Forum Settings
       
Reply To Thread

***** Poverty, He May Have Lied...Follow

#1 Aug 26 2004 at 10:35 AM Rating: Good
Slander - Check

Now, what else can we throw at them?
#2 Aug 26 2004 at 10:49 AM Rating: Good
The kitchen sink.

Not that it matters. It's just a poll and we all know how accurate they are.

On top of that, it's a poll in California and we all know they're just a bunch of tree-hugging hippies. Smiley: wink









Edited because I'm in particularly good typing form today...3 typos ::mutter::

Edited, Thu Aug 26 11:54:31 2004 by TStephens
#3 Aug 26 2004 at 10:50 AM Rating: Decent
****
8,619 posts
It still puzzles me how the supporters of someone who actively avoided going to vietnam can attack the record of someone who did go, twice.
#4 Aug 26 2004 at 11:00 AM Rating: Good
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
Congratulations, Moe! You're copying Varrus now!

Edited, Thu Aug 26 12:02:11 2004 by Jophiel
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#5 Aug 26 2004 at 11:03 AM Rating: Good
Quote:
Congratulations, Moe! You're copying Varrus now!

Yeah, but I can do it with wit and whimsy. And since Varrus is a tool do the links he posts really count anyway?

Yes, I realize he is a tool who espouses right wing beliefs, but a tool none the less.
#6 Aug 26 2004 at 11:04 AM Rating: Decent
Quote:
It still puzzles me how the supporters of someone who actively avoided going to vietnam can attack the record of someone who did go, twice.


Me too, Tarv. Me too.Smiley: disappointed
#7 Aug 26 2004 at 11:06 AM Rating: Good
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
Quote:
Yeah, but I can do it with wit and whimsy
Fantastic. When do you start?
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#8 Aug 26 2004 at 11:06 AM Rating: Good
Pickle wrote:
Tarv wrote:
It still puzzles me how the supporters of someone who actively avoided going to vietnam can attack the record of someone who did go, twice.

Me too, Tarv. Me too.

I would hope you both know that it has nothing to do with Vietnam. It is a tactic to win a race. An underhanded tactic, and completely basesless, but a seemingly effective one at the moment.
#9 Aug 26 2004 at 11:07 AM Rating: Decent
it's a poll in California and we all know they're just a bunch of tree-hugging hippies.

The poll was nation-wide.

Not that it matters. It's just a poll and we all know how accurate they are.

Polls are pretty useless until they lock up some more states. Until then, it's a race. I think they each have under 200 electoral votes locked up. Most other states are too close to call.

Big events could swing things either way at this point. Barring any of those, we know who will win.

It still puzzles me how the supporters of someone who actively avoided going to vietnam can attack the record of someone who did go, twice.

All of these attacks seem rather poorly executed. They should have concentrated on his actions after the war, rather than his service during the war.

Doing that brings into question not only his service record, but those of other vets who fought alongside him. I don't think that's a good strategy to essentially call into question the service of Vietnam veterans.

If you can show what he thought he did was wrong, that would cast him in a much more negative light than saying his service wasn't heroic. Just my opinion.

I wouldn't have been surprised if Kerry-supporters were the ones financing the Swift boat ads, seeing how the attacks were made.

#10 Aug 26 2004 at 11:07 AM Rating: Good
Quote:
Fantastic. When do you start?

I'm waiting to follow your lead.
#11 Aug 26 2004 at 11:10 AM Rating: Good
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
Sorry man. You seem to have the task of Varrus-clone locked up. You're on your own for this one Smiley: lol
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#12 Aug 26 2004 at 11:13 AM Rating: Good
Quote:
The poll was nation-wide.



There ya go, throwing in facts again. Shame on you.
#13 Aug 26 2004 at 12:06 PM Rating: Decent
Prodigal Son
******
20,643 posts
MoebiusLord the Flatulent wrote:

I would hope you both know that it has nothing to do with Vietnam. It is a tactic to win a race. An underhanded tactic, and completely basesless, but a seemingly effective one at the moment.


By hook or by crook....
____________________________
publiusvarus wrote:
we all know liberals are well adjusted american citizens who only want what's best for society. While conservatives are evil money grubbing scum who only want to sh*t on the little man and rob the world of its resources.
#14 Aug 26 2004 at 1:21 PM Rating: Good
*****
16,160 posts
/holds his hands up in a Nixonian gesture

I am not a crook!

/shakes his jowls

Totem
#15 Aug 26 2004 at 1:26 PM Rating: Good
Quote:
/rubs his jewels

FTFY
#16 Aug 26 2004 at 1:35 PM Rating: Decent
Quote:
It still puzzles me how the supporters of someone who actively avoided going to vietnam can attack the record of someone who did go, twice.


Because its easy to deny that you avoided going if you own fox news, in conclusion, the more money you pay journalists, the bigger chance you have of fairly being elected of grand emperor of the land of the free.
#17 Aug 26 2004 at 3:09 PM Rating: Good
Encyclopedia
******
35,568 posts
The Honorable Dracoid wrote:
Quote:
It still puzzles me how the supporters of someone who actively avoided going to vietnam can attack the record of someone who did go, twice.


Because its easy to deny that you avoided going if you own fox news, in conclusion, the more money you pay journalists, the bigger chance you have of fairly being elected of grand emperor of the land of the free.


Eh? I don't see it that way. The thing is that Bush has never denied his role during that conflict. Yup. He served in the National Guard. Yup. We all know it was a unit that wealthy people sent their kids to and he was very unlikely to ever see combat.

Get over it. Bush has not made any issue of his military service. He's not tried to play himself off as a war hero.

Kerry and Kerry's people *made* their respective military services an issue. That's why people will look into Kerry's record. What other choice are they given? If you're going to critisize one candidate for joining the national guard while the other served in a war zone, then of course the other guys are going to go through your candidates war record with a fine toothed comb to see if anything shakes loose.


If you come out of the blocks crowing about how your guy has this great military career, and the other guy doesn't, you can expect that people are going to examine that career. Why expect differently?
____________________________
King Nobby wrote:
More words please
#18 Aug 26 2004 at 3:18 PM Rating: Default
Quote:
Congratulations, Moe! You're copying Varrus now!



The often imitated but never duplicated Varus...

#19 Aug 26 2004 at 3:23 PM Rating: Decent
Quote:
We all know it was a unit that wealthy people sent their kids to and he was very unlikely to ever see combat.


this for me is proof that he is unfit to take power, chances are he wouldn't be alive if his dad wasn't loaded.

the point isn't that he skipped service, its tht he skipped it and then takes the **** out of kerry because he didn't do as well as bush would have if he'd have been out there.
#20 Aug 26 2004 at 3:44 PM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
Quote:
He's not tried to play himself off as a war hero.
Of course. It's not like he flew a fighter onto an aircraft carrier so they could all take pictures of him in his flightsuit as he told us "Mission accomplished" or anything.
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#21 Aug 26 2004 at 4:22 PM Rating: Decent
It's not like he flew a fighter onto an aircraft carrier so they could all take pictures of him in his flightsuit as he told us "Mission accomplished" or anything.

This is nit-pickey, but he didn't land the aircraft. He was aboard the plane. It takes a small measure of skill to land on an aircraft carrier.

Notably much less than running a country well.

Supposedly he flew the aircraft a brief time during transit, although I imagine one of the other two pilots just hit autopilot then told him to keep her steady.
#22 Aug 26 2004 at 4:28 PM Rating: Decent
Prodigal Son
******
20,643 posts
So, he just plays dress-up and poses for photo shoots.

Great.
#23 Aug 27 2004 at 9:37 PM Rating: Good
Encyclopedia
******
35,568 posts
Bah. Was busy with this thing called "work" yesterday.

Jophiel wrote:
Quote:
He's not tried to play himself off as a war hero.
Of course. It's not like he flew a fighter onto an aircraft carrier so they could all take pictures of him in his flightsuit as he told us "Mission accomplished" or anything.


You're absolutely right. It's not like he did that at all.

He didn't fly a fighter onto an aircraft carrier. He didn't perform the landing, and it wasn't a fighter. It was an S-3B Viking.

Yes. They did get pictures of him in a flight suit. Oddly, Bush doesn't look like a dork when wearing a flightsuit, unlike another politician riding around in a tank...

He didn't tell anyone "Mission Accomplished". It was a message printed on a banner on the Lincoln. Furthermore, the banner message was the Navy's idea, and was not intended to convey that we were "done" in Iraq, but that the Lincoln's mission was accomplished. At the time, the lincoln had been at sea for 290 days, the longest deployment ever for a nuclear powered carrier. Um. And they were one day from port. Think about it.


But hey! Let's not let fact get in the way of really good innuendo...
____________________________
King Nobby wrote:
More words please
#24 Aug 30 2004 at 5:27 AM Rating: Default
yeah. facts... BAH! facts can be used to prove anything that is even remotely true.
Vote "W" for President 2004.

"I always hated you, john kerry. Always hated you the most."
#25 Aug 30 2004 at 5:32 AM Rating: Default
Lunatic
******
30,086 posts

Oddly, Bush doesn't look like a dork when wearing a flightsuit, unlike another politician riding around in a tank...


It's only been, what, 20 years or so since that event.

Oddly Kerry doesn't look the kind of guy who would send burgalers to his opponents offices and then lie about it...unlike another politician.

Kerry also doesn't look like someone who would nail his female slaves. Unlike another politican. You know he also doesn't look like a guy who would get his own pope and cut his wives heads off.
____________________________
Disclaimer:

To make a long story short, I don't take any responsibility for anything I post here. It's not news, it's not truth, it's not serious. It's parody. It's satire. It's bitter. It's angsty. Your mother's a *****. You like to jack off dogs. That's right, you heard me. You like to grab that dog by the bone and rub it like a ski pole. Your dad? Gay. Your priest? Straight. **** off and let me post. It's not true, it's all in good fun. Now go away.

Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 185 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (185)