Would you go?Follow

Is it that time of the month again pickle? Try switching to the left hand.

I'm sayin Bro!

I have pot. Just no patience for idiots. Frankly, I'm bored.

You are the saddest and most boring flamer ever.

Well I was going to say that you should take your ball and go home, but since you don't have any balls, I thought I'd go easy on you. Di[i][/i]ckless

To answer the question you asked, yes I would. I'm actually also a proponent of the "2 years mandatory service" idea. Not necessarily military, but some form of government/social service should be required.

To address the specifics of the situation you posed, there are a few problems. First, I'm over the age at which people get drafted, so unless they extend it to the 35+ crowd, it's a moot point.

Second. "Bush" doesn't have a secret plan to re-enact the draft. If you take about 2 minutes to actually follow the links from the guys "proof", you'll find that the Senate Bill (S.89) was sponsored by Senator Earnest F. Hollings. The House Resolution (HR 163) was sposored by Charles B. Rangel. A quick search on Google reveals that Hollings is a Democrat and actually sought the presidential nomination for his party in 1984. Rangel is also a Democrat. He participated in the Impeachment hearings against Richard Nixon, is Chairman of the Board of the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee, and Co-founded the Congressional Black Caucus.


You'd have to have your tinfoil hat screwed on especially tight to believe that Bush is behind this in any way...

It's amazing how talking about my balls just "rolls off your tongue".

Mandatory service ......

And here i was thinking this was the country of freedom.

Like the freedom not to be forced to do something.

Ummm, yeah you would. Everyone gets the same bennies in the service.


I would not go.

First because, I'm too old, and too banged up from already having spent more than enough time serving Uncle Sam.

Second, because I am of the opinion that no nation has the right to defend itself by conscripting its citizens. If, when under attack, the citizens do not respond to the needs of their nation, then that nation really doesn't need to exist.

On the other hand, I don't think any citizen that refuses to serve when his nation is under attack doesn't deserve the protection of that nation that his citizenship provides.

The current war, is in no way an attack on this nation. Iraq did not, and does not pose a threat to this country. They did nothing to us, were not involved in 9/11, and should not have been invaded. War is supposed to be THE last resort, not your first option.

I was giving you a way to bow out, but fu[i][/i]ck it!

The above statement is your only way of ever trying to weasle out of being flamed.

Oh, you can DO BETTER THAN THAT! Pahlease.

I think YOU'RE the one who's going to have to DO BETTER THAN THAT.

Obviously, it IS amateur hour, you ineffectual smudge on the petrie dish that is Kansas.

Why don't YOU bring your "A" game, huh, Stok?

Because you couldn't flame your way out of a gasoline soaked powder keg, you pathetic old fu[/u]ck.

Just slink back into your shi[u]tty little life with your shi[/u]tty little dreams of even being able to touch the hem of my boxers and shut the fu[u]ck up before I embarass you so much that your ***** shrinks into so far up into you, that not even Nicole Kidman with a fu[u][/u]cking microscope and tweezers could find it.

That is if it isn't there already.

Now I did enjoy that.

Repaired the above for the quoted poster.

I edited it to "full of lead" thank you for your concern ^^