Forum Settings
       
1 2 Next »
Reply To Thread

Gbaji, clinnically insane?Follow

#27 Aug 04 2004 at 9:52 AM Rating: Good
Nah, he's just long-winded.

Need anything else pointed out? Color of the sky, maybe?
#28 Aug 04 2004 at 10:39 AM Rating: Default
Lunatic
******
30,086 posts

Oh, I almost forgot the classic gbaji moment.

Is 1 AC better than 1 HP (damn was it 1 or 5???)?

Grady


It was litterally 1AC is better than 100000000 HP.
____________________________
Disclaimer:

To make a long story short, I don't take any responsibility for anything I post here. It's not news, it's not truth, it's not serious. It's parody. It's satire. It's bitter. It's angsty. Your mother's a *****. You like to jack off dogs. That's right, you heard me. You like to grab that dog by the bone and rub it like a ski pole. Your dad? Gay. Your priest? Straight. **** off and let me post. It's not true, it's all in good fun. Now go away.

#29 Aug 04 2004 at 10:40 AM Rating: Default
Lunatic
******
30,086 posts
Just wanted to confirm my suspicion that if presented with a long enough post that seems vaguely plausible, people will assume it's founded on rational thoguht.

I should have known better.

Shame, really.
____________________________
Disclaimer:

To make a long story short, I don't take any responsibility for anything I post here. It's not news, it's not truth, it's not serious. It's parody. It's satire. It's bitter. It's angsty. Your mother's a *****. You like to jack off dogs. That's right, you heard me. You like to grab that dog by the bone and rub it like a ski pole. Your dad? Gay. Your priest? Straight. **** off and let me post. It's not true, it's all in good fun. Now go away.

#30 Aug 04 2004 at 10:44 AM Rating: Decent
Prodigal Son
******
20,643 posts
Smasharoo wrote:

Oh, I almost forgot the classic gbaji moment.

Is 1 AC better than 1 HP (damn was it 1 or 5???)?

Grady


It was litterally 1AC is better than 100000000 HP.


Only until they changed the rate of diminishing returns for mitigation on very-high-end AC.
____________________________
publiusvarus wrote:
we all know liberals are well adjusted american citizens who only want what's best for society. While conservatives are evil money grubbing scum who only want to sh*t on the little man and rob the world of its resources.
#31 Aug 04 2004 at 10:48 AM Rating: Good
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
Does that mean you don't really think Gbaji is insane? Damn.

For the record, I disagree heartily with Gbaji about nearly anything political but I've got no truck with him beyond that. He usually has something intelligent to say on the EQ front and, even in places where we disagree like the value of LDoN, we've always stayed civil. While I've given him raised eyebrows about some of his facts and cites, he's obviously smarter than the average bear.

Really, I think he needs to lighten up a little and stop focusing solely on PoliSci threads. When 98% of your posts are about Bush and Iraq and all that and are fifteen paragraphs long, you come across as a bit unbearable regardless of your stances. On the other hand, Gbaji wasn't soliciting advice on how to make friends and influence people so who cares what I think?
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#32 Aug 04 2004 at 10:55 AM Rating: Default
Lunatic
******
30,086 posts

Only until they changed the rate of diminishing returns for mitigation on very-high-end AC.


We were talking about level 30 characters with like 500 ac.

He was also terribly excited when he made the point that HP items didn't give you HP when you put them on, just space for HP.

When I pointed out that he was wrong, he demanded someone run off and confirm how wrong I was, and so on.

The best part is, he still won't admit that he was wrong about, YEARS later.

That's the insanity I'm talking about.
____________________________
Disclaimer:

To make a long story short, I don't take any responsibility for anything I post here. It's not news, it's not truth, it's not serious. It's parody. It's satire. It's bitter. It's angsty. Your mother's a *****. You like to jack off dogs. That's right, you heard me. You like to grab that dog by the bone and rub it like a ski pole. Your dad? Gay. Your priest? Straight. **** off and let me post. It's not true, it's all in good fun. Now go away.

#33 Aug 04 2004 at 3:33 PM Rating: Good
Encyclopedia
******
35,568 posts
I can't believe you are still hung up on that thread. Odd that it seems to stick in your mind so firmly, yet the details keep slipping away.

I made a statement about +HP items. Thundra corrected me. I said I thought it worked the other way, but I'd test it to be sure. I went hom that night, tested it, verified it worked the way Thundra had said, and in my first post the next day admitted I had been wrong and verified the correct method. I'd gotten the +HP item behavior mixed up with the +sta behavior. Hardly earthshattering.

I did what any sane and rational pereson would do. I tested it and discovered the correct way it worked. You, on the other hand, somehow have elevated that to epic status. What I really don't understand is that you claim I didn't admit my mistake, when I most certainly did. Selective memory I guess.

See Smash. I don't form my sense of self worth based on the perception people have of me on an internet forum board. For me, it's not about "being right", it's about having discussions and from that maybe coming away with more information and understanding then when you arrived. If that means that I come off a bit tough, that's fine. I do it to spark conversation. You don't learn anything new, or discover different points of view if everyone in the room just nods their head and agrees to anything that's said.


If it seems as though I don't "admit to being wrong" often, it's not because I'm an arrogrant prick (save that definition if you want). It's because I want people to argue their points compellingly. I want someone to prove me wrong. And guess what? you having a different opinion does not equal proof. It's very rare that someone actually makes a good argument. We've replaced that too often in our culture with strong words and yelling, with the idea that he who seems most clever, or makes the most noise must be right.

I simply don't agree.
____________________________
King Nobby wrote:
More words please
#34 Aug 04 2004 at 3:48 PM Rating: Default
Is going to go back and research now.........




grr how dare you delete pages!

Edited, Wed Aug 4 16:57:02 2004 by Cherrabwyn
#35 Aug 04 2004 at 4:18 PM Rating: Good
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
Ya know, just because you think you have a perfectly justified excuse for acting like an arrogant prick, you still come off as an arrogant prick. Giving some High School English Teacher-esque excuse of "I act like this because your answers aren't good enough until I say so -- it's all your fault I have to be this way" doesn't make you any less of an arrogant prick in anyone's eyes.

Just sayin'
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#36 Aug 04 2004 at 9:47 PM Rating: Good
Encyclopedia
******
35,568 posts
Jophiel wrote:
Ya know, just because you think you have a perfectly justified excuse for acting like an arrogant prick, you still come off as an arrogant prick. Giving some High School English Teacher-esque excuse of "I act like this because your answers aren't good enough until I say so -- it's all your fault I have to be this way" doesn't make you any less of an arrogant prick in anyone's eyes.

Just sayin'


Yeah, well.... If you don't straighten up, I'm turning this forum around right now and heading back! ;)
____________________________
King Nobby wrote:
More words please
#37 Aug 05 2004 at 12:39 AM Rating: Decent
****
7,486 posts
what happened when i was gone? i always thought gbaji was a fairly cool poster. when did it get to the point where jophiel is calling him an arrogant prick?
#38 Aug 05 2004 at 12:52 AM Rating: Good
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
I didn't. I told him that if he acted like an arrogant prick, he'd be viewed as one regardless of his motives for acting as such. You can use the "this has to be done my way whether you appreciate why or not" line when you're dealing with your children or subordinates in the workplace but, when you're dealing with people who are for all intents your 'equals', you'll just be viewed as an arrogant prick. How much that matters to you is up to you.
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#39 Aug 05 2004 at 7:51 AM Rating: Good
*****
18,463 posts
I'm not a newbie but definetely not an old-timer. During my time here, I haven't seen enough out of him to have an opinion on anything having to do with his character or behavior outside of a political stance. For all I know he's a program someone set up because I never read any jokes or personal anecdotes, no references to RL, an SO, parents, dog, cat, etc.
Gbaji is like the news. I don't mean to imply he is a source for facts but rather that I read him when I feel like informing myself on a particular topic (even if I don't agree), but most days I'm too busy or it's too boring or depressing to get into.
#40 Aug 05 2004 at 8:03 AM Rating: Good
#12
#41 Aug 05 2004 at 8:37 AM Rating: Decent
Scholar
**
644 posts
gbaji came out of the closet to say:
Quote:
Yeah, well.... If you don't straighten up, I'm turning this forum around right now and heading back! ;)


That's the only post that you've ever made that I've laughed at.

Four years (has it been that long? Since the days of Delgard?). One laugh.

I'm going to cry now.

Grady

____________________________
I saw the best minds of my generation destroyed by madness, starving hysterical naked, dragging themselves through the negro streets at dawn looking for an angry fix, angelheaded hipsters burning for the ancient heavenly connection to the starry dynamo in the machin ery of night.
#42 Aug 05 2004 at 9:12 AM Rating: Decent
Prodigal Son
******
20,643 posts
I gots no problem with gbaji. Good to banter with over on the EQ forum. If anything, he keeps Smash posting.
____________________________
publiusvarus wrote:
we all know liberals are well adjusted american citizens who only want what's best for society. While conservatives are evil money grubbing scum who only want to sh*t on the little man and rob the world of its resources.
#43 Aug 05 2004 at 9:14 AM Rating: Decent
Lunatic
******
30,086 posts

That's the only post that you've ever made that I've laughed at.


Really? He posts all kinds of stuff that makes me laugh. Then I show it to my wife and she has a good laugh, then we show it to freinds and we all laugh together.

In fact one of my freinds refers to him as "Horatio Alger" and will occasionally ask me "if Horatio Alger has posted any more of his deep throughts on US monetary policy"
____________________________
Disclaimer:

To make a long story short, I don't take any responsibility for anything I post here. It's not news, it's not truth, it's not serious. It's parody. It's satire. It's bitter. It's angsty. Your mother's a *****. You like to jack off dogs. That's right, you heard me. You like to grab that dog by the bone and rub it like a ski pole. Your dad? Gay. Your priest? Straight. **** off and let me post. It's not true, it's all in good fun. Now go away.

#44 Aug 05 2004 at 10:34 AM Rating: Good
Ministry of Silly Cnuts
*****
19,524 posts
I've rarely agreed with gbaji, but I've usually seen him present his viewpoint and arguments in a measured and reasoned way that varus could never understand. (i.e. English)
Someone I agree to disagree with a lot of the time I suppose.

But to the question in hand. . .

I'm not sure I'd stoop to accuse anyone posting in the assylum of being in the tiniest bit sane (self included).

Nurse! Nurse! It's leaking again Nurse!
____________________________
"I started out with nothin' and I still got most of it left" - Seasick Steve
#45 Aug 05 2004 at 10:41 AM Rating: Decent
Lunatic
******
30,086 posts

I've rarely agreed with gbaji, but I've usually seen him present his viewpoint and arguments in a measured and reasoned way that varus could never understand. (i.e. English)
Someone I agree to disagree with a lot of the time I suppose.


It's amazing how often good grammar will pass for logic.

I guess that's how we ended up with Creationism being taught in some schools. Rename it "Inteligent Source Theory" and people say "Oh, that sounds like a measured reasoned scientific theory, that's ok then."
____________________________
Disclaimer:

To make a long story short, I don't take any responsibility for anything I post here. It's not news, it's not truth, it's not serious. It's parody. It's satire. It's bitter. It's angsty. Your mother's a *****. You like to jack off dogs. That's right, you heard me. You like to grab that dog by the bone and rub it like a ski pole. Your dad? Gay. Your priest? Straight. **** off and let me post. It's not true, it's all in good fun. Now go away.

#46 Aug 05 2004 at 10:44 AM Rating: Good
Ministry of Silly Cnuts
*****
19,524 posts
Smash wrote:
I guess that's how we ended up with Creationism being taught in some schools
In the beginning was the word.
And the word was. . .


Aardvark
____________________________
"I started out with nothin' and I still got most of it left" - Seasick Steve
#47 Aug 05 2004 at 10:46 AM Rating: Decent
****
5,372 posts
Quote:
I know he's a program someone set up because I never read any jokes or personal anecdotes, no references to RL, an SO, parents, dog, cat, etc.


You missed the story about him getting jiggy in a swimming pool with some young lady Smiley: yikes

Granted the story was to argue how there was no logical reason for the girl to have been coyly rejecting his advances other than social programming, or something along those lines.
#48 Aug 05 2004 at 11:07 AM Rating: Decent
Lunatic
******
30,086 posts

Granted the story was to argue how there was no logical reason for the girl to have been coyly rejecting his advances other than social programming, or something along those lines.


Was she old enough to speak or was it non verbal communication? I forget.
____________________________
Disclaimer:

To make a long story short, I don't take any responsibility for anything I post here. It's not news, it's not truth, it's not serious. It's parody. It's satire. It's bitter. It's angsty. Your mother's a *****. You like to jack off dogs. That's right, you heard me. You like to grab that dog by the bone and rub it like a ski pole. Your dad? Gay. Your priest? Straight. **** off and let me post. It's not true, it's all in good fun. Now go away.

#49 Aug 05 2004 at 11:24 AM Rating: Decent
Maybe the reason why they had to be a in pool was because she was a Thalidomide baby.

;)
#50 Aug 05 2004 at 11:36 AM Rating: Good
*****
16,160 posts
She was old enough to bleed but not enough to drive, as I recall. The collective response of the board was, "Ewwwwwwww!" to the thought of people swimming in there and making little fountains while spitting water out of their mouths.

It's one of the only times I ever remember Gbaji getting mad on this board.

Totem
#51 Aug 05 2004 at 11:36 AM Rating: Decent
Lunatic
******
30,086 posts
Only a FEW flipper babbies.
____________________________
Disclaimer:

To make a long story short, I don't take any responsibility for anything I post here. It's not news, it's not truth, it's not serious. It's parody. It's satire. It's bitter. It's angsty. Your mother's a *****. You like to jack off dogs. That's right, you heard me. You like to grab that dog by the bone and rub it like a ski pole. Your dad? Gay. Your priest? Straight. **** off and let me post. It's not true, it's all in good fun. Now go away.

1 2 Next »
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 371 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (371)