Forum Settings
       
1 2 3 Next »
Reply To Thread

Apparently, I'll be voting for David Cobb this NovemberFollow

#52 Aug 03 2004 at 1:14 PM Rating: Good
I understand you don't like his beliefs.
#53 Aug 03 2004 at 1:16 PM Rating: Decent
Quote:
I understand you don't like his beliefs.


Because our beliefs are different and we'd rather see someone who at least is not diametrically opposite to our opinions become President.

Thank you for getting that.

/Hellen Keller off
#54 Aug 03 2004 at 1:24 PM Rating: Decent
**
729 posts
Yeah, Cobb at 66% with Kerry at a close second. That is if you base your decision completely on views. Never even heard of Cobb, and Kerry and Bush run around a 49.4% to 49.6% on who I would vote for over the other. I would definetly vote for Powell. I have always respected him as a military man, can't say the same for Bush or Kerry.

Kerry worries me at this point. The man is on par with Bush intelligence wise. What were the democrats thinking! They could have at least chosen a good candidate. Maybe they should look at some of their women, as they seem to have more balls then the entire democratic party put together. The Republican's should have dropped Bush completely, and chosen Powell. As for the independents, they should have brought someone up like Ventura. He would probably when this election in a cake walk with Bush and Kerry the choices for the Republican and Democratic ticket. At least it would be more lively. If anyone in Congress didn't agree with him, he could introduce them to the DDT! Smiley: lol
#55 Aug 03 2004 at 3:14 PM Rating: Excellent
Avatar
******
29,919 posts
Ok, I'm apperently confused:

2. Bush, President George W. - Republican (64%) Click here for info
3. Kerry, Senator John, MA - Democrat (62%) Click here for info
4. Cobb, David - Green Party (35%) Click here for info
5. Nader, Ralph - Independent (35%) Click here for info
6. Brown, Walt - Socialist Party (30%) Click here for info
7. Peroutka, Michael - Constitution Party (21%) Click here for info
8. Badnarik, Michael - Libertarian (17%) Click here for info
____________________________
Arch Duke Kaolian Drachensborn, lvl 95 Ranger, Unrest Server
Tech support forum | FAQ (Support) | Mobile Zam: http://m.zam.com (Premium only)
Forum Rules
#56 Aug 03 2004 at 3:24 PM Rating: Good
Quote:
Ok, I'm apperently confused:

Boys have a *****, girls have a ******.
#57 Aug 03 2004 at 3:25 PM Rating: Default
Lunatic
******
30,086 posts

Ok, I'm apperently confused:


You're in Texas. Why even vote?
____________________________
Disclaimer:

To make a long story short, I don't take any responsibility for anything I post here. It's not news, it's not truth, it's not serious. It's parody. It's satire. It's bitter. It's angsty. Your mother's a *****. You like to jack off dogs. That's right, you heard me. You like to grab that dog by the bone and rub it like a ski pole. Your dad? Gay. Your priest? Straight. **** off and let me post. It's not true, it's all in good fun. Now go away.

#58 Aug 03 2004 at 3:36 PM Rating: Decent
**
729 posts
Quote:
You're in Texas. Why even vote?


Now, I'm confused! Why not vote? Its my duty as an American to vote.
#59 Aug 03 2004 at 4:25 PM Rating: Excellent
Avatar
******
29,919 posts
Alright, i've figured it out. I will first go purchase one of these suckers:
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=3923432233&category=13899

then, i'll hire a swiss biotech expert to clone a George Washington for me, and using secret super advanced nanotech i'll accelerate everything so he will be ready for electing.

Then i'll surgically replace his brian with that of a wombat. And rule the world!

Who wouldn't vote for washington?
____________________________
Arch Duke Kaolian Drachensborn, lvl 95 Ranger, Unrest Server
Tech support forum | FAQ (Support) | Mobile Zam: http://m.zam.com (Premium only)
Forum Rules
#60 Aug 03 2004 at 4:28 PM Rating: Default
Lunatic
******
30,086 posts


Who wouldn't vote for washington?


John Addams probably wouldn't.
____________________________
Disclaimer:

To make a long story short, I don't take any responsibility for anything I post here. It's not news, it's not truth, it's not serious. It's parody. It's satire. It's bitter. It's angsty. Your mother's a *****. You like to jack off dogs. That's right, you heard me. You like to grab that dog by the bone and rub it like a ski pole. Your dad? Gay. Your priest? Straight. **** off and let me post. It's not true, it's all in good fun. Now go away.

#61 Aug 03 2004 at 7:19 PM Rating: Excellent
Avatar
******
29,919 posts
I'm all set then as long as no one clones a few million John Adams's
____________________________
Arch Duke Kaolian Drachensborn, lvl 95 Ranger, Unrest Server
Tech support forum | FAQ (Support) | Mobile Zam: http://m.zam.com (Premium only)
Forum Rules
#62 Aug 03 2004 at 7:25 PM Rating: Decent
Yeah, and who would clone Adams when they can clone some Benjamins?

Holla!
#63 Aug 03 2004 at 7:35 PM Rating: Good
**
450 posts
Well, I wouldn't mind a bunch of Sam Adams right about now.
#64 Aug 03 2004 at 8:15 PM Rating: Decent
****
7,861 posts
Quote:
1. Your ideal theoretical candidate. (58%)
2. Kucinich, Rep. Dennis, OH - Democrat (59%)
3. Badnarik, Michael - Libertarian (51%)
4. Sharpton, Reverend Al - Democrat (49%)
5. Dean, Gov. Howard, VT - Democrat (48%)
6. Kerry, Senator John, MA - Democrat (48%)
7. Bush, President George W. - Republican (46%)
8. Cobb, David - Green Party (45%)
9. Nader, Ralph - Independent (45%)
10. Gephardt, Rep. ****, MO - Democrat (43%)
11. Edwards, Senator John, NC - Democrat (42%)
12. Brown, Walt - Socialist Party (38%)
13. Lieberman, Senator Joe, CT - Democrat (37%)
14. LaRouche, Lyndon H. Jr. - Democrat (35%)
15. Moseley-Braun, Former Senator Carol, IL - Democrat (35%)
16. Clark, Retired General Wesley K., AR - Democrat (34%) 17. Peroutka, Michael - Constitution Party (29%) 18. Hagelin, Dr. John - Natural Law (17%)

I am confused, According to this I don't match up with even my theoretical candidate over 60%
::scratches head::
____________________________
People don't like to be meddled with. We tell them what to do, what to think, don't run, don't walk. We're in their homes and in their heads and we haven't the right. We're meddlesome. ~River Tam

Sedao
#65 Aug 03 2004 at 10:15 PM Rating: Good
***
1,656 posts
1. Your ideal theoretical candidate. (100%)
2. Cobb, David - Green Party (80%)
3. Nader, Ralph - Independent (76%)
4. Dean, Gov. Howard, VT - Democrat (69%)
5. Brown, Walt - Socialist Party (68%)
6. Moseley-Braun, Former Senator Carol, IL - Democrat (67%)
7. Clark, Retired General Wesley K., AR - Democrat (66%)
8. Sharpton, Reverend Al - Democrat (65%)
9. Kucinich, Rep. Dennis, OH - Democrat (63%)
10. Kerry, Senator John, MA - Democrat (56%)
11. Gephardt, Rep. ****, MO - Democrat (55%)
12. Edwards, Senator John, NC - Democrat (54%)
13. LaRouche, Lyndon H. Jr. - Democrat (39%)
14. Badnarik, Michael - Libertarian (38%)
15. Lieberman, Senator Joe, CT - Democrat (36%)
16. Peroutka, Michael - Constitution Party (16%)
17. Hagelin, Dr. John - Natural Law (14%)
18. Bush, President George W. - Republican (11%


Looks like the Green Party will be gaining a lot of new members soon...
#66 Aug 03 2004 at 10:39 PM Rating: Good
****
4,396 posts
1. Your ideal theoretical candidate. (100%)
2. Bush, President George W. - Republican (74%)
3. Lieberman, Senator Joe, CT - Democrat (46%)
4. Badnarik, Michael - Libertarian (45%)
5. Kerry, Senator John, MA - Democrat (39%)
6. Kucinich, Rep. Dennis, OH - Democrat (39%)
7. Edwards, Senator John, NC - Democrat (36%)
8. Gephardt, Rep. ****, MO - Democrat (36%)
9. Sharpton, Reverend Al - Democrat (29%)
10. LaRouche, Lyndon H. Jr. - Democrat (27%)
11. Dean, Gov. Howard, VT - Democrat (26%)
12. Peroutka, Michael - Constitution Party (24%)
13. Moseley-Braun, Former Senator Carol, IL - Democrat (22%)
14. Cobb, David - Green Party (19%)
15. Nader, Ralph - Independent (19%)
16. Clark, Retired General Wesley K., AR - Democrat (15%)
17. Brown, Walt - Socialist Party (13%)
18. Hagelin, Dr. John - Natural Law (10%)


This is about what I would have assumed

Tacosid
____________________________
I voted for the other guy.
#67 Aug 03 2004 at 10:57 PM Rating: Good
*****
16,160 posts
What's with all you tree hugging homos who want to vote for David Corncob? This is how a real man votes:

1. Your ideal theoretical candidate. (98%)
2. Bush, President George W. - Republican (94%)
3. Badnarik, Michael - Libertarian (51%)
4. Kerry, Senator John, MA - Democrat (16%)
5. Peroutka, Michael - Constitution Party (12%)
6. Corncob, David - Green Party (8%)
7. Nader, Ralph - Independent (8%)
8. Brown, Walt - Socialist Party (6%)

Interestingly, I seem to be the onlt one who has a 98% Mr. Yit Candidate preference. Does that mean 2% of me wishes to have a non-ideal candidate?

Totem
#68 Aug 05 2004 at 12:03 AM Rating: Decent
**
290 posts
Quote:
Interestingly, I seem to be the only one who has a 98% Mr. Yit Candidate preference. Does that mean 2% of me wishes to have a non-ideal candidate?

Totem


98% = Manly Heterosexual American
02% = Treasonous Inner Frenchman

Never stop fighting the good fight!

Yours in Christ,
PFC Zoelef, Patriot
1 2 3 Next »
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 329 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (329)