Forum Settings
       
Reply To Thread

Tax Cuts for the PeopleFollow

#77 Aug 09 2004 at 4:41 PM Rating: Decent
****
5,311 posts
Quote:
I am opposed to the idea that everyone deserves happiness, to get all that they want, to "win". It simply isn't so.
How about minimal safe shelter, food to eat, a living wage for a fair day's work and health care for all the citizens like every other modern country in the world?

I bet those ideas just stick in your craw too.
#78 Aug 09 2004 at 4:43 PM Rating: Good
PicklePrince -
Quote:
I can't believe Moebius, Varus, Stok, and Gbaji actually believe that working hard will get them a ticket to the good old boy world.


If breaking a sweat, getting an education, taking risks, investing money, building networks of people, possibly failing once or twice is not going to get people to a position of wealth and affluence then what will?

Living off of government subsidies?
Getting your GED? Have you got yours yet?
Staying at home with your mom and dad until your old enough to tap your trust fund?

What then moves people up the socio-economic ladder? laziness and ineptitude.

I am not against government assistance and have never stated that I was. Sometimes it is necessary to ask for help for a limited amount of time. There is nothing wrong with this assistance as long as it does not become your primary source of support.

Smasharoo -
Quote:
Yeah, there's nothing like growing up in South Boston and earning scholarships for high school and then joining the military to pay for college to lead to an elitest outlook on life.

You miss the point so completely it's staggering.

All I want is to provide an equal chance for everyone to work hard and succeed.


Sounds like Smash has it right and did it right. Smash is an example of moving upward on your own merits. My question to you though Smash, why don't you think others can't do the same? Not everyone wants to be in the same station in life that some here aspire to.
#79 Aug 09 2004 at 4:43 PM Rating: Good
xythed wrote:

Quote:
So you've grown up a privilaged child, failed to take the advantages you were provided and have been ostricized by your family. Then to justify it so you can sleep at night you tell yourself that you tossed it all away to earn your way to the top.


Not even close allow me to clarify:

I grew up in a lower class family where the 5 of us lived in a small two bedroom apartment. My father created a business that grew to be worth millions, being n*gger rich he spent most of it on yachts, houses, cars, and women. He was able to sell the business which financed his retirement but he always believed you get what you work for so I'm trying to emulate what he accomplished, excluding the lawsuits. I havn't tossed anything aside, as some of you may understand just because your family has money doesn't necessarily mean you have it.

p.s. I like the contempt in your voice for someone that would decide to earn their way through life rather than live off the success of their parents. I know a college teammate that refuses money from his parents even though they've told him they didn't want him to work ever. It's called being a man to work for what you want and not accept handouts.

Varus
#80 Aug 09 2004 at 4:48 PM Rating: Good
Quote:
I know a college teammate that refuses money from his parents even though they've told him they didn't want him to work ever. It's called being a man to work for what you want and not accept handouts.


There are some parents that have worked their lives away and/or built businesses so that their children will never have to face the hardships that they have. I admire people like your friend, but it is a slight to the parents who willing give what they have earned to their children.
#81 Aug 09 2004 at 4:52 PM Rating: Good
stok wrote:

Quote:
I admire people like your friend, but it is a slight to the parents who willing give what they have earned to their children


This may be true but his reasoning is that he won't ever be independent if he accepts money from his parents. True their connections offer him business oppurtunities he might otherwise not have but that's how business is.

Varus
#82 Aug 09 2004 at 4:54 PM Rating: Decent
Quote:
If breaking a sweat, getting an education, taking risks, investing money, building networks of people, possibly failing once or twice is not going to get people to a position of wealth and affluence then what will?


In my experience, binding people to my will gets me ahead.

Quote:
Living off of government subsidies?
Getting your GED? Have you got yours yet?
Staying at home with your mom and dad until your old enough to tap your trust fund?


Hahaha, this barely-veiled attack isn't even based on what disinformation about me I've strewn about this board.

Quote:
What then moves people up the socio-economic ladder?


Luck.

Quote:
I am not against government assistance and have never stated that I was. Sometimes it is necessary to ask for help for a limited amount of time. There is nothing wrong with this assistance as long as it does not become your primary source of support.


Yeah, but when you assume (whether through latent racism or an inferiority complex) that this is the case a majority of the time, these thoughts just turn into neurosis.

#83 Aug 09 2004 at 5:05 PM Rating: Default
Lunatic
******
30,086 posts

Sounds like Smash has it right and did it right. Smash is an example of moving upward on your own merits. My question to you though Smash, why don't you think others can't do the same? Not everyone wants to be in the same station in life that some here aspire to.


We've had this discussion like 17 times, but because even though I was born to lower middle class parents, I had inherant advantages that many people won't have. My parents killed themselves to send me to Catholic school for the first few years, and I was awarded a scholarship to Phillips Andover.

In my graduating class there were 8 black students. I'm also wasn't the average kid. The average kids in my neighborhood had two choices. The smart ones went to trade school and are now Plumbers or Electricians or whatever who are working now because the real estate market in Boston is insane, but who have gone months without wrok when things are slow. The unlucky ones are dead or abysmially poor with no chance at anything.

I have probably fifteen grade school freinds who wanted to go to college, but couldn't afford it. Most of them couldn't afford to go to community college at night because they had famillies and were barely scraping by.

I don't want complete redistribution of wealth. I might say that, but really I just want every citizen to be guranteed a basic place to live in a place where they can send their kids to good schools and not have to worry about medical care, chelter, food or education.

I don't think that's such a radical agenda in the wealthiest nation ont he planet, probably the wealthiest nation in human history.
____________________________
Disclaimer:

To make a long story short, I don't take any responsibility for anything I post here. It's not news, it's not truth, it's not serious. It's parody. It's satire. It's bitter. It's angsty. Your mother's a *****. You like to jack off dogs. That's right, you heard me. You like to grab that dog by the bone and rub it like a ski pole. Your dad? Gay. Your priest? Straight. **** off and let me post. It's not true, it's all in good fun. Now go away.

#84 Aug 09 2004 at 5:07 PM Rating: Excellent
****
6,858 posts
That almost brought a tear to my eye...
#85 Aug 09 2004 at 5:09 PM Rating: Decent
Quote:
I don't want complete redistribution of wealth. I might say that, but really I just want every citizen to be guranteed a basic place to live in a place where they can send their kids to good schools and not have to worry about medical care, chelter, food or education.

I don't think that's such a radical agenda in the wealthiest nation ont he planet, probably the wealthiest nation in human history.


The big problem right now is that some of the leading democrats in Congress have kicked and screamed to do any change in education besides throw more money at it.

Just saying.
#86 Aug 09 2004 at 5:12 PM Rating: Decent
The big problem right now is that some of the leading republicans in Congress have kicked and screamed to do any change in education even throw more money at it.

Just sayin for you.
#87 Aug 09 2004 at 5:15 PM Rating: Decent
Quote:
The big problem right now is that some of the leading republicans in Congress have kicked and screamed to do any change in education even throw more money at it.


Yes there are a few, but you get nutjobs in every family. But they've never been nearly as vocal in their protests.
#88 Aug 09 2004 at 5:16 PM Rating: Default
Lunatic
******
30,086 posts

The big problem right now is that some of the leading democrats in Congress have kicked and screamed to do any change in education besides throw more money at it.


Education is a tricky issue. The Republican concept of testing and rewarding sucessfull schools doesn't really seem to benefit the kids from what I've seen. I don't know what the answer to public education is aside from throwing money at it.

I don't have much personal experience to work with on public schools, I went to a public "middle school" through the 8th grade and almost went to a public high school, but it's probably the best public high school in the country, or close to it (Boston Latin). The high school I went to has an endowment larger than most universities, and probably better faculty. I had the choice between quantum physics and organic chemistry my senior year for science electives, and was probably the only kid without a $50,000 car when I was 16, so it wasn't exactly the average high school experience.

I think schools for exceptional kids are fine for the most part. The problem is schools for average kids. There's just a vast guld currently between the education an average kid gets in Reston VA and in DC. That's a problem that needs to be solved, somehow.

____________________________
Disclaimer:

To make a long story short, I don't take any responsibility for anything I post here. It's not news, it's not truth, it's not serious. It's parody. It's satire. It's bitter. It's angsty. Your mother's a *****. You like to jack off dogs. That's right, you heard me. You like to grab that dog by the bone and rub it like a ski pole. Your dad? Gay. Your priest? Straight. **** off and let me post. It's not true, it's all in good fun. Now go away.

#89 Aug 09 2004 at 5:21 PM Rating: Good
Quote:
I don't want complete redistribution of wealth. I might say that, but really I just want every citizen to be guranteed a basic place to live in a place where they can send their kids to good schools and not have to worry about medical care, chelter, food or education.


There are so many variables to achieving what you state that redistribution of wealth is not the sole answer to achieving the solution. I believe that throwing money at the problem is not going to fix it. This is the fundamental difference between myself and the Liberal way of thinking. Resolving dependency on the federal or state government for survival is what's needed.
#90 Aug 09 2004 at 5:24 PM Rating: Default
Lunatic
******
30,086 posts

There are so many variables to achieving what you state that redistribution of wealth is not the sole answer to achieving the solution. I believe that throwing money at the problem is not going to fix it. This is the fundamental difference between myself and the Liberal way of thinking. Resolving dependency on the federal or state government for survival is what's needed.


I'd argue that best way to resolve dependancy is to offer blanket services to all so that there's no stigma attached to using government services, just as you don't feel guilty when you drive down an Eisenhower Interstate because tax dollars paid for it.

There's a certain subset of any population who's going to happy living a basic life on the government teat and you need to just accept that. Thinking you can change inherant human nature start a lot of wars and such.
____________________________
Disclaimer:

To make a long story short, I don't take any responsibility for anything I post here. It's not news, it's not truth, it's not serious. It's parody. It's satire. It's bitter. It's angsty. Your mother's a *****. You like to jack off dogs. That's right, you heard me. You like to grab that dog by the bone and rub it like a ski pole. Your dad? Gay. Your priest? Straight. **** off and let me post. It's not true, it's all in good fun. Now go away.

#91 Aug 09 2004 at 5:34 PM Rating: Decent
Quote:
Education is a tricky issue. The concept of testing and rewarding sucessfull schools doesn't really seem to benefit the kids from what I've seen. I don't know what the answer to public education is aside from throwing money at it.


In the early 1970's public schools in Harlem were terrible. Administrators didn't know what to do. Then a small group of teachers reorganized part of the district in to independently run small public schools. It worked quite well.

So there is stuff that can be done. I can't tell you the exact procedure considering I'm still going through this public school system, but there are other things that can be done.

Note, I want to make sure you know that I edited Republican out of your quote because I don't have any idea what party the teachers belonged too.
#92 Aug 09 2004 at 5:42 PM Rating: Good
[quote]I'd argue that best way to resolve dependancy is to offer blanket services to all so that there's no stigma attached to using government services,[/quote

If you give these basic services to people what is going to be the incentive for people to create better lives for themselves?

The problem is that where public school systems are failing is that the communities does not support the educational needs of thier children. I'm in a community where we have very good public schools and my children and neighbors children are receiving very good educations and we are not in the "Upper Middle Class". The schools and education our children receive are worth while because the parents take an active role in ensuring the educational needs of their children are being met. In the inner city, does this happen? I'd wager that only a small percentage of the parents whose children go to inner city public schools actually participate in their childrens educational process. So where is the blame to be placed for the failing of the Public School System? On the educational system as a whole or is their blame to be shared on the parents part as well?
#93 Aug 09 2004 at 5:45 PM Rating: Decent
Quote:
In the inner city, does this happen? I'd wager that only a small percentage of the parents whose children go to inner city public schools actually participate in their childrens educational process. So where is the blame to be placed for the failing of the Public School System? On the educational system as a whole or is their blame to be shared on the parents part as well?


That's the problem. You DON't know anything about anything. You just like placing blame.

Give me some figures and we'll talk.
#94 Aug 09 2004 at 5:52 PM Rating: Decent
#95 Aug 09 2004 at 5:53 PM Rating: Decent
***
1,701 posts
Stok wrote:
If you give these basic services to people what is going to be the incentive for people to create better lives for themselves?


The fact that the majority of people are not content to just "get by". I don't think anyone wants or is happy to live at the substinence line. I haven't seen anyone argue that there should be two cars, a 47" TV and an X-box in every home. The arguement is for providing basic necessities, ie. food, clothing, shelter. I don't understand how you can begrudge people that much. Even if they won't get off their *** and strike a lick.

____________________________
If life gives you lemons, make lemonade. Then find someone that life has given vodka and have party.


This establishment does not serve women. You must bring your own.
#96 Aug 09 2004 at 5:54 PM Rating: Good
Quote:
Give me some figures and we'll talk.
Figures lie and liers figure. Numbers don't mean much. Look at the outcome. I have experience in the inner city, and parents there interact with the schools much like they interact with their children: complete indifference until there is a problem, then find someone to blame.
#97 Aug 09 2004 at 5:56 PM Rating: Default
Lunatic
******
30,086 posts

If you give these basic services to people what is going to be the incentive for people to create better lives for themselves?


The same incentive that caused you to open a buisness rather than collect a salary.

The vast majority of people aren't happy with a basic lifestyle, they want the most they can. They want to better themselves and their families futures.



The problem is that where public school systems are failing is that the communities does not support the educational needs of thier children. I'm in a community where we have very good public schools and my children and neighbors children are receiving very good educations and we are not in the "Upper Middle Class". The schools and education our children receive are worth while because the parents take an active role in ensuring the educational needs of their children are being met. In the inner city, does this happen? I'd wager that only a small percentage of the parents whose children go to inner city public schools actually participate in their childrens educational process. So where is the blame to be placed for the failing of the Public School System? On the educational system as a whole or is their blame to be shared on the parents part as well?


We need schools that orphans can go to and get an equal education as the schools wealthy children attend.

I don't know enough about education reform to quantify how you'd do that. My wife does, though, in one of her areas of policy expertise, I'll ask her tonight and tommorow I'll be posting like an authority!
____________________________
Disclaimer:

To make a long story short, I don't take any responsibility for anything I post here. It's not news, it's not truth, it's not serious. It's parody. It's satire. It's bitter. It's angsty. Your mother's a *****. You like to jack off dogs. That's right, you heard me. You like to grab that dog by the bone and rub it like a ski pole. Your dad? Gay. Your priest? Straight. **** off and let me post. It's not true, it's all in good fun. Now go away.

#98 Aug 09 2004 at 5:56 PM Rating: Good
Quote:
That's the problem. You DON't know anything about anything. You just like placing blame.


If that is what you want to call it fine.

Quote:
Give me some figures and we'll talk.


No. You provide the figures. Everytime that a debate is started you or some other liberal start asking for figures. This time you provide them, then we'll talk.

#99 Aug 09 2004 at 5:57 PM Rating: Good
Quote:
The arguement is for providing basic necessities, ie. food, clothing, shelter. I don't understand how you can begrudge people that much. Even if they won't get off their *** and strike a lick.

When people in the ghet-to decide to get their priorities straight and put the money in to housing, food and other basic necessities instead of rolling an Escalade and wearing FUBU or other "fresh gear" I and many like me may give a f'uck about them and their predicament.
#100 Aug 09 2004 at 5:58 PM Rating: Default
Lunatic
******
30,086 posts

When people in the ghet-to decide to get their priorities straight and put the money in to housing, food and other basic necessities instead of rolling an Escalade and wearing FUBU or other "fresh gear" I and many like me may give a f'uck about them and their predicament.


Surely there's a Klan really you're late for?

White power!!
____________________________
Disclaimer:

To make a long story short, I don't take any responsibility for anything I post here. It's not news, it's not truth, it's not serious. It's parody. It's satire. It's bitter. It's angsty. Your mother's a *****. You like to jack off dogs. That's right, you heard me. You like to grab that dog by the bone and rub it like a ski pole. Your dad? Gay. Your priest? Straight. **** off and let me post. It's not true, it's all in good fun. Now go away.

#101 Aug 09 2004 at 5:58 PM Rating: Decent
Quote:
Figures lie and liers figure.


First of all, what the hell is that? Are you an old wife about to regale us with a tale? Stupid is as stupid does.

Quote:
Numbers don't mean much. Look at the outcome. I have experience in the inner city, and parents there interact with the schools much like they interact with their children: complete indifference until there is a problem, then find someone to blame.


Good for you. I am from a rural area and I've seen bad schools, parents, and curriculum, too. Why is there always this blaming of the inner city? Hell, SF doesn't even have an inner city anymore.
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 325 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (325)