Quote:
What other medical decisions should we take out of the hands of patients? You're on a slippery slope here
I think you glossed over a key word here. Not misstated. Apparently misunderstood.
Perhaps I wasn't clear in my own assumptions as I am not as familiar with medical procedures as some others here. I am making the assumption that only previously approved procedures are being discussed. I assume that there is a mechanism in place where there is periodic review of a sampling of cases to ensure compliance with those practices. Am I incorrect in my assumptions?
Quote:
Since when does the patient know what medical condition of theirs is life threatening?
When they have their consultations with their doctors and follow up with some homework and/or get a second opinion.
Is it your contention that doctors are simply going to start telling women in their third trimester of pregnancy "well dear, this baby's going to kill you, but I can make it all better by giving you this abortion."?
Assuming there are doctors so heartless and unscrupulous as to have money be their overriding motivator, wouldn't bringing pregnancies to term and delivering the babies be more profitable?