Smashed,
All taxes are not re-distribution of wealth. For instance when a portion of my taxes go into paving a road that the public uses then I have paid for a service, that service being good roads and the ability to travel easily. When a politician introduces a tax that funds art that is not in the interest of this nation and the only ones benefiting from that tax are those that enjoy that specific type of art and the artist. When a portion of my taxes goes into defending this nation I have purchased protection from foreign and domestic threats, again a service we enjoy. But when a politician uses my taxes to fund someone elses healthcare that's not a service I enjoy being that I already pay for my own healthcare. Do you see the difference?
Varus