Stok -
Quote:
That is the exact reason why! Every member of society that is physically capable of participating needs to in at least one functional capacity that will benefit others beside themselves. Life is not a free ride.
Moebious -
Quote:
When people in the ghet-to decide to get their priorities straight and put the money in to housing, food and other basic necessities instead of rolling an Escalade and wearing FUBU or other "fresh gear" I and many like me may give a f'uck about them and their predicament.
Smasharoo -
Quote:
There's a certain subset of any population who's going to happy living a basic life on the government teat and you need to just accept that. Thinking you can change inherant human nature start a lot of wars and such.
HeresJohnny -
Quote:
True enough. I used Moebs words on you. But the point I was trying to make was that so very few people would accept that free ride. People want better in life, the people you claim would just be content to live on the public teat just don't exist in large numbers if at all. And if they did are you saying that you would spite the 19,995 that are trying to get ahead just to make sure the 5 don't skate by?
Ok I posted three quotes up above yours, now for the sake of arguement why don't you associate your comments with the appropriate quote, that way everyone will know who you are responding to and why. Because implying that I said something that didn't is not nice. :)
And if they did are you saying that you would spite the 19,995 that are trying to get ahead just to make sure the 5 don't skate by? I don't recall ever saying I would spite anyone, what the reference was that anyone living at the base level of government sponsorship needs to be an active participant in society. Performing a function that benefits others, not everyone but others in their community. Is that too much to ask if the people that are paying the taxes are going to support everyone? The free riders need to be flushed out and given bus fare to Canada.