after your last post, if you want respect here then act less like a petulant teenager who figured out how to jam the enter button and more like an adult who can string together two sentences and we will try to assume you can string together two coherent thoughts.

4. As for some magical number: no, there is not a magical number that will get you that super special nifty and wonderful title some of the boys have. They got that because the admins like them and realize their ability to add to the sum total of board quality surpasses the norm. What’s “board quality” you ask? It’s that thing you are sucking the life out of.

5. As of today anyone who uses the following abbreviations or one liners to express their dislike of and disgust for newbie’s attempting to introduce themselves or trolls attempting to prove how little their dick is shall be considered no better then said newbie’s and trolls: GFY, Go fuck yourself, STFU, ESAD, Eat shit and die, You Fucking Suck, Die…and other similar phrases, if you can’t come up with something a little more original then you need to STFU, GFY, eat shit and die, and definitely die because you fucking suck, you homos.

6. Flaming also known as “You made me cry and now I am going to say bader things to you, you bitch” at least that is what it appears to mean to most of you recently. This is the internet; people act like assholes on the internet because we can’t find them and kick their asses for acting like assholes on the internet. Stop assuming every bad thing said to you was meant to make you cry; it was, but at least have the balls to not do so here. Go to the bathroom and cut your wrists with a safety razor if it was so bad, I don’t want to hear about it. Also, stop assuming homophobic name calling is going to get the job done. This is the internet not the boys locker room, you can stop and think up a witty retort, use the spell check and even look up a good come back if your brain is, as I suspect, mush. Go crazy, be creative, you aren’t really trying to come up with something to hurt the guy so much as trying to find something that will make the rest of us laugh and laugh at him for, anyway.

7. New and improved threads: STOP FUCKING POSTING new threads if you have less then 500 posts. I’m not here to do your fucking homework for you, answer dumb *** questions like what my favorite pop band is or read some shitty email spam you thought was cute: I get email too you asshole and I suspect I saw the same fucking thing last year and didn’t think it was funny then.

I suspect I will receive a plethora of nasty comments on this post. Good. Maybe one or two of you will stop, think and stop sucking so much in the mean time.

Right... as soon as you learn to bipass the swear filter without looking like such a fu[b][/b]ck.

I agree with Git on this one.

Since you either have a short memory or a severe inability to analyze your own thoughts I will explain it for you.

You state that status in the forum community has nothing to do with post count, yet 3 rules later you go on to state that new threads should only be made by those with a higher post count.

Should I explain further or do you get the point?

Believe me Krog go with everyone on this one.

Is there a rule about being a quivering pus[b][/b]sy and deleting or signifigantly editing your OP.

It makes sense. I admit i was a bit off, but i do have a point. Yeah the majority of **** posts come from newb posters, but Ill make an example.

Since post count doesnt matter then hypothetically a 50 count poster could be accepted in the community as a valid contributer. Now, would you say that he shouldnt make any threads because his post count is too low? He has put forth good posts before why should he post a couple hundred more responses to validate his thread-starting ability? This actually invokes more spamming because he will get frustrated at only contributing to another's idea rather than submitting his own.

Actually you couldn't do that in real life anyway. That would be assult and its illegal.


On another note YOu mention nothing about political ranting

All i do is spew the liberal left argument for everything. Which gives me another idea lets ban all republican ranting on this board.

Krogsbrew,
The point Gitslayer is making is that quality trumps quantity seven ways from Sunday. He is stating that those people with large post counts, ie 2000+ have generally done so over the long haul and have proven their mettle by longevity.

The only amendment I would add to his rules is that those individuals who are creating socks need to sack up and at the very least make them entertaining. Turn them into whatever you want, right wing, left wing, black, white, yellow, red, brown, short, tall-- it doesn't matter. Just make them funny. Take Pieman for example. This is the quintessential example of uncreative puppeting. If this is somehow an actual original individual, you desperately need to kiss the business end of a 12 guage, because you embody the word "dull."

Totem

Technically you would be WarlordTrooper's sockpuppet if one were to go into technicalities...

One one-liner I do personaly approve of would be BAM!

Good advice. I do wish there was flaming with some degree of intelligence though. To me, insulting someone's intelligence by not stating any fact that counters any facts that the poster had originally presented, is just like calling someone a "doody-head" like we did in the third grade. Personally I like seeing people's opinions picked apart by the good posters and being broken down every step of the way, while providing counter points that make the original poster look like an idiot.

I disagree with rule number 1 on one condition. If the said person is posting a link to an article that they just read, and only use about 3-4 words. Not much more is needed, than "Look at this..". But if it is a stupid article, commense with the stoning.

Git I think you really need to include this, I hate not getting all the great stuff because the OP got scared!