Quote:
You can't be this naive.
Now you made him prove it some more Damn you! (That means God damning you, not damning God btw
)- Forums
- Cross Site
- The Asylum
- Ratio of republicans to democrats.
Ratio of republicans to democrats.Follow
Apparent from every frikkin message he posts.
Now you made him prove it some more Damn you! (That means God damning you, not damning God btw
)"I started out with nothin' and I still got most of it left" - Seasick Steve
Democratic rule number 1
If you can't answer the question to your benefit completely ignore the question then attack the intelligence of the person asking the question.
i.e. attacks on Bushes intelligence based on his policy initiatives. You guys are so predictable this actually fun for me.
Varus
If you can't answer the question to your benefit completely ignore the question then attack the intelligence of the person asking the question.
i.e. attacks on Bushes intelligence based on his policy initiatives. You guys are so predictable this actually fun for me.
Varus
varrussword wrote:
Democratic rule number 1
If you can't answer the question to your benefit completely ignore the question then attack the intelligence of the person asking the question.
i.e. attacks on Bushes intelligence based on his policy initiatives. You guys are so predictable this actually fun for me.
Varus
If you can't answer the question to your benefit completely ignore the question then attack the intelligence of the person asking the question.
i.e. attacks on Bushes intelligence based on his policy initiatives. You guys are so predictable this actually fun for me.
Varus
Come on, varus, both sides pull that sh[b][/b]it and you know it.
Huang wrote:
One side does it more often and obvious than the other.
Varus
Quote:
Come on, varus, both sides pull that **** and you know it.
One side does it more often and obvious than the other.
Varus
Quote:
Quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
And by mentioning that he's spoken with foreign leaders regarding the election he is already attempting to undermine the peoples confidence in the current administrations foreign policy. Don't you see that?
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Are you really serious? You can't be this naive.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
And by mentioning that he's spoken with foreign leaders regarding the election he is already attempting to undermine the peoples confidence in the current administrations foreign policy. Don't you see that?
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Are you really serious? You can't be this naive.
Dan, He is just a sockpuppet created by you guys to feck with me. Wait, that would assume that anyone here gave the least bit of shat about me - which i know they don't so maybe he is for real....
But he must be a puppet - because he can't really be this stupid...
But no one would make a puppet for newbs...
Head hurts... which one has the iocane powder? Everyone knows that Austrailia is populated with thieves and liars...
FYI, I'm still waiting on my nine foot distance Swiftboat cite, Varrus.
I'll kill two birds with one stone and go all Smasharoo on on Varrus: Until Varrus gives me my cite, I won't bother responding to his posts. Everyone already knows that he's a joke anyway, no one takes him seriously (even the other board Pubbies) and I probably feed the troll as much as anyone.
I'll kill two birds with one stone and go all Smasharoo on on Varrus: Until Varrus gives me my cite, I won't bother responding to his posts. Everyone already knows that he's a joke anyway, no one takes him seriously (even the other board Pubbies) and I probably feed the troll as much as anyone.
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
Yes, yes, I know hes a sock, its just that its been pretty slow here lately.
Anyway, to answer the question you accuse me of dodging, yes, I do see that he is attempting to "undermine the peoples confidence in the current administrations foreign policy". You see this year we are holding what is known as an election. During this time, 2 or more people try to demonstrate through words and actions that each is more fit and capable to lead the country. Often times this can include pointing out the shortcomings of the opposition. This is one such time.
Anyway, to answer the question you accuse me of dodging, yes, I do see that he is attempting to "undermine the peoples confidence in the current administrations foreign policy". You see this year we are holding what is known as an election. During this time, 2 or more people try to demonstrate through words and actions that each is more fit and capable to lead the country. Often times this can include pointing out the shortcomings of the opposition. This is one such time.
I dunno.. Danalog said he's not a sock. Which means he actually is a person that dogmatic and that deficient in any sort of debating skills. Much sadder than if he was just a sock.
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
Dan F wrote:
".
Don't you feel a U.S. citizen attempting to undermine an adminstrations foreign policy during a time of war a bit treasonous?
Varus
Quote:
Anyway, to answer the question you accuse me of dodging, yes, I do see that he is attempting to "undermine the peoples confidence in the current administrations foreign policy
Don't you feel a U.S. citizen attempting to undermine an adminstrations foreign policy during a time of war a bit treasonous?
Varus
DanFitzGer wrote:
You see this year we are holding what is known as an election. During this time, 2 or more people try to demonstrate through words and actions that each is more fit and capable to lead the country
Quote:
2 or more people see who controls more newspapers and has more money than the others
Nice bloke, that Kerry; war hero turned socially conscious activist, talks sense, decent policies, but hell, he's no heavyweight. Just takes presidential incompetence on a global level to make him the only credible candidate.
"I started out with nothin' and I still got most of it left" - Seasick Steve
Quote:
Don't you feel a U.S. citizen attempting to undermine an adminstrations foreign policy during a time of war a bit treasonous?
A time of war that was solely created to benefit the present administration? Fu[/i]ck you and fu[i]ck that.
Back to the topic of the thread, I dont feel its a good idea to label myself with one party or the other. Sometimes one parties policies fit the nation best other times anothers do. Right now I think the democrats have a better plan to get the country back on track. I have yet to see a better argument from the Republicans than "Kerry often changes his support to better represent his constituents views."
Nicroll 65 Assassin
Teltorid 52 Druid
Aude Sapere
Oh hell camp me all you want f**kers. I own this site and thus I own you. - Allakhazam
Teltorid 52 Druid
Aude Sapere
Oh hell camp me all you want f**kers. I own this site and thus I own you. - Allakhazam
No, I think its patriotic if you are do so in order to be able to correct what you believe are mistakes. Anyone who would blindly follow any administration simply because we are at war at the time is a fool who is begging to be taken advantage of.
Kerry probably said that to remind voters of what a complete and utter embarrassment Dubya has been.
Now, aren't you neglecting your bridge?
Now, aren't you neglecting your bridge?
In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.
Quote:
Now, aren't you neglecting your bridge?
=======================================
\~~~~~~~~~~~
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~/Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
^^ Tee-hee.
Me - Democrat since 1983
Yeah, how is it that if a "representative" changes his opinion/vote as public sentiment changes or new information comes to light (or fails to), he is lambasted as a "flip-flopper"? Isn't that what it means to represent?
Quote:
I have yet to see a better argument from the Republicans than "Kerry often changes his support to better represent his constituents views."
Yeah, how is it that if a "representative" changes his opinion/vote as public sentiment changes or new information comes to light (or fails to), he is lambasted as a "flip-flopper"? Isn't that what it means to represent?
=======================================
\~~~~~~~~~~~
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~/ Is probably more accurate
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
I dunno.. Danalog said he's not a sock. Which means he actually is a person that dogmatic and that deficient in any sort of debating skills. Much sadder than if he was just a sock.
Or that he has two IP adresses.
It's not like it would take much effort to circumvent that sort of thing.
Allthough taking even that much effort would a sure sign of clinical insanity.
Disclaimer:
To make a long story short, I don't take any responsibility for anything I post here. It's not news, it's not truth, it's not serious. It's parody. It's satire. It's bitter. It's angsty. Your mother's a *****. You like to jack off dogs. That's right, you heard me. You like to grab that dog by the bone and rub it like a ski pole. Your dad? Gay. Your priest? Straight. **** off and let me post. It's not true, it's all in good fun. Now go away.
To make a long story short, I don't take any responsibility for anything I post here. It's not news, it's not truth, it's not serious. It's parody. It's satire. It's bitter. It's angsty. Your mother's a *****. You like to jack off dogs. That's right, you heard me. You like to grab that dog by the bone and rub it like a ski pole. Your dad? Gay. Your priest? Straight. **** off and let me post. It's not true, it's all in good fun. Now go away.
Final count:
Lots of bad tempered democrats
A few of bad tempered republicans
Some undecided/moderates
You know what, this is a very unbalanced board.
Lots of bad tempered democrats
A few of bad tempered republicans
Some undecided/moderates
You know what, this is a very unbalanced board.
Waynotwo wrote:
You know what, this is a very unbalanced board.
You're telling us....
What's bred in the bone will not out of the flesh.
Conservative Republican here.
Something about liberals promoting the death of unborn children doesn't settle with me.
Something about liberals promoting the death of unborn children doesn't settle with me.
Jophiel wrote:
I dunno.. Danalog said he's not a sock. Which means he actually is a person that dogmatic and that deficient in any sort of debating skills. Much sadder than if he was just a sock.
It's not 100% sure... He's either not a sock, or someone with multiple IP addresses who is very careful. Or someone with a work/home thing going on.
Do what now?
Er, actually his IP is 10.x.x.x
That's... not too kosher
That's... not too kosher
Do what now?
No Cash & Kerry for me. Mark me down for Bush/Republicans-- although I'd have no trouble voting for a socially conservative Dem. (Yikes! What kind of abomination would that be?!?) Financial issues are important, but not nearly as near and dear to me as sanctity of life issues.
Totem
Totem
Recent Visitors: 261
All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (261)
- Forums
- Cross Site
- The Asylum
- Ratio of republicans to democrats.
© 2024 Fanbyte LLC