Forum Settings
       
« Previous 1 2
Reply To Thread

2 passenger planes crash in Russia - just in.Follow

#1 Aug 24 2004 at 5:51 PM Rating: Excellent
Avatar
******
29,919 posts
This looks bad. maybe a chechen hijack attempt? russian airliners are fairly unreliable, but two in the same day that close together... no.

http://www.reuters.com/newsArticle.jhtml?type=topNews&storyID=6059970
____________________________
Arch Duke Kaolian Drachensborn, lvl 95 Ranger, Unrest Server
Tech support forum | FAQ (Support) | Mobile Zam: http://m.zam.com (Premium only)
Forum Rules
#2 Aug 24 2004 at 5:54 PM Rating: Decent
*
143 posts
yowza, good find...
#3 Aug 24 2004 at 5:57 PM Rating: Decent
***
1,243 posts
Quote:
that close together


Two airliners that close together could be related because of weather but not very likely.

Hijack or an onboard bomb seems more likely.
#4 Aug 24 2004 at 6:02 PM Rating: Excellent
Avatar
******
29,919 posts
hmm, there is a storm band over western russia, but it doesn't look big enough to be anything that would down aircraft. http://www.weather.com/outlook/travel/map/RSXX0063?from=LAPmaps
____________________________
Arch Duke Kaolian Drachensborn, lvl 95 Ranger, Unrest Server
Tech support forum | FAQ (Support) | Mobile Zam: http://m.zam.com (Premium only)
Forum Rules
#5 Aug 24 2004 at 6:04 PM Rating: Good
I have flown on the domestic airlines in russia, and it wouldn't surprise me to have 2 go down in the same day. If just one goes down, it doesn't even make the news.

I could be wrong.

Edited, Tue Aug 24 19:05:16 2004 by Reinman
#6 Aug 24 2004 at 6:32 PM Rating: Decent
***
1,031 posts
Unconfirmed reports from civilians indicate an explosion prior to the crash of at least one of the two planes.
#7 Aug 24 2004 at 8:08 PM Rating: Decent
Lunatic
******
30,086 posts
Two hijackers who just fly both planes into the ground?

I'm guessing some sort of freak downdraft or windshear.
____________________________
Disclaimer:

To make a long story short, I don't take any responsibility for anything I post here. It's not news, it's not truth, it's not serious. It's parody. It's satire. It's bitter. It's angsty. Your mother's a *****. You like to jack off dogs. That's right, you heard me. You like to grab that dog by the bone and rub it like a ski pole. Your dad? Gay. Your priest? Straight. **** off and let me post. It's not true, it's all in good fun. Now go away.

#8 Aug 24 2004 at 8:43 PM Rating: Good
Funched is right here is link.

http://www.cnn.com/2004/WORLD/europe/08/24/russia.planecrash/index.html



Edited, Tue Aug 24 21:49:46 2004 by Reinman
#9 Aug 24 2004 at 9:55 PM Rating: Decent
***
1,923 posts
I guess they wanted to fly them somewhere or just blow them up? I doubt crashing them into something was a reason.I mean, there ain't nothing worth blowing up in Russia.



Quick aim the plane for that .. snow ..
#10 Aug 24 2004 at 9:58 PM Rating: Decent
Lunatic
******
30,086 posts
There are allways uncomfirmed reports of an explosion.

I imagine the unconfirmed speculation about shoulder fired missles should start in about 12 hours.
____________________________
Disclaimer:

To make a long story short, I don't take any responsibility for anything I post here. It's not news, it's not truth, it's not serious. It's parody. It's satire. It's bitter. It's angsty. Your mother's a *****. You like to jack off dogs. That's right, you heard me. You like to grab that dog by the bone and rub it like a ski pole. Your dad? Gay. Your priest? Straight. **** off and let me post. It's not true, it's all in good fun. Now go away.

#11 Aug 24 2004 at 11:16 PM Rating: Good
*****
16,160 posts
Aviation officials said that the hijacking code in the transponder was activated prior to it missing from the radar screens. If this information is accurate, I believe it is highly likely terrorism is the cause. That being said, does this change anybody's mind about heightened terror alerts or do all of you still think our Homeland Security Agency is nothing more than mental *************

The feeling I've been getting from this board is that all the public announcements about possible terror strikes is politically motivated by a Bush administration who is doing this in their own self interests by increasing the fear among the populace. From that I conclude that each of you believe that the threat of terrorism is over and any further announcements of possible terrorism is a waste of time and energy.

Tell that to those 89 people who probably died today at the hands of terrorists.

Totem
#12 Aug 24 2004 at 11:29 PM Rating: Excellent
****
6,858 posts
Yikes.
#13 Aug 25 2004 at 12:21 AM Rating: Decent
Probably the ******* Chechnans(Can't spell forgive me).

Edited, Wed Aug 25 01:21:31 2004 by TwizzleTheSamurai
#14 Aug 25 2004 at 12:39 AM Rating: Default
Lunatic
******
30,086 posts

Aviation officials said that the hijacking code in the transponder was activated prior to it missing from the radar screens. If this information is accurate, I believe it is highly likely terrorism is the cause. That being said, does this change anybody's mind about heightened terror alerts or do all of you still think our Homeland Security Agency is nothing more than mental *************


Put the crack pipe down, son.

This has absolutely nothing to do with terro alerts in the US. Drawing any comparison at all is Gabjiesque in the extreme.

Did State issue any warnings to US travelers in Russia? Gee, why not? I guess there's a massive failure in the information garthering regarding terrorists, time for a change. Bush didn't care enough to get the warning to them in time.

Tell the families of the dead that he was more intrested in preventing gay marrige, I guess.

See what randomly making shi[b][/b]t up does for an argument? Fun, huh?
____________________________
Disclaimer:

To make a long story short, I don't take any responsibility for anything I post here. It's not news, it's not truth, it's not serious. It's parody. It's satire. It's bitter. It's angsty. Your mother's a *****. You like to jack off dogs. That's right, you heard me. You like to grab that dog by the bone and rub it like a ski pole. Your dad? Gay. Your priest? Straight. **** off and let me post. It's not true, it's all in good fun. Now go away.

#15 Aug 25 2004 at 1:07 AM Rating: Good
Code Monkey
Avatar
****
7,476 posts
in Mother Russia, planes hijack YOU!

yes, I know, bad taste alert
____________________________
Do what now?
#16 Aug 25 2004 at 11:24 AM Rating: Good
*****
16,160 posts
Your narrow focus on your own little world continues to astound me, Smash. Russia is or will be paying the price-- as will all civilized countries --for not stepping up and addressing the issue of obliterating global terrorism. The larger issue is cultural warfare, something we are knee deep in, as is France, Russia, Britain, and every other country with a a non-Muslim outlook, but a very real Muslim problem: an Islamic populace approving of terrorism as an acceptable tool of use. Until they and we break Muslim countries' will to engage in terrorism, planes will continue to crash, bombs will keep going off in crowded public venues, and eventually even larger tragedies will continue to plague us. Wishing it away will not do so, playing nice with them will not change their mind about us, and spreading around our wealth won't make them change their ways. Only a concerted effort by the civilized world as a whole will discourage them from terrorism.

In a perfect world our recourse would be to make it so pricey to continue that they cease and desist. How would we do that? Regime change on a global scale, and in terms of small theater operations, threaten to destroy the Najaf or Fallujah mosque or the Dome on the Rock or Mecca and explain that unless this crap ends, a 2000 pound laser guided bomb will drop in on that shiney golden roof. Tit for tat, one World Trade Center for one holy shrine.

We can always build another tower, but there's only a limited number of Islamic holy places.

But, sadly, no one has the backbone to do that, so what we are left with is quid pro quo: We get behind Russia in terms of Chechnya and they get behind us in terms of Iraq.

Totem
#17 Aug 25 2004 at 11:37 AM Rating: Decent
There are allways uncomfirmed reports of an explosion.

When Columbia went down, and they were interviewing these farmers in North Texas, I just wanted to cry.

"I saw another plane up there and I'm pretty sure it hit the thing. They was flying awful close."

Just... sad.
#18 Aug 25 2004 at 12:03 PM Rating: Good
Drama Nerdvana
******
20,674 posts
Totem, I think we must address the issue of global terrorism. Especially with the Muslim community. Bombing the sh'it out or anyone we think might be associated with terrorists has a tendency of making the situation worse.

Russia has been militarily involved with Chechen-Ingush area since 1993 trying to stop the area from asserting its claims to be an independant state. Things have gotten worse.

However while i do think intensive negotiation is key, sometimes you have to set deadlines/boundaries and say "look we have tried to work with you but you keep pissing around, either start working with us or prepared to get the **** bombed out of you". For example Al-Sadr in Najaf, we throw a few bullets at him and he wants to negotiate, then he starts f'ucking around again then we throw a few more bullets and he smartens up, then he messes around. I would give him a few chances and then if it was a viable military option be like "look last time, no other chances play straight or we are gonna go in and clear you out simple as that".

I thoroughly disagree with you on the bombing of Islamic holy sites though, that would definitely make things worse. Say if tomorrow some militant islamic group blew up the Statue of Liberty, The Whitehouse, burned the declaration of independance or some other significant symbol of America. How effective do you think that would be in getting the whole of America, even those normally opposed to war to agree to go to war? It would be the same if the US blew up the dome of the rock in Israel or the Kaaba in Mecca. It would unite the enitire Islamic community not only in the middle east but in Europe, Africa, Asia, etc against the United States and the amount of terrorism would increase and it would increase the ranks and followers of militant/radical groups.

____________________________
Bode - 100 Holy Paladin - Lightbringer
#19 Aug 25 2004 at 12:24 PM Rating: Excellent
Will swallow your soul
******
29,360 posts
To say that Russia has played no part in fighting terrorism is, sorry to say it, stupid. Speaking of a narrow minded view of one's own little world.

As for this:

Quote:
The feeling I've been getting from this board is that all the public announcements about possible terror strikes is politically motivated by a Bush administration who is doing this in their own self interests by increasing the fear among the populace. From that I conclude that each of you believe that the threat of terrorism is over and any further announcements of possible terrorism is a waste of time and energy.

Tell that to those 89 people who probably died today at the hands of terrorists.


I think the color coded terror alert status is politically motivated in large part, in that it plays to the cult of fear that supports the status quo. The fact that ordinary citizens are given no direction regarding what the different color codes mean to them, or what they should do differently based on those codes, tells me so.

Is the threat of terror over? No, and never again.

Is there any point in screaming "BE AFRAID!" in my face? No, unless of course there's an election coming up. Announcements of terror threats should be given to the people who can use them.

Edit: sorry, your math isn't off, I was reading earlier reports.

Looks like the data recorders were found for both flights, hopefully some answers will be forthcoming.


Edited, Wed Aug 25 13:35:59 2004 by SamiraX
____________________________
In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.

#20 Aug 31 2004 at 12:25 PM Rating: Good
*****
16,160 posts
More Chechyan terror in Moscow today. A car bomb just went off in Moscow. At least 8 dead.

Totem
#21 Aug 31 2004 at 12:33 PM Rating: Default
What the hell is going on over there?
#22 Aug 31 2004 at 12:33 PM Rating: Excellent
Will swallow your soul
******
29,360 posts
That was near the main metro transit/train station in Moscow - sort of equivalent to Grand Central.
____________________________
In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.

#23 Aug 31 2004 at 12:36 PM Rating: Decent
Quote:
What the hell is going on over there?


****-a-doodle-doo, Katie. This sh[u][/u]it has been going on for YEARS.
#24 Aug 31 2004 at 12:51 PM Rating: Default
Oh go **** yourself pencildick! Quit stalking my every post before people start thinking I have you on a short leash. Worse than a damn lap dog you are!
#25 Aug 31 2004 at 12:55 PM Rating: Decent
Quote:
Oh go @#%^ yourself pencil@#%^! Quit stalking my every post before people start thinking I have you on a short leash. Worse than a damn lap dog you are!


Oh please, do us all a favor and quit posting. That's the surest way not to get "stalked".

Ignorant Cu[i][/i]ntfaced PsychoHoseBeast.
#26 Aug 31 2004 at 1:05 PM Rating: Default
Smiley: disappointed and again.. shall I take a brush to that peach fuz you call a beard? How about a nice flea bath? Maybe I should get you one of those cute little shock collars. That way everytime you post and try to annoy the **** out of everyone, this Smiley: dnp will help you learn to not splatter the boards with your bull ****.
« Previous 1 2
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 200 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (200)