britain 60 million total population - 30 medals = half a medal for every 1 million people
USA 288 million total population - 63 medals 0.357 medals for every 1 million people
china 1284 million total population - 103 medals 0.049 medals for every 1 million people
australia 19 million total population - 49 medals 2.57 medals for every 1 million people
- Forums
- Cross Site
- The Asylum
- australia wins the olimpics, britain second, china sucks
australia wins the olimpics, britain second, china sucksFollow
China could kick Australia's *** and put them all to work in the gold medal mines though.
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
The Aussies had a great Olympics.
Somehow I don't think they'll do so well in the Winter Games, though.
Somehow I don't think they'll do so well in the Winter Games, though.
Disclaimer:
To make a long story short, I don't take any responsibility for anything I post here. It's not news, it's not truth, it's not serious. It's parody. It's satire. It's bitter. It's angsty. Your mother's a *****. You like to jack off dogs. That's right, you heard me. You like to grab that dog by the bone and rub it like a ski pole. Your dad? Gay. Your priest? Straight. **** off and let me post. It's not true, it's all in good fun. Now go away.
To make a long story short, I don't take any responsibility for anything I post here. It's not news, it's not truth, it's not serious. It's parody. It's satire. It's bitter. It's angsty. Your mother's a *****. You like to jack off dogs. That's right, you heard me. You like to grab that dog by the bone and rub it like a ski pole. Your dad? Gay. Your priest? Straight. **** off and let me post. It's not true, it's all in good fun. Now go away.
cuba - 11 million total population - 27 medals = 2.45 medals for every 1 million people
the communist states did pretty well eh?
editted to add:
scrap the "britain is second" thing, i forgot about how small cuba was
Edited, Wed Sep 1 09:50:37 2004 by Dracoid
the communist states did pretty well eh?
editted to add:
scrap the "britain is second" thing, i forgot about how small cuba was
Edited, Wed Sep 1 09:50:37 2004 by Dracoid
Where do I pick up my 0.000000049ths of the medal?
Nicroll 65 Assassin
Teltorid 52 Druid
Aude Sapere
Oh hell camp me all you want f**kers. I own this site and thus I own you. - Allakhazam
Teltorid 52 Druid
Aude Sapere
Oh hell camp me all you want f**kers. I own this site and thus I own you. - Allakhazam
your chinees xythex?
Either that or my reading comprehension sucks...
Nicroll 65 Assassin
Teltorid 52 Druid
Aude Sapere
Oh hell camp me all you want f**kers. I own this site and thus I own you. - Allakhazam
Teltorid 52 Druid
Aude Sapere
Oh hell camp me all you want f**kers. I own this site and thus I own you. - Allakhazam
well i get about 0.000000143 more of a medal than you 
so i'm off for my 0.0000005 of a victory lap with a few square inches of a flag around me
Edited, Wed Sep 1 10:03:22 2004 by Dracoid
so i'm off for my 0.0000005 of a victory lap with a few square inches of a flag around me Edited, Wed Sep 1 10:03:22 2004 by Dracoid
Canada 30 million total population- 12 medals =pathetic but we do better in the winter games
J to the R O C
J to the R O C
Quote:
Canada 30 million total population- 12 medals =pathetic
thats probably because your'e capitalist pigdogs
Yeah but didnt China win like 45 medals in table tennis and a couple in badmitton?
Yes I am serious.
Yes I am serious.
Quote:
Yeah but didnt China win like 45 medals in table tennis and a couple in badmitton?
your point being...?
Point being that they are like mad good at table tennis is all.
Ok, a) You're a f'ucking tool. And b) learn how to read a simple chart you retarded pinko twit. The US won 103 and China won 63. So the largest communist state got its *** soundly kicked by the most powerful nation that has ever blessed the face of this earth. Add to that the fact that we made it so Iraq and Afghanistan could compete, and you're still deluded.
Did you just call me a pinko???
I read the chart. I am going to write "S*ck my C*ck" Right on my *** cheeks. So you know exactly what it is you have to do after you are done rectally pleasing me you masochistic prick.
I read the chart. I am going to write "S*ck my C*ck" Right on my *** cheeks. So you know exactly what it is you have to do after you are done rectally pleasing me you masochistic prick.
Thenaturalstyles wrote:
Did you just call me a pinko???
I read the chart. I am going to write "S*ck my C*ck" Right on my *** cheeks. So you know exactly what it is you have to do after you are done rectally pleasing me you masochistic prick.
I read the chart. I am going to write "S*ck my C*ck" Right on my *** cheeks. So you know exactly what it is you have to do after you are done rectally pleasing me you masochistic prick.
Styles, I think he was referring to the OP. Settle down, Tiger.
What's bred in the bone will not out of the flesh.
Quote:
Did you just call me a pinko???
I read the chart. I am going to write "S*ck my C*ck" Right on my *** cheeks. So you know exactly what it is you have to do after you are done rectally pleasing me you masochistic prick
I read the chart. I am going to write "S*ck my C*ck" Right on my *** cheeks. So you know exactly what it is you have to do after you are done rectally pleasing me you masochistic prick
Did you start this thread with f'ucked up numbers? Are you blatantly sympathetic to communism?
No to both?
Good, then shut the f'uck up, you whiney little *****. You are becoming tiresome, you really are. It's time to get back to chewing on that gun barrel. Now go away and let the folks over 14 talk.
Quote:
learn how to read a simple chart you retarded pinko twit. The US won 103 and China won 63.
A) i wrote the chart
B) if YOU had read the chart you would see that my point was not how many medals everyone won, but the medal to population ratio
C) if you had read the chart you would see that the USA lost to britain, cuba and china
For one thing I sympatize with no one. Second those numbers mean nothing. Population should have no bearing whatsoever on meadal count. I mean it is not like all 1284 million people in china were competing in the olympics.
Also another thing who cares. The Olympics are a place for the world to unite and celebrate humanity.
So I think you and your totally distorted views need to take this gun out of my hand and shoot yourself in the stomach.
All the while you can rub one out to pictures of Robert Mathews or something while you slowly bleed out to a pathetic death.
Also another thing who cares. The Olympics are a place for the world to unite and celebrate humanity.
So I think you and your totally distorted views need to take this gun out of my hand and shoot yourself in the stomach.
All the while you can rub one out to pictures of Robert Mathews or something while you slowly bleed out to a pathetic death.
You got the numbers wrong, bucko.
publiusvarus wrote:
we all know liberals are well adjusted american citizens who only want what's best for society. While conservatives are evil money grubbing scum who only want to sh*t on the little man and rob the world of its resources.
Hah. That is funny. I thought there was something wrong with that.
Here are official medal counts.
.................... G S B T Last number is rank by total.
1 USA United States.35 39 29 103 1
2 CHN China.........32 17 14 63 3
3 RUS Russia........27 27 38 92 2
4 AUS Australia.....17 16 16 49 4
Edited, Wed Sep 1 16:50:59 2004 by Thenaturalstyles
Edited, Wed Sep 1 16:51:51 2004 by Thenaturalstyles
Here are official medal counts.
.................... G S B T Last number is rank by total.
1 USA United States.35 39 29 103 1
2 CHN China.........32 17 14 63 3
3 RUS Russia........27 27 38 92 2
4 AUS Australia.....17 16 16 49 4
Edited, Wed Sep 1 16:50:59 2004 by Thenaturalstyles
Edited, Wed Sep 1 16:51:51 2004 by Thenaturalstyles
oh yeah i see, sorry about the china thing, you only lost to cuba and britain, and natural:
i think the stomach shooting might be a little harsh considering my crime
i think the stomach shooting might be a little harsh considering my crime
I was not talking too you Dracoid. You may shoot yourself right in the face. =P
Dracoid. Um... Communist nations didn't do any better then any one else. Small nations with agressive Olympic programs did well. I'd think that would be kinda obvious.
King Nobby wrote:
More words please
Quote:
Canada 30 million total population- 12 medals =pathetic
Canada=Communists=squirrels
Canada is a make believe country filled with squirrels!!!
Quote:
For one thing I sympatize with no one. Second those numbers mean nothing. Population should have no bearing whatsoever on meadal count.
Of course it should. That is just basic math. There are other factors of course - investment in sport, facilities, culture, racial characteristics etc, but population definitely does have a bearing.
Recent Visitors: 271
All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (271)
- Forums
- Cross Site
- The Asylum
- australia wins the olimpics, britain second, china sucks
© 2024 Fanbyte LLC