Kerry didn't flip flop...Follow

Ahh, so you don't think Boston's gonna win. At least you can be realistic about that...

Off of CNN.com:

Kerry's "Top 10 Bush Tax Proposals" are:

10. No estate tax for families with at least two U.S. presidents.
9. W-2 Form is now Dubya-2 Form.
8. Under the simplified tax code, your refund check goes directly to Halliburton.
7. The reduced earned income tax credit is so unfair, it just makes me want to tear out my lustrous, finely groomed hair.
6. Attorney General (John) Ashcroft gets to write off the entire U.S. Constitution.
5. Texas Rangers can take a business loss for trading Sammy Sosa.
4. Eliminate all income taxes; just ask Teresa (Heinz Kerry) to cover the whole damn thing.
3. Cheney can claim Bush as a dependent.
2. Hundred-dollar penalty if you pronounce it "nuclear" instead of "nucular."
1. George W. Bush gets a deduction for mortgaging our entire future.

I'm thinking Canada sounds nice...

i could care less if kerry wins but i still stick with my philosophy of ANYONE BUT BUSH.

I'm honestly curious if you know anything about either canidate or you're just thinking what your parents told you to think. Now this really is an honest question. Do you know anything about either platform and their plans?

Same thing with the "Well, I HATE both of them but at least <canidate> is less of an idiot than the other." crowd. God those people **** me off, I've yet to find one of them that actually knows information about the canidates.

So, what you're saying is you really don't know sh'it.

The President doesn't make laws, dumbass.

No he didn't. He upheld 14 UN Security Council resolutions and ousted a dictator who had flaunted his disregard for international law and gassed his own people.

It's an entirely different situation, infant. Send troops in to N.K. and an artillery barrage to dwarf the second world war destroys Seoul.

The rest of your positions are bullsh'it, too, but I won't go through them because I am only allowed 5 quotes. This is a gem though...

How? By lowering the wage they pay the workers so that the companies can stay competetive globally with those that are able to use the $0.50 a day child labor in Malaysia? Nice thought process there, genius.

Remember FRee enterprise unchecked is a really bad thing.

no i say by financialy punishing the companies that go over seas. Heavy heavy tarifs to the point wher it owuld be less expensive to just stay here therefore creating new jobs. You gotta create insentives to stay here. Why should our companies employ the rest of the world before americans here at home. We need these jobs.


[/quote]It's an entirely different situation[/quote]

This situation is the exact same. (of course i'm assuming that they really though saddam had WMD's available)

How, if you really fear a nuclear attack upon going into kroea then the same logic couldve been argued when going into irarq. The only way we could be sure that that wouldn't happen is if they specifcially knew before hand that irarq did not possess WMD's therefore negating any legitimate reason for the "war" and actually it isn't even a war its a military action people can't seem to understand this. The last War we had was WWII. (only congress has the power to declare war)

So we spent 1,000 + lives freeing a country that didn't wanna be freed in the first place... that makes no logicall sense what so ever.



ok this was bad wording on my part. He issues executive orders and his party proposes constitutional amendments that violate the constitution. Not to mention appoint john ashcroft as attorny general. A man who wipes his *** with the constitution.

Actually an amendment banning gay marrage IS by nature discriminatory which goes against the spirit of the constituion making such an amendment itself unconstitutional.

as far as ashcroft goes have you read the patriot act. Cause there are parts in there that frighten me. That bill IS ashcroft pissing on the constitiution. And would you care to explain how an AMERICAN CITIZEN can be held 2 years without a trial or legal access without violating the constitution.

for more info check out



Well **** the global economy what we need to do is keep jobs at home. Wake up. Outsorcing jobs is BAD for our country.



Your right. Bush could care less about N. Korea. He was looking for ANY reason no matter how small to invade Iraq. So he sent 1000 + U.S troops to their deaths over oil and to free a country that DOESN'T WANT to be freed in the firstplace.

Pieman you really have no clue what you are talking about.



North Korea is a failed state in the last thoes of death. There are countries surrounding NK that can apply pressure to NK (ie China, Japan, Russia.) to get that country to give up her hard line stance. Besides isnt GWB doing exactly what the Dems would want? Using Diplomacy? The democrats howled when GWB "unilaterally attacked Iraq without allowing the diplomatic process to run it's course". NK cant feed it's people and it cannot sustain it's military without the help of the aforementioned countries. Primarily China.

Iraq is a totally different situation. There are no countries there that could apply diplomatic pressure to Iraq. Certainly the UN couldnt. They proved that over 12 years of failed sanctions. Besides the fact that the people in the UN running that show were taking money from Saddam. There is evidence that Saddam was funneling money from the Oil for Food program into terrorist organizations. He certainly wasnt using it to buy food and medication for the Iraqi people.

The people of Iraq most definitly wanted to be rid of Saddam. Believe me I was there and I saw it first hand. The vast Majority of Iraqi's are glad and very appreciative that the US ousted Saddam and freed their country. The fact that a small sect of the country (and alot of the people fighting are not even Iraqi's) is resisting and are able to grab all the media attention doesnt by any means illistrate how the majority of the country is doing. Notice you dont see any reports coming from the north and the south of the country. Just a few areas in the Sunni triangle. That's because by and large the north and south now live in peace and freedom.



Again as Mob stated the congress passes the laws. Neither President Bush or John Ashcroft has the power do enact this act. It's all a part of this thing called seperation of powers.

And just a bit of information heres the link for the voting on the Patriot act. http://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=107&session=1&vote=00313

Notice your boy Kerry and just about all the other Dems voted for it. So I guess Sen Kerry used the stall right after Mr Ashcroft to "wipe his *** with the Constitution".

Following this logic, we could ban interracial marraiges also, so long as we gave people the option to marry 'someone', we aren't discriminating.

Not really, the last time I looked at my wife she was a woman, but she is a different race than I am.


Which was illegal for decades following the same logic as the gay marrige debate.

Oh come on Smash skin pigmentation and which hole someone sticks their **** into are completely different. Interracial marriage was discriminatory based on cultural differences of racial equality. Homosexuality is not a race it is a physical attraction or infatuation with a person of the same sex.

We are not comparing apples to apples here. Your arguement is as erroneous as mine is about polygamy being allowed if gay marriage is.

I assume you mean the gender of the person's hole unless you advocate outlawing **** sex again.

Polygamy??? OMG!!!
SLIPPERY SLOPEEEEE!!!!!