Forum Settings
       
1 2 3 4 5 Next »
Reply To Thread

Strike two for Partial Birth Abortion BanFollow

#102 Aug 27 2004 at 4:14 PM Rating: Good
Quote:
White guilt? Where the hell did that come from, cracker?

You're the affluent white liberal. Not many other reasons for it.
#103 Aug 27 2004 at 4:16 PM Rating: Default
Lunatic
******
30,086 posts

Smash, why would oversight stop abortions being carried out to save the life of the mother? Surgeries are done every day with medical oversight with no fear of reprisals-- just as long as the criteria are met for the procedure and the skill of the surgeon is adequate. Deaths occur on the operating table on a daily basis with no punitive measures. After all, that is part and parcel of the risk of invasive surgery.

An independent medical review board simply watches for unscrupulous and incompetent doctors, that's all-- something I'd think everybody could get behind.


First of all, perfroming the proceedure if it wasn't a risk would be a criminal act and the board would determine of there was risk and thus as well, determine if the law had been broken.

Not ok.

Secondly, there is allready ample recourse for incompetent and unscrupulous doctors and adding a specefic board for this one singe proceedure serves no purpose in that regard. The only reason for it to exist would be to brake doctors from preforming this one specefic proceedure on patients who lives they feel are in risk.

Not ok.
____________________________
Disclaimer:

To make a long story short, I don't take any responsibility for anything I post here. It's not news, it's not truth, it's not serious. It's parody. It's satire. It's bitter. It's angsty. Your mother's a *****. You like to jack off dogs. That's right, you heard me. You like to grab that dog by the bone and rub it like a ski pole. Your dad? Gay. Your priest? Straight. **** off and let me post. It's not true, it's all in good fun. Now go away.

#104 Aug 27 2004 at 4:18 PM Rating: Default
Lunatic
******
30,086 posts

You're the affluent white liberal. Not many other reasons for it.


Not many reasons for being white, affluent and liberal but white guilt? Christ, someone should probably let my rasiscst union relatives know that they shouldn't be liberal anymore.
____________________________
Disclaimer:

To make a long story short, I don't take any responsibility for anything I post here. It's not news, it's not truth, it's not serious. It's parody. It's satire. It's bitter. It's angsty. Your mother's a *****. You like to jack off dogs. That's right, you heard me. You like to grab that dog by the bone and rub it like a ski pole. Your dad? Gay. Your priest? Straight. **** off and let me post. It's not true, it's all in good fun. Now go away.

#105 Aug 27 2004 at 4:21 PM Rating: Decent
Because it's a both a poltical issue and one of judgement. Conservative activist groups will push boards to intrepert the risk to the woman very conservatively, and hence Doctors will let women die rather than risk their carreers.

As an engineer, if I'm asked to provide a power source for a satellite, I'm going to recommend nuclear power regardless of the political issues associated with nuclear power, as well as solar power and a few other options.

I know the risks associated with each power source, and I know the benefits. I'm going to make a recommendation on what I think is best. I'm also fortunate enough to not have to make the decision.

A doctor knows the same risks and benefits regarding these procedures.

The patient is the one making the decision here.

I don't see how politics should ever affect the doctor's medical opinion.

In an emergency room scenario, then obviously the doctor has to make the decision him/herself. In that scenario, I might agree that the oversight of a commitee was counter-productive.
#106 Aug 27 2004 at 4:21 PM Rating: Decent
****
5,311 posts
Quote:
What other medical decisions should we take out of the hands of patients? You're on a slippery slope here
I think you glossed over a key word here. Not misstated. Apparently misunderstood.

Perhaps I wasn't clear in my own assumptions as I am not as familiar with medical procedures as some others here. I am making the assumption that only previously approved procedures are being discussed. I assume that there is a mechanism in place where there is periodic review of a sampling of cases to ensure compliance with those practices. Am I incorrect in my assumptions?
Quote:
Since when does the patient know what medical condition of theirs is life threatening?
When they have their consultations with their doctors and follow up with some homework and/or get a second opinion.

Is it your contention that doctors are simply going to start telling women in their third trimester of pregnancy "well dear, this baby's going to kill you, but I can make it all better by giving you this abortion."?

Assuming there are doctors so heartless and unscrupulous as to have money be their overriding motivator, wouldn't bringing pregnancies to term and delivering the babies be more profitable?
#107 Aug 27 2004 at 4:28 PM Rating: Decent
I think you glossed over a key word here.

That was my point Totem.

Just, some people have valid opinions and points, but aren't the most erudite writers (i.e. me).
#108 Aug 27 2004 at 4:34 PM Rating: Decent
He's not White.

He's Celtic.

#109 Aug 27 2004 at 4:49 PM Rating: Default
Lunatic
******
30,086 posts

As an engineer, if I'm asked to provide a power source for a satellite, I'm going to recommend nuclear power regardless of the political issues associated with nuclear power, as well as solar power and a few other options.


The diffrence being that you don't consider the use of nuclear power in a satalite murder.

Look, I'd love to live in this happy yellow brick road land of impartial doctors who don't let politics intrude into their medical practice, but it's not the reality.

The reality is that in a country where we have doctors who won't perscribe birth control pill to unmarried women, it's not a great leap to see the problems with this.


____________________________
Disclaimer:

To make a long story short, I don't take any responsibility for anything I post here. It's not news, it's not truth, it's not serious. It's parody. It's satire. It's bitter. It's angsty. Your mother's a *****. You like to jack off dogs. That's right, you heard me. You like to grab that dog by the bone and rub it like a ski pole. Your dad? Gay. Your priest? Straight. **** off and let me post. It's not true, it's all in good fun. Now go away.

#110 Aug 27 2004 at 5:05 PM Rating: Good
*****
16,160 posts
Look, I am not saying there are any number of doctors out there who would perform partial birth abortions beyond what the mother's medical condition calls for, but the danger lies in for a politically motivated doctor to provide such a service. It is not unheard of where doctors perform abortions to the virtual exclusion of all other gynocological procedures, be that due to the scarctiy of other abortionists or due to their political motivations, I don't know. But in such cases, medical oversight-- as with every other type of medical procedure --is needed, whether or not it is provided with the current medical governing guidelines. I am not expressing a desire for a specific committee to watch over abortionists, just that any who might otherwise take advantage of their position and license are governed by an independent panel of peer reviewers.

Lastly, to answer Smash's concern that the inherent risk would possibly criminalize partial birth abortions, I'd say that if there was no risk it is likely the procedure is unwarranted. If I am misunderstanding what you are saying, please clarify this for me.

Totem
#111 Aug 27 2004 at 5:08 PM Rating: Decent
If I am misunderstanding what you are saying, please clarify this for me.

^_^

#112 Aug 27 2004 at 5:19 PM Rating: Default
Lunatic
******
30,086 posts

Lastly, to answer Smash's concern that the inherent risk would possibly criminalize partial birth abortions, I'd say that if there was no risk it is likely the procedure is unwarranted. If I am misunderstanding what you are saying, please clarify this for me.


I'm saying all of the precautions you're concerned about allready exist. If you don't think there should be a specefic board for this one procedure then I'm confused at what you're proposing, I guess.

As to doctors who preform "unnessicary" aboritons, the point is that it's better to err on the side of caution when the life of the mother is potnetially at stake.
____________________________
Disclaimer:

To make a long story short, I don't take any responsibility for anything I post here. It's not news, it's not truth, it's not serious. It's parody. It's satire. It's bitter. It's angsty. Your mother's a *****. You like to jack off dogs. That's right, you heard me. You like to grab that dog by the bone and rub it like a ski pole. Your dad? Gay. Your priest? Straight. **** off and let me post. It's not true, it's all in good fun. Now go away.

#113 Aug 27 2004 at 5:31 PM Rating: Good
*****
16,160 posts
<gasp!>

We agree on something! The planets must be in alignment!

The truth is, I don't know how much oversight there is when it comes to abortions, particularly in regards to private clinics not associated with hospital networks. There may be states where there are no governing entities or there may be a national one-- I just don't know.

Totem
#114 Aug 27 2004 at 5:34 PM Rating: Default
Lunatic
******
30,086 posts

The truth is, I don't know how much oversight there is when it comes to abortions, particularly in regards to private clinics not associated with hospital networks. There may be states where there are no governing entities or there may be a national one-- I just don't know.


State by state.
____________________________
Disclaimer:

To make a long story short, I don't take any responsibility for anything I post here. It's not news, it's not truth, it's not serious. It's parody. It's satire. It's bitter. It's angsty. Your mother's a *****. You like to jack off dogs. That's right, you heard me. You like to grab that dog by the bone and rub it like a ski pole. Your dad? Gay. Your priest? Straight. **** off and let me post. It's not true, it's all in good fun. Now go away.

#115 Aug 27 2004 at 5:38 PM Rating: Good
*****
16,160 posts
I guess this highlights my concern that a particular doctor could open a practice based off of political beliefs to provide late term abortions under the guise of the mother's life being at stake, just by darkening his doorstep.

It's what I would consider a loophole that needs closing.

Totem
#116 Aug 27 2004 at 6:44 PM Rating: Decent
****
5,311 posts
Quote:
my concern that a particular doctor could open a practice based off of political beliefs to provide late term abortions under the guise of the mother's life being at stake
This doctor would be performing these abortions to demonstrate that he can?

Is that what you're saying? Honestly I'm just not following this train of thought.
#117 Aug 27 2004 at 6:47 PM Rating: Good
*****
16,160 posts
No, a doctor believing so fervently in the right to choose opens a clinic expressly to give women the opportunity to have abortions upon demand. We have such a clinic right next door to where I work.

Totem
#118 Aug 27 2004 at 6:48 PM Rating: Default
Lunatic
******
30,086 posts

I guess this highlights my concern that a particular doctor could open a practice based off of political beliefs to provide late term abortions under the guise of the mother's life being at stake, just by darkening his doorstep.


You'll never be able to establish that, regardless, if the mother wants the abortion.

There's no way for an ex post facto review of a subjective report of the situation that led to the procedure. Even if you could, you'd just see more "misscarriges".

It's impossible to regulate risk to the mother objectively unless you're standing in the room with her.
____________________________
Disclaimer:

To make a long story short, I don't take any responsibility for anything I post here. It's not news, it's not truth, it's not serious. It's parody. It's satire. It's bitter. It's angsty. Your mother's a *****. You like to jack off dogs. That's right, you heard me. You like to grab that dog by the bone and rub it like a ski pole. Your dad? Gay. Your priest? Straight. **** off and let me post. It's not true, it's all in good fun. Now go away.

#119 Aug 27 2004 at 6:50 PM Rating: Decent
****
5,311 posts
I'm assuming this doctor is bound by the same rules and laws which apply to any other doctor providing this service.
#120 Aug 27 2004 at 6:53 PM Rating: Default
Lunatic
******
30,086 posts

No, a doctor believing so fervently in the right to choose opens a clinic expressly to give women the opportunity to have abortions upon demand. We have such a clinic right next door to where I work.



Does it have a big sign saying "Third Trimester abortions FREE! Plecenta dinner salad with coupon!"
____________________________
Disclaimer:

To make a long story short, I don't take any responsibility for anything I post here. It's not news, it's not truth, it's not serious. It's parody. It's satire. It's bitter. It's angsty. Your mother's a *****. You like to jack off dogs. That's right, you heard me. You like to grab that dog by the bone and rub it like a ski pole. Your dad? Gay. Your priest? Straight. **** off and let me post. It's not true, it's all in good fun. Now go away.

#121 Aug 29 2004 at 9:30 PM Rating: Decent
I had no intention on reading this thread. I am Pro-Giving an innocent life the chance to live.

Be it a Rape related pregnancy or whatever the reason these babies in whatever stage of pregnancy should have the right.

I mean there are alot of loving people in this world that are not able to concieve that would love to raise these babies in a great environment.

I guess the only acceptable exception would be a high risk birth that threatened the life of the infant and the mother.
#122 Aug 29 2004 at 10:09 PM Rating: Default
Lunatic
******
30,086 posts

Be it a Rape related pregnancy or whatever the reason these babies in whatever stage of pregnancy should have the right.


What about sperm?

Don't they have rights? All of them are potentially a person.

I think we should try any male who *********** a mass murderer.

Manslaughter for wet dreams, naturally, no intent.
____________________________
Disclaimer:

To make a long story short, I don't take any responsibility for anything I post here. It's not news, it's not truth, it's not serious. It's parody. It's satire. It's bitter. It's angsty. Your mother's a *****. You like to jack off dogs. That's right, you heard me. You like to grab that dog by the bone and rub it like a ski pole. Your dad? Gay. Your priest? Straight. **** off and let me post. It's not true, it's all in good fun. Now go away.

#123 Aug 29 2004 at 10:33 PM Rating: Decent
Smash not everything is so cut and dry. Sperm is nothing without an Egg. And egg is really nothing (albeit dollars to fertility clinics) without sperm. However aborting an already developed fetus should be outlawed.

I should also go on the record that aborting as early as scientifically possible is imo not horrible, yet still bad.

Still as soon as a baby has arms, legs, and a brain it is murder. That much should be cut and dry.



Edited, Sun Aug 29 23:42:52 2004 by Thenaturalstyles
#124 Aug 29 2004 at 10:43 PM Rating: Decent
Did something happen to this thread. Why is there all this banned junk??
#125 Aug 30 2004 at 1:10 AM Rating: Default
Lunatic
******
30,086 posts

Smash not everything is so cut and dry. Sperm is nothing without an Egg. And egg is really nothing (albeit dollars to fertility clinics) without sperm. However aborting an already developed fetus should be outlawed.


One, it's cut and DRIED, not "cut and dry". I understand what you meant, though.

The part I didn't understand so well was when you went on to contradict yourself in the next sentance.

Why does a gamete have less value than an embryo or a fetus?

____________________________
Disclaimer:

To make a long story short, I don't take any responsibility for anything I post here. It's not news, it's not truth, it's not serious. It's parody. It's satire. It's bitter. It's angsty. Your mother's a *****. You like to jack off dogs. That's right, you heard me. You like to grab that dog by the bone and rub it like a ski pole. Your dad? Gay. Your priest? Straight. **** off and let me post. It's not true, it's all in good fun. Now go away.

1 2 3 4 5 Next »
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 234 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (234)