Forum Settings
       
1 2 3 4 Next »
Reply To Thread

Swiftvets AdFollow

#77 Aug 07 2004 at 11:19 AM Rating: Default
Lunatic
******
30,086 posts

Imagine the disgust of those Tens of Millions of us who were saying that BEFORE the Invasion and Occupation of Iraq?


Yeah, great. You told him so. You and tens of millions of people who have no clue at all about geopolitics and the strategic implications of invading Iraq.

Millions of people think aliens abduct people and that angles watch out for them.

____________________________
Disclaimer:

To make a long story short, I don't take any responsibility for anything I post here. It's not news, it's not truth, it's not serious. It's parody. It's satire. It's bitter. It's angsty. Your mother's a *****. You like to jack off dogs. That's right, you heard me. You like to grab that dog by the bone and rub it like a ski pole. Your dad? Gay. Your priest? Straight. **** off and let me post. It's not true, it's all in good fun. Now go away.

#78 Aug 07 2004 at 6:43 PM Rating: Good
Quote:
...could go on and on. But as you say Kerry doesnt represent your values and beliefs, that i can dig. But you really should dig deeper than the surface and see if Bush does to. Maybe neither is the man for the job.


You're a partisna fu[i][/i]cking hack with that stuff above. Just for blaming Bush for 9/11 destroys any desire for me to ever respond to any ******** that sputters out of your worthless brain.

If you've been paying attention *** wipe you'd realize that Bush is the only one running that could get elected that is not Kerry. So politician #1 or politician #2? hmmmmmm., I'll go with the person currently in office, that has the balls to stay the course instead of changing his mind, when ever the wind blows.
#79 Aug 07 2004 at 6:47 PM Rating: Good
Quote:
Absolutely.

IF we had better intel on Pakistan we should have then too.

There's no reason not to take the hardest possible line against nuclear proliferation unless it's being supported directly by another nuclear power and there is strategic danger.

I'd take out Iran's capabilities tommorw


So it is the United States responsibility to wipe out all Nuclear Weapons programs in the world, but our own? You are the one bit[i][/i]ching and moaning that Bush was wrong for taking out Saddam on what was believed to be WMD, but now you are saying he needs to take out NK (which Clinton could have), Pakistan (which Clinton could have) and now Iran. Are you related to Kerry? Shall we start calling you Smashfliparooflop?
#80 Aug 09 2004 at 1:05 PM Rating: Decent
Quote:
I'd hire you. Hell I'd even hire PP.


You ******* wish. I'm sure being a frigging barista would use every bit of my 155 IQ.

[/i]

[i]Edited, Mon Aug 9 14:22:54 2004 by pickleprince
#81 Aug 09 2004 at 1:07 PM Rating: Good
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
As opposed to inventing a means of cold fusion in between performing brain surgeries like you are now?
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#82 Aug 09 2004 at 1:07 PM Rating: Default
Lunatic
******
30,086 posts

So it is the United States responsibility to wipe out all Nuclear Weapons programs in the world, but our own? You are the one ******** and moaning that Bush was wrong for taking out Saddam on what was believed to be WMD, but now you are saying he needs to take out NK (which Clinton could have), Pakistan (which Clinton could have) and now Iran. Are you related to Kerry? Shall we start calling you Smashfliparooflop?


You're confused, shockingly.

I ***** and moan because Bush and everyone else knew Iraq didn't have Nuclear WMD. Which is the issue.

I could care less if Iran has 9,000,000 metric tons of Sarin.
____________________________
Disclaimer:

To make a long story short, I don't take any responsibility for anything I post here. It's not news, it's not truth, it's not serious. It's parody. It's satire. It's bitter. It's angsty. Your mother's a *****. You like to jack off dogs. That's right, you heard me. You like to grab that dog by the bone and rub it like a ski pole. Your dad? Gay. Your priest? Straight. **** off and let me post. It's not true, it's all in good fun. Now go away.

#83 Aug 09 2004 at 1:22 PM Rating: Decent
Quote:
As opposed to inventing a means of cold fusion in between performing brain surgeries like you are now?


As a matter of fact, YES!

Why is science the only way someone can be intelligent?
#84 Aug 09 2004 at 1:23 PM Rating: Good
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
Because Jessica Simpson already proved a complete moron can make it in music.

Edit: Original said "any moron" which isn't true. You have to be a blonde moron with a big rack and a willingness to dress as a street walker

Edited, Mon Aug 9 14:24:58 2004 by Jophiel
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#85 Aug 09 2004 at 1:23 PM Rating: Default
Lunatic
******
30,086 posts

but now you are saying he needs to take out NK (which Clinton could have)


Eisnehower could have too.

____________________________
Disclaimer:

To make a long story short, I don't take any responsibility for anything I post here. It's not news, it's not truth, it's not serious. It's parody. It's satire. It's bitter. It's angsty. Your mother's a *****. You like to jack off dogs. That's right, you heard me. You like to grab that dog by the bone and rub it like a ski pole. Your dad? Gay. Your priest? Straight. **** off and let me post. It's not true, it's all in good fun. Now go away.

#86 Aug 09 2004 at 1:27 PM Rating: Decent
Quote:
Because Jessica Simpson already proved a complete moron can make it in music.


Bah, I have other hobbies, too.
#87 Aug 09 2004 at 1:28 PM Rating: Default
Lunatic
******
30,086 posts

Edit: Original said "any moron" which isn't true. You have to be a blonde moron with a big rack and a willingness to dress as a street walker



That's pretty much the same criteria for bieng the Nanny for kids.
____________________________
Disclaimer:

To make a long story short, I don't take any responsibility for anything I post here. It's not news, it's not truth, it's not serious. It's parody. It's satire. It's bitter. It's angsty. Your mother's a *****. You like to jack off dogs. That's right, you heard me. You like to grab that dog by the bone and rub it like a ski pole. Your dad? Gay. Your priest? Straight. **** off and let me post. It's not true, it's all in good fun. Now go away.

#88 Aug 09 2004 at 1:39 PM Rating: Decent
So, from what I understand, the Bush administration, in an attempt to keep the region from falling into war, has been trying to solve this issue through diplomatic pressure. Cutting of relations until they make a concession rather then us first giving aid. In theory, this would work for both sides as they lose the nuclear threat (albeit probrably temporarily) and they get aid, which they despretly need.

I was under the impression Clinton had struck a deal for aid to NK if they shut down their nuclear weapons program, and then Bush took a hard-line stance, and the end result has been NK's resumption of nuclear weapons development.

Is this wrong?
#89 Aug 09 2004 at 1:40 PM Rating: Default
Lunatic
******
30,086 posts

I was under the impression Clinton had struck a deal for aid to NK if they shut down their nuclear weapons program, and then Bush took a hard-line stance, and the end result has been NK's resumption of nuclear weapons development.

Is this wrong?


No, it's exactly right.
____________________________
Disclaimer:

To make a long story short, I don't take any responsibility for anything I post here. It's not news, it's not truth, it's not serious. It's parody. It's satire. It's bitter. It's angsty. Your mother's a *****. You like to jack off dogs. That's right, you heard me. You like to grab that dog by the bone and rub it like a ski pole. Your dad? Gay. Your priest? Straight. **** off and let me post. It's not true, it's all in good fun. Now go away.

1 2 3 4 Next »
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 321 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (321)